reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, manages a $8.7 trillion portfolio allegedly obtained through embezzlement by companies like American International Group and Halliburton. The speaker, Adam Knutson, claims to be a whistleblower of the Camp Spiker Massacre, accusing these companies of treason. He mentions legal action against American International Group and urges for the return of defense funds instead of profiting from them through BlackRock.

- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem. - Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research. - Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs. - Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information. - Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help. - Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions. - They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party. - Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.

BlackRock, a powerful and relatively unknown company, owns a significant portion of major media companies like Fox, CBS, and Comcast. They also have investments in tech giants like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, as well as Disney. In fact, BlackRock essentially owns 90% of the world's media. They recently gained access to China's mutual fund industry, allowing them to invest in Chinese companies, including those blacklisted by the US. The money BlackRock uses comes from pension funds and ordinary people's bank accounts. With their vast ownership and access to personal data, BlackRock has significant influence and control. This raises concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of personal information.

Retirement savings funneled through Vanguard's index fund are being used to support the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) global aggression. Individual consumers have no control over which companies their investments are tied to, while Wall Street analysts purposefully include CCP military tie companies in the index fund. This allows the CCP to steal American people's money to fund their agenda. Additionally, there are concerns about how these funds may have indirectly supported Iran and Hamas. The CCP provides money, weapons, and economic aid to terrorist organizations like Hamas, with evidence showing that Chinese-produced weapons were used by Hamas. Congress needs to hold Wall Street accountable to ensure American investors' money is not used to fund dangerous threats and enemies.

BlackRock, a powerful investment firm, owns significant stakes in major media companies like Fox, CBS, and Comcast. They also have influence over tech giants like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, as well as Disney. Despite their vast control over the world's media, BlackRock operates in relative anonymity. However, their involvement in China's mutual fund industry and investments in blacklisted companies have raised concerns. The company's access to personal data, including bank account information and personal preferences, is extensive. As BlackRock's influence in China grows, there are worries about the potential misuse of this data.

BlackRock is reportedly suing UnitedHealth, its largest shareholder, for providing "too much care" to patients after CEO Brian Thompson's murder. The lawsuit alleges UnitedHealth, spooked by public outcry over claim denials, approved more treatments, misleading investors by not clarifying how this would impact profits. BlackRock claims UnitedHealth's shift towards honoring insurance contracts cuts into profits, devaluing their stake. Shareholders allege UnitedHealth inflated its stock price by sticking to old forecasts despite public anger and a Senate report on claim denials. UnitedHealth shares fell 22.4% after the insurer cut its 2025 profit forecast, citing higher costs in its Medicare business. The speaker connects this to broader issues of BlackRock's involvement in destructive initiatives, such as build-to-rent schemes and private equity takeovers, advocating for supporting local businesses and investing in gold and silver as safe haven assets.

BlackRock is a publicly listed company on Nasdaq, managing over $14 trillion in assets. It holds significant shares in many major U.S. companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, airlines, and social networks. This ownership influences various agendas across these companies. For instance, when checking Amazon's stock on Yahoo Finance, it's evident that Jeff Bezos is not the largest shareholder; BlackRock and Vanguard often top the list of major holders. This highlights the extent of BlackRock's influence in the corporate landscape.

Tim Cook reportedly warned Pelosi about Congress's antitrust bills. This raises questions about the influence of lobbyists and powerful CEOs making personal calls. Additionally, a Fortune.com article reveals that Speaker Pelosi's husband made a significant stock trade worth $6 million, resulting in a profit of $5.3 million just as Congress was preparing to take action against big tech.

BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, is under scrutiny by the House Select Committee on China for allegedly facilitating investment in Chinese companies involved in human rights violations and supporting China's military. Jay Clayton, former SEC chairman, discusses the importance of the US-China relationship in addressing key issues like climate, the economy, and national security. He emphasizes the need for transparency and gradual decoupling, as a sharp separation could lead to conflict. Clayton acknowledges the rising debt and deficit in the US and highlights the importance of maintaining economic and military strength while diversifying. The conversation touches on regulating cryptocurrencies and the complexities of dealing with China.

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.

There are darker secrets than BlackRock, like the Wallenberg family, who control around $800 billion in companies, including Ericsson. Telecom companies like Ericsson function as invading armies, seizing territory to control network areas, sometimes through bribery. Ericsson received over $113 million in U.S. government contracts since 2008, including an $8.3 billion contract from Verizon to build 5G infrastructure. When researching Ericsson, Google's search results seemed manipulated, only showing information directly from Ericsson. Looking at BlackRock's board, two members stood out: the CEO of Cisco and the former CEO of Ericsson, who is now the CEO of Verizon. Cisco and Ericsson are key companies in building the Internet. It's strange that 2 out of 14 board members of BlackRock represent companies that make and control the Internet. We need to start digging ourselves.

The US government is using BlackRock to house illegal immigrants in New York, paying homeowners $125 per migrant per day. With BlackRock owning many properties, they stand to profit significantly. Incentives in New York make it attractive for migrants to go there. This arrangement is likely to continue until the census.

Wall Street's connection to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is highlighted in a recent dinner where attendees paid $40,000 per plate. The guest list includes prominent figures like the CEO of Amway, the CEO of Apple (Tim Cook), and the CEO of BlackRock (Lawrence Fink). Other notable names include executives from Blackstone and Boeing. Medical testing companies like Pfizer, Fulgent Genetics, and Gilead Sciences are also present. The secretary of commerce, Gina Raimondo, revealed that these American CEOs and executives expressed their interest in furthering their investments in China. This raises concerns about Wall Street's involvement in profiting from China's human rights abuses and job offshoring. Tim Cook's presence is particularly criticized for Apple's alleged mistreatment of Chinese workers.

BlackRock, a powerful entity, owns a significant portion of major media companies and tech giants. Their investments in China raise concerns about data privacy and potential influence on a global scale. Ordinary individuals unknowingly contribute to BlackRock's wealth through pension funds and bank accounts. With access to vast amounts of personal data, BlackRock's impact on society is substantial and potentially concerning.

Unusual Whales on X started calling out politicians, including Richard Burr, who is a major player as the head of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. On February 7th, 2020, Burr co-wrote an op-ed downplaying COVID-19 while simultaneously receiving private briefings about its true severity as chair of the senate intelligence committee. Tasked with preparing a response, Burr knew the severity of COVID-19 more than the average American. Then, on February 13th, Burr sold $1,650,000 from his retirement account. Selling off a retirement account to that degree is an extreme move, especially for someone in his position.

BlackRock, a major investment firm, owns a significant portion of United States banks, pharma companies, and mainstream media. They also oversee a large percentage of global stock trading and manage billions of dollars in assets. Additionally, they have substantial investments in media companies like Fox, CBS, Comcast, and Disney. BlackRock is also a significant institutional investor in tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon. Recently, they have been acquiring homes and driving up mortgage prices, leading to concerns about homeownership.

Congressional investigators are being asked if Hillary Clinton gave 20% of the US uranium supply to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The question stems from the 2010 sale of Uranium One, a company controlling a fifth of US uranium, to Rosatom, a Russian firm. The US part of the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, comprised of nine agencies, including the State Department, where Hillary Clinton was the boss at the time. The Hill newspaper reported that the FBI was investigating a Rosatom subsidiary for racketeering, money laundering, and bribes aimed at giving Russia more influence over the US nuclear industry while the deal was being approved. Some members of Congress want to know why they weren't told about this. The Hill also reports that the Russians were channeling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation at the same time. Republicans are questioning if Hillary Clinton helped this deal along.

I discovered the ownership structure of BlackRock, which is a major shareholder in many corporations. While Larry Fink founded BlackRock, he doesn't control it. The real control comes from Merrill Lynch, which owns 45% of BlackRock, but this isn't reflected in the top institutional shareholders list. Merrill Lynch is part of Bank of America, which was acquired during the 2008 financial crisis. Warren Buffett, through Berkshire Hathaway, is the top shareholder of Bank of America. Interestingly, despite owning a significant portion of BlackRock, neither Merrill Lynch nor Bank of America has representatives on BlackRock's board. This raises questions about their influence and governance. If anyone has insights into this unusual situation, I’d appreciate the information.

Congressman Gates took us on a tour of the Appropriations Committee, which oversees government funding. We discussed Mr. Rutherford, a member of both the Ethics and Appropriations Committees, who made significant stock trades, including buying Raytheon stock on the day Russia invaded Ukraine. This raises ethical concerns about profiting from war. We noted that energy sector trading is prevalent among congressional members, particularly those on the Energy Subcommittee, like Michael Guest, who has traded extensively in energy and online gaming stocks. Despite being on the Ethics Committee, these members are among the most active traders, showing no signs of slowing down or addressing potential ethical issues.

Wall Street's continued investment in China and American businesses operating there is being questioned. The federal government's pension fund has now been prohibited from investing in mainland China. This move was initiated during the Trump administration, but it took nearly four years to implement. Conservative lawmakers, including Rick Scott, Marco Rubio, and Michael Watts from Florida, have been instrumental in pushing for legislation to divest American investors' retirement funds from CCP-owned companies. The concern is that these investments support the CCP's genocidal regime, human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and military modernization. This issue is particularly troubling as it affects service members, elected officials, and federal government employees whose retirement savings inadvertently fund these activities.

A six-page letter was sent to Sequoia Capital, initiating an investigation into their funding practices, particularly regarding weapons in China. Mike Gallagher, a member of a bipartisan committee, is questioning Sequoia's ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the implications for American security. The investigation could reveal a scandal involving both parties, as many politicians have accepted donations from Sequoia while ignoring potential threats. Gallagher's letter highlights connections to key figures in the Biden administration and raises concerns about investments in companies like TikTok, which could influence elections. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings with foreign investors.

BlackRock has made a deal with Zelensky to rebuild Ukraine after the war. However, it's worth noting that BlackRock is a major shareholder in arms manufacturers profiting from the war. So, while they sell weapons, they also get to rebuild the country. Hillary Clinton also mentioned economic opportunities in Iraq after the devastating war, referring to the large customer base there. It's a rather cynical perspective, considering the loss of innocent lives. The United States should view Iraq as a business opportunity, according to Clinton.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.

BlackRock is allegedly mutilating children for profit through their ownership of Eli Lilly, a health care company specializing in gender affirming care for minors. This care purportedly includes surgical procedures on children as young as 10 who identify as the opposite gender. BlackRock has allegedly profited $771,000,000 from holding Eli Lilly stock over the past five years. The speaker intends to invest in stocks held by BlackRock due to their profitability, suggesting others do the same via borgfinance.com.

BlackRock owns the four meat packers in the country, who are keeping meat prices high and cow prices low, hurting both farmers and consumers due to their monopoly. BlackRock also owns all the pharmaceutical companies. The speaker suggests initiating antitrust suits against the meat packers and regulating pharmaceutical companies to prevent cartel-like behavior.