TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker describes repeated interactions with Epic representatives while serving as training sergeant for the Plano Police Department. He contends there is a general misunderstanding that the community plan aims to build an Islamic Sharia friendly area, asserting that the Epic neighborhood already exists in Plano for nearly twelve years. He states it comprises 74 residential properties, a massive mosque, schools, a medical clinic, and multiple businesses, and includes an office of an Islamic financing institution called the UIF Corporation. He claims the UIF Corporation is not a bank, describing it as a Michigan based corporation whose publicly stated purpose is to “engage in financial transactions that are Sharia compliant.” He asserts that local government officials south of Plano have known for years that only Muslims can purchase homes inside that neighborhood, and that one must be a member of their mosque to live there. The speaker describes the first house built in the neighborhood as being located right next to the Plano Police Academy, noting it as a huge structure with two separate front doors. He describes the rear of the property as being just a few feet from a large outdoor warning siren, and the house as having a large second story platform overlooking the restricted access parking lot where the police department stores specialized vehicles such as bomb trucks, bomb disposal equipment, and the SWAT team’s armored vehicle. As a court recognized expert in SWAT team tactics and procedures, he states that the house has “all the hallmarks of a fortress and a command post.” He elaborates that the rear of the house resembles an observation post and a shooting platform. He questions why someone would build a house so close to a giant warning siren and a police training site and why there would be a huge platform overlooking those specialized police emergency vehicles. He identifies the first owner of that house as a leader in the EPIC neighborhood and also as the co founder of the Yaquin Institute for Islamic Research, urging listeners to visit their website and read what it says about instituting Sharia law. The speaker claims this is not a matter of radicals hiding in plain sight, stating they are not hiding and have been open about their beliefs and their intent. He asserts that local government decision makers have failed to ask hard questions for fear of negative publicity and being labeled as bigots. He says he is not here to spread innuendo or to make unfounded accusations, but is asking everyone to look at the evidence and the confirmed facts that are already in existence. He closes by thanking the judge and mister Deenan.

Speaker 1's initial reaction to the October 7th Hamas attack was disbelief and prayer, anticipating a disastrous Israeli revenge. During a November 9th rally, an unaffiliated individual yelled "death to Jews." Speaker 1 confronted the person, stating they didn't represent the group and then addressed the crowd, condemning the statement as antisemitic. Speaker 1 believes antisemitism is unjust. The speaker stated that the fight for Palestinian freedom and the fight against antisemitism are interconnected, because injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

"I won't listen to them push Sharia in our schools. Brandon Hall, a Republican North Texas State Board of Education member started Wednesday's public hearing by refusing to listen to comments from Shema Zayan, who works for the Austin chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations. Governor Greg Abbott classified CARE as a terrorist organization."

They say they warned years ago that "they didn't want Christians evangelizing Muslims" and that they "made a rule: no one's allowed to hand out materials, but then they only enforced it on Christians." David Wood and friends tried to hand out copies of the gospel of John outside the Dearborn Arab festival; they were stopped, photographed, IDs taken, and their camera seized before being released. They were told the rule also applies outside the festival: "you would have to go at least five blocks away" to distribute anything. They claim they are not free to share on public sidewalks: "I will be arrested in Dearborn" if I hand this out. They announce a planned "Dearborn Again tour" to spread the gospel, preach to Muslims, energize believers, with "the whole crew" possibly joining; "Be bold."

Since October 7th, Americans have been shocked by the deterioration of universities. This is due to the Muslim Brotherhood using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA to destroy America from within, as outlined in their 1991 project. CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2008, accused of funneling millions to Hamas, but faced no consequences. At ISNA's 2015 conference, CAIR unveiled a plan for 4,000 mosques funding 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, plus 50 Muslim congressmen in six years, aiming to reshape America's laws and culture. The speaker stated that loyalty to the US is acceptable, but waving Palestinian and terrorist flags while destroying American property is not. The speaker urges the US government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others have done. They also noted that Syria, Jordan, and other countries have banned them. The speaker claims America's inaction emboldens groups like CAIR. They advocate banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. They urge listeners to visit actforAmerica.org to support their campaign.

They've already come for asylum speakers and migrant families; now they've come for Mahmoud Khalil. Speaking publicly for Palestinian rights carries the risk of harassment and doxxing. Mahmoud, a student negotiator, faces these risks. The Trump government's actions against Mahmoud are considered obscene. The Trump administration is betting that Americans will turn a blind eye to the victimization of a Palestinian. Anti-Palestinian groups have been leveling dangerous accusations, and some community members have repeated them. Examples include calling people terrorists for wearing a kafiyah, getting people expelled for their views, and reporting Jewish colleagues for saying "free Palestine." The speaker is disgusted by the ignorant use of language and truth and ashamed that such slander has found currency in their own community in service of the Trump agenda. Trump's claim that this combats antisemitism is insulting. The speaker implores listeners to scrutinize their own souls if they believe accusations against Mahmoud simply because he is Palestinian. What happens to Mahmoud could happen to anyone.

The exchange centers on whether the person being spoken to is the author of a controversial social media post and on whether authorities should press for a response. The conversation begins with an attempt to verify the person’s identity: “Picture to make sure it's you. We're not sure.” The responding party, referred to as Speaker 0, declines to answer without his lawyer present, stating, “I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present. So I really don't know how to answer that question either.” He emphasizes his stance with a nod to freedom of speech, saying, “Well, you're like I said, you're not gonna is freedom of speech. This is America. Right? Veteran. Alright. And I agree with you 100%.” The officers explain they are trying to identify the correct person to speak with and proceed with the inquiry. Speaker 1 presents the substance of the post in question: “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, Even leave the room when they vote and on related matters. Wants you to know that you're all welcome clown face clown face clown face.” They ask Speaker 0 if that post was authored by him. Speaker 0 again refuses to confirm, stating, “I’m not gonna answer whether that’s me or not.” The discussion shifts to the underlying concern. Speaker 1 clarifies that their goal is not to establish whether the post is true, but to prevent somebody else from being agitated or agreeing with the statement. They quote the line about “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians” and note that such a post “can probably incite somebody to do something radical.” The purpose of the inquiry, they say, is to obtain Speaker 0’s side of the story and to address the potential impact of the post. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to refrain from posting statements like that because they could provoke actions. Speaker 0 expresses appreciation for the outreach, but reiterates that he will maintain his amendment rights to not answer the question. He concludes by acknowledging the interaction and affirming that the conversation ends there: “That is it. And we're gonna maintain my amendment rights to, not answer the question about whether or that's fine.” Both parties part on a courteous note, with Speaker 0 thanking them and wishing them well.

Speaker 0 asserts, 'I mean, Hezbollah, you know, bombed the embassy in, in Beirut and, including many Americans. So, I just feel it's quite inappropriate.' In response, Speaker 1 says, 'You are an Islamophobe. And although you live here, I want you to know as mayor, you are not welcome here. And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of the city because you are not somebody who believe in coexistence.' The exchange shows a clash over international violence, perceived bigotry, and threats tied to political leadership.

- "you shouldn't sell haram." - "in about thirty days, we're gonna start doing demonstrations around the city." - "So get the Haram out of your store." - "I love you for the sake of Allah. Assalamu alaikum." - "Violate the religion of Islam by selling and distributing products that are against the religion because we should love what Allah loves, and we should hate what Allah hates." - "little by little, one by one, we're going to be visiting all of the stores in the neighborhood, particularly the inner city neighborhoods where the religion of Islam is ignored by not only our enemies." - "Speaker 0: Support alcohol and gambling." - "You have a right to do it, but we have to give the dowel to let the people know the truth about Islam."

Speaker 0 says Dearborn, Michigan needs to be cleared and swiped to Muslims. They don't know how to behave. Let's retake them. They don't wanna be anywhere near Dearborn.

In Hamtrack, Michigan, a city with a significant Muslim immigrant population, the majority-Muslim city council in 2023 banned the pride flag because it clashed with the religious beliefs of local residents. They sued, and a federal judge—described as a Democrat—ruled that banning the Pride flag didn't violate the constitution, didn't violate the First Amendment, because they were only banning it on public property, and apparently, the all Muslim city council was allowed to do that. The speaker says cities should be able to do what they want, but claims liberals would riot if this happened in Florida, and notes that the LGBTQ community is amazingly silent. "If this happened in any city run by a republican, there would be riots." "Democrat judge in America's Muslim capital bans gay pride flags after Islamic outrage."

We are allowed to take control of our own country. We're allowed to say, no. You're not gonna Islamicize our cities. No. You're not gonna do that. Dearborn has become an Arab state. It's a Middle Eastern Islamic capital in the American heartland. "But the mosque in East Dearborn are now at times waking us up at 05:30 in the morning with the call to prayer." CBS Detroit did examine Dearborn's noise ordinance and found that loudspeakers between the hours of 10PM and 7AM are in violation of the or. "Number one, church bells are much more beautiful. Number two, church bells don't ring at five in the morning. And three, America is a Christian country." Hearing that sound over a loudspeaker coming from a mosque is not normal. It's not traditional. It's not American.

The speaker recounts arriving with the expectation of leaving danger behind, only to find that “the bad guys are already here.” He explains that these adversaries include many individuals he knew from fifteen to twenty years prior when he was an undergraduate student. He asserts that these people are now leading protests across the country. He claims they are members of the Muslim Brotherhood, although many deny this membership, and he asserts that they organize the protests in the same way as before—“the same way of mobilization, the same flags, the same narrative,” and even the same dependence on Al Jazeera footage and news stories. For him, it feels like a déjà vu, but the events are unfolding in the United States rather than in his home country. The speaker expresses a hopeful commitment to preventing a repetition of what happened in his homeland of Egypt from occurring in the United States. He emphasizes that the United States embodies the essential values he has fought for throughout his life, including human rights, women’s rights, and democratization, and he does not want to see these values erode. With these concerns in mind, he calls for an offensive strategy: a proactive plan designed to safeguard the country’s core principles and prevent any slide away from those ideals before it becomes too late. In summary, the speaker connects observed protest organization, claimed affiliations within a long-standing militant network, and the alleged media and narrative-structure patterns to a broader risk to American values, urging decisive action to preserve democracy and human rights in the United States.

The speaker claims the Muslim Brotherhood aims to destroy America from within using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA as fronts, referencing a 1991 plan. CAIR and ISNA were allegedly unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling money to Hamas. The speaker references CAIR's 2025 plan to fund thousands of lawyers, journalists, and influencers, and elect 50 Muslim congressmen by 2040 to reshape America. The speaker contrasts loyalty to the US with supporting Palestinian causes and denouncing America. The speaker urges the US government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, citing bans in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Libya, Russia, Austria, Syria, Jordan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The speaker calls for banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker urges listeners to visit actforamerica.org to support the "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.

The speaker explains he is trying to navigate possible collaboration with federal authorities while maintaining personal integrity. He says he has a statement that is “completely true” that he’s “never been in contact with any federal authority,” and he’s torn about how to start working with DHS to address threats he faces as a national figure. He claims “the Yemenis, a million of them came out into the streets” and that they want to kill him, with a fatwa on his head. He asserts he would need DHS to make a statement that “the Houthis and their fatwa that they placed on my head will not be stood,” and that “American citizens exercising our rights will not be, you know, subject to to Muslim murder, rituals.” He describes hundreds of thousands of death threats in his DMs and says, to deal with them, he would need to walk into an FBI building and give them a printout, but he “don’t fucking trust the FBI.” He accuses the FBI of having “destroyed my life,” pointing to past raids on his and others’ homes and references to the Mar-a-Lago search, stating he is trying to figure out how to navigate this situation without claiming contact with Harmeet or making contacts he “don’t want to.” He notes that when he and others exercised their rights in Dearborn, he views it as a civil rights hate crime, saying “the Muslim oppression of Christians in Dearborn” was a civil rights hate violation and that “they punched me in the face because I’m white” and “they punched me in the face because I’m Christian, not for anything else.” Harmony Dillon is described as wanting to prosecute this as a hate crime, with others subjected to spit, food thrown, assaults, pepper spray, etc. He mentions the Trump administration’s purported interest in bringing these people to justice, but he expresses a wish not to feed into it, citing personal integrity and caution. He questions whether the rank-and-file FBI officer’s motives are aligned with his interests, contrasting a year ago with a “grandma that walked through the capital” to now a Muslim who punched a Christian, implying hypocrisy or moral decline. He asserts there are “deep state embedded figures in the DOJ, in the FBI, in DHS,” who were involved in actions like the raid on Mar-a-Lago and other “schemes.” He says he needs assurance that these agencies have “our best interest” and that they are not “deep state shills.” Ultimately, he states he has refused to make contact because it’s “too risky” and he cannot be associated with people he deems “un American.”

The report notes that Ahmed Naji Sheikh becomes the seventy-fourth person charged in the $300,000,000 feeding our future meal fraud case. Sheikh is described as the brother of Abi Aziz Farah, who was recently sentenced to twenty-eight years in prison. Farah was convicted with a group of others of stealing $50,000,000 of taxpayer money. Sheikh is accused of helping Farah launder that money. A second segment asserts that in a normal country there would be a major backlash, but liberals allegedly want this, calling it the greatest form of social justice and silencing anyone who speaks out against programs “getting robbed” that are meant to feed hungry children, labeling them bigots, racists, and intolerant. The speaker claims that 25% of Somalia’s GDP comes from remittance—the money sent from the United States to Somalia—and presents a strategy described as stealing money from American taxpayers, giving Somali residents free housing, free food, free school, and free health care. The claim continues that such a lifestyle would encourage four or five children, while the native-born population struggles to have one or two, leading to demographic shifts that purportedly grant Somali residents more political power to enact legislation beneficial to Somali people. The speaker asserts that money not exclusively for Somalis would be stolen through fraud and that, as money increases, it is sent back to Somalia, stated as their goal. This sequence is linked to a claim that someone spoke about it at an Ilhan Omar rally. The broadcast then references Ilhan Omar, describing her as someone who “openly hates America” and declares allegiance to a foreign country, and shows her at a church berating white people for liking Charlie Kirk, who is portrayed as representing American values. The claim attributes to the speakers a claim that viewers should “Thank you” for hearing this, and to describe those who are interested in rewriting this hateful man’s history as “full of shit.” There is a criticism of the church for allowing her to speak, and a rhetorical question about white liberals loving foreigners and telling them how evil they are for caring about their country. It is asserted that Omar’s plan has succeeded, that Minnesotans have adopted a belief that their purpose is to serve Somalia. The narrative then shifts to Charlie Kirk, described as a man who stood up for America and American values, who is characterized as evil and awful, leading to Omar’s appearance on CNN where she mocks Kirk’s death and says he belongs in the dustbin of history. Finally, Speaker 3 reflects on how many people excuse the most reprehensible things, want monuments for him, a day to honor him, and a resolution to produce.

I'm confronting you for disrespecting my credentials and spreading hate in the name of religion. Get out of here. This is a hate crime. Take off your mask and own up to your past. Stop glorifying violence. What do you have to say about the events of October 7th? Go back to where you came from.

On American soil, terrorists took the stage and trashed the country hosting them. It's called the People's Conference for Palestine, which thousands of people attended, and what they were cheering for should terrify terrify you. This isn't a peace conference. It's a gathering of radical activists, terrorist linked organizations, and people glorifying violence under the banner of liberation. They invited actual terrorists like Hussain Shaheem, a convicted terrorist who built a cell in Jerusalem and was sentenced to twenty seven years for attempted murder. He was recently released in a hostage deal and was still invited to come speak. Liberation. Never peace. That's the white man's word. Peace. Liberation is our word. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition was literally led by a Hamas operative. We're saying peace gets booed, but calling for jihad gets applause. We wanted to globalize the Intifada. This is not liberation. This is dangerous, and it needs to be stopped.

The speaker asserts that the world’s white population has declined from 30% in 1900 to 7% now, framing this as part of the “Islamification of Europe” and the “Islamification of America” aimed at destroying white people. They claim that white Christian, European, Western civilization built the arts, the Colosseum, and powered the industrial age, and that Muslims aims to drag them back, oppress women and homosexuals, and destroy what makes America great. They urge President Trump to “send ICE” into Dearborn, alleging that Muslims have overstayed their visas and are part of “H-1B chain migration invaders” come to destroy the country’s way of life. The speaker claims Muslims “lie to our faces, pretending to be Americans, wearing your suits,” and says this behavior is unique to the United States, asserting there are 53 Muslim-majority countries where tyranny and “shithole living” prevail. They declare a desire to avoid Muslims in the country, stating, “We don’t want you in our country,” and even say, “We will come and eat your shawarma in Somalia.” The speaker emphasizes a perceived right to self-determination, claiming fathers fought and died for white Americans and that they are being driven out. The claim is made that Muslims marry multiple wives and outbreed non-Muslims, change laws, and make the country resemble places they fled from, asserting, “We don’t need it here in Michigan. We don’t need it in any part of America.” They call for removal with the line, “Respectfully, get the fuck out of my country.” The rhetoric gains urgency with a reference to World War II veterans, suggesting they fought for a constitutional republic and are now seeing Europe and America become “taken over.” The speaker accuses Muslims of outbreeding “without a single shot fired,” calling them “insidious parasites on the American way of life,” and declares that Muslims will never look like or eat like them or build like them, asserting “You are nothing. You can build nothing.” Culminating in a repetition of “America first. America only,” the speaker aligns with the sentiment of President Trump’s “great American friends” and ends with “God bless America.”

Speaker 0: I mean, Hezbollah, you know, bombed the embassy in, in Beirut and, including many Americans. So, I just feel that's quite inappropriate. Speaker 1: You are an Islamophobe. And although you live here, I want you to know as mayor, you are not welcome here. And the day you move out of the city will be the day that I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of the city because you are not somebody who believe in coexistence.

Muslims have raped over a million girls in the UK and beheaded innocent Christians in Syria for refusing to bow down to their rock. The same fate awaits Americans unless the speaker is sent to Congress, as they are the only one not afraid. The speaker, though not born in America or Texas, claims to care about Texas. They allege that radical Muslims have taken over entire cities due to the actions of the Texas House. They assert that there is an attempt to turn Texas from a Christian state into the Muslim capital of America. The speaker states that America is a Christian nation, and Muslims should go to any of the 57 Muslim nations because Islam has no place in America.

Smith onto the space. Harrison, thanks for joining. We’ve got questions about your tweet. How are you? Harrison: I’m pretty good. I just got home, trying to do Advent with my kids, so I have about ten minutes. I heard Matt Baker defending me, so I came to settle objections. What’s up? Smith: First of all, I appreciate you coming on. We’ve had disagreements on X. The first question is about your original tweet about someone telling you Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated. Explain that, because I’ve got a question about your second tweet. Harrison: That’s it. There’s no further explanation. Somebody with knowledge of the situation told me that, and I tweeted it in response to something Ian Carroll had said, a month before. I told the story again on Moonbase Live when I talked to Jake Shields, a week before the shooting. I won’t tell you who told me because they asked me not to, but it’s basically corroborated. The person I talked to was not the same as those who talked to people like Max Blumenthal. So apparently, multiple people are telling the same story. Only I published it before the event. Did the FBI or TC or something ask you any questions about it? Smith: Nope. Harrison: And that’s the problem, Soleiman. That’s the problem right there. Smith: We’ll move on. He’s got ten minutes. The tweet today said: “the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been a resounding success for the left, they got to kill one of our shining lights, divide the right and normalise political violence and the only backlash they received was Jimmy Kimmel show got suspended for two days.” That seems to contradict your first statement, since the first tweet was before the assassination. How does that message come across? Harrison: The first tweet was before the assassination, so it couldn’t have anything to do with who I thought did it. It was before the assassination, a month earlier, and I had heard the rumor that Charlie Kirk feared for his life. The second tweet reflects the world view that most left people have: “we killed Charlie Kirk. We got away with.” It’s about the left believing they did it and got away with it, and it’s about the weakness of the right to treat threats against us with seriousness. Whether or not it was a leftist is still up in the air; I have unanswered questions about the patsy they have now. Still, the left has benefited. The left acts like they did it. The official story is the left did it, personally. I have questions about that story, but what matters is the widespread perception that the left did it and got away with it, and that informs their behavior. Smith: Do you think the widespread opinion matters? Harrison: I can’t hear you both at once. Matt? Smith: How do you feel about the genocide in Gaza? Harrison: I’m strongly against the genocide in Gaza. Vocally. Since before October 7. I’m against it as an Israeli shill? Smith: No one said that. The argument was that you’ve spoken out against genocide in Gaza before October 7, but Infowars promotes Zionist agendas and Zionist talking points, attacking Muslims in the United States and the UK. Zionist billionaires like Robert Shillman, etc. Harrison: I get it. Zionist interests overlap with mine, but it has nothing to do with Zionism in our calculus. I am for Western culture, America, heritage Americans of all backgrounds, and I’m fighting for Christianity. I’m against Muslims infiltrating Western countries, and I’m against Zionists controlling Western countries. These are not contradictory. There’s nothing Zionist about not wanting Muslims to take over your country, just like there’s nothing Muslim about not wanting Zionists to control your country. Infowars is anti-Zionist recently, and Alex condemns what Israel and Netanyahu are doing. But there’s a deliberate message of unity of all Americans who aren’t trying to dominate or subvert others. Unless they’re Christians, of course. Smith: So you’re saying you’re not arguing for a single team; it’s two enemies, rock, paper, scissors? Harrison: It’s two enemies, not one. I’m against both. I’m against Muslims taking over and against Zionists dominating. It’s not contradictory. It’s not about a single team. Smith: The point isn’t that you must pick sides; the issue is you’ve pushed claims that there is a Muslim takeover, which isn’t supported by numbers or power. People argue this is propaganda. Harrison: Okay. I don’t care whether the takeover has progressed. If I said it’s fake, I’d say that. I’ve got to go, but I appreciate the clarification. Smith: Posted on the day Jake Lang went; you were clearly talking about him. Harrison: I was talking about why Dearborn was the location of the march and why it was appropriate. Jake Lang is Jewish and Zionist; he’s not a Christian. He’s ethnically Jewish. He says he’s Christian, and in Christianity you can convert. I’ll call him a Christian man if that’s how he defines himself. Thanks.

Since October 7th, Americans have been shocked by the deterioration of universities. This is due to the Muslim Brotherhood using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA to destroy America from within, as outlined in their 1991 project. CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling millions to Hamas, but faced no consequences. At ISNA's 2025 conference, CAIR's director unveiled a plan for 4,000 mosques funding 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, plus 50 Muslim congressmen in six years, aiming to reshape America's laws and culture. The speaker stated that loyalty to the US is paramount, and condemns those who wave terrorist flags while destroying American symbols. The speaker urges the government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others have done. They advocate banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker concludes by urging listeners to visit actforamerica.org and support their "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.

The mayor and the White House condemned recent chants of "death to America" at a rally in Dearborn. Fox News correspondent Hillary Vaughn questioned Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib about her stance on the chants. Tlaib refused to engage with Fox News, stating she doesn’t talk to outlets that use racist tropes. When pressed about whether she condemns the chants, she reiterated her refusal to engage with Fox News, accusing them of promoting racism and homophobia. Tlaib emphasized that she would not be used by the network for their agenda.