reSee.it - Related Video Feed

What has happened to Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous, and a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. As Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, which is her job under Colorado statute, and accessed tabulation codes in the voting machines. Instead of a warning, the Colorado Secretary of State went to the Mesa County Prosecutor, and put Tina Peters in prison for nine years with the help of a partisan hack judge. The judge admitted he imposed the severe penalty because she advanced false claims about Trump's defeat and became a celebrity among those who denied he lost the race. The acting US attorney in Colorado just filed a statement of interest in Tina Peters' habeas petition, pointing out that this is a 69 year old woman whose health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished for protected First Amendment thoughts.

On January 6th, the speaker was not inside the Capitol but was visited by the FBI at their mom's apartment. Simultaneously, the FBI also went to the speaker's own apartment. The speaker had a regular doorbell camera, which captured an FBI agent putting a sticker over its lens. However, the agent was unaware that there was also a camera in the peephole of the door. The speaker questioned why the cameras were being neutralized if the FBI had a legal search warrant. The speaker described the scene as resembling a herd of cattle going through the apartment, raising concerns about living in a police state and wondering if they could be the next target.

Joe Biden has sent FBI agents to the homes of Trump supporters without warning. They are supposed to have a conversation, but people are not intimidated. They believe in their right to vote for Trump in 2024 and are united against this action.

An NBC News story reports that ICE agents raided an Oklahoma home, traumatizing a US citizen family. Immigration agents had a search warrant for the home, but the suspects listed no longer lived there. A mother and her daughters, all US citizens, had their money, laptop, and cell phone taken and were forced to wait outside in the rain during the search. The question was posed to Madam Secretary if DHS needs to rectify any mistakes and ensure the family gets its property back if this were a mistake. Madam Secretary responded that the warrant was for the house, which was allegedly being used for human smuggling, not the individuals, though some individuals present had similar names. She stated that everything was done appropriately and will continue to be handled appropriately.

Speaker introduces Tina Peters, a gold star mother whose son died in Iraq. He says she went and got involved in our government and, upon seeing Davinian voting machines, declared it's my job to back up hard drive. She allegedly made a backup copy of the hard drive, giving President Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. Peters spent the year on lunch duty in Colorado prisons, wearing yellow boots. The speaker blames Trump for inaction, suggesting he could move White House to Colorado and appoint a special counsel to investigate Colorado election fraud, but it's a state charge. He claims Jewish allies staged it and accuses a foreign government of buying a US social media platform to indoctrinate Americans, cites Israel's free healthcare and education, says settlers are paid to steal land, and says Tina Peters will rot in jail.

A journalist asks about a recent FBI action at the Fulton County, Georgia elections office, where twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images were seized. The journalist notes that the president claimed, “they got into the votes. You're going to see some interesting things happening,” and asks why the president was so involved in an FBI and DOJ raid. A spokesperson responds that the president’s statements do not imply his involvement. He emphasizes that this is a criminal grand jury investigation, and clarifies that there was a search warrant authorized by a federal judge, a magistrate judge in Atlanta, which allowed the FBI to seize the records. The spokesperson notes that the records have been seized by the FBI as part of the ongoing investigation. The journalist presses on what the investigation is about. The spokesperson reiterates that he cannot discuss specifics of any grand jury investigation, but previously stated that election integrity is of the highest importance to the American people, and that the efforts are aimed at ensuring free and fair elections for everyone in the country, Democrats and Republicans alike. The spokesperson adds that they are doing everything possible to uphold election integrity. The journalist mentions that in Georgia, claims of voter fraud related to the twenty twenty ballots have been debunked repeatedly and that there were multiple recounts. The transcript ends without further elaboration on those claims. Key points conveyed: - The FBI seized twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images from the Fulton County elections office. - The president suggested that “interesting things” would occur, prompting questions about his involvement. - A spokesperson denies the president’s involvement and describes the actions as part of a criminal grand jury investigation. - A federal magistrate judge in Atlanta issued the search warrant permitting the seizure; the FBI conducted the seizure. - The investigation’s specifics cannot be discussed, but officials assert a commitment to election integrity and ensuring free and fair elections for all Americans. - The dialogue references prior debunking of voter fraud claims in Georgia and multiple recounts, without presenting new specifics.

Joseph Bolanos, a New Yorker who was in Washington, DC on January 6th, shares his experience of the FBI coming to his and his mother's apartment. He explains that the FBI agent covered the lens of his doorbell camera but was unaware of the camera in the peephole. Bolanos questions why the cameras were neutralized if the agents had a legal search warrant. He describes the police entering his apartment like a herd of cattle, expressing concerns about the state of policing and wondering if others could be targeted next.

California DOJ agents raided my home due to my undercover investigation on body parts trafficking from late-term abortions. Planned Parenthood and Kamala Harris targeted me to seize my video equipment and computers to silence me. Harris met with Planned Parenthood executives before the raid. This incident shows their disregard for First Amendment rights. Harris poses a significant threat to civil liberties if elected to higher office.

Speaker 0 claims 120,000 fake ballots were scanned in Delaware County, and observers were kept out of canvassing rooms. She alleges 47 USB sticks were "lost" and then found, containing the necessary votes. Delaware County was the last to provide its information to the state. Speaker 1 states Bill Barr said there was no voter fraud based on reports from US attorneys and testified similarly to the January 6th committee. Speaker 1 asks if Bill McSwain knew about the Delaware County information from Greg Stentrum and wanted to hold a press conference about it. Speaker 0 confirms Greg contacted McSwain on November 7th, and they sent a certified letter to McSwain, Josh Shapiro, and Jack Stohlzheimer demanding an investigation into Delaware County. Shapiro allegedly sent special agents to their homes on November 17, 2020, to investigate them, not election fraud.

Tina Peters, a gold star Navy Seal mom and former Mesa County, Colorado recorder, is imprisoned with a nine-and-a-half-year sentence after a conviction. She became suspicious of election systems after unusual April 2021 county elections. When Dominion was sent to work on her county's machines, Peters preserved records, leading to the Mesa County number three report. The DOJ filed a statement of interest regarding her case, citing concerns about the lengthy sentence, First Amendment implications, and denial of bail. The DOJ is reviewing cases nationwide for abuse of the criminal justice process, including whether Peters' prosecution was politically motivated rather than pursuing justice. The speaker claims Peters had a duty to preserve the records, and her actions revealed significant fraud. The speaker alleges the judge ran a kangaroo court, preventing the admission of evidence of fraud uncovered by Peters' actions. A key witness allegedly lied on the stand, with the judge and prosecutor reinforcing the false testimony. The speaker urges financial support for Peters through TinaPeters.US and vouches for the integrity of the Lindell Offense Fund, stating that no money was taken for personal use.

The conversation centers on Tina Peters, her defense team, and alleged procedural and ethical problems surrounding her case. The speaker details his personal involvement, including paying a million dollars to Doug Richards to defend Peters. He recounts discovering misgivings about Richards’ defense plan a few days before trial and visiting Richards’ hotel room to hear his theory of the case. Richards allegedly arrived resentfully on a Zoom call with other criminal defense attorneys and proposed a strategy to put Peters on the stand, claiming that “colonelson” told her to image a hard drive. The speaker notes that colonelson was the president’s attorney, not Peters’ own attorney, and Richards supposedly argued Peters could claim it was legal advice from an attorney, although the speaker states California does not have a legal advice exception and Colorado law would render such a defense nugatory. The proposed strategy allegedly aimed to create jury sympathy for a 68-year-old grandmother rather than present substantive legal arguments or evidence of fraud. The speaker contends that Richards’ strategy would have resulted in Peters going on the stand with no other witnesses, effectively inviting jury nullification and failing to argue legitimate defenses or present critical motions. Peters reportedly fell ill during this period, and she fired Richards at the last moment, seeking proper counsel. The judge and Richards are described as part of a “railroad” process in Colorado, with Richards allegedly designing an ineffectual defense to push Peters to testify, thereby enabling possible indictments of Kurt Olson and 45. The speaker asserts that several local criminal defense attorneys on a Zoom call were horrified by Richards’ strategy and that the defense was deliberately weak. Stephanie Lambert, currently indicted in Michigan, who is in leg irons in Washington, DC, then took Peters’ case and filed motions that, in the speaker’s view, should have been filed earlier. These motions contend that Peters, as county recorder, had the right to make a backup of election data, and that the backup was a legitimate act; a friend with a cyber background and a surfer athlete allegedly participated with Peters’ permission, though the employee “Billy” later denied it. The speaker asserts Peters did nothing wrong and that the charges should have been dismissed. The speaker criticizes the legal profession more broadly, claiming mass coordination by state bar associations and “Project 65” to deprive people of Sixth Amendment rights, citing John Eastman as another example. He mentions a concerted effort to undermine the defense and hints at promises of federal judgeships in exchange for cooperation. He notes that Peters’ motions filed by Lambert should have been filed earlier and accuses Richards of crafting a strategy that would have allowed immediate indictments of Donald Trump’s legal team. The speaker references a Supreme Court filing and a constitutional crisis, stating that the Supreme Court already has “everything it needs” as of the prior night. He praises one DC judge as fair and straightforward, while his other cases are described as varied, though he intends to proceed even if it means jail time. He promises to upload a confidential brief and invites the audience to read the filing with SCOTUS, signaling ongoing legal action.

The Washington FBI office strongly advised against raiding President Trump's home, noting that he was cooperating and had allowed the FBI access multiple times. This suggests that the raid was politically motivated to portray Trump as guilty. Christopher Wray is criticized for politicizing the process and treating Trump differently than Joe Biden, indicating a lack of consistent standards for both presidents.

Speaker 0 questions the Mar-a-Lago raid, asking, “how is the FBI just gonna go and raid Mar A Lago at president's home,” and “would it happen again?” Speaker 1 replies that it was “a total weaponization and politicization by the FBI and DOJ and the Biden administration dating back to the Obama administration that led not only to Russiagate as you opened up with, but to the invasion of Donald Trump's private home in Mar A Lago.” He says “there was no constitutional basis to do so. There was no lawful predicate to open that investigation.” He says the FBI is “ridding this place of its former leadership structure” and that documents are being declassified for public viewing. He notes, “Every single person that has been found to have weaponized or participated in that process has been removed from leadership positions.” He states, “There was no crime. There was no predicate to go and invade Donald Trump's home.” On mortgage fraud: “it's a multi agency effort” and “we're going to route out any sort of corruption.”

During Trump's time in office, Ronna Romney McDaniel, head of the Republican Party, played a role in sending fake electors to Congress and trying to overturn election results. She directed Michigan officials not to certify the vote and told them not to sign it. The goal was to use the party's power to reject election results and hold onto power. The current project is to convince Americans that the 2020 election was not legitimate and to undermine trust in future elections.

The speaker claims that Biden's Justice Department placed mothers on FBI and terrorist watch lists for advocating against certain school curricula. They state these mothers were labeled as terrorists for their activism. The speaker urges listeners to examine the Justice Department's actions. They then mention Biden's pardon of his son and his statement that the Justice Department has been politicized.

Anne VanderSchel asserts that U.S. elections were not compromised by a glitch but were penetrated by global intelligence weapons, a system that did not begin in Colorado but in Serbia. She describes it as a CIA playground where foreign and domestic intelligence agencies perfected digital election manipulation long before Americans knew the name Smartmatic. She claims the system was handed off to Venezuelan military, weaponized through Smartmatic to flip elections, delete logs, and control entire nations, and that this foreign military infrastructure was quietly slipped into the United States, with her saying she witnessed it herself in Panama and the Darien Gap alongside Michael Young, noting the influx of Venezuelan and other foreign nationals. VanderSchel emphasizes that those responsible expected governors, secretaries of state, and corrupt supervisors of elections to cooperate, and they did—except for Mesa County, Colorado county clerk Tina Peters. She claims Peters imaged the Dominion machines before they were illegally wiped, thereby preserving the only untouched 2020 dataset in America. She notes there were 3,143 counties in the country, and Peters was the only county clerk who held that image, which VanderSchel says mirrors exactly what Serbian and Venezuelan insiders described. She asserts that once Peters exposed the election fraud and the foreign intelligence operation on American soil, those involved moved to destroy her, and that this is why she believes Peters is in a prison cell. VanderSchel characterizes Peters’ case as the single most important national security case in modern American history. She closes by stating she, Anne VanderSchel, will not back down and urges others to speak out as well. She calls for a strong public push to support President Trump’s executive order and the deployment of 500 National Guard pods in every state to reach election supervisors and precincts. She warns that if officials refuse to follow the executive order and hand-count ballots, arrests should begin.

Pam Bondi is considered the best attorney general Donald Trump has had because she litigated away nationwide injunctions, created the legal infrastructure for effective deportations, and targeted criminals and gang networks. Jeff Sessions is blamed for Hillary Clinton not being held accountable, and Bill Barr is blamed for legitimate questions about the 2020 election going uninvestigated. Jeff Rosen allowed MAGA grandmothers to be hunted, while Bondi is hunting MS 13. Cash Patel is resetting the FBI by rounding up actual criminals instead of spying on political opponents, unlike James Comey and Christopher Ray. Any tension that erupts is a consequence of strong voices and deep love of country.

A government employee was fired for allegedly helping to rig the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden. She printed 64,000 ballots in City Hall, had ballots filled out by city employees, kicked out observers, and brought in more ballots illegally. An email from a coworker mentioned delivering just enough votes at 3 AM. This may explain how Biden suddenly surged ahead in Wisconsin. The woman has been fired, and this incident needs further investigation. This could have led to Biden having more ballots, not necessarily more votes.

Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.

The FBI's actions against President Trump and other American citizens demand accountability. Where are the Republican senators demanding justice? I experienced this firsthand when FBI agents served a subpoena at my home. This is retaliatory abuse and intimidation by the Biden administration, using the FBI. The raid on President Trump's home was based on trumped-up document retention issues. This is unacceptable. We must stand for freedom, against the extremist left, and for the Constitution and the liberty it represents.

"You've been intrusive into people's personal lives." "You're confused. You think I'm on trial." "These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020." "I'm not on trial." "Here's the next one that shows you can see republican is written there." "Republicans written there." "This is, ballot 61." "This is ballot number two." "The batch number was it 5162? Scanner 5162." "Duplicate ballots. The entire batch is scanned several times." "We are at a time in history, people." "We are at a time in history when you can no longer sit back and just let other folks do." "You cannot expect black women to be perfect and save the world." "The Lord is completing us." "We need your prayers. We need to be allowed to stumble. We need grace." "Please find a way to do your extraordinary God given assignment." "Yes. And make this community and the world a better place for all of his people."

There's a clear distinction between legitimate evidence for an investigation and fabricated evidence, as seen in the Russia collusion scandal where the FISA courts were misled. The Biden administration and the DOJ have also engaged in politically motivated actions, such as the indictments and the raid on Mar-a-Lago, which many view as unjust. This politicization of justice is concerning. It's important to acknowledge that many rank-and-file FBI agents are frustrated with the current situation and desire reform. I've been critical of figures like Merrick Garland and Jack Smith throughout this process.

A Wisconsin government employee was fired for allegedly rigging the 2020 election by printing 64,000 extra ballots in City Hall. She had ballots filled out by city employees, kicked out observers, and brought in more ballots in the middle of the night. An email from a coworker confirmed the suspicious activity. The speaker believes this fraud led to Biden winning the election unfairly. The woman's actions were deemed illegal and unconstitutional, and the speaker calls for prosecution. They express anger and frustration over the situation, calling Biden a fake president.