reSee.it - Related Video Feed

John Paulus serves a subpoena to someone named John for Tina Peters' lawsuit. John seems unsure if he had an appointment.

Speaker 0 announces the time as 9:15 and mentions being arrested. They ask someone to double check something related to arrest in Germany. They then request the person to put something away.

The speaker questions the audience about whether the answer to who killed Charlie Kirk and what happened on September 10 is “very clear.” Even among those who believe Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger, the speaker doubts the situation would be described as “very clear.” The speaker notes that Erica Kirk believes it to be clear, and suggests this represents the “final stop” of a PR campaign, with Erica being brought out to signal to the public that her judgment cannot be questioned. The speaker rejects what he calling emotional manipulation and wants to give people permission to avoid the trap of feeling obliged to share Erica Kirk’s conclusions simply because she is a widow and the public cannot cry or question her judgment. The speaker contends that the story presented thus far “makes little sense, if any sense,” and asserts that it “makes, I think, no sense.” To that end, he signals that later in the show they will discuss Tyler Robinson, who has now made his first in-person appearance in court. He frames this as “the good news” that Tyler Robinson exists, indicating a forthcoming discussion of his court appearance.

Speaker 0 questions going in, Speaker 1 hesitant. Speaker 0 distracted by rock, Speaker 1 reminds of interview. Speaker 0 defensive, claims talking on phone. Speaker 1 reassures, conversation ends positively.

Speaker 0: Suspect in custody. They've released that individual. And they're still looking for him. Do they think it's in he's in this building? This they're they're thinking this building right now? Speaker 1: No. No. We have cameras that show that he left campus. Speaker 0: It shows cameras that he left campus. Yeah. Thank you. Speaker 1: Bye. Speaker 0: Bye bye. Speaker 1: Bye.

Okay, here's the summarized transcript: The police raided my place from the street. I'm going to court. My lawyers will be there for me. Thank you.

Speaker 0 is checking in with someone and expresses that they have accomplished something. The other person asks if they are leaving, to which Speaker 0 confirms. Speaker 0 then asks for some information, but the other person refuses. Both speakers clarify that they are not suicidal and enjoy life.

Speaker 0 and the property manager engage over a search attempt. Speaker 0 asks who they are looking for and whether they have a judicial search warrant, noting they’re not going to get access and that “This is not private property.” The conversation repeats that this is not private property, and Speaker 0 asserts they won’t be able to open the door. The property manager confirms they are the manager but refuses to open the door and declines to disclose whether the person is present, saying, “I can’t tell you,” and “Don’t tell me that yet? Nope. I can’t.” Speaker 0 presses for information and whether the person is in the building, while the manager maintains they cannot reveal anything. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 saying, “Have a nice day,” and the property manager replying, “Have a great day,” and expressing a concern to “keep my residents safe.”

Speaker 0 asks if someone is at their door, while Speaker 1 suggests leaving and says it's not possible to do what Speaker 0 is asking. Speaker 0 repeats their question about someone being at their door.

The speaker questions someone about their involvement in questionable donations made through ActBlue. They mention talking to people in Maryland who denied making the donations listed on ActBlue's website. The speaker is asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing at a location in Massachusetts.

Speaker 0 instructs others to 'stay stay back and back to the grass as much as possible.' He states, 'I the guy who was arrested, got a photo of him.' The exchange ends with 'Yeah.'

I'm John Gray from the FBI. Is Miss Anderson available? No, she's not. I wanted to discuss the Baton Rouge case with her. Can I schedule a meeting to come back and talk to her?

Speaker 0 is contacted by the FBI but refuses to turn off the camera. They are asked about someone they met online but refuse to speak on camera. Speaker 0 declines an interview and ends the conversation.

An individual is asked repeatedly if they are with Black Lives Matter. The person on the phone says he is not being charged with anything. He denies being with Black Lives Matter.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a charge related to not complying with COVID-19 restrictions. Speaker 1 asserts they do not consent to contract or benefits. The court schedules a mention date for further proceedings. Speaker 1 questions trust administration, but the court clarifies the focus on the Criminal Procedure Act. The next court date is set for December 7th for a contested mention. The charge is eventually withdrawn, and Speaker 1 is excused.

The speaker repeatedly asks the person if they have more information about trespassing and being asked to leave the secured side. The person denies refusing to leave and asks for the statute to be cited so they can understand it better. The speaker tells them to look it up themselves.

A person asks John if he was at the Capitol. The person then asks John if he is with Black Lives Matter or right-wing people. John is on the phone during this exchange. The person asks again, "Are you Black Lives Matter?" Someone says John stated on the phone that he is not being charged with anything. The person repeats the question, "Are you Black Lives Matter, John?" John answers, "No."

Speaker 0 denies something, stating "She did not. That is not what happened." This is repeated for emphasis. Speaker 0 then abruptly demands the contact information of an unidentified person, but immediately retracts the request. Finally, Speaker 0 declares an intention to provide a "sign" to someone.

The speaker wants to know if the FBI is working with someone. They are told that the FBI concluded that person had nothing and stopped working with them. The speaker will check and confirm this information.

The speaker mentions that it has been 10 days, but it is unclear what this refers to. They then ask if someone is changing their plea abruptly and question why they made a contract. They also ask if the person is worried about going to prison.

I'm John Gray from the FBI. Is Miss Anderson available? No, she's not. I wanted to talk to her about the Baton Rouge case. Can I schedule a meeting with her?

Speaker 0 has a video of Speaker 1 at a house. Speaker 1 claims they were scammed into living there and are waiting for a lawyer. A reporter asks about the dispute over the house's ownership. Speaker 0 says they are waiting on the lawyer and is not leaving. Speaker 1 asks to put the reporter on the phone. Speaker 0 answers the call. Translation: Speaker 0 has a video of Speaker 1 at a house. Speaker 1 claims they were scammed into living there and are waiting for a lawyer. A reporter asks about the dispute over the house's ownership. Speaker 0 says they are waiting on the lawyer and is not leaving. Speaker 1 asks to put the reporter on the phone. Speaker 0 answers the call.

Speaker 0 confirms that something is working correctly and mentions a 10-digit number. The speaker then asks if someone is changing their plea and questions why they made a contract. They also inquire if the person is concerned about going to prison.

The excerpt opens with a reference to a conference from many years ago, suggesting that the listener might have been in attendance. The exchange then shifts to a brief, awkward moment where someone apologizes and asks for permission to proceed, followed by a request for help. A responder states "No," and a separate remark introduces "the subpoena, for example," indicating a mention of a subpoena within the discussion. The conversation continues with an affirmative interjection—"Oh, good"—and a request: "Can you take off the stage?" The reactions include a startled "Wow" and a meta-comment noting the situation is starting in a dramatic way: "Getting off to a dramatic start already." The exchange ends with a clipped closing, simply "Well," signaling an unresolved or continuing moment in the dialogue. Overall, the passage captures a tense, performative moment at a conference, blending retrospective reference, administrative tension (subpoena), and a stage-direction style query, all underscored by a sense of escalating drama at the outset.

The speaker asks an officer what is happening and what is going on. The speaker repeats, "What's that?" and "What?" The officer responds that they can't describe exactly what's going on, stating, "It's an ongoing investigation." The speaker repeats the word "crime" multiple times.