TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

Data indicates a mechanism is impairing uteruses, causing placentas to flatten and lack blood vessels needed to nourish the baby. Maternal death rates are reportedly up 40%. All the information is available, and the speaker believes the time for action has passed.

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to nearly 6 in my career. In 2021, stillbirth rates for fetuses are alarming, with a rate of 29.3, indicating a significant deviation. Instances of stillbirths and fetal abnormalities are on the rise, possibly linked to the inflammatory effects of vaccines. Safety monitoring systems have not identified increased risks for pregnant individuals receiving vaccines. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to harm, as known for decades.

The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.

The speaker discusses the risks of pregnancy and not giving birth to the child. Pfizer provided important data, revealing that out of 29 specific members in their study, 28 women did not have children. 23 lost their babies within the first 20 weeks, while the remaining 5 experienced stillbirth or fetal death. Only one child survived out of the 29. The speaker also mentions the number of viral particles in the mRNA vaccines, which is 40 trillion. They express concern about the potential harm to the immune system and urge people to stop taking the vaccines.

BioNTech's studies lacked clear guidance and evaluation of results from contract laboratories. The reproductive toxicology studies on pregnant animals showed side effects were dismissed as unimportant or already seen in control populations. This lack of seriousness in safety strategy was concerning.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to 5.8-6 per 1,000 live births. In 2021, the stillbirth rate for fetuses is alarming at 29.3 per 1,000. Reports from Waterloo, Canada show 83 stillbirths out of 4,000 deliveries, with 13 dead fetuses in a 24-hour period. Vaccines are linked to inflammatory effects causing fetal harm. Safety monitoring systems found no significant risks for pregnant women. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to damage, injury, and death, a known fact for decades.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

Speaker claims COVID is a respiratory infection, but Pfizer documents show 'a three sixty degree obsessive focus on ruining human reproduction.' They say researchers studied 'ruining fallopian tubes, ruining ova, ruining placentas, ruining fetuses in utero, ruining the birth process, ruining lactation' and ask, 'Why is that?' They assert lipid nanoparticles 'traverse the placenta' and cause placental calcifications 'which prevent the baby from getting nutrients and oxygen.' They report babies born early because placentas cannot grow normally, and that 'placentas are flat.' They say lipid nanoparticles would go into the baby, 'degrading the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells of baby boys of vaccinated moms,' noting 'Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are the factories of masculinity.' An andrology report allegedly 'confirmed that the injection killed the ants and motility of sperm in men.' Pfizer allegedly warns not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, 'two reliable forms of contraception.' They state 'two seventy women got pregnant in the study of vaccinated women' and 'two thirty four of them, the records of what happened to that pregnancy were lost,' and 'of the thirty six women who gave birth, over eighty percent of them lost their babies.'

We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.

Speaker 1 discusses important findings from autism research that families should know when making decisions. The FDA will act on acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with the FDA responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis of ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development, and the FDA has evaluated contrary studies that show no association. Today, the FDA will issue a physician’s notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. The FDA recognizes that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy, as other alternatives have well-documented adverse effects. HHS encourages clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Thanks to politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution with acetaminophen use by young children, given that strong evidence also associates it with liver toxicity. Some studies have found that use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. The FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, and families. In addition to a possible acetaminophen connection to autism for pregnant women, infants, and toddlers, the research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child’s brain can lead to autism. There are also other confirmation studies. One finding cited is that two studies show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, highly likely because they’re given Tylenol. The speaker notes that none of this is positive, but it is information that should be paid attention to. Speaker 0 comments that there is a tremendous amount of proof or evidence, though he is not a doctor, and that he studied this a long time ago.

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

Despite it being treated as an obligation to do so, physicians reportedly do not know these facts. The speaker expresses strong frustration about the situation. The speaker cites a famous medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, describing a study of vaccine researchers and stating that “the 12.6 percent user rate” was reported, and that the paper claimed there was no problem with the vaccine based on that figure. Using that paper as a basis, the San Fujikawa Society or a similarly named organization promoted vaccination for pregnant women. However, the actual content of the data is described as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in the late stage of pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stage (first trimester). For the subgroup limited to those under 20 weeks’ gestation, i.e., the 127 individuals, the reported miscarriage rate was 82 percent. From this, the speaker argues that the vaccine is dangerous, given the result for the early-stage group. It is claimed that the data were hidden or obscured, and that the later report combined the late-pregnancy group of 700 with the early-pregnancy group of 127 to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate, which was then published. The speaker concludes that even a major medical journal could be influenced by external financial pressures, resulting in biased reporting that supports the other side’s interests.

According to the speaker, now that people are getting the documents from the trials, the miscarriage rate was eighty percent in the Pfizer trials, and they knew that. Obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Kimberly Biss observed disturbing trends in her patients after the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021. She noticed her miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by a hundred percent. She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and published her findings on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022. The speaker also claims that a lot of medical schools, 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma.

I have decades of experience in high-risk obstetrics and have seen a rise in stillbirth rates, with some cases showing alarming numbers of fetal deaths and complications. The vaccine has been linked to inflammatory effects that can harm pregnancies. Despite safety monitoring systems finding no significant risks, inflammation in pregnancy can lead to serious consequences.

Researchers caution acetaminophen including Tylenol might affect fetal development. In a new consensus statement, international scientists insist there's a growing body of research suggesting acetaminophen could increase the risks of certain neurodevelopmental, reproductive and urogenital disorders, adding the drug could be linked to conditions such as ADHD and fertility issues. "It's important to realize that acetaminophen is a drug like any other drug." Along with Tylenol, acetaminophen is in more than 600 pain medications. Experts advise anyone using those meds daily for two weeks or longer to see their doctor. But it's okay to take Tylenol for a day or two as medically directed. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada tells CBC News the evidence for harm is based mainly on animal studies and encourages more research. "When you're pregnant, you really don't wanna take chances."

Recent reports from fertility clinics indicate alarming issues with the reproductive health of vaccinated individuals. Men’s sperm is reportedly not swimming, and women’s eggs are not developing into embryos, with many contaminated by non-organic substances. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed an 80% miscarriage rate among vaccinated women in early pregnancy, significantly higher than the baseline rate. Additionally, there is a noted 79% increase in fetal malformations and unprecedented stillbirths. A database of over 6,000 women highlighted severe menstrual irregularities, including cases of extreme bleeding and decidual cast shedding. Concerns grow that many young women may face infertility due to vaccination, leading to unimaginable consequences.

The discussion centers on ivermectin and various claims about its origins, promotion, and effects. One speaker asserts that ivermectin is made by big pharma, specifically naming Merck and vaccine companies, and that people are using it because influencers told the public to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic, while not disclosing that cell phone towers are in front of their houses. The speaker claims that people took ivermectin instead, and states that ivermectin is linked to liver toxicity, jaundice, brain damage, and infertility, suggesting these risks are part of a broader strategy to reduce fertility in the population. The other speaker counters by describing ivermectin as having productive toxicity, noting this is observed in animal studies, including rabbits and other mammals, and rejecting the idea that its toxicity is limited to arthropods like crabs or cockroaches. This speaker claims it is a well-proven reproductive toxic substance for many mammals. They reference another video discussing the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin and mention that veterinarians discuss routine use and continued use of ivermectin, associating it with various adverse outcomes.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

In the past, obstetrics has seen a series of interventions with harmful consequences. X-rays were used in the 1930s to measure pelvises, but they were later found to cause cancer in babies. In the 1950s and 1960s, a drug called Thalidomide resulted in babies being born without limbs. In the 1990s, the use of Cytotek to induce labor in women with previous caesareans led to numerous ruptured uteruses and deaths of babies. Unfortunately, there hasn't been enough careful study of the long-term effects of these interventions in obstetric practice. To ensure a more humanized birth experience, it may be best to explore alternative options.

The statement is backed by nearly 100 scientists and doctors from around the world. They insist a higher level of caution is needed when pregnant people use fever and pain meds that contain acetaminophen, Tylenol. The authors don't have any new evidence showing the drug harms a developing fetus, but their statement does say a growing body of experimental and epidemiological research suggests that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen might alter fetal development, which could in turn increase the risks of certain neurodevelopmental, reproductive, and urogenital disorders. It cautions pregnant women about using acetaminophen. And that is the active ingredient in Tylenol and many other medications that so many of us use to relieve pain or fever.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

Many drugs once deemed safe and effective have been removed from the market due to serious health risks. For example, Accutane was linked to liver damage after 27 years, and DES, initially used to prevent miscarriages, was found to cause them instead. Thalidomide, which caused severe birth defects, also raised concerns. The funding sources for studies are crucial, as industry grants often influence research outcomes. Universities and nonprofits may receive funding from these industries, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, medical journals rely on industry advertising, which can compromise their integrity. A significant issue is that companies can selectively publish data, omitting studies that do not support their claims. Ultimately, the field of science is lacking in ethics.

Dr. James Thorpe, a board-certified maternal fetal medicine and OBGYN physician, discusses the concerning increase in pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, infertility, fetal anomalies, and chromosomal abnormalities. He presents data showing the high number of deaths associated with a drug that was rolled out despite being known as the most dangerous in medical history. Dr. Thorpe reveals that the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, FDA, and medical boards were aware of the risks but chose to bury the information due to financial interests. He emphasizes that using novel substances in pregnancy goes against the golden rule of medicine and highlights the catastrophic problems caused by this drug. The American College of OB GYN's narrative is driven by financial motives, as they would have to repay millions of dollars if they change their stance.