reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Sonia Elijah’s book, three eleven viral takeover, is described as a deep forensic investigation into the COVID era, built from years of FOIA requests, leaked documents, timelines, interviews, and scientific literature to examine unanswered questions from the period. The host, Clayton, frames the discussion around why the pandemic happened, how it happened, and which power structures created populations that largely complied with lockdowns. Elijah explains that March 11, 2020, marked more than a health response; it was a global reset. She compares it to 9/11, arguing that while 9/11 led to citizen surveillance, three eleven led to citizen compliance with the state, with mass lockdowns and surrender of civil liberties. She characterizes the day as a turning point into a new era. The book argues that COVID marked a shift from a post-9/11 surveillance state to direct citizen compliance, facilitated by weaponized fear. In the UK, messaging campaigns spent hundreds of millions of pounds to tell people that “if you go out, you’re going to kill grandma” or “you’ll die,” which helped create a climate of fear. Elijah cites hypocrisy in leadership during lockdowns, noting Boris Johnson at parties and senior New York public health officials at drug-fueled gatherings, while ordinary citizens faced harsh restrictions. The narrative includes stories such as a family member being pressured to isolate a non-COVID patient and care-home policies that contributed to elderly deaths. Elijah discusses the personal toll of the lockdowns, including experiences with hospital visiting restrictions during a family member’s stroke and the broader trauma seen in children and mental health. She cites a child psychologist and the emergence of “COVID anxiety syndrome” as diagnoses, noting that the public messaging and fear-based coercion affected behavior and well-being. The book emphasizes the role of censorship and the disinformation apparatus after three eleven. Elijah highlights a machinery of censorship, including the World Health Organization’s influence on what was deemed scientific, and the suppression of the lab-leak theory and early vaccine harms discussions. She points to the Trusted News Initiative, coordinated by BBC leadership, which she claims enabled big tech to downrank or remove dissenting voices, including doctors and scientists who advocated for early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. The narrative includes examples of vaccine-injury discourse being shut down, with veteran platforms and media networks flagging or removing related content. Elijah details the epidemiological and testing framework that supported lockdowns, focusing on the PCR test’s use, high cycle thresholds, and the rapid antigen tests from Innova Medical Group. She argues these tests, funded through substantial procurement schemes and criticized by the FDA, helped justify continued restrictions. She discusses a “VIP lanes” procurement environment in the UK and the role of Innova and related networks in driving large-scale testing and surveillance. A major thread is the diffuse network surrounding gain-of-function research and the origins debate. Elijah discusses EcoHealth Alliance, the DEFUSE proposal, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, noting that Fauci’s NIAID funded related work after a DoD rejection. She references emails and FOIA material showing that a core group of scientists coordinated a public narrative that favored a zoonotic origin while privately wrestling with lab-leak possibilities. The Great Barrington Declaration is described as a focal point of dissent that was aggressively attacked; Francis Collins reportedly questioned “these three fringe epidemiologists,” leading to professional repercussions for Kalodorf and others. Elijah’s closing argument positions COVID as a planned, coordinated effort toward a global biosecurity state, with ambitions including digital IDs and alignment with Agenda 2030. She cites NATO involvement in disinformation policy as evidence of state and military coordination, and she frames the book as a road map to prevent future similar actions. Her aim is to empower readers with knowledge and truth as antidotes to potential future crises. The book, she says, is written to chronicle these events for humanity, hoping that awareness will reduce fear and increase vigilance.

The speaker claims that COVID vaccines had more risks than benefits. They argue that the risk of infection increased, while the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID remained unchanged. They also suggest that all-cause mortality increased due to the vaccines. The speaker criticizes the vaccines as one of the worst interventions in medical history. They mention global censorship, where those trying to speak the truth are censored. Additionally, they highlight immunity for drug companies and intimidation tactics, such as job loss or loss of credentials, against doctors who speak the truth.

The speaker questions Dr. Fauci's support for institutions pressuring people to get vaccinated. They criticize the impact on individuals' lives, citing examples of job loss due to vaccine mandates. The speaker accuses Dr. Fauci of instilling fear through mandates and closures, eroding trust in public health institutions. They emphasize the importance of individual freedoms and decision-making in healthcare. The speaker challenges Dr. Fauci's approach and its long-term consequences on society.

The speaker claims that America has encountered a hidden iceberg, which is a war operation. They argue that more people are dying today, especially among the younger age group, due to the Covid vaccine without any valid reason. They also mention a significant increase in the number of American children with cancer and a rise in miscarriages and stillbirths. The speaker emphasizes the devastating impact of these deaths, using examples of sudden cardiac arrests during sports events. They urge caution when allowing vaccinated children to exercise, suggesting thorough testing should be conducted. The speaker asserts that the vaccines have not been properly tested for safety and labels them as a deadly toxic byproduct and a biological weapon.

Speaker 0 accuses 'you and the other leaders of your death cult, particularly as it relates to COVID case rates tied to severity of lockdowns,' and says there has not yet been 'a corresponding something remotely resembling a mea culpa' or accountability. Speaker 1 notes that 'people's lives are still affected,' including 'Kids whose schooling has been delayed for years, that may be permanent, where they're having long term effects, psychological harm, depression, drug abuse,' and adds that 'Sweden... did better than we did by far. They had actually almost no excess mortality through the entire pandemic. It's incredible. The best in Europe. And they didn't do the lockdowns.' He urges planning for the next time that is 'more human' and maintaining 'lots and lots of tools' to understand and counter new viruses, while warning that 'What we don't have is a social structure that responds to that information in a rational way' and that societies are 'prone to panic' and may 'sacrifice children, the poor, the working class,' so pandemic plans must be structured to not ever do that again.

The speaker claims that an “agent’s” vaccines are “blinding the minds” of people, making them “stupid,” losing their intelligence, and that the vaccines are “killing people.” The speaker cites alleged health effects including myocarditis, strokes, heart attacks, athletes dying, and young people dying. The speaker emphasizes that the most dangerous part, according to them, is that “billions that have been injected” are “losing their minds.” They add that people are becoming “more and more controllable” because “they cannot say no.” The speaker describes the situation as “fantastic,” “brilliant,” and “nightmarish,” “horrible,” “diabolical,” and “satanic,” and says it “has got to be stopped.” The speaker argues that the brain “God gave to man” is what makes “man [be] man,” and claims that a process involves “vessels” that are very small and “clogging” them, which the speaker says “no one in the world is going to see.” They conclude by stating that Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna “know very well that they cannot be seen.”

The speaker discusses the impact of COVID-19 on society, particularly in Scotland and the UK. They highlight the high number of infant and youth deaths in Scotland, as well as the overall increase in deaths under the age of 45. The speaker criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the lack of attention given to care homes and the push for vaccinations. They also mention the misuse of masks in care homes and the manipulation of COVID-19 death data. The speaker calls for accountability and action from government officials, healthcare professionals, and law enforcement.

The speakers discuss the effectiveness of lockdown measures and the negative impact they have had on society. They argue that there is no correlation between lockdowns and lower death rates. They criticize the coercive measures taken by governments, which they believe have violated human rights and weakened society. They call for a change in strategy, focusing on individual freedom and medical measures rather than lockdowns. They also discuss the vaccination debate, expressing skepticism about the need for booster shots and the lack of scientific evidence supporting their efficacy. The speakers emphasize the importance of respecting individual rights and freedoms during the pandemic.

The speaker claims that America has encountered a hidden war operation, resulting in increased deaths and younger mortality rates, particularly among vaccinated children. They mention a graph showing a 40% rise in mortality among young people in the past two years, equating to 12,000 deceased American children. The speaker also highlights a significant increase in childhood cancer cases and miscarriages. They emphasize the tragic consequences for families, such as sudden cardiac arrests during sports events. The speaker urges caution and thorough testing before allowing vaccinated children to engage in physical activities. They assert that the vaccines have not undergone safety studies and label them as a deadly toxic byproduct, suggesting they are biological weapons.

The speaker discusses the negative impacts of lockdowns and the lack of plans for reopening schools. They express concern about the developmental and educational gaps experienced by an entire generation. They emphasize the need to prepare for future pandemics and question the reliance on government control. The speaker also mentions how popular figures like Dr. Phil are speaking out against the globalist agenda and the importance of resistance. They highlight the encroachment on personal freedoms, such as tracking and surveillance, and urge listeners to take action by sharing information and purchasing products from Infowars.

The speaker criticizes decision-makers for lockdowns that harmed businesses and lives, promoting experimental medical products as vaccines for profit. They condemn the lack of accountability for spreading propaganda, coercing people to choose between jobs and jabs, and restricting freedoms without apology or responsibility taken for the consequences. No remorse or acknowledgment of the suffering caused. Translation: The speaker is upset with those in charge for implementing lockdowns that hurt businesses and lives, promoting experimental medical products as vaccines for profit. They criticize the lack of accountability for spreading propaganda, forcing people to choose between jobs and vaccines, and limiting freedoms without apologizing or taking responsibility for the consequences. There is no remorse or acknowledgment of the suffering caused.

The speaker questions Dr. Fauci's stance on making it difficult for people to live without getting vaccinated. They criticize the impact on individuals' ability to work, travel, and make medical decisions. The speaker accuses Dr. Fauci of instilling fear through mandates and school closures, eroding trust in public health institutions. This fear is seen affecting education and the economy, with long-lasting consequences.

Lockdowns failed to stop the spread of the virus or prevent deaths, according to data from various studies. They also caused significant harm to children and are projected to lead to an additional 900,000 to 1,200,000 American deaths due to economic fallout. If the U.S. had followed Sweden's approach, there would have been 1,600,000 fewer deaths. The responsibility for the lockdowns lies with those who implemented them, including federal officials and experts who rejected alternative strategies like targeted protection. This was fundamentally a health policy issue, and the focus should have been on mitigating both the virus's impact and the consequences of the lockdowns. I was the only health policy scholar on the White House task force, dedicated to addressing both aspects of this crisis.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

When COVID hit, the initial lockdown was meant to slow the spread, but it led to unforeseen consequences like educational gaps and mental health issues. There was a lack of planning for reopening schools and addressing the collateral damage. The speaker emphasizes the need for a better readiness plan for future pandemics and questions the role of government intervention. They advocate for less government involvement and more reliance on science.

Speaker 0 argues that the government and premier treated British Columbians like guinea pigs, forcing experimental procedures without consent. They claim the numbers support this: all seven doctors in the obstetrics department in Kamloops are gone, and the pediatrics unit in Kelowna is gone, describing this as just the tip of the iceberg. The speaker asserts the devastation is widespread and states that the health minister and the premier should not expect applause for the careers wrecked and lives upended by what they call unscientific mandates. They pledge to stand for the voices of thousands of health care workers the government purportedly cast aside. The speaker ends with a question aimed at the premier: will the premier himself apologize to the health care workers whose lives were derailed by these punitive COVID policies?

The speaker criticizes agencies for shutting down schools, leaving children vulnerable to abuse. They argue that by closing schools, mandated reporters couldn't protect abused children, leading to a drop in referrals. Another speaker defends the decision, stating it was to save lives, despite the negative impact on children's well-being. They claim that children were less at risk from COVID but suffered more due to mismanagement.

Speaker 0 expresses clear personal hesitation about vaccines, stating that they are not jabbed and would not touch the experimental mRNA and gene therapy experiments, asserting there is a lot of concern about these technologies from many medical people. They reference political figures and media narratives, saying Kennedy in the United States will expose much of this material and that Donald Trump is keen to see it as well. Speaker 0 then recalls personal health concerns related to vaccination, mentioning friends who have experienced myocarditis, blood clots, strokes, and other problems after receiving the COVID jab, and emphasizes the idea of long-term effects being unknown. Speaker 1 counters by saying they still believe in vaccinations, but notes that no one on that side would discuss possible problems with vaccines, and they themselves got vaccinated multiple times and are now open to the idea that there might have been problems. They acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state they do not object to vaccines inherently. Speaker 0 clarifies their stance further, stating they are not a medical expert but their instinct was not to have the vaccine, and they acknowledge how difficult it was to avoid it since the state appeared to force people to receive it. Speaker 1 adds that their own vaccination status includes having been vaxxed several times, and they feel okay today, though they recognize the complexity of the situation and that long-term effects are uncertain. Speaker 0 then discusses the notion that the state and public health authorities pressured people to vaccinate, naming the NHS, Matt Hancock, and portraying the messaging as a duty to vaccinate “because you might kill granny,” mentioning Trudeau and the World Economic Forum Brigade as part of the broader narrative. Speaker 0 proposes an alternative approach: those who are vulnerable should isolate themselves. They reference Anders Tegnell’s approach in Sweden, which did not impose lockdowns. They claim Sweden’s economy hardly missed a heartbeat, in contrast to “ours,” and argue that the pandemic greatly disrupted young people’s lives and education, with knock-on effects described as huge. Speaker 0 concludes that those who made the lockdown decisions are not ready to admit they got it wrong, for a host of reasons.

Lockdowns were the worst decision made during the COVID pandemic, causing unnecessary harm. The rollout of vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines, has led to significant health issues, including an alarming rise in cancers. The vaccines were not true vaccines but rather gene therapies that could integrate into human genomes, raising serious concerns about their safety and effectiveness. Children, who faced mandates to get vaccinated despite being at low risk from COVID, may suffer long-term consequences. The entire pandemic response appears to have been a controlled initiative, with many governments ignoring prior pandemic plans that did not call for lockdowns. The situation reflects a failure of accountability among health authorities and raises questions about the motivations behind these decisions.

The speaker expresses concern over the lack of alarm raised by authorities regarding the data presented. They believe there is a cover-up happening. They mention that some individuals involved in lockdowns and policies are backtracking on their actions. The speaker estimates that there have been 300,000 excess deaths, 1,360,000 disabilities, and 26,600,000 injuries due to the vaccine. They also calculate economic costs, including $5.2 billion in damages from deaths, $52 billion from disabilities, and $89 billion from lost wages and productivity. The total estimated cost is close to $150 billion. The speaker acknowledges that the impact on productivity cannot be measured accurately but suggests it could be significantly higher than the given numbers.

The speaker highlights the actions of an evil regime, emphasizing the isolation of dying parents, denial of traditional burials, closure of businesses and churches, and the impact on treatment facilities. They also mention the forced masking of children and the subsequent mandatory vaccination, leading to job loss and the requirement to prove vaccination status for basic transactions. The speaker criticizes the vaccine's effectiveness and potential harm, particularly for children.

When discussing the unvaccinated, some speakers express frustration and blame towards them for the current situation. They argue that the unvaccinated are causing harm, spreading misinformation, and not considering the well-being of society. Suggestions are made to make vaccinations mandatory, impose higher healthcare costs on the unvaccinated, and treat their choice similarly to driving under the influence. The speakers emphasize that COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented and criticize those who spread misinformation.

The speaker believes it's time for the truth about the COVID-19 crisis. They accuse the government of causing harm to millions of people physically, mentally, and financially. They claim that the lockdown was senseless and the COVID vaccine has minimal benefits and significant side effects. The speaker suggests that the government was influenced by a network aiming to profit from COVID patents. They accuse specific individuals of committing serious crimes and argue that these actions must be brought to court. The speaker concludes by stating that the COVID crisis will only end when those responsible are held accountable.

The speaker discusses how quick action and isolation could have extinguished COVID-19, citing the success with SARS. They criticize political interference and the WHO for mishandling the pandemic, leading to a global crisis. Despite pointing out these failures, the speaker feels unappreciated for providing factual information.