TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The government is being questioned for covering vaccine injuries inadequately. Concerns were raised about mRNA vaccines being contaminated with DNA fragments, making them genetically modified organisms. Professor Delglish warns that these vaccines may cause cancer relapses. He calls for a halt on mRNA vaccines and demands full disclosure of data. The speaker urges for transparency and ethical principles in pandemic management. The debate emphasizes the importance of following scientific evidence.

People are finally starting to see the evidence against vaccines, with new studies linking boosters to cancer. Most MPs are still supporting vaccines, but only to save face until after the upcoming election. The speaker believes the vaccine rollout is a crime against humanity, with potentially millions of deaths worldwide.

Synthetic DNA and RNA injections are genetic therapies, not vaccines. The speaker questions the mislabeling of these therapies and criticizes the CDC for redefining vaccines. They argue that the shots are not effective and are being given for non-existent variants. The speaker raises concerns about the safety of these injections, including the potential for cancer and other health risks. They highlight the contamination of the vaccines with DNA and other harmful substances. The speaker calls for the cessation of these shots, the opening of cancer databases, and the return of informed consent in medicine. They emphasize the importance of trust, integrity, and community in navigating these issues.

The oncologist discusses concerns about COVID vaccines, emphasizing the spike protein's potential risks and the negative impact of boosters. He highlights cases of cancer relapse and deaths post-booster. Despite pushback from medical authorities, oncologists worldwide share similar worries but fear repercussions for speaking out. The speaker stresses the importance of open debate in science and urges for immediate action to prevent further harm.

The speaker questions the presence of SB40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting they could lead to cancer through insertional mutagenesis. They advocate for alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, claiming they are safe and effective. The speaker criticizes the FDA for redacting data on vaccine contamination, questioning their transparency.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

The speaker discusses DNA contamination found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, highlighting regulatory agencies' failure to address the issue. They mention potential risks of DNA integration and cancer development, urging for a review of regulatory practices. Concerns are raised about DNA levels exceeding limits, potential cell integration, and long-term presence in the body. The speaker emphasizes the need for better monitoring tools and the unique nature of DNA contamination in these vaccines.

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.

The government is criticized for not adequately addressing concerns about mRNA vaccine contamination with oncogenic material. Professor Angus Delwych warns that mRNA vaccines should be banned due to safety risks. The loss of trust in pharmaceutical companies is highlighted, calling for transparency and data disclosure. The importance of ethical medical science in pandemic management is emphasized. The need for societal coordination, human rights respect, and adherence to scientific principles is stressed. The speaker questions the government's handling of vaccine safety and urges for accountability in the face of potential risks.

A Swedish physician and researcher, Dr. Jutta Kruger, claims that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to fast-growing cancers. She has observed extraordinary rates of aggressive cancers in her pathology work and believes the vaccines are triggering them. Official US government data allegedly shows a shocking 143,233% increase in the risk of developing cancer after COVID-19 vaccination. The speakers express concerns about various systems being rigged, including the banking industry, weapons manufacturers, mainstream media, and the government. They argue that control over information and opinions is increasing, comparing it to communist countries where dissent is suppressed through incarceration or execution. They mention California as an example where opposing views could lead to arrest.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

The speaker, an oncologist, expresses concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. They believe that the spike protein in the vaccines has harmful effects due to its charge and similarity to human epitopes. They argue that the boosters are unnecessary and can suppress the T cell response, leading to cancer relapses and other health issues. The speaker criticizes the medical community for ignoring their concerns and calls for a ban on mRNA vaccines and boosters. They also mention the contamination of DNA in the vaccines and its potential impact on increasing cancer rates. The speaker emphasizes the need for government action to address these issues.

The speakers discuss government surveillance and the harmful effects of spike proteins from certain treatments. They highlight the increase in health issues like cancer and pulmonary embolisms. The conversation also touches on the lack of transparency from pharmaceutical companies and the suppression of natural remedies like ivermectin.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise in "turbo cancers" in young people to these vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly discouraged from publishing anything that might undermine public confidence in vaccines. They argue the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, particularly for young people, and that statistical modeling supporting their use is flawed. The speaker highlights an article in the Mail on Sunday where they and James Royal asserted a causal link between the vaccines and cancer, citing cases of relapsed and new stage four cancers. They criticize the medical community for not routinely collecting patients' vaccine histories and dismissing any potential association. The speaker believes the risk of cancer increases exponentially with each vaccine dose.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise of "turbo cancers" in young people to the vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly considering it a crime to undermine public confidence in them. They state the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, with benefits existing only in statistical models. They criticize COVID modeling for being consistently inaccurate and exaggerating the severity of the pandemic. The speaker highlights a Mail on Sunday article where they and James Royal argued that the vaccines cause cancer, citing relapsed cancers and new stage four cancers in healthy individuals. They conducted a survey revealing that they were the only doctor asking patients about their vaccine history, while other doctors deny any association between the vaccines and cancer.

The speaker discusses the presence of contamination in vaccines, specifically cDNA fragments and s p 40, which is a cancer-promoting segment of DNA. They mention that s v 40, a related virus, caused cancer in millions of Americans in the past. The speaker explains that s p 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the vaccines impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the vaccines promote cancer and hinder our ability to fight it. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing but questions how much of it is due to the vaccines.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

As a vaccine researcher, the speaker opposed COVID boosters from the start, based on the principle that vaccines shouldn't require them. Boosters were given because antibody levels fell off, which the speaker says is normal. The speaker claims the booster was a waste of time because it targeted a virus that no longer existed. The speaker alleges the booster suppressed the T cell system and switched antibodies to be tolerizing, increasing the risk of COVID and other infections. The speaker claims to have observed cancer patients relapsing after boosters, despite advising against them. The speaker says they were silenced for raising concerns, but now "everybody knows the truth" that these observations were correct. The speaker cites a Japanese study correlating increased cancer incidence with the vaccine program and expresses alarm that the study was based on deaths. The speaker says data from around the world shows how boosters can suppress immune response and drive cancers. The speaker concludes by lamenting that clinicians and scientists were silenced and unable to make a difference.

The speaker expresses concern about the presence of s p 40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting that their inclusion was intentional and could lead to cancer. They argue that gene therapies were not brought to market for years due to the risk of insertional mutagenesis causing cancer. The speaker advocates for the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as safe alternatives to vaccines. They question the transparency of withholding data and urge the protection of citizens by standing up against experimental products. The speaker concludes by pleading for one state to take action and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speaker believes vaccines are causing cancer, with the risk increasing exponentially with each booster, because boosters suppress T cell response, which controls cancer. Experts claim messenger RNA is safe because we are exposed to it daily and it's easily disposed of, but the speaker argues that mRNA vaccines are stabilized to prevent disposal, which is the core problem. The speaker claims that mRNA can integrate and hack your genetic code, promoting oncogenes and down-regulating suppressor genes. They state that the UK and Australia have invested heavily in mRNA technology without proper oversight. The speaker advocates for ending this culture and improving population health.

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.