reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FDA and government agencies are accused of covering up deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations, including fatal blood clots and allergic reactions. A father, whose son Ernesto Ramirez Jr. died from myocarditis five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, shares his tragic story. Despite being a healthy boy who loved sports, Ernesto collapsed while playing basketball. The father, devastated by his loss, refused FEMA's offer to change the cause of death to COVID for financial assistance, stating he would not dishonor his son. The father’s account highlights the emotional toll and raises concerns about potential coercion and misinformation surrounding vaccine-related deaths.

During a recent football game, a player collapsed on the field, and some people on Twitter quickly blamed the vaccine for his seizure. Dr. Fauci expressed concern about the spread of misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms. He emphasized that conspiracy theories can lead to people deciding not to get vaccinated, putting their lives at risk. While there is a small shred of evidence linking vaccines to myocarditis, it is extremely rare and generally resolves quickly. In contrast, COVID itself poses a much higher risk of heart-related issues. Dr. Fauci also mentioned that the player's collapse was likely due to a traumatic injury, not the vaccine. He has been dealing with the spread of misinformation throughout the entire COVID pandemic.

I was fired after 31 years as an ER physician for questioning the need for vaccination in those with natural immunity. Pfizer's biodistribution studies revealed that the COVID vaccines spread throughout the body, causing a wide range of side effects due to the spike protein reaching all organs.

The speaker discusses the code blue emergency situation in hospitals and the increase in code blues after the rollout of the COVID vaccine. They mention hearing 1 code blue per shift for 10 years, but after the vaccine, they heard between 6 to 10 code blues per shift, mostly in the lower level injection clinic. The speaker also shares that two colleagues had anaphylactic shock after receiving the vaccine, indicating significant harm. They express frustration about being pressured not to report adverse events and being fired for speaking out. Despite facing consequences, the speaker emphasizes their courage in addressing uncomfortable topics and asks others to consider their motives for speaking out.

I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you. Translation: I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you.

The speaker, a former sports commentator, shares how his life changed after questioning the media's portrayal of COVID-19. He faced backlash on social media but also gained a large following. He lost his job at Sky Sports due to his views and became concerned about athletes collapsing during games. He contacted football associations and wrote a letter expressing his concerns, which gained support from many former footballers. Eventually, the FA informed him that professional footballers in England were no longer encouraged to get vaccinated. This news brought him a sense of relief and a feeling of a small victory in a larger battle.

I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician without any patient complaints. My dismissal was due to my belief that individuals with natural immunity did not need vaccination. While I lost over 50% of my income and can no longer work in the emergency room, I still maintain my private practice. I discovered that Pfizer's biodistribution studies revealed the vaccines spread throughout the body, not just remaining in the arm. The messenger RNA from the vaccines affects various organs, including the brain, lungs, heart, liver, reproductive organs, and bone marrow. This widespread distribution is why the COVID vaccines have resulted in a broader range of side effects than any other medical treatment in history.

Florida's surgeon general raised concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines, while the federal government continues to promote them. This video tells the story of Maddie, a child who participated in Pfizer's vaccine study. After receiving the second dose, Maddie experienced severe symptoms including chest pain, abdominal pain, and loss of feeling in her legs. Despite seeking medical help, her symptoms were dismissed as anxiety. Maddie's case was not properly reported, and the FDA granted emergency use of the vaccine for children based on this study. Other children also experienced serious adverse effects, including heart problems and death. Maddie was eventually diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The government and those involved in the study declined to comment. Maddie's parents are hopeful for her recovery but have lost trust in the medical system.

A father rushes to the hospital after receiving a call about his daughter. She had taken the COVID vaccine without informing her parents. The daughter's condition worsens, and she is moved to the ICU. It is later discovered that she developed heart damage from the vaccine. The family initially didn't realize the connection but eventually researched and found the truth. The daughter's health deteriorates rapidly, and she passes away. The autopsy reveals vaccine-induced myocarditis as the cause of death. This tragic incident highlights the potential risks associated with the COVID vaccine, particularly in children.

A woman describes how unfounded information claiming that vaccines are “killing weapons” and that COVID is something related to people spread through her family and community. This misinformation contributed to a breakdown in her marriage and family life. A husband became absorbed in online content around May of last year, and his behavior changed. In August, the husband gathered what he had researched and printed it on A4 paper, which he then distributed around the middle school attended by his daughter. On a separate occasion, the husband distributed a flyer himself. The flyer claimed that the average remaining life after vaccination was about 2 years, and the family argues that distributing such flyers caused conflict, as the husband insisted that what he was doing was correct while the wife and others questioned why they were opposed to his actions. The wife recalls how, when she left the house to go out, her child would sometimes hear from others that wearing a mask was unnecessary, or that COVID-19 was merely a flu, and that they should not bother with masks, handwashing, or disinfection. The husband would dismiss precautions, saying, “the coronavirus is just a flu,” and would frequently go drinking with like-minded friends despite concerns about the family’s safety. The family’s situation deteriorated as the wife and children felt continually pressured by the husband’s views and actions, and attempts to intervene or stop the spread of misinformation led only to arguments, not resolutions. The family’s fear of contamination and the idea that the house could be contaminated weighed heavily on them, causing ongoing tension. As a result, to protect the family’s safety, the woman separated from her husband in February of this year. This separation created fractures within the family, with strains and conflicts arising over the dissemination of misinformation that labeled vaccines as dangerous and questioned the legitimacy of public health measures. Regarding the sources of misinformation, there is mention of papers or studies that claim certain things, which some use to fuel demagogic rhetoric. However, the speakers acknowledge that when they look at such literature, many sources lack scientific validity, and that reading them leaves a sense of frustration. The speakers emphasize that there are references circulated, but the scientific adequacy of those references often does not hold up upon closer inspection.

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and criticism. In another segment, an IT worker is accused of spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The worker appeared in court, and the health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The worker allegedly shared cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine, citing cardiac arrest, brain bleeds, blood clots, and aneurysms as causes of death. The speaker emphasizes that they are not an expert but are willing to face criticism if it helps stop the misinformation.

Speaker 0 confronts a pharmacist about their son's hospitalization due to myocarditis after receiving a COVID jab. Speaker 0 is upset that his wife was not informed about this potential side effect. Speaker 1 explains that they may not disclose the side effect to avoid scaring parents away from vaccinating their children. Speaker 0 expresses disbelief and insists that parents should be given accurate information to make informed decisions.

Ernest Ramirez shares the heartbreaking story of his 16-year-old son, Ernesto, who tragically passed away just five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Ernesto's father met him at a summit in Kentucky. Following his son's death, FEMA reached out to Ernesto's father, offering to cover the burial expenses, but only if he claimed that his son had died from COVID. Ernesto's father finds this situation appalling and expresses his disgust.

Ernest Ramirez shares the heartbreaking story of his 16-year-old son, Ernesto, who tragically passed away just five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. He mentions meeting Ernesto in Kentucky during a summit. Ernesto's father was later contacted by FEMA, who offered to cover the expenses for his son's burial, but only if he claimed that Ernesto had died from COVID. Ernest Ramirez expresses his disgust at this situation.

A nurse injured by the COVID vaccine has spent the last four years building a community of vaccine-injured people. She asks others to join her in taking down "these criminals." Another individual states they will fight for the cause for life, even if they have to do so from a wheelchair, as they currently cannot stand for more than a minute without convulsions. They want to help people of their generation, who they believe are heavily influenced by the media, understand that things can go wrong. They feel obligated to speak up and will never back down.

This is the story of Maddie, a 12-year-old girl who participated in Pfizer's COVID vaccine study for children. After receiving the second dose, Maddie experienced severe symptoms including chest pain, abdominal pain, and loss of feeling in her legs. Despite her deteriorating condition, doctors dismissed her symptoms as anxiety. Maddie was hospitalized multiple times and diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The family believes that Pfizer, the FDA, and the study leaders tried to cover up Maddie's case. The FDA granted emergency use of Pfizer's vaccine for children based on this study, but there were no official hearings on vaccine side effects. The family's trust in the government and medical professionals has been shattered.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

Vaccine makers face the challenge of misinformation. The speaker believes those who deliberately spread misinformation are criminals because they cost lives. They shared a personal story of their wife's death after getting the vaccine, which was falsely attributed to it. The purpose of spreading such lies was to discourage people from getting vaccinated. The speaker emphasizes that the number of people who died due to not getting vaccinated far outweighs the individual cases like their wife's. Therefore, they consider those spreading misinformation to be criminals.

He was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the VAIR system, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. He was required to do this by law and he whistle blew on his organization on the High Wire show with Dell Bigtree. He also did a little piece for the New York Times. This was when the man gays were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine and I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after without warning. I was surrounded in the middle of my shift; I had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.

The speaker states that they were fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). They say they were required by law to report to VAERS, and they whistleblew on their organization on The HighWire show with Dell Bigtree. They also did a piece for the New York Times. This occurred when the man gays were coming down and they asked why the speaker wasn't getting the COVID vaccine, and the speaker talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after, without warning, they were surrounded in the middle of their shift. They had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They were surrounded and then literally thrown out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because the speaker was supposed to go back and see them for discharge, and they don’t know what happened to them.

Chris and I chose not to vaccinate, concerned about myocarditis. Our family faced tension over vaccination choices, especially after Rory's tragic incident. He got vaccinated and soon after reported discomfort. One night, he collapsed, and despite my efforts to reach him, he was gone. The health commissioner stated that the risks of the vaccine weren't clearly communicated, but it wasn't a breach of rights. Rory's death was linked to acute myocarditis from the vaccine. Many believe the vaccine is safe, and experts emphasize its effectiveness. However, there are concerns about the pressure to vaccinate, which some feel compromised their choices. Ultimately, the message remains that the vaccine is considered very safe.

A plastic surgeon from Utah, Dr. Michael Kirkmore Jr., faced 35 years in prison for allegedly refusing to follow the COVID narrative. He and three other doctors were accused of destroying over $20,000 worth of vaccine doses and issuing nearly 2,000 fraudulent vaccination cards. Instead of administering the vaccine, he allegedly gave patients saline shots, providing a way for them to attend school without the vaccine. Authorities investigated after tracing patterns where government-supplied COVID-19 vaccine doses were destroyed, and fraudulent CDC vaccination cards were issued. Some people paid dollars per card. Dr. Kirkmore was indicted on charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, but the charges were dropped mid-trial. Supporters claim he didn't profit and acted on principle, giving parents a choice and saving lives. While what he did was illegal, some believe he was justified in helping people avoid something he felt was harmful or unnecessary.

A nurse shares a story about a 10-year-old who had a heart attack and had to fight with a doctor to get the necessary tests done. The nurse mentions that there is victim shaming when it comes to vaccine injuries, as healthcare providers won't get reimbursed if it's labeled as such. The nurse also compares the healthcare system in the United States to developing nations, stating that the level of care has deteriorated. They mention reports of patients not receiving food or water and the difficulties in advocating for their basic needs. The nurse expresses frustration with the restrictions on helping patients, particularly those on ventilators.

100 Canadian children have died after receiving Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, but this information is being covered up. Many kids were mandated vaccines to play sports. No one is taking responsibility for these deaths, with Health Canada, public health officials, and medical organizations all denying any deaths from the vaccines. The speaker has reported on these deaths on social media, leading to attempts to shut down their accounts.

Ernest Ramirez shares the heartbreaking story of his 16-year-old son, Ernesto, who tragically passed away just five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Ernesto's father met him at a summit in Kentucky. To add to their grief, FEMA contacted Ernesto's family and offered to cover the burial expenses if they claimed his death was due to COVID-19. This unethical proposition is deeply disturbing.