reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A congresswoman claims NBC has a previously unseen video allegedly showing Oswald near the vehicle during the JFK assassination, suggesting he wasn't the shooter. She says they will request the tape, which director Stone saw a secondary copy of, believing it could "blow open" the JFK investigation, but that NBC has been "guarding" it. She also references a CIA document that supposedly shows the CIA never bought the "lone gunman theory." She praises Trump, Radcliffe, and Gabbard for pushing for transparency and hopes to bring forward legislation to prevent similar situations. She encourages the public to ask NBC to release the tape so the American people know the truth about JFK's assassination.

Recently, in January, a member of the Senate Intel Committee tried to block someone from getting a job in the intel world because this person would push for the release of the JFK files. This senator's main goal is to keep those files secret, but I don't understand why they would be protecting the CIA, especially after the Church Committee hearings already discredited them. I know that a member of the Senate Intel Committee made that call to block the appointment. Someone asked if it was Tom Cotton from Arkansas, but I haven't asked him directly for an interview, even though I probably should.

Today marks the 60th anniversary of the JFK assassination, and there are still unanswered questions. The speaker discusses liaison activities, where the CIA and FBI can avoid reporting their actions to Congress if done jointly with partner agencies like MI6 or MASA. This is used as an excuse to withhold JFK documents, as revealing that the FBI and CIA used foreign henchmen to manipulate the president would jeopardize their existence and partnerships. The speaker mentions Trump's reluctance to expose allies. They emphasize the need for truth and urge action on liaison activities to dismantle the deep state and uncover the truth behind JFK's assassination.

According to the released JFK assassination files and director Ratcliffe’s disclosures, the CIA undermined congressional investigations by stonewalling, destroying evidence, and intimidating witnesses. The speaker asserts that the CIA internally launched a coup against President Kennedy, which they say resulted in his assassination. This claim is said to be supported not only by their interpretation but also by investigators’ conclusions within the released materials. A key evidentiary point cited is testimony from a doctor who worked in the Operating Room and later testified to Congress. The doctor, now upwards of 90, testified to multiple entrance wounds, not just from the front but also from behind President Kennedy, which the speaker says indicates more than one shooter. The claim is reinforced by the assertion that the Secret Service destroyed evidence as well, even though they were given a no-order. Regarding accountability, the speaker notes that identifying the individuals who fired the shots may be unlikely, but maintains that the evidence points to a CIA coup within the agency to assassinate Kennedy. The discussion also references contemporaneous media dynamics. The Washington Post is described as having shifted from being perceived as a mouthpiece for the deep state to publishing a piece about George Joe Niedis, described as an embedded spy with dual identities tied to the congressional investigations. This is presented as an intriguing development in the coverage of the case. Additionally, the speaker mentions that multiple presidents, both Democrat and Republican, sought declassification of Kennedy-related materials, especially after Oliver Stone’s film in the 1990s. They claim that the intelligence community blocked these efforts, with the FBI and CIA directors among those who obstructed declassification. The turning point is attributed to Director Ratcliffe, whose involvement led to the release of the files. The speaker asserts that the files have now been released and are available at the National Archives, following a declassification order signed by President Trump. The closing invitation is for the audience to check the National Archives for the released materials.

Upon election, the speaker will establish an independent presidential commission on assassination attempts. This commission will release all remaining documents pertaining to the John F. Kennedy assassination. The commission will also conduct a rigorous review of the attack that occurred last month. The speaker states that many people have asked them to release the documents on the Kennedy assassination.

Speaker 1, a government official, expresses dedication to uncovering the truth about historical cover-ups, particularly regarding the JFK assassination. They express distrust in agencies like the FBI and emphasize the importance of transparency. They hope for the release of all relevant documents to the public. The speaker questions the motives behind past cover-ups and stresses the need for full honesty and accountability.

After a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination, the initial congressional hearing was flawed regarding the single bullet theory. I believe there were two shooters. Hopefully, we can gain access to the SCIF before the files are released to the public to find more information.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following news coverage of released documents. One revelation discussed is that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis to monitor Lee Harvey Oswald prior to the assassination. JFK was allegedly concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in the summer of 1963, and sent letters to David Ben-Gurion demanding inspections. Ben-Gurion resigned when pressed on the issue. The speaker asks if the current administration will acknowledge Israel's nuclear arsenal. The response states that 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination have been released by order of President Trump, and that this is all the material. There will be no comment on speculation or conspiracy theories about the assassination.

The Kennedy family had a long-standing feud with the CIA. Joseph Kennedy, the family patriarch, called for an end to the CIA's operations, and John and Robert Kennedy criticized the CIA's role in Vietnam. Before his assassination, John Kennedy planned to remove the clandestine services from the CIA. There were many enemies, not just from the CIA, who opposed the family. It wasn't until recently that doubts arose about who killed John Kennedy. Paul Schrade, a close friend of Robert Kennedy, believes Sirhan Sirhan did not act alone. The autopsy report and ballistic evidence suggest that Sirhan couldn't have shot John Kennedy from behind. The speaker doesn't draw any conclusions but emphasizes the importance of facts, autopsy reports, ballistic evidence, and eyewitness accounts. The involvement of the CIA or another government agency remains uncertain.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following the release of unredacted records ordered by President Trump. One revelation discussed is that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis as part of his intelligence gathering, including monitoring Lee Harvey Oswald prior to the assassination. Oswald was reportedly under surveillance for four years, from 1959 to 1963, with new documents pointing to an Israeli connection. JFK was allegedly concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in the summer of 1963 and sent letters to Ben Gurion demanding inspections. Ben Gurion resigned when pressed on the issue, and JFK was assassinated in November. The speaker states that 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination are currently being released and that this is all the material. The speaker declines to comment on speculation and conspiracy theories about the assassination.

Speaker discusses Trump’s stance on JFK assassination files, saying Trump claimed that if you knew what I know, you wouldn’t tell people either, and notes that this is his position on UAP as well. He asserts that the CIA had knowledge of the JFK matter and that the conspiracy industry around JFK is an industry with many wackos, but emphasizes that the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. He mentions that documents are still classified sixty-one years later and argues that both Trump and Joe Biden have kept those documents secret in violation of his reading of federal law. He states there is no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination, only an institution or possibly countries involved, and indicates there may be something worth protecting. He relays a conversation with someone who had seen the documents two years earlier, from whom he learned that yes, the CIA was involved, and notes James Jesus Angleton, head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this. He says this was news to him and he discussed it on TV. The next day, while quail hunting, he received a phone call from Mike Pompeo’s lawyer, who, as then-CIA director and later Secretary of State, had plotted the murder of Julian Assange. The lawyer told him that anyone who reveals contents of classified documents has committed a crime, and the speaker recalls driving with his dog and asks if revealing that the U.S. government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president constitutes the crime, while suggesting Pompeo is protecting the murder. The speaker says Pompeo had no response. The speaker asserts Pompeo pressed Trump to keep the documents secret and calls Pompeo sinister and criminal, citing that Pompeo was caught—referencing Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff’s piece—where Issachoff’s sources claimed Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange, who had not been charged in the U.S. as CIA director. He states federal employees are not allowed to kill people they don’t like. He contends Pompeo pressured Trump to withhold information the public has a right to know and that Pompeo plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. Finally, the speaker questions how Pompeo is treated in Republican Washington, noting he is treated as a respected figure and potential secretary of defense in a Trump administration, despite being described as criminal for keeping information secret and for plotting a murder. He finds it mind-bending that Pompeo is treated as a pillar of Republican Washington.

It is an honor and solemn responsibility to testify regarding disturbing new revelations from the newest JFK files. It is a grave matter to assert that CIA officers were culpable or complicit in the death of a president, so fact checkers should have all the evidence used to support this testimony.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. The source of this pressure is unknown, but it is not believed to be the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The question is posed: who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which is the same as preventing it? The purpose of this slow-walking is to continue hiding facts. It is questioned what force is acting on the US government and the new administration to prevent disclosure, especially considering the assassination of a president undermines democracy. Getting to the bottom of the JFK situation is deemed very important.

Good evening. After Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald, many Americans questioned the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination. The Warren Commission concluded that both acted alone, but doubts persisted. The term "conspiracy theory" emerged in 1964 as skepticism grew. Psychiatrist Louis Joylan West, who assessed Ruby, was a CIA contractor involved in mind control programs, raising further questions about his motives. A 1976 House committee suggested a conspiracy in Kennedy's murder, with the CIA as a prime suspect. Despite laws mandating document disclosure, recent administrations have withheld thousands of pages. A source with access to these documents claimed the CIA was involved in the assassination. This suggests a powerful, unaccountable force within the government, undermining democratic control. Trust in government has eroded since Kennedy's death, and many key figures have been aware of this troubling reality.

The speaker discusses a series of alarming claims related to political violence and distrust in U.S. institutions. They reference online activity on social media and a book that appeared prior to what is described as the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The speaker states that the book “was put up, I believe, twenty four hours or within a certain period of time before he was assassinated,” and they recall seeing it but are unsure if there was any follow-up. Turning to broader issues of trust, the speaker asserts that skepticism toward the government, and specifically agencies like the FBI, does not arise from nowhere. They frame this distrust as grounded in “decades of the federal government and elected officials' failures and actually being transparent and honest with the American people.” In their view, there has been a history of corruption within the FBI, described as “corruptness that exists within the Department of the FBI previously,” which they juxtapose with references to “the deep state individuals in various branches of government that have engaged in coups against the American people.” The speaker then suggests a possible topic for discussion, stating, “We can talk about Kennedy if you want,” implying that discussions about government overreach or conspiratorial actions could include the Kennedy assassination as a point of reference. Overall, the points highlighted are: (1) a book about the assassination of Charlie Kirk appearing online shortly before the alleged event, with uncertainty about follow-up; (2) a claim that distrust in government institutions stems from long-standing failures and lack of transparency by federal authorities; (3) allegations of FBI corruption and deep-state actors across branches of government who have engaged in coups against the American people; and (4) an invitation to discuss related topics such as Kennedy.

After reviewing 30,000 JFK assassination files, the speaker found nothing new or any mention of a specific group. In 1962, JFK and Bobby forced the AZC to register as a foreign agent, preventing monetary contributions to US officials. In 1963, JFK and CIA Director John McCone discussed Israel's nuclear program. A May 1963 letter from JFK allegedly provides answers about this. The speaker questions the point of the task force and expresses frustration. They criticize the US involvement in conflicts, citing the situation in Yemen and the attack on ships by Houthi rebels. They question what's happening behind closed doors, referencing the Epstein files and the JFK files release. The speaker asks US military members if they are willing to go to war for a nation that wouldn't do the same for them.

The speaker discusses the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. They mention Rob Reiner's claim that JFK was shot by four shooters and question the official investigation. They also mention a CIA agent who confirmed the CIA's involvement in the assassination. The speaker highlights the lack of trust in the government and the existence of powerful forces within the US government that are beyond democratic control. They mention a Secret Service agent's account that challenges the lone gunman theory. The speaker concludes by calling for truth and honesty in the matter.

The speaker, initially uninterested in the JFK assassination due to its association with conspiracy theories, has since learned enough to believe "there's something actually there." Trump issued an executive order to release files on the JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and MLK assassinations, but the files have not been released. The speaker believes the CIA was involved in some way, but doesn't think protecting the CIA is the reason for the delay, especially after the Church Committee hearings. The speaker questions who is being protected and if a foreign government is involved, stating there is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking the disclosure, as slow-walking the disclosure is the same as not providing the disclosure. The speaker believes it's important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.

The discussion centers on newly declassified CIA files and old JFK assassination records, with a key claim that Israel was involved in JFK’s assassination. The main points asserted are: - CIA files allegedly show that James Arlington, a top CIA officer, had connections to Israel intelligence and subverted President Kennedy’s policy to prevent Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons. Arlington was praised by Mossad head Emmett as “the biggest Zionist of them all.” - Arlington allegedly hid documents from the Warren Commission about the Kennedy assassination. Shortly before his death, Arlington purportedly stated, “the better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would have been promoted.” The file, previously released in 02/17/18 and 2022 in redacted form, is now unredacted. - The material is presented as proof that “Israel assassinated JFK,” and the speaker expresses disbelief about why Israel would act this way. - In a separate thread, Speaker 1 discusses anti-Semitism online, plans to battle it, and proposes creating a division within the State Department to handle technology and revamp the office to be highly prominent. - Speaker 2 questions how a US official could advocate censorship of citizens, arguing that it would be illegal and contrasting it with free speech. References are made to the Biden administration, the US government, and the potential firing of an official for statements. - Speaker 0 returns to a broader claim that American citizens are losing their First Amendment rights to expose truths about Israel. The argument is that exposing such truths would provoke a countrywide revolt, and a critique is leveled at those who would silence speech. The speaker urges compliance as a way to avoid tyranny, suggesting that “you’re gonna pass this burden … onto your children,” and concludes with “Trust me. You can comply your way out of tyranny.” Overall, the transcript juxtaposes declassified material and theories about Israel’s involvement in JFK’s assassination with discussions about censorship, speech rights, and governmental efforts to regulate or revamp technology-related oversight in the State Department, all framed by a provocative stance on silencing discourse about Israel.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. It is unknown who is exerting this pressure, but the speaker does not believe it is the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which they equate to preventing disclosure altogether. The speaker believes it is a fair question to ask what force is acting on the US government to prevent disclosure, especially considering the gravity of a president's assassination. Getting to the bottom of the JFK situation is considered very important.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following the release of unredacted records ordered by President Trump. One person states that Jefferson Morley of JFK facts analyzed the released documents on Bill O'Reilly's show, revealing that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis to monitor Lee Harvey Oswald for four years prior to the assassination. They add that JFK was concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in 1963, demanding inspections from Ben Gurion, who then resigned. The speaker asks if the current administration will acknowledge Israel's nuclear arsenal. Speaker 0 confirms the release of 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination and states that all material is now available. They decline to comment on speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination.

CIA counterintelligence was responsible for Kennedy's assassination, according to newly reviewed documents. CIA counterintelligence officers targeted Oswald for recruitment as an agent in 1959, surveilling him for four years, then lied about it to investigators. The documents reveal deep CIA involvement with Oswald before the assassination and subsequent deception. Oswald was never regarded as a security threat, despite actions that should have raised alarms. James Angleton had two FBI reports on Oswald on his desk in mid-November, confirmed in the latest JFK releases. Whether or not Oswald was a shooter, he was not the intellectual author of Kennedy's death. The focus should be on the actions of CIA counterintelligence. Fifteen specific JFK documents, known to exist and easily retrieved, have never been seen in their entirety by the public, violating the JFK Records Act.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. The source of this pressure is unknown, but it is not believed to be the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The question is, who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which is the same as preventing it? The purpose of this slow-walking is to continue hiding facts. What force is acting on the US government and the new administration to prevent disclosure? It is a fair question because the president of the United States was murdered, which overturned the vote of the people. It is important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.

Secrecy is repugnant in a free society. The assassination of President Kennedy occurred at 1 PM CST. We must overcome societal divisions – racial, economic, etc. – and work together. The assassinations of both Kennedy brothers are acknowledged. The dangers of excessive concealment outweigh the justifications for it. We must not let the need for security be used to expand censorship. The CIA’s purpose was creating constant wars for the military-industrial complex. Many Americans distrust the Warren Commission report. We must protect our freedoms; they are coming after us. No official should use my words as an excuse to censor, stifle dissent, or withhold facts. Some media push personal agendas, threatening our democracy. We seek a true peace, not one enforced by American weapons; we all share this planet and our children’s future.