TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of deaths were either directly caused by the COVID-19 vaccine or significantly contributed to by it. Most deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is responsible for some deaths, challenging the government's stance. The study has gained significant attention on social media and editorial platforms.

The speakers discuss a study of 325 autopsies of individuals who died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the speakers, this is the largest autopsy series of its kind. A rigorous review of the autopsies allegedly found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. This study is claimed to be a peer-reviewed paper that is going to be published. One speaker states that they are the senior author of this study. The speakers anticipate a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines in children, pregnant women, and adults. They urge politicians to acknowledge and address this issue.

The speaker suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be causing more harm than good. They claim to have conducted a study of over 300 autopsies, finding that 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. They also state that 100% of cardiac arrest and sudden deaths had no other explanation but the vaccine. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these findings, as death is usually attributed to known causes.

There are 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

According to the speaker, the best data to support their opinion comes from autopsies. In the largest autopsy series published to date, of which the speaker is the senior author, 73.9% of individuals who underwent autopsy after vaccination were determined to have died as a result of the vaccine. The first author of the study is Holsher and colleagues.

The speaker discusses a set of 36 documents that are almost entirely redacted (blackened), described as “nori-bento” documents, and notes that 80% of the content is blacked out. The documents were received by a family member, specifically the widow of a man who was a former cram school teacher, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, in her 40s. She explains that her husband died at home, and police prevented an autopsy; she wanted to know the cause of death and sought the autopsy results from the evidence. The narrative then presents a specific case: a 42-year-old man died six days after vaccination. He received the first vaccine dose on October 15, 2021, which was Pfizer. After the shot, he developed side effects: arm pain, fever, with the fever peaking at 38.5 degrees Celsius for about three days. The wife confirmed the fever lasted for three days, but she notes that he continued to go to work and did not typically discuss such symptoms. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was spitting white foam from his mouth and also bleeding; she recalls he was experiencing difficulty breathing. He subsequently suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Regarding the cause of death, the doctors stated that the exact cause is unclear. They said, “this may or may not be the vaccine’s fault,” but there is no conclusive evidence that it was the vaccine. A physician described the death as related to an “acute circulatory system disease,” and there was discussion among multiple doctors who identified potential conditions such as heart attack, coronary issues, or other acute circulatory problems, but no definitive determination could be made from the available materials. The documents show that the police and investigators offered opinions that included statements like “rapid circulatory system disease inferred opinion.” The widow wanted autopsy results to clarify the cause, but the police or authorities did not provide a clear, accessible explanation in these redacted documents. There are other referenced cases where families argued that autopsies would have clarified the cause of death, and the narrator notes that some families regret not having autopsies performed. The speaker underscores that the majority of the 36 documents are redacted, with only a portion visible. The conclusion stated in the material is that the cause of death was inferred as an acute circulatory system disease, yet the detailed sequence of events leading to that conclusion remains obscured by redactions. The widow expresses ongoing grief and a wish for more complete, transparent autopsy information to understand why her husband died after vaccination. The material also hints at broader concerns about whether autopsies are being pursued aggressively enough in such cases.

A study on COVID vaccine autopsies was published in The Lancet, stating that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. The study was removed within 24 hours, citing unsupported conclusions. The study reviewed 325 autopsies, with the cardiovascular system being the most affected. Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination. The authors called for further investigation. The removal of the study raised concerns about censorship and the CDC's stance on vaccine-related deaths.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

We submitted a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet on COVID vaccine-related sudden deaths. The paper, co-authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, is the largest autopsy series in the world with 325 cases. 74% of sudden deaths were linked to the vaccine. Despite pressure, the paper passed peer review and will be published. More evidence is emerging on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.

And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot. Over 50% of these deaths had a cardiovascular cause. According to the speaker, these findings contradict the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. The speaker claims this research represents the largest series of autopsies indicating patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's position.

It is claimed that autopsies should be performed on everyone who dies after receiving a vaccine. It is alleged that there is a refusal to perform autopsies. It is argued that without autopsies, it is impossible to determine the specific cause of death. It is claimed that autopsies used to be commonly performed on most people who died.

A study published in The Lancet claimed that 74% of deaths from COVID vaccines were caused by the vaccine, but the study was removed within 24 hours. The study, written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and others, reviewed 325 autopsies and found that the cardiovascular system was the most affected organ system. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with most deaths occurring within a week of the last vaccine administration. However, the CDC and FDA do not consider these deaths as vaccinated deaths. The study suggests a causal link between COVID vaccines and death, but the reasons for its removal are unclear. The CDC has not acknowledged any deaths caused by COVID vaccines, and autopsy evidence challenging this is not welcomed by the public health establishment.

In the largest autopsy series to date, the speaker is the senior author. After reviewing deaths and using an adjudication committee to determine cause, it was found that in 73.9% of cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, the vaccine was determined to be the cause of death. The first author of the study is Holsher and colleagues.

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the COVID-19 vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This challenges the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking the vaccine to deaths. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is indeed causing deaths. This study has gained significant attention on social media and other platforms, forcing the government to address this issue.

The image being highlighted is a set of 36 blacked-out documents, referred to as “kuro-nuri so-ryo” (blackened documents). Of these, eight-tenths are blacked out. The relatives who received these documents are introduced: a woman in her 40s living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of the deceased; she had heard that her husband was a tutor at a cram school. He died at home, and the police prohibited a full investigation, so she wanted to know the cause of death and went to Northern Hokkaido to see the autopsy results. The narrative then shifts to the sequence of events for a different case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wanted to know the details of her husband’s death. The husband received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. Soon after the vaccination, he developed a reaction: arm pain, fever up to 38.5°C, and a fever that lasted about three days, during which his wife acknowledges the fever was present but notes he did not usually discuss symptoms beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and came down; the husband had collapsed, coughing up white foam, with blood in his mouth and difficulty breathing. He then fell into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical professionals were asked to comment on the cause of death. They stated that the exact cause is not clearly known; it could be the vaccine, but there is no evidence to confirm this, so they could not definitively say it was the vaccine. They described the death as an acute circulatory system disease and mentioned possibilities such as vascular issues, heart or blood vessel abnormalities, and conditions like myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or aneurysm, but could not specify. One doctor suggested that the death might be attributed to an acute circulatory system disease, while another indicated that the precise cause remains uncertain. The wife wanted the autopsy results from the police to understand why her husband died, and she expressed that she regrets not having had an autopsy performed. When asked about performing an autopsy after national guidelines advised against it, officials reportedly suggested that delaying the man’s return home would be problematic, and thus the autopsy was not performed. The speaker notes that in other cases they have covered, some relatives feel that an autopsy would have helped them understand the death, while others question whether an autopsy would have changed anything. The report concludes that the death is suspected to be due to an acute circulatory system disease, but the pathway to that conclusion remains unclear because much of the evidence is redacted. The speaker emphasizes that if autopsies had been pursued more actively, such cases in Sapporo might be less common.

In a recent study, researchers examined autopsy reports of deaths that appeared to be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Using a rigorous analysis, they found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the last vaccine dose, with cardiovascular issues being the main cause. The study was conducted by a team of doctors and experts in pathology, who reviewed 44 papers and 325 autopsies.

During a 6-month period, 22,000 people received the vaccine while 22,000 others received a placebo. In the vaccine group, 1 person died from COVID, compared to 2 in the placebo group. However, the number needed to vaccinate to save one life is 22,000. Additionally, the vaccine group had 21 deaths from all causes, while the placebo group had 17. This means there were more deaths in the vaccine group. Furthermore, there were 4 to 5 cases of cardiac arrest in the vaccine group, compared to only 1 in the placebo group. This suggests that taking the vaccine increases the likelihood of dying from all causes and cardiac arrest.

Dr. McCulloch is asked to weigh in. Speaker 1 responds that he has presented at FDA advisory meetings and advised companies for decades on regulatory science. He states that when a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death—some on the very first day they take the shot. He argues that this must be a black box warning on the product immediately. He says he checked the package inserts for the currently available products, noting that the ones Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue, and what the Governor still wants to pursue, and what the FDA still wants administered, do not have the word “death” in the package insert. He asserts that Americans are not fairly informed. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 doubts that the COVID injection caused some deaths, and asks for his view on the numbers listed on VAERS (thirty-seven thousand, six hundred seven, per the prompt) and whether he has any science to back up his opinion. Speaker 1 replies that the best data are autopsies. He references the largest autopsy series published to date and notes that he is the senior author. He says they examined deaths after vaccination, had an adjudication committee and methods of arbitration to decide whether the vaccine caused death, and that in these autopsy cases, seventy-three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. He mentions Holsher and colleagues, who are right behind him. Speaker 0 reiterates the FDA’s own laws, asking that this be included in the package insert, correct? Speaker 1 confirms, noting that in 2021 Dr. Carol Tocetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote about Peters’ marks in 2023 and asked, “where’s the black box warning? Where is it?”

In the largest autopsy series to date, the speaker states that they are the senior author. After examining deaths and reviewing them with an adjudication committee, it was determined whether the vaccine caused death. According to the speaker, in 73.9% of cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, the vaccine was determined to be the cause of death. The first author is Holsher and colleagues.

The speaker discusses a review of 325 autopsies, which they claim is the largest autopsy series in the world, of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals who died shortly after vaccination. According to the speaker, this review found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. The speaker states that this information will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. The speaker anticipates a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines to children, pregnant women, and adults. The speaker urges politicians to "get ahead of this" issue now.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system.

A study published in The Lancet claimed that 74% of deaths from COVID vaccines were caused by the vaccine, but the study was removed within 24 hours. The study, written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and others, reviewed 325 autopsies and found that the cardiovascular system was the most affected organ system. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days, with most deaths occurring within a week of the last vaccine administration. However, the CDC and FDA do not consider these deaths as vaccinated deaths. The study suggests a causal link between COVID vaccines and death, but the reasons for its removal are unclear. The CDC has not acknowledged any deaths caused by COVID vaccines, and autopsy evidence contradicting this is not welcomed by the public health establishment.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot, and in over 50% of cases, the single cause of death was cardiovascular. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. According to the speaker, these autopsy results are incontrovertible evidence that patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's stance. The findings have gained significant attention online and on social media.

The transcript centers on a set of 36 blackened documents, referred to as “海苔弁” (a term used for darkened papers or redacted files). The speaker notes that 8割 (about 80%) of the white areas are blacked out. The family involved is introduced: a 40-something woman living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of a man who taught at a cram school. He died after receiving a vaccine, and his death occurred at their home, after which the police prohibited autopsy. The wife wants to know the cause of death and asks to see the autopsy results from the northern region. The documents she received do not reveal anything conclusive. The narrative then moves to a specific case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wants details about her husband. He received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. After vaccination, he experienced side effects, including arm pain and fever, which reached up to 38.5°C. The fever lasted about three days, and the wife confirms the fever occurred, but she notes her husband did not commonly discuss illness beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was coughing up white foam from his mouth and bleeding from the mouth, and he complained of difficulty breathing. He then suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical opinions on the cause of death are summarized: the doctor(s) say, “Details are unclear; it may be the vaccine, but it could be something else; there is no evidence to confirm the vaccine as the cause.” The police describe the condition as an acute circulatory system disease, and multiple doctors mentioned possibilities such as acute circulatory system disease, heart conditions, coronary events, arrhythmias, cardiac failure, and aneurysm, but a specific cause could not be confirmed. One doctor notes that while the autopsy would help clarify, the evidence does not definitively point to the vaccine as the cause. The documents include statements from a party labeled as “investigative or consent-possible opinions,” including autopsy-related viewpoints and “acute circulatory system disease suspected” remarks. The final conclusion in the documents states that the death is “presumed to be acute circulatory system disease,” but the path to that conclusion remains unclear due to the blacked-out or redacted portions of the materials. The wife expresses regret that autopsy was not performed, saying she now regrets not having an autopsy. She was advised that delaying the return home would be an issue, and thus the autopsy did not proceed. She has continued to worry about why her husband died, given that the exact cause remains unknown, and she suggests that more proactive autopsies could reduce such unresolved cases in the future. The transcript notes that there are multiple fatality cases studied, with some families wishing autopsies had been performed to understand why death occurred. The account ends with the author noting ongoing questions about whether autopsies are being actively pursued in similar cases.