reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Math suggests that due to the Earth's curvature, a 40-foot tall object should be invisible from 20 miles away. However, people have seen the Edelkapa Arch, which contradicts this math. A math professor confirmed that, according to calculations, it shouldn't be visible. Many of us won't reach altitudes above 73 miles, but observations from hot air balloons show that without fisheye lenses, the horizon appears differently. As the balloon ascends, the horizon distorts, but when it crosses the center of the lens, it provides a more accurate view of what is actually seen.

The speaker discusses the idea that the belief in a level Earth is often dismissed as a ridiculous conspiracy theory. However, they argue that it is actually a easily provable fact. They believe that once humanity realizes the truth about the Earth's shape, it will lead to a new era of enlightenment and expose those who have deceived us. They emphasize the importance of aligning our perception with the truth.

A couple tested the alleged earth curvature and found no evidence of it over water. They placed a laser 16.42 miles away from the observer, who was 4 feet above the water. According to calculations, the observer should have been 130 feet high to see the laser source. However, the observer's camera was only 2 feet above the water, yet they could still see the laser source. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the globe model.

The speaker explains that the apparent movement of the horizon throughout the day is due to changing atmospheric conditions, not a physical obstruction. They compare it to the convergence of the ceiling and ground at the end of a long hallway. The horizon is defined as where the sky appears to meet the ground. The speaker emphasizes that the horizon is an apparent location and not a physical hump. They also discuss atmospheric refraction, stating that it is a distortion of what is already in the field of view. They argue that the flatness of the ocean disproves the idea of a curved Earth and challenges the globe model.

In this video, the speaker demonstrates a proof of the Earth's curvature. They are 21.29 kilometers away from the other shore and show that there is a 40-foot hump of water obstructing the view of a mirror flash. They explain that if you try this experiment yourself, you will notice that as soon as the mirror is blocked, the flash disappears completely. This experiment serves as evidence for the curvature of the Earth.

The speaker challenges the idea that the Earth is a globe and presents what they believe to be scientific facts. They argue that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to claim that the Earth is a curved sphere. They also claim that objects can be observed at great distances, contradicting the idea of a globe Earth. The speaker mentions that the horizon always appears flat, and Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while other stars revolve around it. They question the unobservable theories of Earth's spinning and the Milky Way's motion through space. The speaker invites viewers to explore more on this topic through the provided links.

The speaker discusses the use of a sextant in celestial navigation and questions which horizon is being observed on a globe. They argue that the concept of a refracted horizon makes it impossible to measure angles and navigate using celestial bodies. The speaker criticizes the idea of presupposing a spherical Earth and creating artificial horizons to compensate for the refracted horizon. They claim that the black swan theory has debunked the curvature of the Earth and rendered celestial navigation on a globe impossible. The speaker concludes by stating that the globe theory has been invalidated since January 1, 2020.

The speaker marvels at the Grand Canyon and the mountain range in the distance. They question the globe theory and suggest there may be two realities at play. The speaker mentions supernatural beings and a flat earth perspective. They conclude by sharing an image from the infrared video clips and leave viewers to ponder its meaning.

In this video, the speaker discusses a new proof of the flat Earth from a frozen lake in Manitoba, Canada. The test involved setting up lights at different distances from the camera and observing if there was any curvature. The lights were all on the same flat plane, with no Earth bulge or physical globe horizon. By lowering the camera to different heights, it was shown that the lights should have been below the horizon if the Earth was curved, but they remained visible. The speaker emphasizes that this observation proves the Earth is flat and questions the lies perpetuated by those in control of education, media, government, and major institutions. The speaker encourages independent thinking and breaking free from mental controls.

The speaker argues that the theory of a flat Earth has been suppressed and ridiculed for centuries. They claim that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to believe in a spherical Earth. They also state that the horizon appears flat from all angles and that Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while the Earth does not move. The speaker dismisses the idea of Earth's rotation and the motion of the Milky Way as unobservable and unproven theories. They conclude by suggesting that there are many observable facts supporting a motionless, flat Earth that have been ignored in favor of untestable theories about a spinning, tilting, and spherical Earth.

In this video, the speaker questions the argument that we can't see the curvature of the Earth because it is so large compared to us. They argue that if this is true, then we shouldn't be able to see boats disappear over the curvature of the Earth. The speaker suggests that convergence might explain this phenomenon. They also express skepticism towards the theories of relativity, evolution, pollution, the Big Bang, and gravity, stating that these theories are presented as facts. The speaker encourages critical thinking and questions why people enjoy being lied to.

Speaker 0 presents a deep-dive critique of globe Earth claims, arguing there is legitimacy to a flat-Earth view. He starts by examining NASA’s most recent globe image from outer space, noting stars in the background and claiming the picture is from twenty-something years ago, and comparing two NASA globe images showing the United States at different sizes “in the very next year,” questioning how that is possible. He asserts the globe image has “copied and pasted clouds” and asks if the globe was made in Photoshop. He then discusses a moon picture with the earth behind it, urging attention to the sides and asking how the earth could be drastically smaller when observed from the moon, yet drastically larger when you’re about 50,000 miles away from the moon. He claims that, when put into context, “they’re completely lying to our faces,” and describes the lunar module as looking “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it a replica and a toy, and questions whether the buttons have real functions and why ten thousand buttons would be needed. He questions who recorded the lunar module launch, noting that there were no fully autonomous cameras or drones at the time, and asks “Who got left on the moon?” He asserts that the moon landing was implanted as a false reality on the subconscious mind to govern conscious behaviors, linking Apollo 11 to symbolic numerology (11) and stating that the moon and sun are symbolic pillars representing subconscious and conscious realms. He claims the moon landing was a symbolic act to capture imagination and limit consciousness. He asks if the Earth were a globe, one would have to sit at eye level with water to have a perfectly flat horizon, implying a flat horizon because Chicago’s skyline is visible from about 40 miles across Lake Michigan. He states that curvature would be eight inches per mile squared, so buildings would have to be level with the floor and would appear to lean if the Earth were globe. He claims there is no detectable curvature on any body of water, and that the horizon is merely how far the eye can see. Regarding circumnavigation, he asserts there is no proof of east-to-west circumnavigation but no evidence of north-to-south circumnavigation, arguing that north is the center on a flat map and that circumnavigating north to south would leave the magnetic field. He mentions Antarctica’s average elevation and its role in “holding all of the waters in,” and notes no country has a flag shape for its nation, while Antarctica does. He calls attention to the Antarctic Treaty and contrasts it with Greenland, and mentions crepuscular rays as evidence of a local sun, and claims that if the sun were 93 million miles away, light rays would be perfectly parallel and seasons would be explained differently. He claims the moon gives off its own light, with a few degrees colder Fahrenheit than the surrounding atmosphere, which would not be possible if the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. He references a model visually and asserts that what is shown makes no sense if the Earth is a globe. He concludes by saying the video is “the tip of the iceberg,” asserting that observing no curvature and the sun and moon appearing the same size and moving across the sky might reflect what’s actually happening. He ends with, “But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up,” and states, “This video was for entertainment purposes only.”

A person questions the roundness of the Earth and presents camera footage from 110,000 feet in the air without a fisheye lens. They argue that there is no curvature and that the sun does not appear to be 93,000,000 miles away. The person believes that some individuals are too indoctrinated to accept this evidence and urges them to wake up.

The speaker argues that the idea of a spinning ball Earth is ridiculous and unscientific. They claim that common sense and personal experience contradict the notion of a rotating Earth. They also argue that water always remains horizontal and cannot conform to the shape of a globe. The speaker criticizes NASA and other space agencies for providing manipulated images and videos of a globular Earth. They point out that long-distance photography and the horizon's flatness contradict the idea of a curved Earth. The speaker concludes by encouraging listeners to research and discern the truth for themselves.

The speaker claims that there is a hidden truth about who we are and where we come from, specifically that the Earth is flat and motionless. They argue that the pictures and videos presented by NASA and other space agencies are fake, while scientific experiments prove the Earth is flat. They believe that the curvature of the Earth is a myth created by fisheye lens footage and fake computer-generated images. The speaker encourages viewers to explore this rediscovery, as millions of people worldwide are waking up to this idea.

The speakers discuss whether the Earth is flat or round. Speaker 1 argues that it's not okay to say the Earth is flat, citing pictures from space as evidence. Speaker 2 mentions video footage of a rotating spherical Earth. Speaker 3 makes a random comment about robot polishers. Speaker 1 explains that if you observe a boat on a lake, it gradually disappears over the curved horizon, which wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. Speaker 4 defines science and mentions an experiment by Eratosthenes to determine if the Earth's surface is curved. They discuss the scientific process and the difference between pseudoscience and regular science. Speaker 5 mentions Einstein's explanation of gravity and the possibility of better models in the future. They also touch on the use of light to understand the composition of things. Speaker 7 talks about the conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry. Speaker 8 briefly mentions evidence suggesting the Earth's surface is either flat or much larger than believed. The video ends with a comment about academia's role in seeking truth.

Speaker 0 outlines a pattern they’ve found in the National Archives’ master list: the search term “lighthouse” appears 1,159 times, yet there are zero construction records or files proving how these lighthouses were built or funded by U.S. taxpayers. They argue that lighthouses were supposedly government-funded and built in the 18th–19th centuries, requiring surveys, material logs, engineering plans, and maintenance records, which should exist if these were real constructions. Cape Hatteras Lighthouse, they say, is officially dated to 1870, but the master list lists its construction date as nd (no date). They note the story of an original lighthouse (constructed in 1802, a 112-foot dark sandstone structure) that was demolished in 1871 and eroded in a storm, followed by the current 270-foot tower moved in 1999. They claim the unverified 1870 date and the missing original documentation undermine the official narrative. The White Shoal Lighthouse (the tallest on the Great Lakes) has no construction date in the master list, and no date is provided at all. They question the architect’s identity, noting the United States Lighthouse Board is cited instead of a named architect, and accuse the narrative of fabricating a board to pin lighthouses to the military, implying no real architectural attribution. Princess Bay Lighthouse (Staten Island, NY) also lacks paint records and a construction date in the master list, with no construction documentation or blueprints. Nash Island Lighthouse in Maine is discussed with speculation that houses built next to old-world structures may be the actual construction dates, given the lack of records for the lighthouses themselves. They question why a county with very few people (Emmett County, Michigan) would require a five-mile-offshore lighthouse in the 1850s, suggesting population data contradicts the claimed need for so many lighthouses. They discuss the Mount Desert granite lighthouse in Maine (20 miles offshore, built around 1830) and note that it originally had a bell tower, which was replaced by a steam whistle in 1889, along with the assertion that the house was built after the lighthouse. They observe repeated patterns of a granite first lighthouse being destroyed by storms or replaced, and they anticipate more examples as they continue to investigate. The Bodie Island Lighthouse in North Carolina is highlighted for its fresh paint and a new house, described as having an AI-like story that it is the third construction on the site, with earlier lighthouses abandoned or destroyed. They challenge the feasibility of powering these offshore lighthouses in the 18th–19th centuries with cables, noting that whale oil and kerosene were used for lighting, but suggesting a hidden mechanism. Overall, Speaker 0 argues the historical narrative is inconsistent, points to a recurring pattern across multiple lighthouses, and speculates that there may be a deeper, subterranean or “underneath the paint” connection among these structures. They close by proposing that these lighthouses might have been powered by free energy and could serve as evidence of a advanced preexisting civilization, while acknowledging skepticism about the mainstream account.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 describes a “backup experiment” designed to test a claim about the shape of the Earth, outlining the conditions under which light would be visible to an observer at different heights. The test hinges on sightlines through a series of holes and the illumination of a light source positioned at specific elevations above the water. The core proposition stated by Speaker 0 is that if one can see through a hole to the next hole and observe light at the backboard or at 17 feet off the water, the Earth is flat. On the other hand, if the light is only visible when the light source is held higher—specifically at 23 feet—then the Earth is curved. In other words, the claim contrasts two scenarios: visibility at 17 feet indicating flatness, and visibility at 23 feet indicating curvature. The summary of the criterion is that the observer should only be able to see the light when the light source is at 17 feet. Following this explanation, Enrique is instructed to proceed with the demonstration “down there,” with Speaker 0 directing him to hold the light at the stated height. The instruction is precise about the height at which Enrique should operate the light: 17 feet. The dialogue then records a moment of practical verification, as Speaker 0 notes that they cannot see Enrique—indicating the light is not in the immediate line of sight from their current vantage—and then instructs Enrique to “lift up your lift up your light way above your head.” This directive introduces an adjustment to the light’s position, moving it higher than the previously specified 17 feet, which aligns with the experiment’s focus on whether visibility persists at a higher elevation. The sequence emphasizes a procedural shift: after establishing the 17-foot height as a reference point, the participants adjust the setup by elevating the light beyond that height, potentially to observe how changes in elevation affect visibility through the experimental holes. The overall interaction is concise and procedural, centering on whether the light would become visible under different height conditions, thereby distinguishing between a flat-Earth and curved-Earth interpretation according to the stated criteria. The exchange ends with the instruction to raise the light, labeled as “interesting” in the transcription, signaling a moment of curiosity or anticipation about the outcome of elevating the light during the demonstration.

A couple tested the idea of Earth's curvature and found that there was no curvature over water, suggesting that there is no globe. They conducted a test with a laser placed 16.42 miles away from the observer, just 4 feet above the water. According to calculations, the observer should have been 130 feet high to see the laser source. However, the observer's camera was only 2 feet above the water, and they could still see the laser source. This raises questions about the accuracy of the globe model.

The speaker begins by looking up flights from New Zealand to Argentina on Google Flights. They find a flight with two stops: Los Angeles and JFK. The speaker questions the logic of flying all the way up to the United States and then back down to Argentina, as shown on a standard map. They then present a flat earth model, suggesting that the flight would be a straight line from New Zealand to LAX and then down to Argentina.

The speaker questions why independent travel and exploration of the Earth, including the North Pole and Antarctica, is heavily restricted. They highlight that even government employees and tourists are not granted the freedom to explore Antarctica. The speaker suggests that if the Earth is a globe, it should be easy to prove by allowing independent travel south of the South Pole or live streaming a circumnavigation from Antarctica. They also mention that historical circumnavigations have not been straight lines but rather convenient routes with stops. The speaker explains that North and South are not straight lines but points and tangent lines to the North Pole, while East and West are circular paths around the Pole. They challenge globe proponents to show what happens when traveling straight for 24 or 48 hours and to demonstrate what lies south of the South Pole.

At 9.35 feet above the lake, a target 17.82 miles away was observed at 2.79 feet above the surface. Calculations show a hidden height of 131.9 feet due to curvature. Use this to debunk claims of lake curvature. Visit f e core dot org for more information.

Infrared technology shows objects that should be hidden by Earth's curvature. Questions arise about Erastosthenes' shadow experiment proving Earth's roundness. The sun's size relative to stars and moonlight's coldness are discussed, along with shadows being warmer at night. Translation: The video questions the curvature of the Earth based on infrared technology, Erastosthenes' experiment, the sun's size, moonlight's temperature, and shadow temperatures at night.

Speaker 0 asks if the descent in the air is straight or if there is a dip. Speaker 1 confirms it is straight but suggests a slight adjustment with the nose. Speaker 1 then asks if there is any curvature while up in the air, to which Speaker 0 replies no, it's all flat. Speaker 2 confirms that the pilot believes the Earth is flat. Speaker 2 questions the speed of the ground's movement and its relation to landing direction, but Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 dismiss it, stating that the ground appears still. Speaker 2 mentions the possibility of seeing landmarks from Kansas, but Speaker 0 explains visibility depends on weather conditions. Speaker 1 interrupts to ask if they adjust for curvature while flying, and Speaker 0 replies that they fly slightly over a curved surface.

Water naturally finds its level, so whether it's in a cup or a large body of water, it appears flat. NASA admits to photoshopping Earth images, but they claim it's necessary. They also acknowledge that we can't go beyond low Earth orbit, which is much closer than the moon. However, when observing distant skylines or islands, there is no visible curvature as expected. The Michelson Morley experiment failed to prove Earth's motion, leading to the theory of relativity. The sun's claimed distance of 93 million miles is questioned due to the angle of its rays. Lunar eclipses have occurred with both the sun and moon visible, contradicting the explanation of shadow causing moon phases. Moon phases remain consistent despite the Earth's supposed orbit. The speaker, after unbiased research, believes the Earth is flat, questioning the accepted model of a spinning globe.