reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The chart is outdated. Look at what happened. Who was there? Get ready. It's your turn.

The speakers discuss their work in December, specifically in relation to the Rubicon project. They mention the army and talk about the importance of their work.

Speaker 0 states that your mother's Jewish and that your mother's mother is Jewish, and that today is your bar mitzvah, ending with “Awesome.”

This is the current CDC recommendations for vaccines for children. On day number one, they get their first jab, a hepatitis vaccine. By the time they're 18, they've had 18 jabs. By the time they get to build up to vote, they have 76 jabs. Speaker 0 discusses vaccines and a timeline from birth to adulthood milestones. These lines illustrate a staged vaccination pattern culminating in 76 jabs. However, the transcript includes no further detail about the vaccines, dosing intervals, or specific ages beyond 18. The overall message emphasizes a count of injections rather than the nature of each vaccine.

The speaker questions why the FDA isn't investigating excess deaths. They highlight a significant increase in American deaths in 2023, particularly among younger age groups. The speaker notes a drop in life expectancy and points out that white-collar workers were disproportionately affected. They suggest a major workplace event in Q3 of 2021 as a potential cause for the spike in deaths.

Speaker 0 presents a disturbing set of preferences expressed as a personal viewpoint. The speaker rejects any idea of waiting or gradual enjoyment, insisting, “No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.” This metaphor is used to describe a desire for immediacy and immediacy in relationships. The speaker then extends the metaphor to women, arguing against aging in a traditional, patient way. They state, “Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.” The claim asserts that women do not age gracefully like wine, but rather age like milk, contradicting the notion of aging well. Continuing, the speaker proposes a specific, controversial timeline for marriage and reproduction. They say, “I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something.” They justify this with calculations about age differences: “Here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.” The speaker draws a progressive, increasingly favorable age difference for themselves as they age. The speaker amplifies their stance with an explicit age preference, saying, “Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine. Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent.” They further claim, “That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.” Overall, the transcript centers on a provocative, highly problematic set of beliefs about age, consent, and the supposed desirability of a 16-year-old partner, framed through aggressive metaphors and explicit preferences.

The speaker repeatedly mentions the number 17, asking who the 17% are and mentioning their own interactions with a team called 17. They also mention being in Washington 17 times and planning something for 17 years. The transcript is filled with repetitions of the number 17.

The speaker discusses the pension system and the experiences of various individuals. They mention the names of different people and talk about waiting in line and the possibility of receiving a pension. The speaker repeats these points multiple times throughout the transcript.

This is not prophecy, but prediction. If this was predicted twenty seven years ago, somebody knew something. Okay. Here's the list. This is an abbreviated list. I could've made it much longer. You know I can. I didn't. Okay. You ready for the list? - Fast mutating viral disease pandemics, genetically developed vaccines, DNA database tracking. DNA chips. Get this one. 1997. Gene based pharmaceuticals. - Transmitting genetic instructions for a disease process. How about this one? You ready for it? Ready for it. - Artificial intelligence to determine gene patterns. - Twenty seven years ago, who had heard about AI? Apparently, they they had. - How about this one? Robots for doing genome sequencing. - And then this one blew me away. Using recombinant DNA for making spike proteins. 1997? - It it gets even worse. Smart homes. They have a whole chapter on smart homes slash smart cities. - This one will absolutely floor you. It did me. In 1997, and this is you can do the word search research yourself. They predicted not 2025, but by 2020 that people would be working from home virtually. - Nuclear devices causing widespread contamination, nanotech devices. - This stuff was never even heard of. Digital currency. - And last but certainly not least, vaccination programs I'm sorry. I gotta chuckle. Because if I don't, I'll cry. - Vaccination program is run by organizations like the World Health Organization for a global killer that has yet to emerge. First printing, February 1997.

A speaker urges people to join armed groups and gather in Washington, DC on January 2nd, 3rd, and 4th to fight against corruption and prevent Joe Biden from becoming the president. They emphasize the need for a large number of armed individuals to show strength and deter any aggression from the police. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action and encourages listeners to contact friends with rifles and make the choice to join others in DC. They stress the need to act as Americans and not just talk about it.

A person asks if someone is a blood donor and when they last donated. The person replies they donated in January and seems to believe they cannot donate again for a while. The first person states that whole blood can be donated every eight weeks and other donation types can be donated more frequently. The first person then asks if the other person wants to donate next week.

The speaker points to an old chart to show something significant that occurred recently.

The speaker discusses the issue of pension payments and the establishment of queues for receiving them. They mention the names of several individuals and state that they have installed a fish and trade system. They also mention receiving grass and instructions for trading. The speaker repeats these points multiple times throughout the transcript.

Wars are ongoing, and the situation is chaotic with Kamala in charge. There is a proposal to draft women, making it a felony if they do not comply. President Trump has stated he would not draft your daughter.

The speaker argues that the given dates are incorrect and explains that historically, there were 13 months with 28 days each, including a day of rest. They mention various examples of the number 13 in nature, such as lunar cycles and zodiac signs, suggesting that our current calendar disconnects us from these natural cycles. Another speaker adds that our calendar should have 13 months of 28 days, with Easter as a neutral day. They mention similarities between this calendar and the Mayan and Sanskrit calendars. They question the meanings of the names of the months and state that April is the first month, symbolizing the start of spring and new beginnings. They also mention the loss of a month.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of documenting the military actions and mentions the names of individuals involved.

The speaker references an outdated chart, a couple of months old, and expresses surprise or shock at more recent developments.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking at a recent chart to see what has happened. They point out that the current chart is outdated and encourage viewers to focus on the most recent data.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

The speaker shows a blacked-out page containing personally identifiable medical information. The date on the page is November 14th at IRWIN ACH, Fort Riley, Kansas, and it mentions five instances of COVID-19 immunization with Moderna. The speaker questions why this soldier's medical record includes COVID-19 immunization from as far back as 2014.

The speaker is asking people who they are excited to vote for in the 2024 election. Many people responded that they would vote for Donald Trump. Some people said they would vote for Nikki Haley, and others said they would vote for Governor DeSantis. One person said they were in the middle and would vote for either Trump or DeSantis. Another person said they were pumped up but felt like we need a break from elections.

Speaker 0 expresses concern that Iran’s escalation leads to automatic draft registration and that many people voted against the Biden administration and Kamala Harris because of floated draft ideas for Russia. They reference a report on Liberty Report about this automatic involuntary draft registration. Speaker 1 describes the NDAA as a must-pass bill that often includes dangerous language. He says the bill will automatically register young men aged 18 to 26 for the draft and create a database, removing any choice about whether to register or not. He argues this presumes the government owns you and your body, equating it to slavery. He contends that if a war is unpopular or unconstitutional, people will still be forced to register. He notes a belief that the current war is obviously unconstitutional and asserts confidence in young Americans defending their country if attacked, though he questions whether an attack has occurred. Speaker 2 counters that the threat is not existential from Iran, but argues it comes from elsewhere, including issues at the southern border. He reframes the concern as domestic rather than a direct external threat from Iran. Speaker 3 agrees and adds that the U.S. lacks a sufficiently large army due to prior cuts and a focus on exotic weapons and a large surface fleet. He contends the army is too small to project power, and any ground invasion into the Middle East would face immediate, formidable opposition, including precision missiles and drones, making a conventional ground war implausible. He criticizes naval power’s utility in modern conflicts and suggests an invasion would be impractical. Speaker 2 asks for more detail about Karg Island, a strategic island off Iran’s coast, noting 90% of oil flows through Iran from that area. He mentions talk among Trump administration officials about capturing the island and asks how the U.S. could secure it. Speaker 3 explains that much of the oil from Karg Island goes to India, China, Japan, and South Korea; destroying or occupying the island would require moving ground forces and crossing water, which would be extremely dangerous. He warns that destroying oil infrastructure in the Persian Gulf would lead Iran to target refineries, drilling rigs, and storage tanks, and notes that Gulf States heavily rely on desalination plants. He cautions that destroying these plants could cause mass death and devastate Gulf economies. He adds that the Israelis previously struck a desalination plant in Iran, which would amplify consequences for regional economies. Speaker 0 asks how the public should feel about the conflict, noting that the government started it on false pretenses and that the country’s leaders and military performance have been disappointing. They seek guidance on how to view the situation and how to respond. Speaker 1 expresses domestic concern about a potential false flag, citing FBI warnings that Iran may have launched attack drones off the West Coast, suggesting a false flag could be used to erode civil liberties. Speaker 2 agrees with the false-flag concern and notes that Israel has a history of false flags and mentions events in Azerbaijan and Turkey. He emphasizes the need for Americans to understand the consequences of U.S. actions for people in the region and to push the president and administration to stop inflammatory language. Speaker 3 clarifies that Iranian officials have instructed contacts in the Western Hemisphere not to harm the United States, arguing that causing harm would benefit Israel. He concedes that false-flag analysis is plausible but unlikely in the long run, and stresses the importance of public awareness of consequences and maintaining peaceful regional relations after the war ends.

Speaker 0 argues that humans were never meant to see part “24” and asserts we are not in 2025, offering proof through calendar history and structure. He states the word calendar derives from the Roman word calens, the day of the month Romans paid taxes to the Roman Empire, and claims the calendar used today, the Gregorian calendar, is a copyrighted false timeline created to enslave people and is reflected on birth certificates, which purportedly place birth records under the Gregorian system’s copyright. He contrasts two calendars: a god-made lunar cycle versus a man-made Gregorian calendar. He says the true calendar is the cycle of the moon and the heavens. He notes the root of the word month, “mon,” comes from moon, reflecting a 28-day lunar cycle that progresses from new moon to full moon back to new moon. Dividing 365 days by 28 yields 13, implying thirteen moon months per year, which he claims indicates a missing month. He contends one month was removed to create a twelve-month cycle, thereby severing our connection to the heavens. The consequence, in his view, is a disconnection from the moon’s influence on consciousness; the full moon supposedly opens the subconscious, enabling the implantation of new messages or beliefs. He asserts that the matrix (a reference to popular culture or societal systems) intentionally performs rituals on certain days to implant negative messages into the subconscious. He describes the sun as a god-designed clock and an intelligently based design that tells time of day, the moon tells the day of the month, and the stars tell the month of the year. He claims these celestial cycles are aimed at keeping people out of alignment with heavenly intelligences, and thus the true calendar is the lunar one with thirteen months, not the Gregorian twelve-month system. Overall, the speaker presents a theory that the Gregorian calendar is a coerced, copyrighted system designed to enslave humanity by severing people’s alignment with lunar and celestial cycles, thereby blocking access to subconscious and spiritual influences associated with lunar phases and celestial movements.

Checklist for the summary approach: - Identify the core facts: birthday-based order for the draft, ranges of ages (19–26), and the policy that lowest numbers correspond to draft; middle group odds; include example lines. - Preserve the ascending order lists of dates and the exact dates/numbers as presented. - Include the specific examples: numbers 18, 35, and 52 with their associated dates. - Maintain the sequence: initial birthday list, then the “Number 18” list, then the drafting rule with the number 35 example, then the middle-group explanation, and finally the number 52 list. - Exclude filler and off-topic content; avoid added analysis or opinion. - Translate if needed (not needed here); present in English. - Aim for a total length between 372 and 466 words. The transcript describes the draft lottery process using birth dates to determine the order in which 19-year-olds next year and those aged 17–26 will be drafted. The speaker indicates the order of the birthdays is the determining factor, with the dates listed in ascending order and presented in blocks of five as they are given. The dates listed in ascending order are: September 14, April 24, December 30, February 14. October 18, September 6, October 26, September 7, November 22, December 6, August 31, December 7, July 8, April 11, July 12, December 29, January 15. This is ascending order. Each man posts them as they are given to him. Number 18 is September 26, November 1, June 4, August 10, June 26, July 24, October 5, February 19, December 14, July 21, June 5, March 2, March 31, May 24, April 1, March 17, November 2. These are in ascending order. It is generally agreed, stipulated by the selective service people that those men with the lowest numbers, the lowest third, will be drafted. So for number 35, it is May 7, August 24, May 11, October 30, December 11, May 13, December 10, July 13, December 9, August 16, August 2, November 11, November 27, August 8, September 3, July 7, November 7. The middle group, that is the group with the number between about one hundred and twenty and two hundred forty, stand about a fifty fifty chance of being drafted next year. Number 52 is January 25, December 22, August 5, May 16, December 5, February 20 third, January 19, January 24, June 21, August 29, April 21, September 20, June 27, May 10, November 12, July.

The speaker starts by mentioning numbers on a terminal, starting at 182 and jumping to 215, then 487, and finally 801. They continue to mention jumps to 1,085 and 1,278. They also mention that someone else's numbers are increasing as well. The speaker then jumps to 13:49 and mentions another jump to 13/71. They conclude by saying that everyone will be on a voted list.