reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Carl Benjamin, known as Sargon of Akkad, discusses his recent de-platforming from Patreon after insulting Nazis on a live stream. He highlights that Patreon’s actions were unexpected and not aligned with their stated terms of service, which only cover platform activity. He relied on Patreon for significant income, and the sudden removal left him feeling vulnerable. Benjamin notes a trend of censorship in Silicon Valley, where companies like Patreon and PayPal seem to collaborate to suppress certain voices, creating a monopolistic environment. He expresses concern over the ethical implications of tech companies dictating societal norms, likening their influence to fascism. The conversation shifts to a controversial Gillette advertisement that promotes feminist narratives, equating normal male behaviors with toxic masculinity. Benjamin criticizes the ad for pathologizing typical boyhood play, arguing that it misrepresents male socialization. He believes that societal pressures should not dictate how boys behave and that understanding male nature is crucial for healthy development. The discussion also touches on broader political themes, including Brexit and the challenges facing the UK government, emphasizing the need for sovereignty and the complexities of international relations.

Joe Rogan welcomes Jon Ronson back to the podcast, where they discuss Ronson's recent work on a series for Audible called "The Butterfly Effect." The series traces the story of a tech nerd named Fabian who created Pornhub in the 1990s, revolutionizing the porn industry by offering free streaming content. Ronson explains how Fabian's actions led to significant financial consequences for traditional porn stars and producers, as the industry shifted towards free content and piracy. Rogan and Ronson delve into the challenges faced by porn stars, including difficulties in obtaining banking services due to the stigma associated with their profession. They discuss how the rise of Pornhub and similar sites has led to a decline in income for many performers, with some struggling to find work as the market has become saturated with new entrants. Ronson highlights the moral implications of this shift, noting that while consumers enjoy free porn, the performers often suffer financially. The conversation shifts to the impact of technology on the porn industry, with Ronson noting that the search engine optimization has changed the types of films being produced, often favoring titles that align with popular search terms. This has created a situation where many performers, particularly those who do not fit specific categories like "teen" or "MILF," find it difficult to secure work. Rogan shares anecdotes about the collapse of the traditional porn industry, mentioning a friend who lost everything due to the rise of free streaming sites. They discuss the broader societal implications of porn consumption, particularly how children today learn about sex primarily through online content, which can lead to misunderstandings and harmful consequences. Ronson recounts a specific case of a young man with autism who faced severe legal repercussions after texting inappropriate lines from porn films to a girl, resulting in his placement on the sex offenders registry. This example illustrates the unintended consequences of the porn industry's evolution and the stigma attached to those who engage with it. The discussion also touches on the stigma surrounding former porn stars, with Ronson noting that many face challenges reintegrating into society after leaving the industry. They explore how different cultures perceive porn and the varying degrees of acceptance for adult film actors. Throughout the conversation, Rogan and Ronson emphasize the humanity of those involved in the porn industry, countering stereotypes and highlighting the complexities of their experiences. Ronson expresses hope that his series will shed light on these issues and foster a better understanding of the consequences of the tech takeover of porn. As the podcast wraps up, Rogan encourages listeners to check out Ronson's work, including "The Butterfly Effect" on Audible and his film "Okja" on Netflix. They conclude with a discussion about the nature of public perception and the challenges of navigating societal norms surrounding sex and adult entertainment.

Patrick Bet-David hosts Laila Mickelwait, who initiated a petition with 2.33 million signatures to shut down PornHub due to its alleged involvement in trafficking and exploitation. Mickelwait shares troubling details, including internal communications revealing executives' awareness of underage content and their reluctance to remove it. She emphasizes that PornHub is not merely a porn site but a "crime scene" profiting from real sexual crimes, including child abuse and revenge porn. Mickelwait argues for the complete shutdown of PornHub, asserting that the site has perpetuated trauma for countless victims since 2007. Despite claims of reform by new ownership, evidence suggests ongoing issues with illegal content and inadequate moderation. The conversation highlights the role of financial institutions like Visa and Mastercard in holding PornHub accountable, as their withdrawal of services led to a significant reduction in content on the site. Mickelwait stresses the need for systemic changes in the porn industry to ensure age verification and consent, advocating for stronger laws against online exploitation. The episode concludes with a call to action for listeners to support the movement for justice and accountability in the adult entertainment industry.

The episode centers on a controversial wave in U.S. visa policy, highlighting the surprising dominance of influencers and OnlyFans models among recipients of a visa category meant for exceptional creatives. The hosts critique the broader cultural and economic implications, arguing that the confluence of libertarian attitudes, luxury consumption, and lax regulation has accelerated a normalization of highly visible, monetized content. They compare this trend to historical drug and gambling debates, underscoring how social stigma and policy choices interact to shape public behavior, while stressing the need for enforcement, accountability, and coherent norms to prevent a perceived decline in civic standards. A recurring thread examines the role of digital platforms, finance, and law in constraining or enabling growth, including a critique of how banks treat adult content businesses and the risks of unregulated monetization in new technologies. The discussion culminates in a call for thoughtful regulation that aligns technology with societal values without sacrificing essential liberties.

Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson discuss their decision to leave Patreon on January 15th due to concerns over censorship and the ethical implications of the platform's policies. They emphasize that this move is not financially motivated, as Patreon has been a significant source of funding for their work. Both express gratitude for past support from their patrons while highlighting the risks involved in leaving. They address the broader issue of free speech, particularly the influence of organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center in regulating online discourse. They warn about the potential for credit card companies to monitor spending habits based on moral judgments, which they view as a troubling trend toward censorship. Rubin and Peterson are exploring alternatives to Patreon, including the possibility of a new platform that could offer multiple payment options to reduce vulnerability to censorship. They acknowledge the complexity of the situation and the need for a careful, deliberate approach to finding solutions. The conversation concludes with a call to action for viewers to consider the type of internet and freedom they desire, urging them to express their concerns to credit card companies about their roles in regulating speech. They remain committed to developing a viable alternative while navigating the challenges ahead.

Laila Mickelwait discusses the dark realities of Pornhub, describing it as a "crime scene" due to the rampant presence of illegal content, including child sexual abuse material and non-consensual videos. She highlights the ease of uploading content without verification, which has led to widespread exploitation. Mickelwait's activism began in 2020 after discovering the extent of abuse on the platform, leading her to launch the #TraffickingHub movement, which gained over 2.3 million signatures advocating for accountability. Pornhub, owned by MindGeek, has a history of legal issues and negligence, failing to report child abuse for over a decade. Mickelwait emphasizes the need for age and consent verification to prevent further exploitation. Recent legal actions have forced Pornhub to remove 91% of its content, but challenges remain, especially with verified uploaders still posting harmful material. Mickelwait's efforts have garnered support from various allies, including former Pornhub executives and credit card companies, which have been pivotal in pressuring the site to change its policies. She advocates for comprehensive regulations across all user-generated content platforms to ensure safety and accountability. The conversation also touches on the implications of AI-generated content and the ongoing need for awareness and education regarding online exploitation, particularly for children.

The hosts, Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg, discuss various topics, including personal updates and business developments. Friedberg shares insights about the Production Board (TPB), which recently raised $300 million to support its incubated businesses, including a molecular beverage printing company called Cana. He emphasizes the importance of attracting talent and maintaining focus on specific sectors like synthetic biology. Sacks announces the closing of Craft's third fund at $1.1 billion, focusing on SaaS and marketplaces, and discusses the success of his podcasting platform, Callin. The conversation shifts to Zymergen, a synthetic biology company that faced significant setbacks, including a 70% stock drop after revealing issues with its product pipeline. The hosts analyze the challenges of deep tech companies, emphasizing the need for product-market fit and the dangers of overhyping potential. They also touch on the implications of funding models, particularly the risks associated with milestone-based financing and the importance of due diligence. The discussion highlights the contrasting approaches of firms like SoftBank, which engage in large, speculative investments, versus more cautious, milestone-driven strategies. The hosts express concerns about the trend of financial de-platforming, particularly in the context of companies like PayPal and Square, which have significant control over financial access. They discuss the potential consequences of this consolidation in the fintech space, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight and the importance of maintaining a decentralized financial ecosystem. Finally, they reflect on the broader implications of these trends for the tech industry, noting the potential for both innovation and risk as companies navigate the evolving landscape of finance and technology.

The discussion begins with light banter among the hosts about personal health and investments, particularly in Super Gut, which has aided in weight loss. The hosts then transition to discussing the Twitter Files, revealing a secretive system of shadow banning that targeted conservative voices, including notable figures like Dan Bongino and Charlie Kirk. David Sacks compares this to an FTX-level fraud, asserting that Twitter executives suppressed free speech rights under the guise of content moderation, contradicting their public statements. The conversation highlights the implications of this suppression, particularly regarding scientific discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic, with Jay Bhattacharya's experiences exemplifying the dangers of stifling dissenting opinions. The hosts argue that Twitter's actions were not merely content moderation but a violation of public trust, with Sacks emphasizing the need for transparency in social media practices. They also touch on the broader implications of demographic changes in countries like China and Iran, suggesting that younger populations are increasingly influencing political shifts. The hosts express concern over the intertwining of big tech and the security state, particularly in light of the Hunter Biden laptop story, which they argue was unjustly suppressed. Finally, they discuss the fallout from the FTX scandal, criticizing figures like Kevin O'Leary for their involvement and the ethical implications of accepting money from a fraudulent source. The conversation concludes with reflections on the need for accountability and transparency in both social media and financial sectors.

A study published in the British Journal of Criminology revealed that one in eight videos on PornHub displays sexual violence, including non-consent. Laila Mickelwait, a prominent advocate against online pornography, has been investigating the intersection of the porn industry and sex trafficking for over a decade. MindGeek, the parent company of PornHub, has a virtual monopoly on the global porn industry, with PornHub receiving 170 million visits daily at its peak in 2020. Mickelwait's campaign, which began in 2020, has gathered 2.3 million signatures to hold PornHub accountable for distributing illegal content, including child sexual abuse and non-consensual videos. Despite the site's vast content, it employed only 30 moderators to review videos, leading to a backlog of flagged content. Mickelwait emphasizes the need for verification processes to ensure the age and consent of individuals in videos. The financial model of PornHub relies on advertising and premium subscriptions, generating hundreds of millions annually. Recent efforts have led to Visa and Mastercard cutting ties with PornHub, resulting in the removal of 91% of its content. Mickelwait's book, "Takedown," details her journey and the systemic issues within the porn industry, advocating for stronger enforcement of existing laws against child exploitation and user-generated porn. She encourages public support through petitions and awareness campaigns to combat these issues.

The episode narrates the explosive rise and upheavals surrounding a dominant adult site network, detailing how a trio of Canadian students built a platform that outpaced its rivals by combining in‑house content, a traffic‑first growth strategy, and aggressive rollups of competing sites. After early years of directory links and pirated content, they built a unified hosting network, leveraging a top‑tier search‑engine optimization approach to become the leading destination for adult traffic. The story emphasizes the risky, high‑stakes nature of operating at such scale, including protective moves like securing content licensing, pursuing private equity style consolidations, and expanding via acquisitions to control more traffic and reduce vulnerability to lawsuits. The narrative ties in the tension between content creators, platforms, and the legal system, highlighting how different owners, from the original founders to later strategic buyers, navigated litigation, government scrutiny, and public relations. A pivotal shift occurs when a German founder reorganizes the empire, improves monetization, and uses aggressive debt to finance growth, culminating in a dramatic ownership transition to a shadowy overseas financier. This ownership change introduces new dynamics: vast leveraged debt, media strategy experiments, and efforts to diversify beyond adult content, including attempts to create broader media ventures. The discussion then pivots to the wider ecosystem around the company—payments processors cutting ties after a high‑profile activist intervention, private equity players entering the frame, and a series of ownership handoffs. The hosts connect the dot to broader themes about value creation, risk, and the human cost of rapid expansion in tech and media businesses. They also reflect on the idea that modern platforms can seem empowering and exciting while operating within a web of financial engineering, legal scrutiny, and reputational risk, ultimately offering a cautionary lens on scale, governance, and the human consequences behind a billion‑dillion‑dollar empire.

Laila Mickelwait, co-founder and CEO of the Justice Defense Fund, founded the Trafficking Hub movement and wrote Take Down: Inside the Fight to Shut Down PornHub for Child Abuse, Rape, and Sex Trafficking. The campaign began in early 2020 after Broward County’s 15‑year‑old was found in 58 PornHub videos and after a Sunday Times report detailing illegal videos including children as young as three. Testing PornHub’s upload system revealed that an email address sufficed to upload without age or consent checks, and that the site monetized content with ads on billions of daily impressions. By December 2020 PornHub was among the world’s most visited sites, with 170 million visits per day and 56 million pieces of content. To mobilize, she launched Trafficking Hub on Twitter, wrote an op‑ed, and started a Change.org petition that grew into traffickinghubpetition.com, now with millions of signatures from around the world. Victims described how their abuse appeared on PornHub and could not be removed; whistleblowers and MindGeek insiders provided information. MindGeek, later rebranded as ILO, allegedly monopolized the global big‑porn industry, financed by a $362 million loan from Colette Capital and investors including JPMorgan Chase and Cornell. The campaign pressed banks and credit cards to cut ties, arguing that monetizing trafficking content violated laws against knowingly benefiting from trafficking. A New York Times investigation, Nick Kristof’s The Children of PornHub, intensified pressure, and Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and PayPal withdrew support, leaving cryptocurrency as the remaining option. PornHub’s 24‑hour takedown deleted about 10 million videos and 30 million images, described by Financial Times as the biggest Internet content takedown; insiders later disclosed that TrafficJunky resumed monetization. Serena Fus and other victims filed lawsuits; discovery revealed the site relied on a single reviewer for millions of flagged videos and a backlog of tens of thousands. In 2024 European regulators required removal of thousands of child‑abuse and non‑consensual videos under the Digital Services Act. The company’s rebrand to Ethical Capital Partners continues, with still unverified content and a small moderation staff. The plan now emphasizes age‑ and consent‑verification for every person in every video and for uploaders, aided by third‑party verification technology that protects privacy. It also calls for modernizing USC 2257 and pressuring card companies to enforce robust verification. The episodes underscore that the solution requires accountability for financiers and cross‑border action; American Express remains the only major card not involved in online pornography. Signatures on traffickinghubpetition.com, reading Take Down, and joining Team Takedown at takedownbook.com are urged.

The podcast features a discussion with Solomon Friedman and Alexander, representatives from Ethical Capital Partners, who recently acquired PornHub. They address ongoing litigation and the controversial nature of adult content. Friedman emphasizes that adult content is constitutionally protected in Western democracies and highlights the opportunity to legitimize and modernize the adult industry, which has historically lacked mainstream investment. Friedman shares impressive statistics about PornHub, including 5.8 billion hours of content consumed in 2018 and 33.5 billion visitors that year. He notes that the platform has faced significant public scrutiny, with over 2.2 million signatures on a petition to shut it down, largely due to concerns about trafficking and underage content. However, he argues that these concerns often conflate consensual adult content with trafficking, which he believes undermines the agency of individuals involved in legal sex work. The hosts question the measures PornHub takes to ensure the safety and legality of its content. Friedman explains that the platform requires strict verification processes for content uploaders, including ID checks and biometric scans. He asserts that there is zero tolerance for underage content and that all videos are moderated by humans. He acknowledges the challenges of verifying the age of individuals in videos but insists that the platform invests heavily in trust and safety measures. The conversation also touches on the societal implications of pornography, with Friedman arguing that it can serve as a form of expression and connection for many. He believes that the adult industry should be destigmatized and that responsible practices can lead to a safer environment for all users. The hosts express concerns about the potential for underage access to adult content, to which Friedman responds that they advocate for device-based age verification to prevent minors from accessing such material. Friedman and Alexander discuss the company's commitment to transparency and safety, including partnerships with child protection organizations. They emphasize the importance of creating a safe platform for content creators and users alike. The podcast concludes with a discussion about the evolving nature of the adult industry and the need for responsible practices to ensure the safety and well-being of all involved.

The episode traces a controversial arc in tech and online entertainment, beginning with a young coder rising from privilege to become a pivotal figure in a global subscription platform. The narrative follows how his early ventures built a fortune through shady automation and adult content, eventually evolving into a more sophisticated business that used creator monetization tools, live streaming, and generous revenue splits to drive mass adoption. The story emphasizes timing, especially the surge in digital connection during a global disruption, which amplified demand from users seeking connection and supply from creators seeking income. It also highlights the tension between rapid growth and legal scrutiny, including investigations into content safeguards, regulatory concerns, and the reputational risk for investors tied to high-profile platforms. The episode explains how leadership shifts reshaped the platform into an adult-first ecosystem, with new marketing funnels and partnerships that drew millions of users and creators, while still facing lawsuits, settlements, and questions about payment handling, content moderation, and platform integrity. It discusses the financial engineering behind payout structures, equity arrangements, and offshore banking that sustained cash flow even as controversy mounted. The closing segments reflect the difficulty of exiting such a highly valued yet embattled business, the challenge of aligning incentives for continued growth, and the broader implications for founders, investors, and policymakers grappling with ethics, accountability, and the long-term viability of high-risk platforms. The episode leaves the listener with a meditation on the broader consequences of rapid platform-driven wealth, the social costs of a model that concentrates attention and money, and the uneasy balance between innovation, opportunity, and responsibility in the digital economy.

Meltem Demirors, the Chief Strategy Officer at CoinShares, discusses the evolution of her company and the broader cryptocurrency landscape. CoinShares began as an asset manager with a focus on exchange-traded products (ETPs) in Europe, managing around $700 million in assets. They offer products like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin trackers, with a strong emphasis on accessibility and daily tracking without premiums. Beyond ETPs, CoinShares has expanded into advisory services, venture investments, and capital markets, aiming to provide a comprehensive suite of services for investors interested in digital assets. Demirors highlights the challenges of educating policymakers about the differences between Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, noting that many in Congress conflate the two. She emphasizes the need for clear distinctions to avoid misinformation and misrepresentation in regulatory discussions. Her testimony before Congress aimed to clarify Bitcoin's unique attributes, as well as the risks posed by lobbying efforts from companies like Ripple, which may not align with the broader interests of the cryptocurrency community. The conversation shifts to the implications of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which Demirors views as fundamentally different from Bitcoin. She argues that CBDCs are designed to maintain government control over monetary systems, contrasting with Bitcoin's decentralized nature. Demirors expresses concern that the centralization of Bitcoin within existing financial systems could undermine its core values and privacy features. Demirors also addresses the potential risks to Bitcoin, including regulatory pressures and the centralization of custody solutions. She warns that as Bitcoin becomes more integrated into traditional finance, the original benefits of decentralization may be compromised. The discussion touches on the broader implications of technology and finance, with Demirors asserting that the future of financial services will increasingly rely on digital-first experiences and the integration of technology into traditional banking. The conversation then transitions to the topic of deplatforming and censorship in the digital age, particularly in relation to Zero Hedge's recent ban from Twitter for doxxing a scientist linked to the coronavirus outbreak. Demirors critiques the inconsistency in how platforms enforce their terms of service and the implications for free speech. She argues that while private companies like Twitter have the right to enforce their policies, the broader societal implications of censorship and the control of information are concerning. Finally, Demirors reflects on the current geopolitical climate, including the U.S.'s military actions and the potential for global unrest. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the incentives driving political decisions and the need for a more nuanced conversation about the role of technology and finance in shaping the future. The discussion concludes with a call for greater transparency and engagement in financial education, highlighting the need for individuals to take control of their financial futures in an increasingly complex world.

The episode centers on a wide‑ranging exchange between Theo Von and Tucker Carlson, blending politics, culture, media, and personal candor. Carlson sits with Von to reflect on leadership, sincerity, and the fragility of modern institutions, moving from jokey banter about wellness products to earnest debates about how truth, power, and influence shape public life. They discuss Carlson’s brand and the pressures of being perceived as an agitator or reformer, with him describing sincerity as a dangerous weapon in a media landscape prone to branding dissent as hate. The conversation then pivots to substantive political issues, including how Israel and Gaza are discussed in U.S. media, the ethics of intervention, and the responsibilities of public figures when asked to defend or question official narratives. The dialogue explores fear, meaning, and moral clarity, arguing that love for the people close to you and telling the truth are the anchors of a meaningful life amid systemic decay. It closes with reflections on the future of media, the role of leadership, and a personal resolve to resist cynicism by engaging with ideas honestly, even when they provoke controversy or misinterpretation. Weaving through the footage of contemporary conflicts and online discourse, the hosts critique how power brokers, tech platforms, and cultural gatekeepers shape what counts as acceptable speech. They debate the integrity of institutions, the perils of censorship, and the temptation to simplify complex geopolitical crises into neat narratives. The episode also scrutinizes how fame, money, and corporate influence interact with public opinion, including candid remarks about the business of nicotine products and the personalities who propel or undermine legitimacy in media, politics, and entertainment. The long discussion delves into questions of control, perception, and adaptability in a world that feels unstable and opaque. It touches on moral philosophy—the idea of meaning derived from loving real people and speaking honestly—and contrasts it with a modern climate of fear, labeling, and factionalism. The guests also examine how technology, social media, and conspiracy theories influence political engagement, urging a pivot toward principled dialogue, personal responsibility, and creative resilience in the face of a changing information ecosystem.