reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A protester disrupted an event, with the speaker identifying them as a "code pink lunatic" who believes that funding Israel is the greatest threat to world peace. The speaker claimed that Code Pink is funded by communist China.

Francesca Albanese, the UN Rapporteur on Palestine, is described as having said that America is controlled by the Jewish lobby. The speaker claims that on October 7 she defended Hamas, stating there was a context, and that she has been repeatedly echoing “the worst blood libels against Israel” on Twitter. The speaker further alleges that Albanese is “the leading purveyor of the genocide libel,” and says they are “fighting back” by exposing her and her hateful remarks. The speaker claims Albanese has become the first UN rapporteur in history to have been condemned by multiple countries, including France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Argentina, Hungary, the US, Latvia, Estonia, and other countries, and argues that “each condemnation matters.” The speaker says they led a campaign that collected 120,000 signatures, including people at the event, for a petition asking Secretary Rubio to take action after the United Nations failed to act. The speaker states that Secretary Rubio announced, for the first time in history, that the United States would sanction a UN official on July 9. The speaker says Albanese was sanctioned by the United States as a result. The speaker describes the sanctions as including a ban on Albanese’s entry into the United States. The speaker also claims that Albanese cannot use a bank card or a debit card, and cannot receive a payment. The speaker reports that Albanese said the sanctions are devastating, and quotes the speaker’s response as “very good, very good,” describing the sanctions as sending a message of deterrence. After the sanctions, the speaker claims additional consequences occurred. The speaker says they got Albanese’s husband, who works for the World Bank, who “shares in her incitement.” The speaker states that he was demoted from his position at the World Bank for incitement to hate. The speaker also claims that after Albanese was sanctioned, Navi Pillay, the head of the Commission of Inquiry against Israel, resigned. The speaker adds that they heard Albanese has family in the United States and that she was afraid the sanctions would prevent her from entering, leading her to resign. Overall, the speaker presents the sanctions against Albanese as unprecedented and connected to international condemnations and the petition campaign, and portrays the follow-on actions involving her husband and Navi Pillay as linked to her remarks and the consequences that followed.

A speaker stated that some males will refuse to vote for a female president because they don't think females are smart enough. The speaker then said, hypothetically, that those men could be lined up and shot for not understanding the way the world works. The speaker immediately retracted the statement and asked for it to be removed from the recording to avoid repercussions from the dean.

My son Sean was killed in the Benghazi attack. He was a proud member of the US foreign service. Sean told me he was going to die the night before the attack. He was murdered by terrorists. I blame Hillary Clinton for his death. She lied about the attack being terrorism. I saw her lie to me and call me a liar.

The speaker describes an incident attributed to Hillary Clinton and her spokeswoman, in which they allegedly: - put a five-year-old girl naked on a table, bound her, and, with a scalpel, began to remove the child's face. - the child screamed throughout the procedure. - Hillary Clinton allegedly put the removed face on her own face and approached the child. - the child, still alive, sees her own face on the face of Grindel as this happens. The speaker states that they will never forget that image and that it demonstrates “how evil these people are.”

The speaker is asked if they support Hamas killing 700 Israelis, including children, and kidnapping children. They respond by saying that the question is framed to make them look bad. They clarify that they do not support the United States, but they believe that the Israeli government is the real terrorist. The speaker is then asked a yes or no question about supporting the 700, but their response is not provided in the transcript.

Ilhan Omar, a congresswoman from Minnesota, is criticized for allegedly wanting to bring 1,000 jihadists sympathizers from Gaza to the state. The speaker questions how she was elected and mentions her attendance at a speech during their own campaign.

President Obama is being accused of being the founder of ISIS, with Hillary Clinton as the co-founder.

The speaker recounts an incident where Hillary Clinton fell while entering a van. According to the speaker's head of security, she was not going to the hospital to avoid examination, but instead to her daughter's apartment to see a "phony doctor." The speaker claims the staff had no loyalty to Hillary and observed her looking wobbly. One staff member said she almost fell into the crowd on stage. The speaker believes she was also sick with some kind of infection, observable for about a week. The speaker states they had people following her because the press doesn't provide truthful explanations.

Hillary Clinton's actions are criticized for being satanic, particularly her support for abortion. The speaker also mentions her alleged involvement in financing rebels in Syria, who later became the Islamic State. They suggest that the consequences of these actions speak for themselves.

Speaker 0 stated they were more concerned with Donald Trump's congresswoman. Speaker 1 asked if Speaker 0 had served in a combat zone and if they were still friends with school shooters, which Speaker 0 denied. Speaker 1 referenced a debate stage where Speaker 0 allegedly claimed friendship with school shooters. Regarding bullying, Speaker 0 said it's okay to bully the bully at times, which Speaker 1 interpreted as condoning bullying. Speaker 1 accused the Democrat party of violence and asked if Speaker 0 was at Tiananmen Square, to which Speaker 0 responded they were there in January 1990. Speaker 1 then asked, "What is a woman?" Speaker 0 said they didn't understand the question. Speaker 1 wanted Speaker 0 to say a woman is an adult human female and that men can't become women, accusing the party of erasing women.

Speaker 0 states that Speaker 2 has a reputation for texting underage girls. Speaker 0 claims Bill Clinton officiated Speaker 2's wedding with someone who was a right-hand person to Hillary Clinton in 2016. Speaker 0 mentions 650,000 emails and a folder with the words "life insurance," claiming that nine out of twelve NYPD cops who saw the email committed suicide. Speaker 0 then reads a list of 46 names of people close to the Clintons who have died, including James McDougal and Mary Mahoney. Speaker 2 accuses Speaker 0 of being a bully for reading the list and says Hillary Clinton is the problem. Speaker 0 asks how people close to the Clintons keep dying. Speaker 1 suggests cutting the list out, but Speaker 0 refuses.

Hillary Clinton is accused of being a super predator and supporting genocide. The speakers express anger and blame her for various atrocities, including the genocide of Palestinian people. They demand answers from Clinton.

Speaker 0 asks which actions by Hillary Clinton are the most satanic, stating “the willingness to kill babies innocent babies.” They question what happened in Syria with her financing the rebels, which allegedly “turned out to be the Islamic State.” They conclude, “All you have to do is look and see what's happened already.”

The speaker claims that Hillary Clinton was executed in Guantanamo Bay in December 2018. They suggest that the person we see on television is a body double. When asked how they know this, the speaker admits they are not a firsthand witness to the execution. They also mention that other high-level public officials, including Joe Biden, were executed by military tribunals.

The speaker was asked if they believed students protesting were motivated by anti-Semitism or horror at the Gaza slaughter. The speaker dismissed the idea of students being driven by horror and refused to continue the conversation if it was being recorded.

Kamala Harris was heckled at a Detroit rally with chants of "Donald Trump." The speaker claims Harris became visibly angry and asserted that everyone's voice matters, but she would speak at that moment. She challenged the hecklers to state their support for Trump directly. The speaker alleges Harris looked like she was going to cry and was yelling about an attack on fundamental freedoms. The speaker contrasted this with Trump rallies and stated Harris was done.

The speaker was asked how many civilians have been killed in Gaza. The speaker responded, "Who gives a shit? Okay." The speaker then stated, "Children grow up to be Arabs."

The conversation begins with the speaker asking if the person is still close to the Clintons and who they think is a better politician between Bill and Hillary. The person praises Hillary's political skills and intelligence but mentions the challenges she faced as the first woman candidate of a major party. The conversation then shifts to conspiracy theories surrounding Hillary and the speaker refuses to entertain them, stating that there is no credible source. The speaker then lists a number of names of people associated with the Clintons who have died, implying a connection. The person being interviewed strongly objects to this and accuses the speaker of spreading conspiracy theories and dishonoring the memory of the deceased. The conversation becomes heated and the person defends Hillary and criticizes the speaker for promoting baseless claims. The speaker tries to ask a question about why people believe these conspiracy theories, but the person continues to argue against them. The conversation ends with both parties expressing their frustration with each other.

Did he just call for the genocide of everyone who supports the Palestinian people?

A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.

The transcript captures a discussion about Clinton-related death conspiracy theories and how these claims circulate in political commentary. Speakers repeatedly assert that “the Clintons have killed” a large number of people—well over 100, with an figure cited of about 130—arguing that such deaths are linked to the Clintons’ power and to foreign policy actions, including a bombing campaign in Iraq and a massive blockade around Iraq that, according to UN estimates, contributed to the death of hundreds of thousands of children. One speaker emphasizes that “the body count is about 130” and notes that people know the body counts, even if some refuse to acknowledge the implication that politicians might have people murdered. A recurring theme is that there used to be a Clinton Body Count website tallying people connected to Hillary and Bill who were said to have been secretly killed; one participant says Hillary should demand its return and that the record is misrepresented. The conversation frames this as a widely held belief rather than proven fact, acknowledging skepticism about the claims while insisting there is “a lot of very suspicious deaths around the Clintons” that are fair to bring up. The discussion then shifts to particular cases and figures associated with Clinton circles. Vince Foster’s death is described as a conspiracy theory that never produced evidence, but the idea lingers. The panel also references other individuals—Mary Mahoney, John F. Kennedy Jr., James McDougal, and Mark Middleton—along with the broader pattern of deaths that are framed as connected to the Clintons, though without definitive proof being established on many of the cases. In the case of Mark Middleton, described as a longtime Clinton adviser who allegedly facilitated Epstein connections, Middleton’s death is recounted with details: found dead after driving to a Heifer Ranch, with an elaborate scenario involving hanging and a shotgun, an autopsy described as unclear, and a family that disputes the notion of suicide. The family has sought to seal photos and footage, arguing that releasing them would fuel conspiracy theories. The conversation also foregrounds Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was shot in Washington, D.C. The panel notes that Rich was connected to WikiLeaks and allegedly provided thousands of emails to WikiLeaks, with claims that Fox News reported an FBI forensic finding showing contact with WikiLeaks and the release of top DNC emails leading to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. There is debate among participants about whether Rich’s death was a botched robbery, noting that his wallet and watch were left behind and his phone was not taken, and that claims of murder are contested by others on air. Julian Assange and WikiLeaks are discussed as adding to the conspiracy milieu: Assange raises questions about killings, offers a reward for information, and is described as “working for Russia now.” The panel references the broader political pinboard: the Clinton/DNC nexus, the FBI/CrowdStrike narrative about the 2016 hacking, and the media environment around Russia investigations and alleged election interference. There is a sense of ongoing investigation and uncertainty, with speakers insisting that sources face danger and that certain deaths remain unresolved or contested in public discourse. Toward the end, the speakers reflect on how reputations attach to candidates; they compare Clinton-related reputations with those of other politicians, asking how, over the last fifty years, the pattern emerges that people close to Clinton figures die, while noting that public perception often constrains open discussion of these claims.

A woman asked a congresswoman if she would condemn the Hamas flag being flown outside the White House during a free Palestine protest last week. The congresswoman responded, "What are you talking about?" and "That sounds ridiculous." The woman then asked again if the congresswoman would like to condemn it.

The UN Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, is described as having said that America is controlled by the Jewish lobby. The speaker claims that on October 7 she defended Hamas by saying there is a context, and that she repeatedly echoes “the worst blood libels against Israel” on Twitter. The speaker states that Albanese is “the leading purveyor of the genocide libel,” and says their group is “fighting back” by exposing what they call hateful remarks. They claim Albanese has become the first UN rapporteur in history to have been condemned by France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Argentina, Hungary, the United States, and other countries including Latvia and Estonia, and that “each condemnation matters.” They say they led a campaign that gathered 120,000 people, including attendees, who signed a petition asking Secretary Rubio to take action because the U.N. failed to act. They say Secretary Rubio announced that, for the first time in history, the United States would sanction a U.N. official on July 9. The speaker asserts that the U.S. sanctioned Albanese and adds that this results in multiple restrictions: she is banned entry from the United States; she cannot use a bank card; she cannot use a debit card; and she cannot receive a payment. They quote Albanese as describing the sanctions as “devastating,” and as saying, “very good, very good,” and that it sends a message of deterrence. The speaker then claims consequences beyond the sanctions. They say that Albanese’s husband, who works for the World Bank and is described as sharing in her incitement, was demoted from his position at the World Bank for incitement to hate. After Albanese was sanctioned, the speaker claims that the head of the Commission of Inquiry against Israel, Navi Pillay, resigned. Finally, the speaker says they heard Albanese has family in the United States and that she was afraid that if she were sanctioned she could not enter the U.S., concluding that she resigned in that context.

A witness was suspended due to a protester. The protester, identified as a "code pink lunatic," claimed that funding Israel is the greatest threat to world peace. It was stated that Code Pink is funded by communist China.