reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm amazed to be part of the entertainment industry, coming from a small town in Indiana. And just to clarify, I am not a pedophile.

Speaker 0 believes the school system intentionally avoids teaching about money to produce compliant employees. School discourages mistakes, promotes individual work, and seeks single correct answers, which Speaker 0 says is the opposite of real-world success. This paralyzes graduates, killing their spirit of learning. Speaker 1 relays that children are told not to report bullying to their parents, because parents might bring weapons to school and someone could die. Speaker 1 also states that people shouldn't be judged for wanting to have sex with a five-year-old.

We all saw how Weeknd’s cast changed radically, but no one explains why. The industry doesn’t elevate celebrities; it destroys them to exploit them. It’s important to understand that Ariana does not exist. She has been erased and replaced. She speaks of memory loss and going into a clinic. This isn’t marketing; it’s the effects of a CIA program, and declassified documents explain the techniques: drugs, hypnosis, sleep deprivation, electroshock, rape. Ariana speaks of extreme anxiety, sexual abuse at Nichellodéon, and she has also admitted losing years of memory. If Cynthia reacts oddly, it’s because she received a precise role, the master who watches the slave. So the seemingly incomprehensible gestures are actually codes to keep Ariana under control. For the industry, she is a functional puppet, and the butterfly is the visual code of her new personality. If the victim panics, the refuge phrase is “behind the rainbow.” It’s not poetry; it’s the land of wonders the victim creates to reassure herself. Wicked is based on The Wizard of Oz, and the film stages electroshocks. Because Judy Garland suffered the same program, a former child star of The Wizard of Oz, exploited, medicated, raped. And then Britney Spears, the same anxiety, same loss of control, and tears in interviews. They are not unstable artists; they are victims of mind control. So learn to read the symbols.

"Don't read all the things written about me. I wasn't aware that the world thought I was so weird and bizarre. But when you grow up as I did in front of 100,000,000 people since the age of five, you're automatically different. My childhood was completely taken away from me. There was no Christmas. There was no birthdays. It was not a normal childhood. No normal pleasures of childhood. Those were And that's why I love children and learn so much from being around them. I realized that many of our world's problems today from the inner city crime to large scale wars and terrorism and our overcrowded prisons are a result of the fact that children have had their childhood stolen from them. The magic, the wonder, the mystery, and the innocence of a child's heart are the seeds of creativity that will heal the world."

Speaker 0 notes the intense public interest in the relationship and asks how Speaker 1 deals with it. Speaker 1 responds that they try not to worry about what others think and focus on doing what feels right for them. Speaker 0 then asks how they met, but neither party is comfortable commenting on the topic.

New Yorkers hate politicians they can't trust more than those they disagree with. The speaker was asked if their different speaking accents in different scenarios are real or affected. They responded that as an immigrant born in Kampala, Uganda, raised in South Africa, and moving to the US at seven, there are different parts of their life. They referenced a worldwide tour and press tour when they were a rapper. They mentioned bringing flavor to fish and rice. They also mentioned being in a Disney movie directed by their mother, stating nepotism and hard work go a long way, and that they speak a certain way in New York City.

As a child, I attended 37 different schools because my parents were in the movie business and running from a cult. This combination could lead to paranoia, according to psychologists.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 what they think about the imagery behind them, given that Speaker 0's parents were born in the USSR, and questions whether it conflates ideologies and a movement. Speaker 1 responds that communism doesn't necessarily mean dictatorship, but acknowledges that it often turns out that way. Speaker 1 then admits to feeling like a hypocrite and shrugs.

You went to Cranbrook, a private school. What's the story behind you in Paris? This guy seems like a gangster. His real name is Clarence, and he comes from a stable family with both parents present.

The discussion centers on stress, guilt, and conflict. "Is that why you look a little haggard right now? Because you look a little worn. No offense." "I've been drinking a lot, but Is that because of the stress of this?" "Of course, stress, guilt, just conflict of all kinds." "I do feel bad about it. I also feel proud of it." "It's a terrible conflict. Because you've pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes ever because of your And because I made a film, if you wanna call it a film, which I considered to be my masterpiece." "And you can't take credit or even talk about it as if as if Well, I'm here you are now. I'm hereby taking service. Right." "But you can't actually go out. You're doing when people see this"

A former child star from an iconic American TV sitcom contacted the speaker to say she is leaving woke Hollywood. She learned that the pending reboot of the series would be very progressive and woke, turning her character into an unlikable conservative. She refused to participate and is walking away from the project. The speaker is conducting a face-to-face interview with her, which will be released soon.

Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1 claims to hate children in interviews. Speaker 1 explains that in today's world, it's easier for a single man like him to say he doesn't like children. Speaker 0 suggests that Speaker 1 says this to avoid tabloids speculating about him being a pedophile. Speaker 1 agrees and questions how anyone can truly know if he is or isn't.

Speaker 0 claims that upon arrival, girls scream, John Kits can't take it, and rich kids have access to spas or sleepovers with Saudi Princesses. They mention bling tests, OS, and Morse code. They claim to have been sprayed with a hose for 3 days at the VMAs. They state that when they are no longer useful, they will be hunted for sport by rich businessmen at a resort. Speaker 1, identifying as Boba, Figio, and Powell, suggests the previous statements are a practical joke.

Speaker 0 questions if the theory of secretly saving the world from a satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals is something Speaker 1 supports. Speaker 1 responds by saying they haven't heard of it, but they are open to the idea of helping to save the world and are willing to put themselves out there.

The speaker is questioned about his time at West Point Grey Academy and his relationship with a convicted sex offender. The speaker denies any involvement in sexual misconduct and refers to his autobiography for more information. The speaker is then asked about the attention he received from teenage girls in the yearbook and if there were any relationships with them or their mothers. The speaker claims to have been a good teacher and struggles to remember the details of his departure from the school.

Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.

Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 was stolen and adopted. Speaker 1 confirms and reveals they found out about their adoption at the age of 5. Speaker 0 inquires if Speaker 1 ever tried to find their biological family, to which Speaker 1 responds negatively. However, six years ago, Speaker 1's brother reached out to them, but Speaker 1 clarifies that they didn't want to ask for money.

Speaker 0 marched in the civil rights movement to change attitudes. They were involved in desegregating movie theaters and organizing voter registration drives. Speaker 0 sat in black churches with Jewish rabbis, preparing to desegregate movie theaters. They have been involved in causes since they were 18, including desegregating restaurants. However, according to the New York Times, Speaker 2 claims that Speaker 0 lied about marching in the civil rights movement. Despite being reminded of this, Speaker 0 continued to tell the story. Speaker 2 finds this behavior strange.

Speaker 0 claims Bill Gates, Tom Hanks, and Lady Gaga are part of a reptilian race. Speaker 1 states that entertainment and information are now closer than ever, and this trend is unstoppable. Speaker 0 admits to not having a solution. Speaker 1 then says, "Come on, Bill."

Speaker 0 raises a provocative question about Hollywood: whether famous people must sacrifice their first born child to reach a certain level of success. They ask, “Is that a crazy thing to say?” Speaker 1 responds by distinguishing between what can be proven and what is believed. They say they do not have proof for the claim, but they believe a club exists that grants certain levels of stature, influence, or power in exchange for a blood sacrifice or a sacrifice involving a family member. They suggest the sacrifice could involve a mother or a relative, or even a transition of one’s child, asserting that the motivation behind these acts is worship of a god described as a false god. Speaker 0 prompts for concrete signs that would support this belief. Speaker 1 explains that signs could be observed by researching public information about celebrities. They propose using Google to examine how many stars have lost a parent or a child, or have died in accidents, or died during a particular period in their life. They also suggest looking into how many stars have transgender children and to consider who might be pushing that narrative. They imply that these patterns or coincidences could be indicators of the claimed “club” and its requirements. Speaker 0 characterizes the described phenomena as dark. Speaker 1 reiterates that the phenomenon is satanic, identifying it as Baphomet and associating it with evil. Speaker 0 concurs, reinforcing the assessment as very dark. In this exchange, the speakers discuss the existence of a supposed exclusive group within Hollywood that requires extreme personal sacrifices—potentially including a child or a parent—as a precondition for attaining high levels of fame, power, or influence. The claim is framed as belief rather than proven fact, but it is presented with the assertion that signs could be investigated through public records and celebrity life events, including parental loss, child loss, and the presence of transgender children among celebrities. The conversation attributes the motive to worship of a “false god” and identifies the rooted belief system as satanic, specifically mentioning Baphomet, and labeling the phenomena as dark and evil.

Speaker 0 mentions being blocked out and refers to MK Ultra, a mind control program. The speaker believes that they are under mind control and mentions that they always tell the truth, despite others laughing at them. They express frustration that people never apologize for doubting them.

Speaker 0 argues that conspiracy theories have been made to look like lunacy, noting that the Kennedy assassination popularized the term “conspiracy theorist.” He says it wasn’t widely used before Kennedy, but afterward it became a label for “kooks,” and he’s repeatedly been called that. Speaker 1 acknowledges this dynamic. He and Speaker 0 discuss what a conspiracy is—“more people working together to do something nefarious?”—and Speaker 0 asserts that conspiracies have always happened. He disputes the view that most conspiracies are due to ineptitude, insisting that when there is profit, power, control, and resources involved, most conspiracies, in fact, turn out to be true. He adds that the deeper you dig, the more you realize there’s a concerted effort to make conspiracies seem ridiculous so people won’t be seen as fools. Speaker 1 remarks on the ridicule as well, and Speaker 0 reiterates his own self-description: “I am a conspiracy theorist,” a “foolish person,” and “a professional clown.” He mocks the idea that being labeled foolish is a barrier, and reflects on how others perceive him. Speaker 0 then provides specific, provocative examples of conspiracies he believes are real: Gulf of Tonkin was faked to justify U.S. entry into Vietnam; production of heroin ramped up to 94% of the world’s supply once the U.S. occupied Afghanistan; and the CIA, in the United States, allegedly sold heroin or cocaine in Los Angeles ghettos to fund the Contras versus the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. He states clearly that these claims are real and asserts that there are conspiracy theorists who are “fucking real.” Speaker 1 pushes back on reputation and judgment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms his self-identification as a conspiracy theorist who faces mockery. Speaker 1 suggests that this stance might give him a “superpower.”

Speaker 0 asks if everyone thinks the family is a nice Jewish family. Speaker 1 responds: From the outside, you appear to be a nice Jewish girl. Definitely. And you all are worshiping the devil inside the home? There are other Jewish families across the country. It’s not just my own family. Speaker 0 prompts for non-gory details about what kinds of things went on in the family. Speaker 1 describes rituals in which babies would be sacrificed, noting that there were people who bred babies in their family. She says no one would know about it, and that a lot of people were overweight, so you couldn't tell if they were pregnant or not, or they would supposedly go away for a while and then come back. Speaker 0 notes that she witnessed the sacrifice. Speaker 1 confirms she witnessed it when she was very young, and she was forced to participate in sacrificing an infant. Speaker 0 asks what the purpose of the sacrifice is. Speaker 1 answers the sacrifice is to bring you what? For power. Speaker 0: Power.

The speaker questions why people believe what they believe, suggesting that trusted sources may be deceiving them. He focuses on Hollywood, where he worked as a stunt performer and coordinator, and how the entertainment industry influences people. He recounts a catastrophic injury that led him to a pelvic floor therapist who claimed to treat victims of satanic rituals, which sparked his "awakening" and questioning of his reality. He researched online, finding that a small group of people control the narratives in media companies like Disney. He learned about the CIA's involvement in Hollywood, referencing a FOIA document stating motion pictures were used for psychological warfare. He cites Operation Paperclip, MK Ultra, and the CIA's Entertainment Liaison Office as examples. Another stuntman shares his disillusionment with Hollywood, seeing an agenda in every movie and finding reality more interesting. He mentions the CIA's involvement with Disney buying swampland in Florida. The discussion touches on mind control, desensitization to violence, and occult topics in media. Liz Crokin, a journalist, is referenced for her reporting on Pizzagate and alleged code words in John Podesta's emails. The speakers urge critical thinking and questioning the messages in media to discern the truth. They express hope for a future media landscape that promotes compassion and truth.