reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It also appears that the mother of the gunman was a former employee of Annunciation of the school who had retired a couple of years back. Initially, authorities had said there was no clear connection between the gunman and the school itself. Now it appears as though the mother of the gunman does have a connection with that school.

It also appears that the mother of the gunman was a former employee of Annunciation of the school who had retired a couple of years back. And so initially, authorities had said there was no clear connection between the gunman and the school itself. Now it appears as though the mother of the gunman does have a connection with that school. And as

"And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on, we lost something important in America today. But, the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today. Yeah. I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest. That's the latest I heard from law That's correct. Law enforcement. You're hearing the same thing."

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

Speaker 0 asks why the president hasn't acknowledged the shooting at CDC headquarters that took place earlier in August where a police officer was killed, and it was reported that the motivation for the shooting was somebody who was really unhappy with the effects of the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1 responds: "We absolutely were very much aware of that shooting. The secretary of health and human services put out a statement immediately. He was in touch with the CDC, and he actually traveled to Georgia, to assess the situation and to mourn, with the the people who work in that building there. So"

We have a situation with at least one suspect down, but there may be more. The shots fired were all headshots, indicating a targeted attack. There’s a lot of focus on the scene, and it appears that the shots were aimed directly at the victims. Regarding the claims of conspiracies or multiple gunmen, there have been no findings to support these assertions. The only identified shooter is Mr. Paddock.

Speaker 0 politely asks for the audience to lower their voices and thanks someone for their question. Speaker 1 mentions that federal authorities were not informed about certain information regarding the shooter. Speaker 0 asks for clarification on who "they" refers to. Speaker 1 explains that it was the local police who did not share the information. Speaker 0 states that the matter is under investigation and asks not to argue. Speaker 0 acknowledges the concern in the community but states that the facts are yet to be determined. Speaker 0 refuses to make assumptions and ends the conversation.

Ongoing investigation on the active shooter leads us to 'a trans liberal with a Republican dad.' 'That'll create some division.' The FBI: 'Get in, Tyler' and 'Thirty three hours.' The FBI is described as triaging and 'hard at work coming up with a solid script to present to the public.' They propose using 'chat GPT to generate us a story of young gay lovers from the twenties.' 'We trusted you with the Epstein files. We definitely can trust you with this.' 'Trust your government. Noticing is antiseptic.' Officials claim 'we might have found our suspect texting his furry lover,' though 'nobody my age sounds like that.' They assert 'he disassembled the rifle to fit it in his pants' and say 'the suspect's father turned him in' after video enhancement. Critics ask, 'Seems like they could just show the actual footage' and ask, 'Do they think we're retarded or something?'

"And just last night, the suspect was taken into custody at 10PM local time in less than thirty six hours, 30 three to be precise." "For thirty three hours, I was I was praying that that if this had to happen here, that it wouldn't be one of us." "This thing is not commercial at all. It is most likely a surveillance drone and someone was flying it over the campus for a particular reason." "The main suspect in Kirk's killing is now Tyler Robinson and he is in custody." "This translates to approximately one in 2,000,000,000." "The FBI agents didn't even bother to show him the photos of the shooter for twelve hours." "Yes. Yes. So when he's first spotted on campus, he has different clothing on," "Look folks, it's very easy to just believe whatever we're being told, but we cannot afford to do that anymore."

"Talk to me about the environment in which a shooting like this happens." "we don't know any of full details of this. We don't know if this was the supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or so. We have no idea about this." "He's been one of the most divisive, especially divisive, figures in this who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups." "I always go back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions." "And I think that's the environment we're in, that people just you can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place." "And that's the unfortunate environment we're in."

And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on to, we lost something important in America today. But, the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today. Yeah. I hope so. I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest. That's the latest I heard from law That's correct. Law enforcement. You're hearing the same thing.

Speaker 0 expresses anger that there are kids like him in the country who have had to go through this not once but twice. Speaker 1 notes that after shootings such as Parkland, there is typically a moment of expectation that there might be change and actual action, but it fades. He references that pattern after Sandy Hook, after Parkland, and after Uvalde, sometimes with some incremental progress, but nothing seemingly consequential. He says that has to be frustrating as a victim of this. Speaker 0 responds by stating it is not possible to put into words how frustrating it is, and identifies a common denominator inaction by Congress. He argues that time and time again, Congress has failed to show that they actually care about their constituents, and if they did, they would immediately pass comprehensive gun violence prevention bills. Speaker 1 asks how Speaker 0 is doing right now, noting that there is still a shelter in place on campus and in the area. He asks whether Speaker 0 is still in a shelter in place order. Speaker 0 confirms that he is safe in his dorm, but they cannot leave their dorms or buildings. He says physically he is safe and that he has had many friends and family reunited. Speaker 1 asks about Speaker 0’s family, acknowledging that they went through this with him once before and must be concerned tonight. Speaker 0 says the first person he called was his mom, which is the same thing that happened with Parkland. He describes seeing his mom go through those emotions all over again and feeling bad for her. He says it feels like he is 12 again, and it feels like it’s twenty eighteen again for his family as well, with them going through the exact same emotions.

And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on, we lost something important in America today. But, the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today. Yeah. I hope so. I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest. That's the latest I heard from law That's correct. Law enforcement. You're hearing the same thing.

Speaker questions the narrative: 'random trans shooter' on the roof who 'took this shot' and was 'undetected' because the FBI released video footage. He asks if this means 'he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior' and wonders 'why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?' He questions the lack of footage—'why don't we have any images of this kid leaving the school?' and 'video footage of this kid jumping off the roof?' He says, 'he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods' and argues, 'you definitely wouldn't carry the rifle with you' to blend in, citing 'an American flag shirt on.' He references 'criminal minds' and BAU, concluding, 'This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird.'

Why did the shooter act? Was he alone or connected to others? What motivated him? We sought answers from the DOJ and FBI, but they claim it's an ongoing investigation and can't share information with Congress. This is unacceptable. As a member of the intelligence and armed services committees, I regularly access sensitive information, so it's hard to believe we can't get updates on this investigation. I don't know if they're intentionally withholding information, but stonewalling is common in oversight. Misinformation thrives in the absence of clarity, and our goal is to provide transparency and counter conspiracy theories surrounding these events. So far, I have seen no evidence linking state actors to these assassination attempts.

"This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting." "It is a high powered bolt action rifle." "That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled." "So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon." "Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis." "Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive." "I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated." "As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that."

Speaker 0 politely asks for the audience to lower their voices and thanks someone for their question. Speaker 1 mentions that federal authorities were not informed about certain information regarding the shooter. Speaker 0 asks for clarification on who "they" refers to. Speaker 1 explains that it was the local police who did not share the information. Speaker 0 states that the matter is under investigation and asks not to argue. Speaker 0 acknowledges the concern in the community but states that the facts are yet to be determined. Speaker 0 declines to make assumptions and ends the conversation.

Investigators identified an individual as the roommate of Robinson, who stated that his roommate referring to Robinson made a joke on Discord. He opened it and showed several messages to investigators and allowed investigators to take photos of the screen as each message was shown by Robinson's roommate. These photos consisted of various messages, including content of messages between the phone contact name Tyler with an emoji icon and Robinson's roommate's device. The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point. Discord said: "In a statement to NBC News, a Discord spokesperson said the company did identify an account belonging to the suspect, but said the messages mentioned in the news conference were not believed to have been sent on Discord." "The messages referenced in recent reporting about planning details do not appear to be Discord messages." These were communications between the roommate and a friend after the shooting, where the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere; "The messages aren't between Tyler, the alleged shooter, and his roommate." They were about Tyler, not from him. This seems to contradict the governor's claims; "The governor never mentioned that these communications were between the roommate and another person." The governor started by saying the roommate told the FBI that Tyler sent him a joke, and then goes on to detail how Tyler allegedly told the roommate to watch over the area where the gun was placed. But asking someone to watch the area where the gun was placed doesn't sound like a joke. It sounds like a deliberate order to assist with the cover up of an assassination. And now, the shooter's own grandmother says the FBI have the wrong man: "There is no way Robinson could be involved. ... I don't think he ever shot a gun to tell you the truth, ... He doesn't own any guns." Up until this point, we haven't heard from the father or any other family members. This raises a very serious issue because right now there are two pieces of evidence that the FBI and the governor of Utah is presenting to the public as evidence that Tyler is the shooter. One is that his father convinced Tyler to turn himself in, and two, the supposed Discord messages. With the Discord messages already being called into question, and since we haven't heard from his father, we shouldn't consider this case closed.

- "And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on to, we lost something important in America today." - "But, the case goes on." - "The investigation goes on." - "There's a lot of piecing of evidence together." - "We don't have a shooter tonight." - "We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter." - "They have a couple hot leads." - "There's a little bit of foreign intelligence." - "And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today." - "I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest." - "That's the latest I heard from law" - "That's correct." - "Law enforcement." - "You're hearing the same thing."

There is reason for people to believe that this is a professional hit job. John Salmon is an excellent reporter, and Steven Crowder has some leaked information. I want to talk about both. I want to begin by saying that I'm very, very close with Charlie and his team, and here is the thing that I wish to relay to you from them: that there is some considerable evidence that there were state actors involved here. That's it. I don't want to go any further than that. I can't go any further than that. That is all I've that is what I've been told. It is not like this is exclusive to me necessarily. John Solomon said it last night on Sean Hannity's show. Here we go. There's a sense that we all lost something important in America today, but the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, a couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today.

The witness denied being on social media after the incident and claimed not to know his name and picture were circulating online as the shooter. The witness struggled to recall details when questioned about it. No further questions were asked, and the witness was excused.

- I recognized an individual and 'have taken down the cameras minute four after Charlie was shot? The back camera of all the ones when you take the front camera.' - 'I've never seen that. He's never been behind me at an event. He's never been lingering around me at an event.' - I asked about 'his presence behind Charlie' and 'the mysterious phone call ... minute three after Charlie was assassinated.' - He told me explicitly that 'they were trying something new that day. Like, it was something new. Charlie's super ambitious. And on the AV thing, they were trying something new, and they wanted to be able to feed it back instantly to Arizona.' - 'None of it makes sense to me because these events are typically livestreamed. But again, something new. Okay?'

Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.

We noticed a suspicious person, shared photos with snipers, but didn't receive a response. Secret Service didn't communicate with us before the shooting. Climbed onto the roof unsure of the situation, found the shooter's body. Despite efforts, we feel we failed that day as lives were lost and we could have done more to prevent it.