reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that while global focus is on Venezuela, Mexico, Cuba, and Colombia, Donald Trump quietly put Canada in the hot seat, presenting the Venezuelan operation as an opening salvo against the British empire. He frames Trump’s actions as not about Maduro alone but as a broader assault on imperial structures. Speaker 1 discusses the perceived death toll from drugs and asserts a real number of 300,000, noting drugs entering primarily through the southern border and also through Canada, implying this is part of a wider systemic issue. Speaker 0 notes that mainstream headlines focus on familiar targets, while the Toronto Globe and Mail editorially warns that Venezuela’s fate is a warning to Canada. The New York Times is described as framing this as another regime change operation from the Bush era that will split the MAGA movement, with Marjorie Taylor Greene contributing to that narrative. The Democratic Party is said to be shrieking about Trump’s actions, with some calling for impeachment. Former British MI6 head John Bolton is cited as recognizing that the operation is not a regime change. Speaker 0 and others present the view that this is a surgical strike against the British empire’s irregular warfare and the nexus of narcotics trafficking, terrorism, and the London-centered banking system. Susan Kokinda introduces herself as someone who has tracked offshore banking since the 1970s and claims this is the first time someone is taking on that system, namely Donald Trump, urging viewers to engage with Promethean Action for deeper analysis. Speaker 2 clarifies the big picture: there is not a war against Venezuela, but a war against drug trafficking organizations, arguing that the largest oil reserves are controlled by adversaries of the United States and misappropriated by oligarchs, including in Venezuela. The speaker emphasizes that the target is oligarchs and drug trafficking organizations, not socialism or communism. Speaker 0 connects oligarchs and drug trafficking with the British empire, describing Canada as run by the empire’s central bankers (notably Mark Carney) and as a major political outpost in North America used for drug trafficking, illegal immigration, and terrorism. This frame contrasts Trump’s actions with the cartels and highlights Canada’s role as part of the broader imperial apparatus. Speaker 3 (Sir John Soros) cautions against calling it regime change, noting Maduro has been abducted and taken to the U.S. to stand trial, but saying the army remains in power and the regime’s legal structures persist. He acknowledges the operation is not the same as Iraq’s regime change and notes Trump’s reluctance to deploy large-scale ground forces. John Bolton adds that Maduro has been removed from power, but the regime remains, and there is ambiguity about Trump’s thinking regarding Machado. Speaker 0 reiterates that this is not regime change but irregular warfare, with the United States pushing back against the empire’s rules-based order. The narrative argues that Trump is targeting the offshore banking system that finances terrorism, cartels, and the destruction of sovereign nations, including the London-centered financial network and its secrecy jurisdictions established in the 1960s. Prominent voices, including Tom Luongo and Crypto Rich, are cited to support the view that the British empire’s financial system and the rules-based order have long protected nonstate actors, NGOs, and cartels, and that Trump’s actions represent breaking those rules to defeat the imperial system. The piece frames the operation as the United States taking on irregular warfare and challenging the offshore financial framework that underpins global illicit activities, including narcotics trafficking and terrorism. Bottom line presented: Trump has launched a major offensive against the city of London’s offshore banking system and has targeted Canada as part of this broader strategy, signaling a shift from conventional regime-change thinking to irregular warfare against imperial financial and geopolitical structures.

Gaddafi's plan to introduce the Gold Dinar threatened Western monetary dominance. His vision of a united Africa with a common currency aimed to free the continent from Western exploitation. Economic sanctions were imposed to stop him. Despite this, Gaddafi persisted, but covert operations led to his downfall. Libya became unstable, Africa lost a visionary leader, and hopes for economic liberation were dashed. Corruption in governments continues to benefit the few at the expense of many, perpetuating economic injustice globally. Translation: Gaddafi's plan for a new currency challenged the West, leading to sanctions and his downfall. Africa lost a leader, and corruption persists, hindering economic justice.

Afshin Rantansi introduces an episode of *Going Underground* from the UAE, saying that tomorrow Donald Trump is set to host Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whose kingdom has called out the UK-U.S. EU-armed genocide in Gaza and is refusing to normalize relations with Israel. He also links current events to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and claims that Cy Hirsch, in *The Samson Option*, says Kennedy tried to push Israel to open up its Dimona nuclear weapons reactor for inspection. Rantansi argues that another secret apparatus—Operation Gladio, NATO’s clandestine terrorism network run with the CIA and MI6—was used to stage mass murder atrocities to be blamed on the left, preventing legitimate parties from coming to power in Cold War Europe and opposing Washington imperialism in the Global South, adding that “Gladio never truly ended.” Colonel Roxantana Watkins, a 30-year U.S. Air Force veteran, explains that Operation Gladio ran out of NATO and relied on secret agreements among NATO-aligned organizations to create “stay-behind units.” She says the United States, as a NATO country, also had Gladio units, and she claims that Gladio was used “everywhere,” including Iran before the overthrow of Mossadegh, Korea before the Korean War started, and Vietnam by the French. She says Gladio is a generic term because each country’s program had different names, but Italy did an in-depth study and revealed that its program was called Gladio—leading to the generic reference. Rantansi connects this to Italy’s post-1945 political situation, saying Italy had the largest Communist Party in Europe and that fake atrocities at railway stations were used to discredit the left. Watkins responds by claiming that “communism” became a boogeyman attributed to the Soviet Union and points to declassified CIA documents, including a story about Guatemala, saying labor organizing was often attributed to the left. She adds an account from Italy under Mussolini: she says workers’ rights were abolished, international corporations dominated transactions, and she claims the National Cash Register enabled an intelligence network to identify finances and target people. She says these “tentacles” go deep and are orchestrated around what she calls an “international syndicate” of oligarchs controlling societies to prevent democracy. Discussing the war on Russia via Ukraine, Zelensky, and Western Europe’s behavior, Watkins argues that elites maintain control by preventing societies from becoming democratic. She gives examples to support her framework: she claims Libya’s assassination after Gaddafi defied a central banking system; Venezuela’s overthrow as she describes it; and the murder of Patrice Lumumba in the early 1960s, saying Lumumba sought to use uranium to enrich his own people, and that “Operation Gladio elements” were involved, referencing Otto Skorzeny and Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence structures. Rantansi asks how Gladio could relate to Israeli interests rather than only U.S. empire. Watkins claims James Angleton sat at the Mossad desk in the CIA and the Vatican’s desk, and she links her view of Gladio to a “strategy of tension” concept. She says this concept involves creating “left and right” camps to control people, and she claims Israel became part of that strategy of tension, citing the Middle East and also describing Taiwan as a friction point in Asia. She says covert operations were funded “under the table” with drug networks, referencing Chiang Kai-shek and opium trade, and names Paul Helliwell and Castle Bank as part of her account. In part two, Rantansi asks Watkins about the live-streamed assassination of Charlie Kirk and what she thought, asserting an Israeli motive. Watkins says Kirk’s ability to get people to talk to each other threatened the apparatus, and she claims youth movements around the world are central to the “current Gladio,” citing student organizing mechanisms and saying Mossad, MI6, and CIA recruit “foot soldiers” at college age. She adds that unity-building movements have been targeted historically, and she connects this to her view of Trump’s political rise. Rantansi then raises the scale of poverty and government shutdowns, and Watkins argues that funding is cut to prevent people from rising up. She claims planned “targeted radicalizations” and says she was surprised no false flag occurred during the shutdown, comparing this to Venezuela efforts in 2019–2020 that she says failed. She also claims she has tracked “over 400 attempts to overthrow governments” with “90 successful coups.” Rantansi asks about Jeffrey Epstein revelations and whether such exposures could shock the public into overthrowing oligarchic power. Watkins describes Gladio-style operations as needing “grease” and frames blackmail as the grease that keeps the system operating, citing Epstein and alleging similar systems in other countries. She also responds to questions about Israeli influence on Trump’s administration by saying Israel comes up repeatedly in her Gladio research, including claims about Israel being involved in Reagan-era covert actions, diamond trade, and as a “cutout,” and she says it is “very troubling” to have Israeli support for politicians because of “a lot of pull” in funding.

The speaker argues that when a politician claims support, they are really loyal to a vast international banking dynasty—a Masonic cult with no loyalty to the people whatsoever. This system will offer them gold or lead, and to thrive within it, they must play by its rules. It is not a nation, but the fatherland of a global corporate mafia who rule from behind the veil, the deep state. Their primary jobs are to keep you divided by playing into the left and right paradigm while ensuring that the foreign conquest continues. War is something that they will always agree upon. In other words, you are being used to facilitate and fund their global conquest of other countries. Wars are cleverly marketed and justified by their bought and paid for politicians and their complicit media machine. They fund small terrorist proxy forces which are then attributed to their target nations. Therefore, we have no choice but to invade and install one of our own puppet leaders. And thus now the nation and its riches belong to them. Meanwhile, you’re all distracted, screaming at your own countrymen because they have a different opinion to you so they can ultimately weaken your society and conquer you too. You see divided, are weak, but together, you are strong. The solution is to pull your heads out of your asses, put aside your differences, and realize that you’re all being played, and identify the real threat, the puppet masters who keep you divided.

The discussion centers on allegations that the United States has used or could use domestic and international mechanisms to effect regime change, including through domestic unrest and foreign influence operations. Speaker 0 describes a 2021 Special Operations Command instruction manual, framed as a vision for 2021 and beyond, that purportedly contains instructions and examples on how the military could work with the State Department, intelligence services, and USAID to use race riots to destabilize nations. He points to examples labeled as part of this manual’s guidance for destabilization via combined military-government-civilian efforts. Speaker 1 lays out a model of how revolutions are allegedly structured, starting with a government at the top and support funneled through USAID, the State Department, or other administration entities. He then describes a degree of separation through privatized NGOs, including the National Endowment for Democracy, the International Republican Institute, and similar organizations, with money flowing from entities such as George Soros’s Open Society Foundations through tides and government-funded NGOs like NED. He suggests money ultimately comes from the people, and that demonstrators, youth movements, a sympathetic media, and labor unions contribute to organizing protests. He outlines conditions for regime change: an unpopular incumbent, a semi-automatic regime (not fully autocratic), a united and organized opposition, the ability to quickly frame the voting results as falsified, media amplification of that falsification, an opposition capable of mobilizing thousands, and divisions among coercive forces like the military or police. He asks whether those conditions are present and implies they are. Speaker 2 cites a declassified CIA guide from 1983 aimed at training operatives to organize riots in foreign countries, including using agitators and hiring professional criminals to manipulate mass meetings, with the goal of turning general anger into violence against the regime. The guide describes creating a climate where a few hundred agitators could mobilize tens of thousands, using 200 back channels and 200 human assets to generate a 10,000–20,000 demonstration. It also notes strategies such as setting up job fairs near riots to enlist disaffected workers. He references USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), implying that “transition” is a code for regime change, and cites a 2009 congressional report warning that OTI was a foreign operation aimed at toppling governments through organized political warfare, including mobilizing unions, boycotts, and shutdowns of roads, transportation, hospitals, and schools. Fulton Armstrong’s quote is cited regarding government secrecy surrounding such operations. The speakers conclude by condemning actions conducted in the shadows, destabilizing nations using race wars to achieve political aims, and advocating that the military be involved, arguing these efforts occur without oversight.

The speaker describes Stepan Bandera and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists as Nazi-aligned white supremacists who murdered Jews, Poles, and Russians. After World War II, the CIA used the Galen organization to coordinate with the Banderists as a stay-behind force to fight the Soviets, resulting in a violent war until the Soviets gained the upper hand around 1953-1954. Many Banderists were imprisoned or fled to the West, where they were welcomed and maintained connectivity through diaspora funding. After being released from the gulag, they infiltrated Ukrainian society. The CIA continued to coordinate the resurrection of Banderist ideology to weaken the Soviet Union, which succeeded in 1991. In 2014, the CIA ousted the Ukrainian president and replaced him with someone the US could support, resulting in the Banderists taking control. The speaker claims the CIA has been supporting Banderist groups since 1945.

The speaker discusses the existence of a supranational committee called the Committee of 300, which he discovered during his time in Africa. He claims that this committee, composed of 300 men, controls the world and runs the United States. He also mentions the British East India Company's involvement in the opium trade and the control of natural resources by the black nobility. The speaker argues that the Federal Government in the United States is controlled by this committee and is working towards a one world government. He also criticizes the actions of past presidents and the current political system.

The United States government decides to send the CIA to Venezuela. They say the CIA will conduct operations against Venezuela, against the peace of Venezuela. This is claimed to be unprecedented; the speaker notes that never before has any government since the CIA’s existence publicly said it would order the CIA to kill, to derange, and to topple countries. A historian named Alejandro is invoked to support this claim. The speaker lists past Latin American coups, asserting that all involved the CIA and resulted in governments being overthrown and presidents assassinated, with documents allegedly published by the U.S. government that have since been declassified. Specific examples named are: 1974, Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz; 1965, Dominican Republic, Juan Bosch; 1964, Brazil, Joao Goulart; 1973, Chile, Salvador Allende. The speaker says these are “a few” among many coups in Latin America, all documented through declassified U.S. government documents. Additionally, the case of Mosaddegh in Iran (1952) is cited as another example of a national leader toppled. The speaker asserts that, over time, the CIA apologized for overthrowing these presidents, stating the pretenses were that they were communists or terrorists, but later acknowledging the deception. The speaker uses the term “immorality” to describe those past actions and contrasts them with the present claim, stating that for the first time in history, a U.S. government says it has given authorization and issued orders to attack a country. The speaker concludes with a call to the Venezuelan people, saying their people are clear, united, highly conscious, with “1000000 of eyes and 1000000 of ears,” and that they possess the means to defeat this “open conspiracy” against the peace and stability of Venezuela. The ultimate aim asserted is to restore the peace and stability to which the people of Venezuela have a right, and to ensure they regain and sustain that peace and stability.

Speaker 0 says that Al-Qaeda and ISIS are “working for the Western countries” that claim to fear and loathe them, citing that French, Belgian, British, and German people suffered at the hands of ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Speaker 0 claims those governments covertly assisted ISIS and Al-Qaeda to power, including in Syria, and then recognized and welcomed the ISIS-al-Qaeda leadership in Syria. Speaker 0 references the German government welcoming “the ISIS al-Qaeda chief,” “al-Julani,” and calling him “Mr. President,” and also mentions having seen him holding up severed heads. Speaker 0 argues that Western governments’ “ambivalence” toward ISIS and Al-Qaeda is “well charted.” Speaker 0 then makes an allegation, blaming Macron, stating: “Macron were behind the ISIS-Al Qaeda super growth,” which Speaker 0 says has enabled them to infiltrate thousands of soldiers in an attempt to overthrow the government of Mali.

The discussion argues that Western European support for Ukraine in a war with Russia reflects elite efforts to control their own populations rather than protect countries from Soviet or Russian influence. Corruption in Zelensky’s Ukraine is cited as an example of how elites maintain control. The speakers claim that leaders who prioritize nationalism—using national resources to enrich their people—are targeted. Libya is presented as an example: Muammar Gaddafi is described as caring about Libyans and Africans generally, but being assassinated for defying the central banking system and relying on gold in connection with oil. Venezuela is described as having a similar pattern, where nationalistic resource-use leads to being killed or overthrown. The transcript then links these outcomes to “Gladio networks” and intelligence agencies that allegedly deploy against such leaders. Patrice Lumumba is offered as a historical case. In the early 1960s, after the Congo’s first freedom from Belgium and Lumumba’s election as prime minister, Lumumba is said to have sought a deal to provide the United States with Congo uranium previously directed to Belgium, while using the portion that would have gone to Belgium to enrich Congolese society. The claim continues that President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Vice President Richard Nixon would not meet with him, but the secretary of state did, rejecting the request to bypass Belgium. According to the account, the refusal meant the Congo would receive “the same arrangement” as before, described as essentially nothing for building schools and hospitals. Lumumba is said to have refused to honor that deal and to have indicated that the Soviet Union would be interested in the uranium, after which he was murdered. The transcript attributes Lumumba’s killing to “Operation Gladio Elements” controlled by Otto Skorzeny, identified as a Nazi, working under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence and the BND. The speakers conclude that any prime minister or president who “stands up for their country” is portrayed as a target of an international syndicate seeking control of the world’s resources.

Afshin Ratansi hosts *Going Underground* from the UAE, saying that tomorrow Donald Trump will host Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, while Ratansi claims Gaza has been called out as genocide by the UK, U.S., and EU and that Saudi Arabia will not normalize relations with Israel. Ratansi connects this to the anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, referencing Charlie Hirsch’s *Samson Option* and claiming Kennedy tried to push Israel to open its Dimona nuclear weapons reactor for inspection while a separate clandestine apparatus, Operation Gladio, was already operating. Ratansi describes Gladio as NATO’s clandestine terrorism network run with the CIA and MI6, allegedly used to stage mass-murder atrocities blamed on the left to block legitimate parties in Cold War Europe and oppose Washington in the Global South, and claims Gladio “never truly ended.” Ratansi introduces Colonel Roxantana Watkins, a 30-year U.S. Air Force veteran who says she traced Cold War covert structures and believes they still shape the world. Watkins explains that Operation Gladio ran out of NATO and required NATO-aligned organizations to sign secret agreements to create stay-behind units in each country. She says the U.S. is a NATO country too and asks where its Gladio units were. She claims Gladio was used “everywhere,” including Iran before the overthrow of Mossadegh, Korea before the Korean War, and Vietnam “by the French.” Watkins says Gladio is a generic term and that actual programs had different names in each country—for example, Portugal’s “Jinter Press” and Turkey’s “Gray Wolves,” with Italy being the only country she says conducted an in-depth study that revealed the program existed under the name “Gladio.” Ratansi says Italy had the largest Communist Party in Europe after 1945 and that fake atrocities at railway stations discredited the left. Watkins agrees and says communism became a “boogeyman” attributed to the Soviet Union, while declassified CIA documents she cites discuss labor efforts assigned to the left. She says she stopped using “left and right” because it has no use in modern language, describing a model in which workers’ rights were abolished under Mussolini while labor organizing occurred alongside international corporations. She claims the National Cash Register took over transactions in Italy during Mussolini, and that James Jesus Angleton—father of CIA official James Angleton—was tied to the franchise owner, which she says enabled an intelligence network to control finances. Watkins says the system is orchestrated around “the international syndicate” of oligarchs controlling societies so they are not democratic. She links this to assassinations and overthrows when leaders become nationalistic and rely on resources to enrich their own people, citing Omar Gaddafi’s assassination and Venezuela’s situation. She then narrates the case of Patrice Lumumba in the early 1960s Congo, alleging Eisenhower and Nixon refused to meet him and that Belgium-linked arrangements would block Congo from enriching itself, leading Lumumba to refuse the deal and prompting his murder by “Operation Gladio Elements” controlled by Otto Skorzeny under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence, the BND. Watkins argues that any prime minister or president “that stands up for their country” becomes a target. In response to whether Gladio aligned with Israeli interests, Watkins claims James Angleton sat at the Mossad desk in the CIA and at the Vatican’s desk, asserting that a “strategy of tension” governs Gladio, tracing it to the late 1800s with the Fabian Society and the idea of creating “left and right” camps to control people. She claims Israel is a strategy of tension concept controlling the Middle East, and says Taiwan was a pivotal friction point in Asia. Watkins says covert operations are funded with drug networks, citing Chiang Kai-shek in Taiwan as controlling over 80% of the opium trade in Asia, and describes Paul Helliwell’s alleged role in creating Castle Bank and using front companies for property purchases in Central Florida. She also claims the UK MI6 helped set up Colombia as part of the “crystal triangle” and that London set up Israel. Ratansi asks Watkins about Watkins’ reaction to the live-streamed assassination of Charlie Kirk. Watkins says Kirk’s persona encouraged people to talk to each other across divisions and that the apparatus “cannot have” that. She says the current Gladio rests on student youth movements worldwide and references “Optor in Serbia,” student movements, and George Soros funding, claiming college-age levels include recruiting foot soldiers for Mossad, MI6, and CIA. She compares it to FBI assassinating Fred Hampton after he built the “Rainbow Coalition,” saying authorities do not want people to come together. Ratansi raises poverty and opposition to Israel, including polls after Gaza and a SNAP pause during a government shutdown, and asks what happens if people rebel. Watkins responds that she argues the “42 million” figure is exaggerated and that the strategy includes cutting off funding so people rise up, using both conditions for radicals to evolve and “planned, targeted radicalizations.” She says during the shutdown she was surprised there was not a false flag to generate opposition, and claims Venezuela had multiple false-flag-style attempts in 2019 and 2020 that failed. Watkins says she tracked over 400 attempts to overthrow governments and documented 90 successful coups. Ratansi asks about the Jeffrey Epstein revelations and whether they would shock the public enough to overthrow oligarchic power. Watkins claims blackmail is “the grease” that makes operations work and says people like Jeffrey Epstein were part of enabling leverage, describing blackmail networks operating globally and citing examples involving underage videos and suicides after exposure. Ratansi asks whether Israeli power over the Trump administration is as strong as during the Biden administration. Watkins says Trump publicly called out Mary Madelson as funding various efforts and that Israel comes up frequently in Gladio research. She cites claims that the IDF created a one-year school for drug-network managers in Latin America and that Israel acted as a “cutout” for Reagan-era missile and weapons transfers, as well as involvement related to diamond mining in Africa despite Israel not owning diamond mines. She concludes that it is “very troubling” anytime Israeli support backs a politician, saying it implies significant pull over funding. Ratansi ends the show with condolences for people affected by what he calls ongoing UK-U.S. “armed genocide” across Palestine, and says the program will return on Saturday.

The speaker believes those hiding the truth about 9/11 are capable of murder. They claim the U.S. caused Gaddafi's death because Hillary Clinton played a "game." The speaker says they went to Libya during the war with a Biden staffer, a Bush staffer, and a film crew, and hand-carried a letter from Gaddafi offering to resign, but the U.S. wanted him dead. According to the speaker, Gaddafi wanted to unite Africa economically on the gold standard, but the U.S. and Europe wanted control of his oil and sovereign wealth. The speaker took Biden to Libya on their second trip. The speaker feels it is outrageous that people who have never served in the military make money off conflicts while kids are drawn into them and killed.

Speaker 0 describes a long, forty-year conflict described as a Third World War waged by the CIA and the U.S. National Security Complex against people of the Third World, not the Soviets. He states that at least six million people have been killed in this war. He emphasizes that these are not Soviets and notes no parachuting into the Soviet Union to kill since 1954, when the Soviets developed the capability of dropping atomic weapons on the United States. He references CIA, Marine Corps, and three CIA Secret Wars. He recalls his 1975 position as chief of the Angola task force within the National Security Council, describing it as the third CIA secret war he was part of. He mentions the National Security Act of 1947 creating the National Security Council, and the CIA being given a charter to perform duties and functions necessary to national security interests, with vague authority to protect sources and methods. He says, in the mid-80s, he coined the term the Third World War after realizing the U.S. was not attacking the Soviet Union but people in the Third World. He characterizes the Third World War as the third bloodiest war in history, with operations conducted globally and a license to kill, smuggle drugs, and violate international law and principles of nations working together for a healthier and more peaceful world. He alleges the U.S. legal system was being converted to give the CIA control of society. He notes there is massive documentation of CIA secret wars, citing the Church Committee investigation of 1975, which found 900 major operations and 3,000 minor operations in the fourteen years prior. Extrapolating over the forty-plus years of CIA activity, he claims 3,000 major operations and over 10,000 minor operations, all allegedly illegal and disruptive to other societies, with many bloody and gory. He asserts the CIA organized the overthrow of functioning constitutional democracies, created secret armies, and directed them to fight on multiple continents. He claims the agency encouraged ethnic minorities to rise up: the Mosquito Indians in Nicaragua, the Kurds in the Middle East, the Hmongs in Southeast Asia. He alleges death squads funded by the CIA, such as the Treasury Police in El Salvador, responsible for most of the 50,000 killed in the 1980s, and 70,000 before that. He describes orchestration by the CIA through secret teams and propaganda, leading to involvement in the Korean War and attacks on China from Quemoy and Matsu, Thailand, and Tibet. He notes drug trafficking, the Korean War resulting in about a million deaths, and the Vietnam War, with CIA involvement at every level, contributing to the creation of the Golden Triangle and the Golden Crescent, where heroin became a major outcome, with Air America aircraft shipping arms for allies and returning with heroin, and claims President Carter and Admiral Turner brag about the Afghanistan operation as the largest CIA secret war operation in history. He concludes that the Golden Crescent remains the largest source of heroin today. He summarizes that the Third World War, waged by the CIA, the U.S. National Security Complex, and the military, has resulted in widespread devastation, especially in the Third World, as opposed to Europe where there is no equivalent destructive capability. He notes that those regions rarely have the means to hurt the U.S., questioning the motive of targeting those who cannot defend themselves.

Speaker 0 argues that antisemitic violence and persecution have occurred in multiple places—“to the Jews,” in Spain, Germany, and that it “is happening” now and “going to happen in America”—unless “these people” begin “behaving,” claiming “they may be they have a death wish” and asserting this has been a problem “for centuries.” Speaker 1 responds by saying that, through the Bible, Jews have functioned as “God’s timepiece,” judged across generations and also used while keeping their identity. He claims the Bible distinguishes between two groups: one associated with “the remnant of God’s people” (which he says will be Jewish people) and another described as “the synagogue of Satan.” He states that in “the latter days” (which he says is “a thousand years,” as others call it), those in “the synagogue of Satan” are “energized by a supernatural power called the devil.” Speaker 1 adds that he believes this group has “a strange brilliance” and are “smart,” and that, in his view, they are “not inspired.” He says Hitler “didn’t” and references that this group had “a stranglehold on Germany,” including on “the banking of Germany” and “the media,” and that “this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.” Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 then discuss political labeling and ideological constraints. Speaker 1 says people view “you” as conservative and claims that if one “leans a little bit” toward “the sociological thing,” the result is that “the whole thing will be closed” off, while stating he does not care how conservative someone is. He says he is “more conservative than you are,” but that he must “lean a little bit.” He describes meeting friends connected to the New York Times and people like Mr. Rosenthal, saying he knows some Jews are friendly to him because they know he is friendly to Israel, but they do not know “how I really feel” about what he says they are doing to the country. He concludes that he has “no power” to handle them, but would “stand up” if “under proper circumstances.”

- The speakers present a conspiratorial framing of Libya’s recent history and its global repercussions. They assert, “It’s a Chinese colony at this point,” implying foreign influence over Libya and its trajectory. - They claim that “the West and Hillary blows up Gaddafi,” arguing that those who were aligned with the West retaliated against Muammar Gaddafi. They further state that Gaddafi had “invested everything with the West, came and apologized,” and describe NATO as “the defensive alliance” that “went and just murdered Gaddafi for no reason.” - Gaddafi is portrayed in softened, almost heroic terms: “One’s Gaddafi, you know, the crazy colonel,” but the speakers emphasize that “the point was he was for the people.” They describe him as “a statesman,” noting that “he literally lived in a tent.” - The economic and infrastructural claims are central to their narrative: they say “98% of the state money coming in and oil went to not just his people, Africa,” and that he was “building real infrastructure” with a “whole plan to link up” with Africa. They imply that his policies would have connected Africa regionally rather than remaining separate from the rest of the continent. - They allege that the killing of Gaddafi was part of a broader, destabilizing plan: “they came and killed him,” and as a result, “now all of Africa’s collapsing because they blew up the South Point and the North Point.” They attribute these upheavals to “the globalist deliberately blow[ing] that up for destabilization.” - The discussion turns to population movements: they claim that “the population will be moved here and to Europe as it already is being in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, of course.” The speaker asserts personal certainty about this trend: “I know I see it so, so clearly.”

The speaker claims: "we overthrew, Iraq with military force coming in from across the globe to overthrow Iraq." "We have gone in, and we have overthrown, Ukraine, with military force from the other side of the globe." "and, we we were the source of both of these conflicts, and it's very unfortunate because the American people are not are not like this." "It's just it's the foreign policy establishment." "Zelensky is a is a puppet." "He does what he is told, when he is told, and they you know, the the people who control him decided that if they put him in a green T shirt, he would look like a hero, so they they had him wear a green T shirt." "This is a fellow who is a comedy actor." "He is a creation of the media out of whole cloth." "He he really didn't exist as as anything until the media created an image of him, very much like a like a play actor."

I outline the speaker’s central claims about George Soros, the CIA, and global political influence. The speaker contends that George Soros has been one of the CIA’s most valuable private assets for over forty years, acting as the civilian, deniable funding arm of American regime-change operations worldwide. Because of this, Soros is not only allowed in the United States but protected there, enabling him to operate with impunity, which the speaker says explains his arrogance and continued influence. The speaker traces a pattern of Soros-backed “color revolutions” starting with Serbia in 2000, refined in Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, and the Arab Spring in 2011. They assert that logos for USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the Open Society Foundations appear in all these cases, framing Soros as central to these movements. According to the speaker, the Arab Spring served as a trial run for Europe’s migrant crisis. They claim that in 2011 the CIA and Soros turned that playbook on Libya and Syria. Gaddafi allegedly warned in March 2011 that removing him would unleash millions to flood Europe from Africa; eight months later, Gaddafi was dead, Libya descended into chaos, and migrant waves began as predicted. By 2015–2016, the speaker asserts, battle-hardened jihadists and economic migrants were crossing the Mediterranean with iPhones, prepaid cards, and Twitter guides written in Arabic, described as the same social media mobilization tactics used in Kyiv and Tahrir Square. Wayne Madsen is cited as having called this pattern out in 2015, described by the speaker as a deliberate CIA social-engineering operation to fracture Europe from within, applying the same playbook to new targets. The speaker then asserts that the United States has been subject to this strategy from 2020 to the present, pointing to the summer riots of 2020 as an example. The claim continues that Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated at least $33,000,000 to groups that organized and sustained the 2020 riots, and that Soros-backed NGOs provided lawyers, maps, and logistics for the southern border caravans, as well as funding to influence police departments and district attorneys in major cities, effectively helping to elect them. The speaker argues that Soros is implementing the color-revolution playbook “on us now,” with the target being ordinary Americans rather than foreign nations. A historical reference is made to JFK, who allegedly spoke of splintering the CIA after the Bay of Pigs betrayal, a chance JFK did not realize, leaving the world the speaker claims the CIA built. The speaker notes that Hungary, a country of 9 million, has passed Stop Soros laws and expelled his operations, asking why the United States cannot do the same, and suggests finishing what JFK started.

Muammar Gaddafi was killed because he was working with other African leaders to establish Africa's first Central Bank, which would have backed its currency with the continent's natural resources. This move threatened the global economic order dominated by currencies not backed by resources. Gaddafi's assassination was to prevent the creation of a Central Bank of Africa and the end of modern slavery and neo-colonialism on the continent.

The speaker presents a message of alarm and action, arguing that anarchy in Washington DC stems from the federal government seizing powers and passing unconstitutional laws, with men acting as though they are above the Constitution. He claims a supranational, clandestine power structure governs world events. Key claim: a Committee of Three Hundred (also known in intelligence circles as the Olympians) consists of 300 men who run the world and who are sworn to secrecy. The speaker says he discovered this while in Africa, finding documents labeled above top-secret that revealed the committee’s influence. He asserts that the descendants of the British East India Company control The United States today, and that the 300 men govern global affairs with equal voting rights and no outvoting. The speaker traces the committee’s roots and influence to the British East India Company, opium profits, and a global elite. He asserts that in India House in London he found manifests showing opium trade profits that dwarned major carmakers’ profits for certain years, and that the 300 govern from Venice’s black nobility families (the Lucatis, the Rekanates, the Volpe Dumiserratis), boasting wealth that would make figures like David Rockefeller seem modest. He claims those families still run the world and name every member in his book The Committee of 300 and, later, in socialism, the road to slavery. The scope of control is described as worldwide and multi-branch: the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA, aka Chatham House) is the executive arm; the Club of Rome, the Seni Foundation, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Order of Saint John are tapped as executive arms; the RIIA allegedly instructs U.S. policy through the Morgan Guarantee & Trust Bank, with Dennis Weatherstone as a conduit to the Secretary of State and then the President. The speaker alleges the Gulf War was orchestrated by Margaret Thatcher (in Aspen Institute) to instruct George Bush, framing it as unconstitutional and driven by an international agenda. He asserts that the Club of Rome (through Aurelio Peccei) sought to destroy U.S. industry and agriculture, citing Bertrand Russell’s influence and writings on overpopulation. He claims the Club of Rome’s “Zero Growth” post-industrial plan aimed to destroy the American middle class, destroy U.S. industries, and push a socialist transformation. Global 2000 is described as a Club of Rome genocide blueprint targeting mass population reduction by 2050, aimed particularly at decimating the U.S. middle class and other populations. The speaker links AIDS, HIV-era and other outbreaks to this plan, alleging deliberate creation and dissemination of pathogens via Fort Detrick, the World Health Organization, and other bodies, with assertions of experiments (CAB, Lassa fever, etc.) and a later shift to other viruses like HIV/AIDS, cholera, malaria, and black plague, all framed as part of population control under the global plan. He claims vaccines and viral campaigns in Africa and Brazil were weaponized to decimate populations, while the “black nobility” finances these operations through London and Venice. The speaker asserts that a vast network of bankers, insurance companies, mining conglomerates, and political organizations—including the Democrat Party in the U.S.—are controlled by the 300 and their secret society apparatus ( Illuminati, Society of the Cincinnati, etc.). He contends the strongest arm is the Club of Rome, and that the RIA/Club of Rome manipulated U.S. presidents through PMs, MI6, and other foreign controllers. He gives examples: Lincoln’s assassination, Wilson’s presidency, Kennedy’s murder, and later U.S. policy under Bush, Clinton, and others, as outcomes of control by London and the RIIA. The speaker contends that intelligence and political leadership are predetermined by the 300, not elected by the people. He argues the President and Secretary of State are chosen by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, not directly by the American electorate. He cites MacArthur, Dean Rusk, and Truman as exemplars of subversion by an international power structure that guides U.S. foreign policy. In closing, the speaker asserts the Constitution is immutable, condemns what he sees as creeping socialism, and calls for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve and a severing of the concord between the 50 states and the federal government. He frames the situation as a war to the death for the United States, urging Americans to reclaim state sovereignty and reject what he characterizes as unconstitutional measures, arguing that the United States consists of 50 nations with rights to dissolve the federal government if necessary.

Afshin Ratansi hosts *Going Underground* from the UAE and introduces guest Colonel Roxantana Watkins, a 30-year U.S. Air Force veteran researching Cold War covert structures. Ratansi frames the episode around Donald Trump hosting Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the Gaza situation, and connects these developments to earlier claims about nuclear inspection efforts, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and Operation Gladio—described as NATO’s clandestine “stay-behind” terror network run with CIA and MI6 that allegedly targeted mass murder to be blamed on the left and to block political opposition to Washington across Cold War Europe and the Global South. Watkins explains that Operation Gladio ran out of NATO: NATO-aligned organizations signed secret agreements to create “stay-behind units” in each country. She says the U.S. was a NATO country too and asks where its Gladio units were, arguing that Gladio shaped “terrorism as a controlling domestic audience.” She asserts Gladio-like methods were used beyond Europe, citing alleged use in Iran before the overthrow of Mossadegh, before the Korean War, and in Vietnam by the French. Watkins describes “Operation Gladio” as a generic umbrella term because each country’s program had different names; she claims Italy was the only country to conduct an in-depth study and reveal its existence, and that Italy’s program was called Gladio. She links the broader concept to false-flag operations meant to “prep a battlefield” and create allegations attributed to communism or other targets. Ratansi adds that post-1945 Italy had a large Communist Party and claims fake atrocities at railway stations were used to discredit the left. Watkins says “communism” functioned as a “boogeyman” attributed to the Soviet Union, pointing to declassified CIA references she describes as involving Guatemala labor efforts attributed to the left. She asserts that in Italy, workers’ rights had been abolished under Mussolini, and she claims international corporations participated in surveillance—specifically mentioning National Cash Register, and asserting that its franchise owner was connected to James Jesus Angleton, describing Angleton’s family ties. She describes the overall operation as orchestrated around an “international syndicate” of oligarchs controlling society. Watkins argues that elites maintain control by preventing democracy, using examples such as Libya under Omar Gaddafi—claimed to have been assassinated for defying a central banking system and relying on gold—and Venezuela under present-day circumstances—claimed to follow the pattern of killing or overthrowing leaders who rely on national use of resources. She describes alleged Gladio involvement in Patrice Lumumba’s assassination, including claims about Eisenhower refusing Lumumba’s requests, Nixon’s refusal, and a subsequent murder she attributes to Gladio elements controlled by Otto Skorzeny under Reinhard Gehlen’s BND. Ratansi asks how Gladio became aligned with Israeli interests. Watkins claims James Angleton sat at a “Mossad desk” in the CIA and a Vatican desk, and she describes a “strategy of tension” originating from late-1800s Fabian Society ideas: creating “left and right” camps to control populations. She claims key nodes include Israel in the Middle East and Taiwan (Formosa) in Asia, and states covert operations were funded through drug networks, pointing to a narrative about Chiang Kai-shek and opium control. She ties funding and recruitment to CIA-linked figures and claims Israel and the UK were integral to setting up Colombia as part of a “crystal triangle,” repeating that London helped set up Israel and that this mapping controls oil. The discussion then shifts to a live-streamed assassination of Charlie Kirk. Watkins says Kirk threatened an apparatus by encouraging people to talk across divisions and claims current Gladio rests on student youth movements globally, including mention of “Optor in Serbia” and George Soros funding. She claims youths are recruited as “foot soldiers” by Mossad, MI6, and CIA, and that movements promoting unity are targeted to prevent societies from coming together. Ratansi then raises U.S. poverty and government shutdown conditions, asking what happens when people rebel. Watkins argues population figures are exaggerated and describes a strategy of tension involving cutting off funding and “planned, targeted radicalizations,” while asserting that false flags are used historically even when some attempts fail. She claims the U.S. companies want oil in Venezuela and references “over 400 attempts” to overthrow governments, with “90 successful coups” documented. Finally, Ratansi asks about Jeffrey Epstein revelations and whether blackmail enables these systems. Watkins argues blackmail is “the grease” that allows the operation to function, describes Epstein as an example, and adds that each country has comparable figures. She links such networks to global travel and exposure of sexual abuse as a means of control, while noting some incidents were exposed in the UK and mentions an unnamed one-star general who allegedly killed himself after exposure. Ratansi asks whether Israeli influence over the Trump administration matches that over the Obama-era “Genocide Joe” administration, referencing PragerU and Alexis Wilkins’s lawsuit. Watkins says she finds it “intriguing” that Trump publicly called out a figure funding pro-Israel activities, but asserts the connection goes deeper, describing Israeli roles as “cutouts” in multiple covert operations involving Iran, Angola, and Africa, and claims Israel became a major diamond seller despite allegedly owning no mines. The episode closes with condolences for those affected by the alleged “UK-US” armed genocide continuing across Palestine and an announcement of the show returning on Saturday.

The speakers discuss a “most dangerous game” involving human hunting conducted by high-profile figures, described as being driven by mind control and the pleasure those involved received from the act. The narrator, identified as a mind-controlled slave, says he was stripped of clothes and hunted in the woods by George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Bill Clinton, among others, asserting that these individuals subjected him to trauma beyond what was necessary given his preexisting conditioning from mind control programs. Speaker 1 asks for specifics about the base and era when Clinton and Bush were involved. Speaker 0 identifies Lampy, Missouri—just across the Arkansas line—as the location. He notes Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas at the time and claims Mina, Arkansas was a main hub for bringing people into a CIA compound. He describes a CIA facility in Lampy as an amphitheater-like Swiss villa complex in the woods, with military fencing and mind-control training happening in one building, offices in another, and Swiss-style villas or cabins where officials from the military, CIA, or politics would stay during activities or paramilitary operations. The speaker claims black helicopters and robotic “special forces” were used. Speaker 1 asks which special forces were involved and mentions Delta Force and Navy SEALs, seeking more detail. Speaker 0 answers that Delta Force and Navy SEALS are elite units that are mind-controlled like mercenaries, but says he is more familiar with mercenaries trained to carry out international operations not necessarily sanctioned by Congress, brought into other countries (such as South America) to fulfill orders. He asserts airplanes would return with the driver and be sold on the streets in the U.S. and worldwide. He ties these activities to the CIA’s so-called war on drugs, claiming it was really about eliminating competition and taking over the drug industry, with all components interlinked. The conversation links the Lampy compound to UN-related paramilitary operations. He claims operatives wore black uniforms and used black helicopters, and that the activities were connected to implementing the “new world order” rather than traditional national defense.

The speaker argues that whenever a country defends its own people, the United States asks, “Who owns the resources?” and if the answer isn’t The US, a coup follows. The claim is that over 80 foreign governments have been overthrown or destabilized by the United States, and that most of them weren’t dictatorships, but democratically elected governments that threatened US corporate profits. The described playbook involves the CIA funding opposition groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda, planting stories in the media, bribing generals, arming rebels, or collapsing a country’s economy, with the coup replacing the leader with a pro-US dictatorship. The overarching assertion is that this is not about democracy but about power and control. Key historical examples cited include: - Iran in 1953: Mosaddegh attempted to nationalize oil; the CIA launched Operation Ajax, orchestrated protests, paid off politicians, and installed the Shah, resulting in twenty-five years of dictatorship and torture under US protection. - Guatemala in 1954: President Arbenz redistributed land from the United Fruit Company, a US corporation; the CIA branded him a communist, conducted a coup, and Guatemala descended into a civil war with over 200,000 deaths. - Chile in 1973: Allende was overthrown in a US-backed military coup, and Pinochet’s regime tortured and killed thousands after Allende’s attempts to nationalize copper. - Congo in 1961: Lumumba sought African control of African resources; the CIA helped orchestrate his assassination and installed a brutal dictator who was supported for decades. The speaker adds that there are “dozens of others” beyond these cases, including Haiti, Iraq, Libya, Nicaragua, El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Bolivia, and beyond, arguing that the motive is not fighting tyranny but profits and control. When a country attempts to exit the system or nationalize resources to reduce inequality, they threaten profits and the idea that another world is possible, so the CIA sabotages such efforts to prevent successful example-making, such as Libya. The conclusion is that many nations don’t trust the United States because “we’ve been the villains throughout most of our history.” The speaker invites readers to comment to receive a “forbidden reading list” of books and documentaries that “they never wanted you to find.”

Afshin Ratansi introduces an upcoming meeting between Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, linking it to Saudi Arabia’s stance on Gaza and refusal to normalize relations with Israel. Ratansi says the anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination is connected to a claim that Kennedy, as described by Cy Hirsch in *The Samson Option*, tried to push Israel to allow inspection of its Dimona nuclear reactor while “another secretive apparatus” allegedly operated in parallel, Operation Gladio—described as NATO’s clandestine terrorism network run with the CIA and MI6—used to stage mass atrocities blamed on the left to block legitimate political parties in Cold War Europe and oppose Washington’s agenda in the Global South. Ratansi also frames Charlie Kirk and broader grassroots movements as relevant to these Cold War covert structures. Colonel Roxantana Watkins says Operation Gladio ran “out of NATO” and that NATO-aligned organizations signed secret agreements to create “stay-behind” Gladio units in their countries. She argues that Gladio was used “everywhere,” not only Europe, and cites claims of use in Iran before the overthrow of Mossadegh, in Korea before the Korean War, and in Vietnam by the French. She describes Operation Gladio as a generic term because each country’s program had different names, such as a Jinter Press in Portugal and the Gray Wolves in Turkey, while she says Italy did an in-depth study and revealed its program called Gladio. Watkins connects Gladio to false flags and says its activities were used to “prep a battlefield” with operatives on the ground. Ratansi adds that Italy had a large Communist Party after 1945 and claims that fake atrocities at railway stations were used to discredit the left. Watkins responds by saying “communism” was turned into a boogeyman attributed to the Soviet Union, and she points to declassified CIA documents she says show the Soviet Union label masking other topics such as labor efforts. She claims Mussolini-era Italy abolished workers’ rights, and she describes labor organizing as tied to international corporations, including the National Cash Register taking over transactions in Italy. She says the franchise owner was James Jesus Angleton’s father and describes this as enabling an intelligence network tied to finances. Watkins argues that elites can control populations, which she says explains Western European backing for the war on Russia through Ukraine. She illustrates the pattern with examples including Libya, Venezuela, and the Congo. She claims Muammar Gaddafi was assassinated after defying the central banking system and relying on gold, and she claims Venezuela’s leaders are overthrown or killed when nationalistic resource enrichment challenges central arrangements. She describes Patrice Lumumba’s attempt to renegotiate uranium arrangements after Belgium’s colonial administration and says he was murdered by Operation Gladio elements associated with Otto Skorzeny under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence (BND). She says “every prime minister [or] president” who stands up for their country is a target of an “international syndicate” seeking control of the world’s resources. Ratansi asks how Gladio could have become aligned with Israeli interests. Watkins claims James Jesus Angleton sat at the “Mossad desk” in the CIA and at the Vatican’s desk. She describes “the strategy of tension” as originating from late-1800s Fabian Society ideas, saying it aims to control people by creating “left and right” camps, with Israel framed as a focal point. She claims covert operations are funded through drug networks and cites Taiwan/“Formosa,” alleging Chiang Kai-shek controlled most opium trade in Asia and connected figures she says were involved in OSS/CIA operations and other institutions. In part two, Ratansi asks what Watkins thought when Charlie Kirk was assassinated on video. Watkins says the key risk to this apparatus is “us talking to each other,” and she claims Gladio rests on student youth movements, citing mechanisms like “Optor” in Serbia and George Soros funding. She says college-age recruitment is where Mossad, MI6, and CIA recruit “foot soldiers,” and she describes Charlie Kirk as an Achilles heel because she says he encouraged cross-group conversation. She also compares this to Fred Hampton and the FBI assassinating him, saying large movements that unite people are targeted. Ratansi raises poverty and hunger figures, SNAP disruptions during a government shutdown, and asks what happens when people rebel. Watkins argues numbers like “42 million” are exaggerated and says part of the strategy is to cut funding to prevent uprisings, including “planned, targeted radicalizations.” She says the shutdown period was surprising because she did not see a false flag used then, and she references Venezuela attempts in 2019–2020 that she says failed, attributing failure to U.S. companies wanting oil. When asked about Jeffrey Epstein revelations, Watkins describes Gladio-style operations as requiring “grease” and says she views blackmail as enabling the machinery. She claims Epstein was an example of that blackmail role and mentions other alleged blackmail operations across countries, including the UK, saying global travel and meetings provide opportunities for compromising imagery and coercion. Ratansi concludes by asking whether Israeli influence is as strong under Trump as it was under the previous administration. Watkins says Israel’s role repeatedly appears in Gladio research and claims Israel has acted as a “cutout” for U.S. policy in sending missiles and weapons, including in Iran-related and Angola-related contexts. She says Israel became a major diamond seller “when they don’t own a single diamond mine,” and she ends by saying it is “very troubling” to have Israeli support for politicians because she says Israel has pull over funding.

Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.

Speaker 0 argues that the UN agenda is the same as the Davos agenda, and identifies this as the main topic of the conversation. They claim that the world oligarchic system has power over Europe because they control all the key positions, including Bundescansal or president or prime minister. They state that Donald Trump’s situation was a big shock and not part of the oligarchy’s game plan, calling it an accident. They say the accident was the first time the oligarchy system acted in this way. They assert that normally it would have been Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump. They claim the process they are dealing with—referring to “this blandemy and all these liars”—was supposed to unfold in 2016 and then be pushed into 2020 to be a disaster regarding food and water. They say the disaster was normally expected to arrive in 2025, but the plan was changed, and for this reason, they believe the oligarchy will not succeed. They describe the system as almost down, but note that there are last moments and call for courage from everyone to say no. They suggest that the UN could be fantastic and Ken could have a fantastic role, but that the UN is under the total control of the oligarchs. The speaker contends that these oligarchs are all connected with a pedophilia system, asserting knowledge that there are more than eight million children per year who disappear, equivalent to the entire population of Austria, and that they disappear without any information. They conclude by linking this to transhumanism and labeling these acts as criminal.