reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I confronted Lisa McGee from Vaxx Choice about the bio cyber interface for e-health being taught at Cambridge and other universities. I asked her to clarify its definition, location in the body, and functionality. She claimed there was no misrepresentation of Professor Akhiles' work, but I disagreed, emphasizing that it involves an injectable bio cyber interface under the skin, not a wearable device. There are honest representations of this work and misleading ones. Doctor Edward Group has shared Acuity's latest keynote and a definition of the bio cyber interface, which includes internal biosensors and wireless biomedical telemetry for e-health, enabling wireless intrabody nanocommunication. More details will follow in part 2.

In July 2024, the issue of wireless biomedical telemetry without consent is still ongoing. Sabrina Wallace, a former network engineer, has been discussing this topic. In 2012, the medical body area network was approved, leading to the deployment of a nano cyber interface for intra-body communication. The IEEE standard for internal biosensors is 802.15.4 for patient monitoring. The Internet of Bio Nanothings is our current health monitoring system. This includes telemedicine, nano routing, and nano micro interface. Doctors and nurses should have informed the public about these advancements.

The program presents a narrative linking Havana syndrome, COVID-19 vaccination, and alleged pervasive nanotech-based surveillance and control technologies, framed by whistleblowers and investigators. Key claims and points: - Havana syndrome is described as real, with documented anomalous frequency phenomena. The guest, Jesse Beltran, an expert in anomalous frequency analysis and Havana syndrome-related phenomena, says the phenomenon expanded after the COVID vaccine rollout, with complaints “identical to what he was seeing with Havana syndrome” and suggests vaccines act as transmitters of signals. - A central premise is that signals can be received inside the body and sometimes appear to originate from external sources, including graves. A trailer scene allegedly shows signals coming from six feet underground in graves of people who took the shot and died, described as signals still being broadcast. - The documentary frames the COVID vaccines as containing or enabling signals and transceivers, with claims that biosensors and programmable nanotechnology are embedded in vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, and related substances, enabling data retrieval and data transmission from the human body. - The discussion covers biometric surveillance “into what’s under the skin,” with assertions that biometric data and location data are collected through these technologies, turning vaccine recipients into “routers” and “communication devices.” - The Bonnie Keller-B case is highlighted: a woman implanted with biosensors without consent, later surgically removed in some cases. Beltran cites these biosensors as evidence of nonconsensual implants, used to illustrate broader claims about experimentation on U.S. citizens without consent. - The 21st Century Cures Act (2016) is cited as enabling experimentation on U.S. citizens without consent under minimal risk criteria; the speakers claim Section 3024 was extended in 2024 to cover private entities and research institutions, with implications for consent and data sharing (including FOIA exemptions and national security protections). - Specific claims are made about nanotechnology being self-assembling, programmable, and able to cross the blood-brain barrier. A reference is made to patents and documents describing nanoscale biocompatible devices and their capabilities. - Doctor Hall (John Hall) is presented as an early whistleblower who linked signals to Havana syndrome as far back as 2010, with a history of using frequency detectors to identify anomalous signals. Hall’s work is said to have led to field scans and data collection from hundreds of individuals, revealing patterns in who is affected. - The frequency-detection methodology is described: two devices—an RF general frequency detector with precision to a fraction of a millimeter and a nonlinear junction detector—used to scan living subjects. The nonlinear junction detector is described as capable of locating silicon-based circuitry and biosensors in the body, sometimes leading to surgical removal. - The narrative asserts post-COVID increases in the number of detected signal locations per person (averaging around 20 locations or more), with comparisons across demographics and geography, including prisoners, soldiers, and general populations showing similar patterns. It is claimed that children can also test positive. - The speakers discuss broader implications: a new form of war using neurotechnology, six-g/AI integration, remote manipulation of thoughts, and potential erosion of human rights if these technologies are used for control. They cite potential military subcontractors and telecommunications companies as sources of the frequencies, and they reference a “brain initiative” and AI-assisted control as evidence of centralized command and control over individuals. - A recurring theme is the threat to free thought and autonomy, with warnings about a future where people could be deprived of basic rights or become “homo borgensis,” subject to memory imprinting or erasure via remote technologies, especially as six-G and advanced AI advance. - Practical takeaways offered include a supplement (zeolite Z) to reduce symptoms and excrete graphene oxide, and the Stop3024.com initiative seeking signatures against nonconsensual experimentation. The speakers urge independent research and present themselves as offering coaching and evidence gathering for those claiming to be affected. People and roles: - Jesse Beltran: TSCM-certified investigator, expert in Havana syndrome and anomalous frequency analysis; discusses detectors, biosensors, and post-vaccine signals; shares case histories and demonstrations. - Doctor John Hall: Referenced as a pioneer who documented hearing signals and health effects; linked to early Havana syndrome work and field data collection. - Bonnie Keller-B: Subject of biosensor implants; case cited to illustrate nonconsensual implants and surgical removal. - Speaker references include various researchers, whistleblowers, and advocates who describe legal, ethical, and technocratic concerns around biometric surveillance, nanoscale technologies, and government programs. Overall, the transcript presents a cohesive, if controversial, account connecting Havana syndrome, COVID vaccines, nanotech, biological monitors, and a trajectory toward pervasive biotechnological control, framed as a matter of urgent public disclosure and citizen action.

Way back in 1778, the Continental Congress unanimously passed America's first whistleblower law, recognizing the duty to give the earliest information to congress of any misconduct by government employees. Two hundred forty six years later, whistleblowers have an incredible record of changing the course of history. The discussion centers on alleged biometric surveillance and control: “Microchips and tracking devices are embedded in the vaccine. Is this accurate?” “We have six MAC addresses that are pulsing Bluetooth signals, and all we are is surrounded by tombstones.” “These are not vaccines. These are not biological. As you go through the patent in section two one nine, it explains how they are self assembled nanoparticles, and they're fully programmable.” “From a technical perspective, if I can retrieve data, I can send data.” “DARPA calls it transhumanism.” Documents cited include FOIA-released “New World Vistas” (1994), which says: “utilizing radio frequencies in order to manipulate and control biological process on a human person” and “the ability to imprint memory sets and erase memory sets, along with causing various physiological responses.” Earlier reports allege “remotely read thoughts” and “biometric telemetry” in Vacaville Prison, and a reference to “the future is not human” by the World Economic Forum.

The speaker expresses frustration that people are not acknowledging the existence of computer networking through the human body. They discuss the use of biosensors, electromagnetic dominance, and the manipulation of human anatomy. The speaker criticizes those who deny or lie about these technologies and urges others to recognize the truth. They emphasize the importance of understanding the augmentation and control of the human body through electronic warfare and the potential consequences of ignoring these realities. The speaker calls for transparency and accountability in discussing these topics.

This video discusses the use of body area networks and biosensors in tracking and monitoring individuals. It highlights the use of near field communication and how the body acts as a node on the network. The speaker emphasizes that this technology has been in existence for 28 years and questions why people are not more aware of it. The video also touches on the potential implications of this technology, including its use in medical applications and the ability to control and manipulate the body. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency and education surrounding these technologies.

Dear Doctor Cartland, you requested more information about the medical body area network. It's crucial to address the implications of computer networking within the human body, especially regarding informed consent. You’ve shown interest in topics like the injectable bio cyber interface for eHealth and wireless biomedical telemetry, which are part of the curriculum at Cambridge University. Additionally, there are discussions about frequency bands assigned to our bodies for the medical body area network and human body communication technologies. It's important to go beyond just liking posts; we need to share and discuss this information. There's an upcoming conference in Florence focusing on wireless healthcare, intra-body communication, and molecular engineering within the human body, again highlighting the need for informed consent.

DARPA foundries making their own molecules, peptides, amino chains. I was reading them, not comprehending. Is it transhumanism? regenerative medicine? In the second livestream, nanotechnology reproduces itself, grabs up the components of your body to do it, then after reproducing itself, creates its own neural networks, no different than your body does. It can give commands to itself, upgrading nodes and then creating its own AI internally on its own. "Every single one of you that thinks you need the five g, no. It's inside." Thus, "the foundries with DARPA ten years ago." Then: "PACS database, anybody with the DHS, the FBI, can click a button remotely." The speaker warns: "You jabbed people with nano that not only recreates itself, but makes its own neural nets and its own artificial intelligence that is specific to the human on the inside?" It's in the molecular communication routing. The talk warns this is about turning humans into something else, not arms into a fish flipper, referencing a 2020 military blog. "Our synergists know more, I think, I suspect, than your military does."

Doctors are working with the telecommunications and computer industries to create the Internet of bionanothings in the human cardiovascular system. Initially, people may dismiss this information, but medical websites confirm it, leading to a strong reaction of concern.

Doctor Michalcha discusses internal bionanosensors and synthetic biology at a medical symposium. She emphasizes the use of medical body area networks by physicians. Nano technology, biosensors, and nanomedicine are key components in the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The goal is to digitize every cell on Earth and merge organic life with synthetic biology for improved well-being. However, this advancement may come at the cost of losing our humanity. Bioleno sensors in our bodies enable bidirectional communication with the cloud.

Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”

The channel discusses the U.S. Department of Defense's network-centric warfare doctrine, which utilizes body area networks and biosensors for medical monitoring. These technologies, developed since the 1990s, aim to enhance healthcare by allowing remote monitoring of patients, potentially reducing medical errors. Despite their benefits, there are concerns about privacy and security, especially regarding the tracking of individuals through vaccines and other means. The integration of biological signals with digital systems raises ethical questions about consent and surveillance. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and dialogue within the medical community about these technologies, which are often misunderstood or ignored. The discussion highlights the intersection of healthcare, technology, and warfare, urging a reevaluation of how these systems are perceived and managed.

Doctors and nurses missed the chance to inform the public about computer networking in the body without consent. Medical body area networks and nano sensors are used for health monitoring. A nano cyber interface sets up networks for communication, data transfer, and surveillance in humans without consent. Sabrina Wallace shared this info in a 30-page PDF. This is biodigital enslavement and technocratic totalitarianism. Download and share the PDF.

Good doctors are urged to consider sustainability goals, bio digital convergence, bioengineering, and human augmentation. Sabrina Wallace discusses smart healthcare using meta materials, graphene healthcare, and BioCyber interface. She highlights the use of technology in telemedicine, nano Mhealth, and the integration of the body with the cloud for monitoring. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency regarding sensors, open systems architecture, and electronic disease surveillance by the military and CDC.

Falko Dresler presented nano sensor technology at the NanoCom 2021, showcasing nanomachines that can travel through the bloodstream for wireless Internet connectivity. Michael Dresler, a telecommunications expert from the Technical University Berlin, is involved in discussions about the Internet of bio-nano things, highlighted in a recent European Parliament briefing on smart bodies for smart cities. Although the presence of nano sensor technology in human blood vessels was not confirmed by medical professionals, the concept of a nano cyber interface has been introduced. Dresler also participated in NanoCom 2024 in Milan, where he discussed advancements in precision AI medicine and wireless technology in the bloodstream.

The speaker believes injections are attempts to install operating systems in people's bodies, referencing a statement by Moderna's chief scientist officer. This relates to the Internet of Bodies, where materials are placed in bodies to facilitate interaction with telecommunications and digital technology. The speaker compares this to tagging livestock, suggesting nanoparticles create an organic barcode within the human body. They cite a symposium called Omni War: The Battle for the Brain, which delves into the Internet of Bodies. They believe there are intentional, mysterious ingredients in food, sprays, and injections aimed at installing an operating system in the body.

The speaker expresses concern over individuals promoting the wireless body network, including Sabrina from the DARPA Space Force Project. They mention Luke from Belly Bruce Books also supporting this. The speaker feels people are lost in these narratives and have lost touch with reality. They are unsure of what to say about the situation.

The European Union website discusses terahertz nano networks for e-health systems, with nano nodes flowing in the bloodstream. People in France are concerned about this forced system. A post on this topic gained 17,000 views in French. The focus should be on IEEE 1906.1 standards for intravody molecular engineering, not vague future implications. The medical body area network has been in use since 2012.

The speaker discusses how the human body is connected to the cloud through electromagnetic warfare. They explain that the electromagnetic spectrum is used for surveillance and communication, including within the human body. They highlight the existence of the biofield, an electrical and magnetic field emitted by the body, which has been exploited for 60 years. The speaker criticizes the lack of awareness and understanding around this topic, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the body's electrical nature. They also mention the use of wireless body area networks for medical monitoring and the potential risks of hacking and manipulation.

The speaker discusses the use of biosensors made from DNA and computer networking protocols to log into and monitor the human body. They explain how radio frequency and computer game theory are used to route information through the body, and how the blockchain and electromagnetic resonance are also involved. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of transparency and gaslighting surrounding these technologies. They mention the involvement of various individuals and organizations, such as the CIA and Department of Defense, and discuss the concept of starseeds and the manipulation of bioelectric fields. The speaker emphasizes the need for awareness and accountability regarding these technologies.

The speaker asserts that everyone has had a “mark of the beast” since 2011 in relation to critical infrastructure at health level seven, specifically hospitals. They claim health and human services and CMS Medicare are handing out this mark in the form of a wearable. The speaker also describes this as interbody communication biometrics for DHS from several years ago. They state that this is not only a matter of health administration but spans business and government. They claim that Congress, throughout this year and last year, has been helping the police obtain updated drone services, with Sean Ryan bragging about them, along with others. The speaker contends that the general public is weaponized and kept uninformed about the fact that national security is under the skin and looking through people’s eyeballs in their own homes, and that it cannot be turned off and does not require a tower. The speaker explains that biosignals come from the human body, and that biophysics uses advanced signal processing to measure bioelectromagnetics, describing the measurement of signals coming off the human body in multiple ways.

The speaker discusses the use of radio frequency technology to manipulate the human body and control the immune system. They explain how the body's biofield is connected to wireless communication and how this technology has been used for decades. The speaker criticizes the lack of awareness and transparency surrounding these technologies and urges people to educate themselves about the potential dangers. They also mention the use of synthetic telepathy and brain-to-brain interfaces. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the need for honesty and accountability in discussing these issues.

The speaker discusses how the Cisco backplane controls AI healthcare through manipulation of the astral plane. They highlight the dangers of being part of the Internet of Things, being targeted for transhumanism, and the suppression of natural abilities like telepathy. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the body's biofield and the manipulation of human DNA through advanced technology. They criticize the belief in aliens and starseeds, exposing a hidden agenda of population control and electronic warfare. The speaker urges awareness of network killing and the need for electronic warfare shielding. They also mention the importance of acknowledging the 802.15.6, 0.4.5 standard for protection.

Sabrina Wallace, a self-proclaimed child of Black Projects, discusses various topics related to electromagnetic warfare and the manipulation of the human body. She claims that biosensors have been implanted in people since 2005, allowing for wireless communication and control. She also mentions the use of synthetic telepathy and the routing of data through the human body. Wallace emphasizes the importance of understanding one's physiology and the existence of the biofield. She encourages individuals to prepare for electromagnetic warfare and to reclaim control over their own bodies. The transcript is approximately 440 words long.

The speaker claims the biggest issue is the transhumanism agenda, naming Bill Gates, World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Ray Kurzweil, who 'started this in 2000 roughly '16 going public with what they wanna do.' They say 'we are going to convert God's carbon based life form humans into a silica based cyborg system' and 'they've been doing that,' urging people to take responsibility for health to become superhuman. They claim 'Right now, everybody is about 10% human and 10% machine.' They say they can show, for any person, whether 'vaxxed or unvaxxed,' 'synthetic red blood cells,' 'hydrogels,' and 'nanotechnology,' and insist 'it's everywhere'—in toothpaste, toilet paper, cereal—and that 'they're spraying nanotech and nanodust, smart dust everywhere in the sky with the chemtrails' and 'it's in the water supply.' They mention a transhumanism research team with an electron microscope, ending with 'What we have to focus on right now.'