reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The CDC unanimously recommended the COVID-19 vaccine for 5 to 11 year olds, which has raised concerns about hidden incentives and liability immunity for manufacturers. The speaker questions the medical justification for vaccinating healthy children who have minimal risk from COVID-19 and already possess lifetime immunity. They argue that the potential harm from the vaccine outweighs the benefits, especially considering the limited testing done on children. The speaker compares the situation to the Tuskegee experiment, highlighting the lack of informed consent for children. They express shock and concern over the decision to vaccinate young children and believe it is an atrocity in the making. The speaker questions the justification of putting children at risk to protect others and emphasizes the importance of individual well-being.

Biden aims to vaccinate as many people as possible annually, benefiting drug and vaccine companies financially. FDA executive Christopher Cole predicts gradual mandates for COVID vaccines, including for toddlers. Despite concerns about the approval process, emergency use authorization is granted for all age groups based on limited data. The focus is on providing more benefits than harm, even for low-risk age groups like toddlers.

Biden wants as many people as possible to get an annual COVID vaccine. The speaker claims that drug, food, and vaccine companies pay reviewers to approve their products. They believe that if everyone is required to get an annual vaccine, it will bring recurring money to these companies. Christopher Cole, an executive officer at the FDA, says the approval process for the vaccines will be gradual and eventually become an annual requirement like the flu shot. The speaker admits they don't completely agree with the process, especially for toddlers, as there may not be enough testing. However, all age groups are approved under emergency authorization, with the focus on the benefits outweighing the harm. The approval process for toddlers is related to COVID.

Two years ago, the largest vaccination program in the country's history began. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of COVID vaccines, with reports of adverse events and deaths. Some believe that the government is influenced by corporate interests and that the CDC has become a marketing arm for pharmaceutical companies. Others argue that updated vaccines can prevent deaths from COVID. There are calls for transparency and acknowledgment of vaccine injuries. The CDC has added the COVID vaccine to routine vaccinations for all age groups. Critics question the safety of the vaccine and accuse authorities of lying. The emotional toll is evident as people express their frustration and loss.

According to VAERS, there have been 38,000 deaths from COVID shots. The speaker claims that under normal circumstances, the FDA would have pulled the shots, but instead, they've been put on the childhood vaccine schedule, with babies expected to get three shots by nine months old. The speaker states the shots are still under EUA status for those 12 and under, and are not fully FDA approved, yet are on the vaccine schedule. According to the CDC, nine million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots. The speaker expresses concern about myocarditis in children. The speaker believes the shots should have been shut down a long time ago.

Secretary Kennedy, the mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines are merely emergency use authorized medical countermeasures. This pathway bypasses standard pharmaceutical regulations and informed consent. Misrepresentations about these products' safety and efficacy are legally permissible, making official claims unreliable. These shots are now on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule for infants as young as nine months old. The current PREP Act declaration, extended until 2029, abuses federal law intended for short-term emergencies. This shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for deaths and injuries caused by these unsafe products. The FDA falsely claims full approval for those 12 and older, yet the injured are directed to a compensation program that denies almost all claims. I urge you to terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration and investigate the misuse of federal law in the pandemic response, which has led to a human tragedy and destroyed public trust.

Gates operatives escorted out as Bill Gates was escorted into the White House last night for dinner with president Trump. 'No press, no visitor logs, no photos were allowed.' The close friend of Jeffrey Epstein and vaccine pusher on unwitting Africans met Trump in a closed-door session reportedly lasting three hours. On the same day, the FDA quietly revoked emergency use authorization for mRNA COVID shots, only to reauthorize them for infants as young as six months and the broader at-risk population. 'So in one afternoon, they pull it, then put it back.' 'What the hell is going on here? The timing is no coincidence.' 'Secretary Kennedy said this, I promised four things to end COVID mandates, to keep vaccines available to people who want them, demand placebo controlled trials from companies, and to end the emergency.' 'Okay. But these things are contradictory.' 'Now Pfizer wrote this in their press release about it. They're saying that the COVID vaccine from Pfizer, was approved based on the listen to it.' 'This is how they do a slide of words. Based on the quote, cumulative body of evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer COVID vaccine, including clinical trial data supporting the approval for children five through 11 years of age.'

Dr. Menares and an interlocutor debate the science behind pediatric COVID vaccination and routine immunizations, focusing on transmission, hospitalization, and risk. - The interlocutor asks whether the COVID vaccine prevents transmission. Speaker 1 answer: the vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are infected, and with reduced viral load, there is reduced transmission. The interlocutor reframes, insisting that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and notes decreasing effectiveness over time, citing Omicron data showing around 16% reduction when there is a reduction. - On hospitalization for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 asserts the vaccine does not reduce hospitalization for 18-year-olds; statistics are inconclusive due to small numbers of hospitalizations in that age group (approximately 76 million people aged 18 in the country, with 183 deaths and a few thousand hospitalizations in 2020–2021; numbers have since dropped). The argument emphasizes a need to discuss the issue. - On death for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 says the vaccine does not reduce the death rate; claims there is no statistical evidence that it reduces deaths. Speaker 1 responds with a more cautious stance: “It can,” but Speaker 0 counters, calling that an insufficient answer. - The discussion references the vaccine approval process and ongoing debates in vaccine committees. The interlocutor states that when the vaccine was approved for six months and older, the discussion acknowledged no proof of reduction in hospitalization or death. The argument asserts that the justification for vaccination is based on antibody generation rather than clear hospitalization/death data. The interlocutor contends that immunology measurements (antibody production) do not necessarily justify vaccination frequency. - The core debate centers on what the science supports for vaccinating six-month-olds and the benefits versus risks. The interlocutor argues there is no hospitalization or death benefit for vaccination in this age group, and notes a known risk of myocarditis in younger populations, estimated somewhere between six and ten per ten thousand, which the interlocutor claims is greater than the risk of hospitalization or death being measurable. - The exchange then shifts to changing the childhood vaccine schedule, particularly the hepatitis B vaccine given to newborns when the mother is not hepatitis B positive. The interlocutor asks for the medical or scientific reason to give a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn with an uninfected mother, arguing that the discussion should focus on whether to change the schedule rather than declaring all vaccines as good or bad. - Speaker 1 says they agreed with considering the science and would not pre-commit to approving all ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0 disagrees, asserting their position that the debate should center on the medical rationale for these specific vaccines and schedules, not on a blanket endorsement of vaccines. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes examining the medical reasons and evidence for specific vaccines and schedules, rather than broad generalizations about vaccines.

Doctor Gruber discussed the need for further studies on myocarditis risk in pediatric populations before licensing the Pfizer vaccine. The FDA was aware of the risk before a meeting in July 2021. Vaccine mandates were not part of the FDA's considerations for licensure. Doctor Marks took over Gruber's responsibilities, appointed by Doctor Woodcock. The decision to approve the vaccine for children without proper testing is concerning, especially with reports of vaccine injuries. Congressional oversight is necessary for accountability and potential legislative reform. Marks pushed for a quicker timeline despite safety concerns, leading to the removal of top officials. The rush to mandate vaccines raises questions about prioritizing safety.

Vaccine recommendations typically come from the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices (an outside consulting committee at CDC) and VRBPAC (within FDA), which recommends vaccine licensure. These committees only adopted evidence-based medicine about twelve years ago. The speaker states that during their administration, they want safety studies prior to vaccine licensure and recommendation. They claim vaccines are exempt from pre-licensing safety testing, and the COVID vaccine was the only one tested in a full placebo trial. They assert that the other 76 shots children receive between birth and 18 have not been safety tested against a placebo, meaning the risk profile is not understood. The speaker intends to remedy this.

"The FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas." "The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over." "But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them." "We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on."

Joe Biden announced funding for a new vaccine, urging everyone to get it. Concerns have been raised about vaccine injuries, with reports of myocarditis, blood clots, and heart attacks. The pharmaceutical companies have not released their data on side effects. The speaker asks if the vaccine companies will be required to make this data public. The response is that they should, as transparency is important. The speaker emphasizes the need for facts to be made public immediately. They mention the unexpected nature of the pandemic and the devastating impact it has had globally. The conversation then shifts to President Biden's announcement of a new vaccine. The speaker questions whether the previous vaccine was ineffective and discusses the liability protection for pharmaceutical companies, which expires in December. They stress the importance of honesty and transparency from the companies regarding vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes by expressing the desperation of some people for the president's support in this matter.

The question asked whether the president believes the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. The response notes that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously approving four new COVID-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas. The revocation is described as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health emergency being over. To correct the record, it is stated that the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. The administration says, “We believe in individual choice,” a promise the president and the secretary have made and delivered on.

The speaker believes that gradually we will move towards mandatory vaccination, which will likely be implemented after the presidential election next year. However, before that, there will be an intermediate step of vaccinating children. The Pfizer laboratory has completed its study and found that the vaccine is effective and well-tolerated in children aged five to eleven. They have submitted their request for commercialization to the FBI in the United States. Cuba has already started vaccinating children from the age of two. Therefore, the question of vaccinating children aged two and above will arise.

We're seeing the tip of the iceberg. So right now, I think probably the most prominent, demonstration of that, is, what secretary Kennedy did with changing the childhood schedule for COVID nineteen. In that, we were directed that only children with underlying conditions would be the ones that should qualify for vaccination. That's not what the data shows. Six month old to two year old, their underlying condition is youth. Fifty three percent of those children hospitalized last season had no underlying conditions. The data say that in that age range, you should be vaccinating your child. I understand that not everybody does it, but they have limited access by narrowing that recommendation. Insurance may not cover it.

Pfizer presented evidence to the FDA on their trial for 6-month to 4-year-old children. Out of 4,526 children, 3,000 dropped out of the trial, which is concerning. The trial defined severe COVID as a slightly raised heart rate or increased breaths per minute. In the vaccine group, 6 children aged 2 to 4 had severe COVID compared to 1 in the placebo group. One child in the trial was hospitalized after vaccination. The trial twisted the data by ignoring cases of COVID during the 3-week gap between doses and the 8-week gap after the second dose. Ultimately, they only compared a small number of cases, claiming the vaccine was effective.

The government urges people to get vaccinated to protect themselves and others. Businesses are encouraged to require vaccinations for employees. Approval for vaccines for children aged 5 to 11 is sought to ensure school safety. The recent FDA approval may help increase vaccination rates.

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The Trump administration's Operation Warp Speed developed a COVID vaccine quickly, but critics argue that the program protected drug companies from liability for vaccine injuries. The government's compensation program for harm caused by vaccines has been criticized for being bureaucratic, with only 8 payouts out of 12,000 claims filed. The issue of liability for vaccine manufacturers has been a topic of debate since Reagan's presidency. Some argue that those harmed by vaccines deserve accountability and that free speech is crucial in discussing the merits of vaccines. There is a call to end crony capitalism and lobbying in government, with a focus on preventing government officials from joining companies they previously dealt with. The government's actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, including vaccine mandates and the approval of mRNA shots for young babies, are seen as problematic. There is a desire for accountability and a promise to clean house in agencies like the CDC, NIH, and FDA to prevent similar situations in the future.

According to VAERS, there have been 38,000 deaths from COVID shots, but instead of being pulled, the FDA has doubled down and put the shots on the childhood vaccine schedule. Babies are expected to get three COVID shots by nine months old. The shots are still under EUA status for the under 12 age group and are not fully FDA approved, yet they are on the vaccine schedule. The CDC states that nine million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots. There is concern about myocarditis. It is believed that the shots should have been shut down a long time ago.

The CDC has recommended COVID vaccines for everyone over the age of 6 months, which contradicts the UK's recommendation for those over 65. The CDC's communication does not mention the vaccines being safe and effective. They provide some data on the estimated risk of hospitalizations prevented per 1,000,000 doses, but there is limited information on adverse reactions. The speaker questions the CDC's thinking and highlights the high number of adverse reactions compared to the number of hospitalizations prevented. They also mention the increase in the price of COVID vaccines and raise concerns about the independence and trustworthiness of drug regulators. The symptoms of COVID are similar to those of a common cold for most people.

In this video, an executive officer at the FDA named Christopher Cole discusses the government's desire to mandate annual COVID vaccines for everyone, including young children. He mentions the financial relationship between the FDA and big pharma, with drug companies paying the FDA millions of dollars to approve their products. Cole expresses concerns about the approval process for vaccines in young children, stating that there haven't been enough tests done. He also mentions the lack of protection for whistleblowers and the pressure to stay silent within the government. Overall, the video raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of mandating annual vaccines for all age groups.

No children died from COVID in 2020, so there is no need for them to be vaccinated. The government's role in this situation cannot be denied, and many Americans are outraged and angered by the lack of accountability. The worst thing to happen to our country and the world, in my opinion, is the ongoing vaccine mandates.

None of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have undergone proper testing. No childhood vaccine has completed a placebo-controlled clinical trial with sufficient duration and power to confirm its safety before being administered to millions of children in America. This is not an opinion; it can be verified by anyone visiting the FDA website, where the package inserts and clinical trial documents are available for review.