reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses strong anger and frustration towards Joe Biden and his wife, criticizing their actions and calling them traitors. They accuse Biden of being out of touch with the common man and lying about personal experiences to establish commonality. The speaker also condemns Biden's inability to address the tragedy and loss experienced by others, particularly children. They insult Biden and suggest he should step down from office. The speaker further criticizes the governor and expresses outrage at the behavior of individuals in government. The transcript ends with a vulgar insult directed at Biden.

Trump is the popular choice over Kamala in this video. Despite repeated questions, everyone consistently chooses Trump. One person expresses dislike for Kamala, while another strongly criticizes Trump. The conversation turns dark when someone mentions shooting Trump if he were present. Overall, the preference is clear: Trump over Kamala for president.

An individual expresses anger towards Joe Biden, calling him a traitor and criticizing his wife's presence. They accuse Biden of being out of touch with the common man and lying to establish commonality. The speaker condemns Biden for discussing his personal experiences instead of addressing the tragedy of children being incinerated. They insult Biden's age and suggest he should step down from office. The speaker also criticizes Kamala Harris and the governor, expressing frustration with the behavior of those in power. They conclude by telling Biden to go away.

In this video, the speaker expresses their support for Trump over Joe Biden. They repeat their preference for Trump multiple times and mention that the whole neighborhood is also in favor of Trump. They criticize Biden, calling him a "pedophile" and express their regret for voting for him in the past. The speaker concludes by stating that Trump did not receive their vote in the previous election.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 engage in a terse exchange about past remarks by an ambassador and the possibility of an investment. Speaker 0 asserts that the ambassador said something about Speaker 1 in the past and adds that the ambassador is attempting to invest with him. Speaker 1 responds with uncertainty about who the ambassador is and what was said, saying, I don’t know anything about him. If he said bad, then maybe he’ll like to apologize. I really don’t know. Did an ambassador say something bad about him? Don’t tell me. Don’t Where is he? Is he still working for you? Speaker 0 confirms the ambassador’s presence and location by replying, Yeah. Yeah. He’s just right there. He’s right. Give up. This sequence indicates a desire to move on or to end the line of questioning, with Speaker 0 directing attention to the ambassador’s physical presence and implying there is no further discussion to be had about the matter. Speaker 1 presses for clarification about whether something bad was said, repeating the question, You said bad? The tension in the dialogue is underscored by Speaker 0’s concise confirmation that there was some prior remark attributed to the ambassador, followed by an immediate pivot to the ambassador’s proximity as a way of signaling that the issue has shifted or concluded in Speaker 0’s view. Later in the exchange, Speaker 0 adds a new point by saying, Before I took this position, mister, which introduces a reference to a time prior to Speaker 0’s current role. The phrasing suggests there is context regarding Speaker 0’s relationship with the ambassador or with the situation that existed before taking the current position, though the exact nature of that context is not elaborated in this portion of the dialogue. Speaker 1 directs the conversation toward President Biden, saying, president Biden. I don’t like you either. I don’t. And I probably never will. Go ahead. This line conveys a personal sentiment toward President Biden, indicating disapproval or hostility, and ends with Speaker 1’s instruction to proceed, implying that Speaker 0 should continue whatever line of dialogue or argument was being pursued prior to this comment. Overall, the dialogue centers on alleged past statements by an ambassador about Speaker 1, a potential investment connection with that ambassador, and a tense personal stance from Speaker 1 toward President Biden, all within a brief, confrontational exchange.

The speaker criticizes Joe Biden's speaking abilities, claiming that his speeches are confusing and lack clarity. They express a desire for a strong leader and believe that Biden's struggles with the teleprompter make him appear weak. They argue that even their grandparents could outperform him in a debate. The speaker suggests watching press conferences to see Biden's shortcomings and points to the dislike ratio on YouTube videos as evidence that people do not like him. They state that they disagree with his decisions and would prefer mean tweets over his policies.

The speakers engage in a heated conversation about political views and personal beliefs. They discuss voting choices, LGBTQ+ issues, and express strong opinions. The conversation becomes confrontational and filled with profanity. The second speaker questions the first speaker's stance on various topics, including homosexuality and transgender rights. The first speaker responds with anger and insults. The conversation ends abruptly with frustration from both speakers.

The speaker expresses extreme frustration with Donald Trump, stating, "Wish I never would have fucking met Trump. I wish it never would have happened." The speaker clarifies that their sentiment is not due to personal attacks they've endured, but rather a deep-seated weariness: "I'm so sick of fucking Donald Trump, man. God, I'm fucking sick of him." They emphasize that their statement is not an attempt to flatter Trump.

The speakers in the video express their support for Trump and criticize Biden. They mention Trump's promise to put money where his mouth is and how black people were getting benefits during his presidency. They also mention Biden's comment about black voters and express their dislike for him. One speaker admits that they now see what Trump did, while another says they want Trump back and higher gas prices. Overall, the speakers express their preference for Trump over Biden.

The speaker expresses intense hatred towards Donald Trump, calling him names like "orange pumpkin" and "fucking businessman." The speaker claims Trump once called them one of the most important people in his life. The speaker declares Trump will never be president again. The speaker mentions their father was the most important person in the world to them, but "his colors are finally out." The speaker expresses disgust towards Trump and his supporters, saying "Fuck you."

The conversation begins with one person asking if the other is voting for Trump and accusing them of being a white supremacist. The accused person asks for proof, but the accuser doesn't provide any. The accused person then reveals that they are voting for Trump as their proof. The conversation then shifts to the accused person asking if the other is voting for Biden and accuses them of being a pedophile. The accused person denies it, but the accuser continues to make baseless accusations. The conversation abruptly ends.

In this video, the speaker expresses their frustration with the choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. They apologize for using derogatory terms to refer to Trump but emphasize the need to address the current situation.

The speaker expresses their dislike for Trump but states they did not vote for his opponent, whom they consider a racist. They recall incidents from 1972 involving Trump and other politicians making racist remarks. They mention Joe Biden's offensive speech about African Americans and his plan to put them in zoos. The speaker criticizes various crime bills, particularly one from 1981 that abolished federal parole. They accuse Biden of being a racist and discuss the impact of his policies on criminal trials.

Speaker 0: Expresses being a “never Trump” person and not liking him. Frames the discussion as a “he said, she said” dispute about who is telling the truth, jokingly questioning whether to believe Donald Trump who “always tells the truth? Just kidding,” or the woman on the tape. Speaker 1: States they cannot stand Trump, calling him a “fraud” and saying he is “exploiting these people,” describing him as a total fraud. Speaker 2: Agrees with Speaker 1, saying they don’t think Trump is the person and that he “doesn’t actually care about folks.” Speaker 0: Acknowledges an element of Trump support that has “its basis in racism or xenophobia.” Indicates a possible scenario where, if Trump has a strong chance of winning, they might have to “hold my nose and vote for Hillary Clinton,” adding they’re considering voting third party because they “can’t stomach Trump,” and describing him as “noxious” and leading “the white working class to a very dark place.”

The speaker expresses their frustration with Biden and mentions a desire to confront him physically. They specifically mention hitting him in his fake nose, which they believe is made of plastic. However, they hesitate to openly state their thoughts.

Speaker 0 asks about pronouns, but Speaker 1 responds aggressively. Speaker 1 supports Biden for president, while Speaker 2 supports Trump. They discuss Biden's son's alleged corruption and Trump's impact on the country. Speaker 1 mentions the border wall and claims that mainstream media lied about Trump's collusion with Russia. Speaker 2 disagrees and accuses Speaker 1 of being biased. The conversation becomes heated, with Speaker 1 promoting their website for more information.

The speaker confronts the interviewer about their bias towards Donald Trump and attacks on colleagues. They express a desire to discuss Joe Biden and Trump impartially. The interviewer is asked to stop the interview if the attacks continue. The speaker is then cut off and the interview ends abruptly.

The speaker asks the other person if they are gay and criticizes them for being weak and electing Justin Trudeau. They express anger towards the trans community and claim that being trans is a mental illness. They also mention not wanting their kids to be taught about different genders or sexual preferences. The speaker sees the other person as an enemy to the world.

The speaker expresses strong negative sentiments towards President Biden, accusing him of various wrongdoings and criticizing his leadership. They claim that Biden is soft, untruthful, and working for the rich. They also make derogatory remarks about his intelligence and suggest he should be imprisoned. The speaker expresses a preference for former President Trump and criticizes Biden's policies. They conclude by reiterating their dislike for Biden and accusing him of inappropriate behavior.

The speaker is asked about a previous statement regarding having a gay son. The speaker deflects the question and insults the interviewer. The interviewer then brings up the speaker's comments about the trans community and asks if they will continue to address it. The speaker goes on a rant, calling the trans community an infection and expressing opposition to teaching about gender diversity. The speaker concludes by labeling the interviewer as the enemy.

Several individuals express their voting preferences between Trump and Kamala Harris. Primary reasons for supporting Trump include his stance on immigration, with some believing immigrants take jobs. One person states that electing a woman would lead to World War 3, while another claims no man will listen to a woman leader. Despite the potential to "make history" with a Black woman in office, most voice strong opposition to Kamala Harris. One person initially supports Trump but then says they would vote for Kamala, leading to disagreement.

The speakers discuss the hatred and violence they perceive from Trump supporters. Speaker 1 claims that Trump supporters hit people, throw urine, and use crowbars. Speaker 0 expresses doubt but acknowledges the possibility of milkshake incidents. Speaker 1 questions if Trump supporters would engage in such behavior, to which Speaker 0 responds that they hope not. Speaker 1 then suggests that Democrats and liberals are actually responsible for these actions. Speaker 0 disagrees, stating that the average Democrat does not support violence. The conversation continues with Speaker 1 mentioning incidents at a Trump rally and accusing liberals of stealing and burning red hats. Speaker 0 dismisses these claims as an attempt to push an agenda. The video ends with Speaker 1 questioning Speaker 0's support for multiple candidates.

A BLM leader endorses Donald Trump as the best candidate, stating that everyone else is terrible. They express personal liking for Trump and deep disappointment and disdain for the current president and vice president. The BLM leader feels that black people are starting to shift away from the Democratic Party, which they believe has racist policies that harm the black family. They see Trump as the opposite, someone who is honest and won't betray them like the Democrats.

In a hypothetical Biden vs. Trump election, Speaker 1 expresses their hesitation to vote for Biden. They do not explicitly state their support for Trump but acknowledge the challenging decision they face.

Speaker 0 asserts there is a mental health crisis in the country and "the left" needs immediate help. Speaker 1 calls "Trump bigots" racist and claims they think they are superior. Speaker 0 suggests people are triggered by a gay man's message that they can leave the Democratic party. Speaker 0 states their message is that people don't have to be Democrats and that their "unhinged devotion to a radicalized party" is resulting in the negative reactions. Speaker 1 says "prove more" and expresses dislike.