reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

The Biden family received over $15 million from foreign nationals and companies, including Ukraine, Russia, and China, between 2014 and 2019. Joe Biden has lied about his involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings at least 16 times. The president met or spoke with Hunter's foreign business associates at least 22 times. Checks written to Joe Biden were found in banking records, including $40,000 from China and $200,000 from a bankrupt healthcare company linked to his brother James Biden. The evidence is clear, and the Constitution requires the House to follow the truth. We have a duty to continue the process.

My son has not made money. The House Oversight Committee found checks totaling $240,000 in Joe Biden's account from Hunter's dealings with a Chinese energy company. Hunter sent messages demanding payment, leading to $5,000,000 wired to a joint venture. Money then moved to Hunter's company, his uncle James, and finally Joe Biden. The White House denies Joe's involvement, but questions remain. More bank records are expected.

The speaker claims to have seen suspicious activity reports suggesting that the Biden family received over $50 million in payments. It is not just Joe Biden, but also his son Hunter Biden, brother James Biden, and even their grandchildren who allegedly received money from Communist China.

Congressman James Comer, chair of the House Oversight Committee, reveals new information about the money flowing into the Biden family. From Ukraine, they received $17 million, and from China, at least $3 million. There are also funds from Romania. Additionally, it is discovered that Joe Biden used pseudonyms in official business emails and copied his son, Hunter, on these messages. This contradicts Joe Biden's claim that he had no knowledge of his son's involvement in corrupt activities. The mainstream media's lack of coverage on this issue is disappointing, and there are allegations of a government cover-up. While there is a report of a potential federal indictment against Hunter Biden for a gun charge, it is considered minor compared to the other crimes he has allegedly committed.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

Joe Biden's son, Hunter, received $40,000 in laundered money from China, which ended up in Joe Biden's bank account. Hunter extorted an associate, claiming his father would turn against him if he didn't pay up. As a result, $5 million was sent from a Chinese company to a joint venture involving Hunter. From there, the money was transferred through various transactions to hide its origin. Ultimately, $40,000 was given to Joe Biden, labeled as a loan repayment. This shows how Joe benefited from his family's dealings and cashing in on his name, with money from China. These actions also raise concerns about potential blackmail and prioritizing personal gain over America's interests. The House Oversight Committee will continue investigating and holding President Biden accountable for his alleged corruption.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

The speaker is asked about the appropriateness of his son's work in China and Ukraine. He denies any wrongdoing, stating that he carried out his job impeccably and that no one found anything out of line. He also mentions that the person who got in trouble in Ukraine was trying to bribe the government to say something negative about him, which never happened. He denies his son making money from China and dismisses the claim that his son received a large payment from a Ukrainian company. He concludes by stating that there is no basis for any wrongdoing in Ukraine.

House oversight claims to have bank records indicating that a Chinese energy company paid three members of the Biden family through a third party. The purpose of these payments is unclear. The speaker refuses to comment on the matter, citing the history of inaccuracies and lies from House Republicans on this issue.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

President Biden's denial of discussing business with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The speaker claims that Joe Biden's 40-year career in Washington, DC is the Biden family business. The speaker presents evidence of James Biden receiving a loan based on his political connections, and then transferring money to Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions an email referring to Joe Biden as the "big guy" in a joint venture. The speaker accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into Joe Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics.

The speakers discuss the evidence for an impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden. Speaker 2 argues that the Bidens' ownership of expensive homes and receipt of large sums of money from overseas interests, along with the existence of shell companies, suggest corruption and money laundering. They also mention that the prosecutor investigating the company Biden's son worked for was fired. Speaker 1 supports this argument and mentions the possibility of a foreign corrupt practices act investigation. Speaker 0 questions the lack of indictments and subpoenas, but Speaker 1 explains that an impeachment inquiry is needed for jurisdiction. They conclude by emphasizing the evidence of over $20 million received by the Biden family.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

Speaker 0 asks if the viewer is aware of the money that went through Rob Walker's Chalk Companies. Speaker 1 claims to have left these matters to Mr. Weiss and not interfered. Speaker 0 suggests that looking the other way implies knowledge of illicit activities. They mention the China initiative leading to convictions and imply that bribes are given in exchange for something. Speaker 0 questions the credibility of North Korea being a significant threat, considering the alleged payments made by China to the Bidens.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

Joe Biden's son, Hunter, received $40,000 from China through a series of financial transactions involving a Chinese company linked to the Communist Party. Hunter extorted money from a CEFC associate, claiming his father, Joe Biden, was aware. The money flow included $5,000,000 wired to Hunter's joint venture, with subsequent transfers to family members. Ultimately, Sarah Biden wrote a $40,000 check to Joe Biden, labeled as a loan repayment. This reveals how Joe Biden benefited from his family's dealings with China, potentially compromising America's interests. The House Oversight Committee will investigate further.

The speaker discusses the potential crimes committed by the Bidens in relation to their dealings with China. They mention that the Bidens could be charged as unregistered foreign agents, potentially involved in bribery, wire fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. The speaker finds it insulting that these actions have not been reported. They believe that Joe Biden's involvement borders on treason and that he has not been honest about his family's financial dealings. The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the truth and reveal Joe Biden's role in receiving the money. The speaker concludes that Joe's claim of having no knowledge is a blatant lie.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of working for a Russian oligarch and misusing money. Speaker 1 denies the accusations and criticizes Speaker 0's integrity. The conversation becomes heated as they argue about truth and lies. Speaker 1 questions the DOJ's treatment of him compared to Speaker 0. Speaker 0 mentions Speaker 1's conviction and reduced sentence. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0's credibility. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 accusing Speaker 0 of not being able to handle the truth.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

Joe Biden's son, Hunter, received $40,000 from China, contradicting Joe's previous claim that his son didn't make money there. Hunter extorted money from an associate, using his father's influence. The Biden family engaged in complex financial transactions to hide the Chinese money's source. A Chinese company wired $5 million to a joint venture involving Hunter, who then sent $400,000 to his own company. From there, $50,000 in cash was withdrawn and deposited into James and Sarah Biden's personal account. Sarah later wrote a $40,000 check to Joe, labeled as a loan repayment. This shows how Joe benefited from his family's dealings with China, potentially compromising America's interests. The House Oversight Committee will investigate further.

Chuck Grassley's audio recordings allegedly show conversations between Joe and Hunter Biden, contradicting Joe Biden's claim of no contact with Burisma. The laptop also reveals Hunter paying for a cell phone for his father, suggesting a back channel of communication. The Oversight Committee plans to subpoena phone records to confirm these conversations. The committee is relying on previous research to issue subpoenas and gather more evidence. The Bidens received $83,000 a month from Burisma, with an additional $5 million separate from that. The family has received around $31 million from China, $5-7 million from Ukraine, and $3.5 million from Russia. The total foreign money received by the Bidens is estimated to be over $50 million. The Bidens' lack of a legitimate business raises questions about the legality of their dealings.