reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The member from Spadina, Fort York, addressed the prime minister regarding national security and the upcoming Hogue Commission report on foreign interference. He questioned the prime minister's ability to work alongside ministers who may not be serving Canada's interests, implying that at least one minister could be compromised. In response, the prime minister criticized the member's comments as disgraceful and irreverent, emphasizing the seriousness of national security issues. He pointed out that the member's alignment with the Conservative Party is concerning, as their leader lacks the necessary clearance for briefings essential to keeping Canadians safe.

The Prime Minister is under fire for his "radical liberalization of hard drugs," specifically the decriminalization of fentanyl, crack, and heroin in partnership with the BCNDP, and lowered jail sentences for fentanyl producers. Eighty percent of fentanyl ingredients enter Canada unregulated, threatening the trade relationship with the U.S. The Prime Minister is accused of scoring "cheap political points" instead of delivering solutions based on science, compassion, and a public health approach to the toxic drug epidemic. The opposition claims it is irresponsible to allow unregulated fentanyl ingredients into the country and to decriminalize hard drugs, which has allegedly led to increased deaths. They also allege that the Prime Minister, along with the Bloc and NDP, recently voted in favor of a committee report to decriminalize fentanyl nationwide. The question is raised whether the Prime Minister opposes the decriminalization of the export.

Let's focus on what we can do, like addressing organized crime. That's point 2 of the criminal code, according to the leader of the opposition.

The speaker uses offensive language to describe someone as crazy and uses a derogatory term.

The Prime Minister is under fire for his "radical liberalization of hard drugs," specifically the decriminalization of fentanyl, crack, and heroin in partnership with the BCNDP, and lowered jail sentences for fentanyl producers. Eighty percent of fentanyl ingredients enter Canada unregulated and are then manufactured into fentanyl. This threatens the trade relationship with the U.S. The Prime Minister is accused of scoring "cheap political points" instead of delivering solutions based on science, compassion, and public health. The opposition claims it is irresponsible to allow unregulated fentanyl ingredients into the country, decriminalize hard drugs, and then support decriminalization nationwide despite rising deaths. The Prime Minister is asked to confirm he opposes decriminalization.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition for suggesting that everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wanting to make Canada great again. Canadians do not share this nostalgia. The speaker highlights the leader's past as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, where he violated the rights of indigenous peoples, ignored environmental responsibilities, and lacked a plan for the future.

A speaker stated that it is negligent for the council to allow disinformation to be spread without correction. The speaker claimed that one of the speakers at the meeting spread misinformation and disinformation. They wanted it on the record that statements made by speakers are not necessarily factual.

Aaron Gunn, Shadow Minister for Ethics and Accountable Government, said the Liberals shut down the investigation into a “condo billionaire bailout” in Ottawa, calling it an attempt to cover up misdeeds and another Liberal scandal. Jacob Mantle, Member of Parliament for York-Durham, said Liberals provided no answers to basic questions about who benefits from the bailout, who asked for it, and how it would work. He described the bailout as “moral hazard,” saying it socializes losses and puts taxpayers on the hook, shutting out the next generation of homebuyers. Gabriel Hardy, Member of Parliament for Montmorency—Charlevoix and Quebec Region, said it was “so simple as a motion” to ask for facts and questions to be answered by those who took the decision, so people would know what is happening with their money. He said the Liberals shut down debate and committee, and accused them of not wanting oversight. Hardy added that ethics committees must adapt to what is going on, and said the Liberals’ actions were a “big problem.” Gunn added that the group were all millennial members of Parliament and criticized the Liberals for justifying the billionaire bailout with taxpayer dollars taken from Canadians still trying to save for a first home. He said the bailout transfers wealth to individuals who made billions over the past 20 years. Gunn also criticized Liberals who complained about having to be in Ottawa in July, saying they had been elected to stand up for constituents as loud voices and call out corrupt behavior, and said they would continue to oppose what they called another Liberal scandal.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

How many more children must die, Prime Minister? It's time for a change. Let's make a real difference for our children.

Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development, outside. Ministry of Women and Gender Diversity. You can't give an inch to the left. Can you define a shitty lefty? Because they're all shitty. What madness are we living in? The madness of stupid political correctness where if you don't recite cool socialism, if you're not woke, then you're violent, a danger to democracy. Come on. Sure. Let's continue with this nonsense and instead of being united, let's create the biggest slum.

The parliamentary secretary responded to a member's question about whether they were following the Liberal Party or Communist Party of China line. The parliamentary secretary challenged the member to say it publicly outside the room, where parliamentary privilege does not apply.

He's labeled me venomous and disgraceful, criticizing the Supreme Court situation and calling me radical. Yes, we recognize his erratic behavior and lack of sound judgment. His time is limited, and we will unite against him. He's also called me a racist. We must confront an administration that is too male, too pale, and too stale. Thank you.

Friday's events were unacceptable and embarrassing to the House and Canadians. The speaker should listen to members and step down.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

Speaker 0: Battle River Crowfoot, Tony Lauren. Speaker 1: Farmers want the carbon tax axed. The PM's promise of an independent senate is a farce. He bullied his senators to gut bill c234. The PM lied and his minions continue to act out of order. Speaker 0: Order! Retract and apologize for using that word. Speaker 1: I won't apologize to that broadcaster. Speaker 0: Apologize or leave. Speaker 1: It's the truth. Speaker 0: Leave now. Speaker 1: Fine, I'll leave.

Speaker 0: We are proud to have penetrated the cabinet. Speaker 1: A constituent asked about outside interference in our democracy. Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, boasted about infiltrating governments worldwide, including over half of Canada's cabinet. Can the member disclose which cabinet ministers support the WEF agenda for transparency? Speaker 2: Sorry for the poor audio and video quality. I'm unsure if the member...

You've betrayed Canada for globalism. You're not serving our country but your globalist allies. I question how much you're being compensated for this betrayal. What should we do with traitors in Canada, Mr. Trudeau? Historically, they faced severe consequences for treason, and your actions feel similar to that betrayal.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.

Mister President, can you address the funding pause? I don’t think this is the right time for that question. The government is performing well, and we are making significant cuts. Thank you.

During question period, a member accused another member of being an anti-Semite, which was deemed unacceptable. The speaker requested an apology for the comment. Another speaker expressed support for Canadians' right to go about their daily lives without disruption caused by illegal protests. They emphasized the need for these protests to cease.