TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of deaths were either directly caused by the COVID-19 vaccine or significantly contributed to by it. Most deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is responsible for some deaths, challenging the government's stance. The study has gained significant attention on social media and editorial platforms.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

The speakers discuss a study of 325 autopsies of individuals who died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the speakers, this is the largest autopsy series of its kind. A rigorous review of the autopsies allegedly found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. This study is claimed to be a peer-reviewed paper that is going to be published. One speaker states that they are the senior author of this study. The speakers anticipate a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines in children, pregnant women, and adults. They urge politicians to acknowledge and address this issue.

The speaker suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be causing more harm than good. They claim to have conducted a study of over 300 autopsies, finding that 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. They also state that 100% of cardiac arrest and sudden deaths had no other explanation but the vaccine. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these findings, as death is usually attributed to known causes.

Dr. McCulloch states that COVID vaccines, in some people, result in death, sometimes on the first day of the shot. He believes this should trigger a black box warning on the product immediately. He claims that the currently available COVID vaccine package inserts do not contain the word "death" as of today. Therefore, Americans are not fairly informed.

A person shares their findings on deaths related to COVID-19 vaccines in Massachusetts. They obtained 500,000 unredacted death certificates and found a 7-year-old girl who died from complications of COVID-19. They also mention another girl who died from a stroke after receiving the vaccine. The person claims that the vaccine caused these deaths, but the CDC did not code it as the cause. They mention several other cases of strokes and deaths related to the vaccine. They conclude by stating that over 4,000 people in Massachusetts have died from the vaccine.

The speaker discusses a set of 36 documents that are almost entirely redacted (blackened), described as “nori-bento” documents, and notes that 80% of the content is blacked out. The documents were received by a family member, specifically the widow of a man who was a former cram school teacher, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, in her 40s. She explains that her husband died at home, and police prevented an autopsy; she wanted to know the cause of death and sought the autopsy results from the evidence. The narrative then presents a specific case: a 42-year-old man died six days after vaccination. He received the first vaccine dose on October 15, 2021, which was Pfizer. After the shot, he developed side effects: arm pain, fever, with the fever peaking at 38.5 degrees Celsius for about three days. The wife confirmed the fever lasted for three days, but she notes that he continued to go to work and did not typically discuss such symptoms. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was spitting white foam from his mouth and also bleeding; she recalls he was experiencing difficulty breathing. He subsequently suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Regarding the cause of death, the doctors stated that the exact cause is unclear. They said, “this may or may not be the vaccine’s fault,” but there is no conclusive evidence that it was the vaccine. A physician described the death as related to an “acute circulatory system disease,” and there was discussion among multiple doctors who identified potential conditions such as heart attack, coronary issues, or other acute circulatory problems, but no definitive determination could be made from the available materials. The documents show that the police and investigators offered opinions that included statements like “rapid circulatory system disease inferred opinion.” The widow wanted autopsy results to clarify the cause, but the police or authorities did not provide a clear, accessible explanation in these redacted documents. There are other referenced cases where families argued that autopsies would have clarified the cause of death, and the narrator notes that some families regret not having autopsies performed. The speaker underscores that the majority of the 36 documents are redacted, with only a portion visible. The conclusion stated in the material is that the cause of death was inferred as an acute circulatory system disease, yet the detailed sequence of events leading to that conclusion remains obscured by redactions. The widow expresses ongoing grief and a wish for more complete, transparent autopsy information to understand why her husband died after vaccination. The material also hints at broader concerns about whether autopsies are being pursued aggressively enough in such cases.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They suggest that there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality following vaccine rollouts, which is consistent across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be low. They mention that this pattern is seen during booster rollouts as well. This phenomenon is described as unprecedented.

A study on COVID vaccine autopsies was published in The Lancet, stating that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. The study was removed within 24 hours, citing unsupported conclusions. The study reviewed 325 autopsies, with the cardiovascular system being the most affected. Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination. The authors called for further investigation. The removal of the study raised concerns about censorship and the CDC's stance on vaccine-related deaths.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.

There have been reports of thousands of deaths, but only one post-vaccine autopsy out of 11,000 deaths. This raises concerns about the validity of the science behind it. The focus seems to be on instilling fear and promoting the vaccine without proper investigation. Without actively looking for answers, we cannot expect to find them.

And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.

People are dying suddenly from various causes like blood clots, strokes, and cancer. Some believe it is due to weaponized vaccines and experimental shots. The victims are young and healthy, raising concerns about the safety of these treatments.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot. Over 50% of these deaths had a cardiovascular cause. According to the speaker, these findings contradict the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. The speaker claims this research represents the largest series of autopsies indicating patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's position.

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the COVID-19 vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This challenges the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking the vaccine to deaths. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is indeed causing deaths. This study has gained significant attention on social media and other platforms, forcing the government to address this issue.

The speaker claims that aligning deaths in the vaccine trial to intervention arms shows the vaccine was never life-saving. They allege that at the time of vaccine approval, there were more deaths in the vaccinated arm, but four deaths in the vaccinated arm within the data reporting period were not publicly announced. The speaker states that loved ones of two patients called the clinical site on the day of their death. They felt it was their ethical duty to inform the TGA and Ken Paxton about these hidden deaths. Publicly available data stated four deaths in the placebo arm and two in the vaccine arm. The speaker questions delays in reporting deaths, noting discrepancies in reporting rates between the vaccinated and placebo arms. The speaker wrote to Professor Tony Lawler of the TGA, who allegedly stated there were no hidden deaths and that no deaths in the vaccine arm were due to the vaccine. The speaker highlights that out of 38 total deaths in the six-month period (21 vaccinated, 17 placebo), only seven autopsies were done. Ten of the 21 deaths in the vaccinated arm were categorized as sudden adult death, with some individuals found dead shortly after vaccination.

Professor Lawler stated there were no breaches of good clinical practice and no hidden deaths in the Pfizer trial, also claiming that none of the deaths were attributed to the vaccine and the initial conclusions remain valid. In response, the speaker says they reanalyzed the data and found more deaths in the vaccinated arm (21) compared to the placebo arm (17). In the vaccinated arm, 10 deaths were categorized as sudden adult death or found dead, but only two had autopsies. One autopsy result is available and showed sudden cardiac death. The other is still pending. The speaker questions how it can be stated that deaths are not due to the vaccine when autopsy results are pending or not performed, especially in cases of sudden death. The speaker has repeatedly asked the TGA for the evidentiary basis for the statement that none of the deaths were due to the vaccine, but has not received a reply.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality. This is especially evident in the southern hemisphere, where there should be a low death period. The speakers conclude that this is a new phenomenon and it occurs globally during booster rollouts.

In a recent study, researchers examined autopsy reports of deaths that appeared to be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Using a rigorous analysis, they found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the last vaccine dose, with cardiovascular issues being the main cause. The study was conducted by a team of doctors and experts in pathology, who reviewed 44 papers and 325 autopsies.

The speaker discusses the importance of autopsy in understanding the immune response to COVID-19 and the potential complications of the disease. They highlight two cases of aortic dissection following COVID-19 vaccination and emphasize the need for further investigation through autopsies to determine the underlying mechanisms. The speaker argues that autopsies are crucial in identifying unusual immune responses and ensuring the safety of vaccines. They stress the importance of asking scientific questions and advocating for patients' well-being. The speaker concludes by expressing the need for more autopsy reports to be independently reviewed and understood.

Dr. McCulloch is asked to weigh in. Speaker 1 responds that he has presented at FDA advisory meetings and advised companies for decades on regulatory science. He states that when a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death—some on the very first day they take the shot. He argues that this must be a black box warning on the product immediately. He says he checked the package inserts for the currently available products, noting that the ones Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue, and what the Governor still wants to pursue, and what the FDA still wants administered, do not have the word “death” in the package insert. He asserts that Americans are not fairly informed. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 doubts that the COVID injection caused some deaths, and asks for his view on the numbers listed on VAERS (thirty-seven thousand, six hundred seven, per the prompt) and whether he has any science to back up his opinion. Speaker 1 replies that the best data are autopsies. He references the largest autopsy series published to date and notes that he is the senior author. He says they examined deaths after vaccination, had an adjudication committee and methods of arbitration to decide whether the vaccine caused death, and that in these autopsy cases, seventy-three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. He mentions Holsher and colleagues, who are right behind him. Speaker 0 reiterates the FDA’s own laws, asking that this be included in the package insert, correct? Speaker 1 confirms, noting that in 2021 Dr. Carol Tocetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote about Peters’ marks in 2023 and asked, “where’s the black box warning? Where is it?”

The speaker discusses a review of 325 autopsies, which they claim is the largest autopsy series in the world, of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals who died shortly after vaccination. According to the speaker, this review found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. The speaker states that this information will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. The speaker anticipates a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines to children, pregnant women, and adults. The speaker urges politicians to "get ahead of this" issue now.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot, and in over 50% of cases, the single cause of death was cardiovascular. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. According to the speaker, these autopsy results are incontrovertible evidence that patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's stance. The findings have gained significant attention online and on social media.

The transcript centers on a set of 36 blackened documents, referred to as “海苔弁” (a term used for darkened papers or redacted files). The speaker notes that 8割 (about 80%) of the white areas are blacked out. The family involved is introduced: a 40-something woman living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of a man who taught at a cram school. He died after receiving a vaccine, and his death occurred at their home, after which the police prohibited autopsy. The wife wants to know the cause of death and asks to see the autopsy results from the northern region. The documents she received do not reveal anything conclusive. The narrative then moves to a specific case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wants details about her husband. He received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. After vaccination, he experienced side effects, including arm pain and fever, which reached up to 38.5°C. The fever lasted about three days, and the wife confirms the fever occurred, but she notes her husband did not commonly discuss illness beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was coughing up white foam from his mouth and bleeding from the mouth, and he complained of difficulty breathing. He then suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical opinions on the cause of death are summarized: the doctor(s) say, “Details are unclear; it may be the vaccine, but it could be something else; there is no evidence to confirm the vaccine as the cause.” The police describe the condition as an acute circulatory system disease, and multiple doctors mentioned possibilities such as acute circulatory system disease, heart conditions, coronary events, arrhythmias, cardiac failure, and aneurysm, but a specific cause could not be confirmed. One doctor notes that while the autopsy would help clarify, the evidence does not definitively point to the vaccine as the cause. The documents include statements from a party labeled as “investigative or consent-possible opinions,” including autopsy-related viewpoints and “acute circulatory system disease suspected” remarks. The final conclusion in the documents states that the death is “presumed to be acute circulatory system disease,” but the path to that conclusion remains unclear due to the blacked-out or redacted portions of the materials. The wife expresses regret that autopsy was not performed, saying she now regrets not having an autopsy. She was advised that delaying the return home would be an issue, and thus the autopsy did not proceed. She has continued to worry about why her husband died, given that the exact cause remains unknown, and she suggests that more proactive autopsies could reduce such unresolved cases in the future. The transcript notes that there are multiple fatality cases studied, with some families wishing autopsies had been performed to understand why death occurred. The account ends with the author noting ongoing questions about whether autopsies are being actively pursued in similar cases.