reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are two classes of people: vaccinated and unvaccinated. Vaccinated individuals have certain rights. Initially, there was hope to maintain elimination of the virus across the country without the need for vaccination certificates. However, it has become clear that these certificates not only drive up vaccination rates but also provide confidence to vaccinated individuals. They want to be around other vaccinated people and feel safe in hospitality and event settings. Offering this confidence and safety is important for those who have been vaccinated, allowing them to enjoy these activities again.

We were elected by the people to represent their best interests in the European Parliament. However, the leaders of the Parliament have stripped away our fundamental rights without proper explanation. They are now conditioning access to the Parliament based on a green certificate, which violates people's freedom to choose whether they want to be vaccinated or tested. We also question whether European citizens were properly informed about what is happening. The contracts between pharmaceutical companies and the European Union were initially kept secret, but after pressure, they were disclosed. We believe in transparency and democracy, and it is our duty to fight for the freedom and liberty of the people.

We will collaborate with provinces and territories to implement vaccination certifications or passports for safety. The federal government will fund the creation of privileges for vaccinated individuals, as it is crucial for everyone to get vaccinated. Those who choose not to get vaccinated pose a risk to all of us.

The speaker suggests distinguishing between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Another person questions this, arguing that it infringes on human rights and that new variants have little impact. They present data from the UK to support their point. The first speaker emphasizes the importance of maximizing freedom for vaccinated individuals, especially for travel, as an incentive to get vaccinated. The second person accuses the first speaker of having ulterior motives, mentioning their connections to the pharmaceutical industry and past controversies. They strongly oppose the first speaker's involvement in public health and the protection of rights. The first speaker concludes by stating that vaccination is the path to freedom.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated and states that it is a personal choice. However, they assert that unvaccinated individuals should not be allowed to travel on planes or trains with vaccinated people, as it poses a risk. They emphasize the need for strong decision-making in this regard.

When vaccinated and unvaccinated people mix, masks should be worn unless there is proof of vaccination. The speaker supports the CDC's return to indoor mask requirements because the unvaccinated have been walking around without masks, which led to the surge.

Speaker 0 says the government will continue to say, get vaccinated. If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. We need to be strong in the decisions we're taking going forward.

The speaker discusses the issue of whether the new testing requirement is a backdoor vaccine mandate. They explain that while some may argue that it is a test requirement, it effectively becomes a test requirement for outdoor dining establishments, as individuals must provide a negative test result to enter. However, this requirement can now be fulfilled by being vaccinated instead. The speaker acknowledges that there are individuals who may choose not to be vaccinated, and they can still participate by getting tested. They mention that excluding individuals completely based on their vaccination status is a separate debate that will likely arise in the future.

Speaker 0 states that permanent residents in the U.S. are mandated to be up to date on CDC-recommended vaccines, but this is not mandated for those entering the country illegally. Speaker 0 claims that measles cases in New Orleans are coming from people entering the country from elsewhere. Speaker 0 asks if the federal government should mandate that those becoming U.S. citizens be up to date on their immunizations. Speaker 1 states they are strongly pro-vaccine, an advisor to a vaccine company, and supports the CDC vaccine schedule.

Vaccination will always be a choice, and there will not be a two-tier society. The idea of a vaccination passport should be approached with caution, as it may create implicit pressure. Companies or organizations cannot enforce vaccination. There should be no indirect vaccination requirement, and no disadvantages or advantages for those who choose not to vaccinate or have already been vaccinated. People should never feel compelled to prove their vaccination status, and it should be legally impossible to use it as a requirement. Voluntary means voluntary, and it should not become mandatory through other means.

There is a debate about implementing a vaccine mandate, but the speakers have different opinions. Speaker 0 is against it, while Speaker 1 believes it cannot be enforced. Speaker 2 thinks it is proportionate, but Speaker 3 emphasizes the need to increase vaccine willingness without mandating it. Speaker 4 mentions the right to refuse vaccination and the government's promise against a mandate. Speaker 2 reiterates that there will be no vaccine mandate, and Speaker 0 insists on the need for one. However, Speaker 2 clarifies that not using the vaccine won't result in losing basic rights. They believe a solution leading to a vaccine mandate will be found.

Millions of people have received their first vaccination, including those under 50 with underlying health issues. The speaker believes that showing proof of vaccination or a negative test should allow people to enjoy activities like going to the theater or watching sports. They think it could also encourage more people to get vaccinated. When asked about compulsory vaccination, the speaker doesn't want unvaccinated individuals near them and suggests they stay at home. They believe the government has an obligation to keep the majority, including 15 million pensioners, safe.

Speaker 0 questions the seriousness of the European Commission's proposal, asking if they are really not forcing people to be vaccinated. Speaker 1 clarifies that they were not allowed to enter the parliament without a green certificate. Speaker 0 asks about the transparency of disclosing redacted versions of contracts, questioning how trust can be built without knowing the contents. They also inquire about the responsibility for side effects, stating that EU citizens should know the price of vaccines and not be forced to be vaccinated against their will.

Speaker 0: I ask all citizens to hold on a little longer. But until everyone is vaccinated, there will be no easing of restrictions, that is not the path we are aiming for. Speaker 1: Yesterday, you said that as long as not everyone can be offered a vaccine, there will be no new freedoms, we are talking about old freedoms. How do you plan to keep the vaccinated, let's say, in check, so that they don't start traveling, meeting up, or partying again? How long do you intend to enforce this strictly? Speaker 0: Well, I was asked about the wrong word, which I have already used, privileges, you didn't mention that. Because we must not get used to the normal life, as we know it with other freedoms, that life is no longer normal. That's where we want to go back to. These are fundamental rights that everyone has. But at the moment, even if someone is vaccinated, it is not clear whether they can still infect other people. And as long as that is not clarified, we cannot have any special measures or rights in addition to the normal rights for which the wave of lawsuits is demanding, and they are right. Look, there are now many lawsuits from people who want to be vaccinated in the highest priority group. There are lawsuits about the fairness of the measures. There will be lawsuits about the question of rights for the vaccinated, that is part of the rule of law and as politicians, we must argue why we are doing something, why we are not doing something. I believe that if we have been able to offer vaccination to a large number of people later on, and then some people say, we don't have mandatory vaccination, now I don't want to be vaccinated, then maybe we have to make such distinctions and say, okay, if you don't want it, then you may not be able to do certain things. Speaker 1: Chancellor, you explicitly mentioned the 21st of September yesterday. By then, there should be a vaccination offer for everyone. That is, if you look at the calendar, five days before the federal election. That date was not a coincidence, right? Speaker 0: Look, that is the meteorological beginning of autumn.

We need to be sure that being vaccinated prevents both contracting and transmitting the disease before implementing a vaccine passport. Allowing vaccinated individuals to access certain places based on proof of vaccination makes sense, but only if we are certain that being vaccinated prevents disease transmission.

Speaker 0 questions if anyone was forced to get vaccinated, specifically referring to a comment made by Dr. Kuat. Speaker 1 confirms that they made the comment and states their belief that nobody was forced to receive the vaccine. They explain that mandates and requirements are determined by governments and health authorities, and that individuals were given the choice to get vaccinated or not. Speaker 0 disagrees, suggesting that many Australians would disagree with Speaker 1's statement.

Speaker 0 apologizes for any discrimination based on vaccine status and promises amnesty for those prosecuted during COVID restrictions. Speaker 1 acknowledges the restrictions faced by unvaccinated individuals, such as job loss, limited access to loved ones, and travel restrictions. They consider this discrimination extreme but also recognize discrimination faced by other groups. Speaker 1 emphasizes the need to avoid creating a segregated society based on medical choices.

Individuals have the freedom to choose whether or not to get vaccinated. While there may be various reasons for vaccine hesitancy, enforcement measures ensure that everyone is vaccinated without forcing them. One person questions if people were forced to get vaccinated to keep their jobs, but another firmly believes that nobody was forced. Those who choose not to get vaccinated may not be able to work. However, it is emphasized that everyone had the opportunity to decide for themselves. Vaccine mandates are expanding to cover a significant portion of the workforce, creating distinctions between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Certain businesses like hospitality, hairdressers, and gyms can operate if they require customers to show vaccine certificates. It is clarified that vaccination was not compulsory, and people made their own choices. The requirement for customers to be vaccinated also applies to workers.

We are not considering removing the mandate; it's not on the agenda. Our immediate priority is to protect unvaccinated individuals from infection, which means keeping them away from crowded places. Many restrictions have been lifted in hospitality venues, allowing vaccinated individuals to live normally. It's unfair to ask vaccinated people to make sacrifices for the small number of unvaccinated individuals.

The speaker addresses the anti-vaxxers, stating that they are wrong about how to handle the pandemic. They emphasize that these individuals not only have the right to their opinions but also put their own children and others at risk. To ensure the safety of families traveling, the speaker announces that full vaccination will be required for plane and train travel in the upcoming months. This measure aims to alleviate concerns about being seated next to or near someone who could potentially endanger others.

The speaker argues that people often believe untrue things, using vaccinations as a prime example, and asserts that vaccines should not be forced but that if you don’t want to get vaccinated, you cannot board planes or trains alongside vaccinated people. The speaker states that anti-vaxxers are wrong and emphasizes that to travel on planes or trains in the coming months, individuals must be fully vaccinated. Those who hesitate or resist will not enjoy the same freedoms and opportunities as those who have done their part for others, with consequences for choosing not to get vaccinated. The speaker contends that while frustrations with mandates are understandable, mandates are necessary to avoid further restrictions, and unvaccinated people will not be able to board a plane or a train in Canada. The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act, with interjections of “Go. Go. Go.” The speaker notes that Canada is a place of free expression where individuals and communities can express themselves openly and strongly, and thanks people for sharing their perspectives. The speaker adds that democracy does not mean everyone must agree; it means everyone can work together, listen to each other, and respect each other. The speaker then references young leaders, stating that “they all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum.” The final emphasis is on pride in the newer generation, describing “a young generation like prime minister Trudeau” as a source of pride.

We need to argue as politicians why we do or don't do something. If we have offered many people the opportunity to get vaccinated and some refuse, we may need to make distinctions and say that those who don't want to be vaccinated may not be able to do certain things.

The government encourages vaccination. If you choose not to get vaccinated, you can't travel with vaccinated people and endanger them. We must stand firm in our decisions.

The speaker discusses the vaccination policy in the UK and mentions that two doses are necessary for effectiveness. They highlight a specific problem in the Landes region where there is a cluster of cases in a nursing home. While most residents are vaccinated, there are four or five unvaccinated staff members. The speaker emphasizes the importance of vaccination for both nursing home staff and hospital personnel, mentioning a similar issue in Italy where 22 people were excluded for refusing vaccination. They conclude by stating that choosing these professions means accepting the obligation to get vaccinated.

Government is urged to halt mRNA treatments for humans and animals during an inquiry. Clapping will result in the gallery being cleared if it persists.