reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks whether vaccinated friends or family have “a whole different personality” or are “more angry” since getting injections, and then claims there is “a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders.” They say the information comes “directly from the FDA and the CDC,” and that they will provide a link to the study. The speaker states that “thresholds that were all breached” were “way over,” and that the factors listed next are “a more likely determination.” They then list specific reported increases in neuropsychiatric conditions, including: psychosis being “four forty times more likely,” dementia being “140 times,” schizophrenia being “three fifteen times,” and suicidal thoughts.

There was once a division between vaccinated and unvaccinated, but the speaker argues that it should be transcended because both groups had a very similar experience and “people are people” who act similarly—they just believed different things. The speaker generalizes that many vaccinated people honestly believed there was a dangerous pathogen that posed a lethal threat to them and people they loved, and that there was a solution: the vaccine, “if only the unvaccinated would take it.” They describe how the belief that unvaccinated people would pose a threat to vaccinated individuals and their families created fear, which then led to hatred and division. The speaker then generalizes that many unvaccinated people honestly believed the vaccine posed a lethal threat to both themselves and their families. The speaker says unvaccinated people did not have to take the vaccine in Canada if they did not want to, but they faced pressure largely backed by vaccinated people—resulting in fear, anger, and hatred. The speaker concludes that everyone shared an “surprisingly similar” lived experience, with the main difference being what each group believed and what they considered the facts. At the National Citizens Inquiry, the speaker says one key lesson was that listening to each other’s stories can help people come together, because both sides were trying to do what they believed was best for themselves and their families. Returning to the political question, the speaker says the situation was traumatic for most people, and that the nation needs healing. Part of that healing, they say, involves recognizing that many who “took one for the team” are injured and that their experiences should be listened to.

Michael Caine shares his painless COVID vaccine experience. A grieving mother warns against vaccination after her daughter died post-shot. Morgan Freeman expresses trust in science and the vaccine. Concerns arise about vaccine safety, with reports of severe side effects and deaths linked to various vaccines. Individuals share personal stories of adverse reactions, including heart issues and neurological problems. Some argue that the risks of COVID vaccines may outweigh the benefits for children, emphasizing the need for more research. A retired pediatrician notes that the risk of serious disease from COVID is low for children, while potential vaccine risks are higher. Others claim that COVID-19 may not exist as a distinct virus, suggesting it is misidentified influenza. Overall, the discussion reflects deep divisions regarding vaccine safety and efficacy.

People believe conspiracy theories because they think information is being withheld. During COVID, if people feel they aren't being told the whole story, they become more susceptible to alternative theories about the vaccine. Some claim that excess deaths are solely caused by the vaccine, alleging a cover-up. Trust is crucial, and while we support free speech, it's important to distinguish it from spreading false information.

In 2020, only 2% of hospitalizations were related to Covid, with an average duration longer than other cases. Intensive care unit admissions were at 5%. This contradicts the perception that hospitals were overwhelmed with Covid patients. The numbers confirm that the fear and hysteria surrounding the virus were disproportionate. The consequences included increased suicides among young people and school closures. There may have been less harsh ways to handle the situation. It's unfortunate to say that the fear was exaggerated.

Speaker 0 asks if the vaccine prevented people from getting COVID. Speaker 1 believes it lessened symptom severity and reduced emergency room visits, a view supposedly held by 90% of objective experts. Speaker 0 regrets getting vaccinated, fearing he would miss his son's birth. He got COVID a couple of weeks after vaccination and received conflicting test results, questioning the competence of the testers.

In the autumn of 2021, Hugo de Jonge publicly stated on TV that 80 percent of the corona patients in hospitals were unvaccinated. The speaker, who was conducting research at the time, had precise hospital data on all corona patients and personally asked each patient whether they were vaccinated. They found that the actual percentage in their hospital was 35 percent, a substantial discrepancy from the 80 percent figure. The speaker and a colleague published the data online from their study, which was permissible because they were conducting integral scientific research and intended to publish whatever the results showed. However, they encountered significant pushback, which was largely political in nature. The backlash did not come from colleagues denying the data’s accuracy; instead, it came from political actors and environments. The speaker notes that the pushback included responses from political circles and not from medical colleagues or other scientists who would challenge the data. A notable example mentioned was pressure from the Forum for Democracy, with the implication that the data or its dissemination could be affected by the party’s interests. The speaker recalls being questioned about whether they would be retweeted or supported by that forum, and expresses astonishment at the idea that they would need to adjust their scientific conclusions to align with a political party’s interests. The core point emphasized is the discrepancy between the widely cited 80 percent unvaccinated figure and the speaker’s observed 35 percent within their hospital, and the subsequent political pushback encountered when publishing and sharing those findings.

People in America are skeptical about the information regarding vaccinations, especially since the vaccines were developed quickly. It traditionally takes years to create a vaccine, and nine months feels insufficient. The conversation shifts to the impact of vaccination on controlling the virus, with one person emphasizing that unvaccinated individuals allow the virus to spread. While some argue that COVID-19 is more serious than the flu, others question the reported death toll from COVID-19, suggesting it may not be accurate. Concerns arise about incentivizing vaccinations, with one person perceiving it as a sign of something suspicious. Ultimately, there’s a belief that the pandemic is driven by fear rather than genuine health concerns.

Vaccinated individuals are still at risk of getting COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and early treatment and natural immunity were key in saving lives. There is controversy over vaccine safety, with reports of deaths following vaccination. Some studies suggest vaccinated individuals are at higher risk of severe outcomes. Calls have been made to remove vaccines from the market due to safety concerns. Translation: Vaccinated people can still get COVID, but may have less severe symptoms. Early treatment and natural immunity were important in saving lives. There are concerns about vaccine safety, with reports of deaths after vaccination. Some studies indicate vaccinated people may be at higher risk of severe outcomes. There are calls to remove vaccines from the market due to safety concerns.

The speaker claims that in Pfizer's initial vaccine trial with 20,000 vaccinated and 20,000 unvaccinated participants, the vaccinated group had 23% more deaths from all causes than the placebo group after six months. The speaker states that the claim of 100% vaccine efficacy was based on the fact that two people in the placebo group died from COVID versus one person in the vaccine group. The speaker asserts that people believed the vaccine would prevent them from getting COVID, which they now realize is false.

Vaccinated individuals may still get COVID, but are less likely to experience severe effects like ICU admission or death. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, after the virus had become milder and treatment had improved. Studies show misclassification bias in reporting vaccinated vs. unvaccinated hospitalizations. Some reports indicate higher rates of hospitalization and death among the vaccinated. Risk of COVID increases with each vaccine dose. Post-vaccine deaths are concerning.

Five years ago, when an episode discussing COVID-19 origins came out, people reacted negatively. The speaker believed the episode was correct, and now the COVID-19 website is up, possibly due to Bobby Kennedy's influence. The New York Times reported the virus may have originated in a lab, but the speaker feels they were misled by the media itself. There have been no apologies or corrections from mainstream media, who are now presenting this information as if it's new. The speaker contrasts this with a hypothetical scenario: if podcasters had encouraged experimental shots and people experienced complications, mainstream news would have blamed the podcasters for side effects, unnecessary deaths, strokes, and other issues, potentially calling for their platforms to be shut down.

The speaker reflects on the difficulty of understanding COVID-19 due to being misled by trusted authorities, leading to public avoidance of the topic. Stories about COVID-19 don't perform well, not because of a lack of strong feelings, but because it's "triggering." People are angry that nothing changed, children were "screwed over," and some feel unhealthier after vaccination, with worries about their children. The speaker admits to not getting everything right about COVID-19, giving themselves a "B plus," citing the challenge of widespread deception from previously trusted entities.

Some people love the vaccines, while others hate them. The speaker acknowledges that vaccines have saved lives, but also mentions concerns about their safety. Reports vary on the effectiveness and problems with the vaccines, but the speaker claims to have saved 100 million lives. They argue that those who get very sick and go to the hospital are usually the ones who haven't taken the vaccine. The mainstream media is accused of stifling information about adverse reactions. The speaker believes the vaccines have saved millions of lives but criticizes the media for pausing the Johnson and Johnson vaccine over a small number of cases.

It's okay to be afraid of COVID dominating your life, and everyone should be afraid of COVID. We won't be free of this pandemic until we listen to the acknowledged truth and the scientists. Science is truth. Questioning science impacts public health and prolongs economic hardship. Someone not wearing a mask is perceived as a threat, selfish, a COVID denier, and unvaccinated. Seek out scientists, listen to their advice, and trust the experts. Republicans have given their voters license to believe whatever they want. Don't listen to Trump, a nonmedical professional, but listen to Bill Gates. The science checks out, and eventually, the science catches up with you. Trust the vaccine and the medical experts. If you don't understand the science, let the experts speak. Don't take advice from your golf buddy or aunt; listen to the scientists and stop saying, "I need to do my own research." If we follow science, people can hug their grandchildren. This isn't about freedom, but freedom for your neighbors. You can hug each other if fully vaccinated. Listen to the scientists because the science works.

The transcript describes a contentious exchange about the COVID-19 vaccine and the roles of public health figures and political leaders. Key points include: - Speaker 0 asserts there was a “fake vaccine” pushed by Antony Fauci and Deborah Birx, accusing Trump of failing to fire them and allowing them to “destroy the said economy,” impose “fascist restrictions,” and promote a vaccine that Speaker 0 claims has “killed and maimed breathtaking numbers of people.” The vaccine is described as self-replicating and not proven safe or effective, with the period framed as Trump’s Christmas message in 2020 during Operation Warp Speed. - Speaker 1 counters that millions of doses of a safe and effective vaccine were delivered, thanking scientists, researchers, manufacturing workers, and service members, calling it a “Christmas miracle.” - Speaker 0 then reframes Trump’s stance, labeling the vaccine push as aligned with the agendas of Gates, Fauci, Klaus Schwab, and the World Economic Forum, calling them “the deep state” and asserting that Trump was pushing their agenda rather than opposing it. - A year later, in late 2021, Speaker 0 notes ongoing consequences of the vaccine and the pandemic, while Speaker 1 repeats positive messaging about the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, and asserts that those who do not take the vaccine may experience more severe illness if they become very sick and go to the hospital. Speaker 1 emphasizes that the vaccine “worked” and that taking it provides protection, while non-vaccination is framed as a personal choice. - In the ensuing exchange, Speaker 1 makes a historical analogy, claiming the vaccine is “one of the greatest achievements of mankind,” noting that during the Spanish flu there were no vaccines, and claiming three vaccines were developed in less than nine months, whereas it would normally take five to twelve years. - Speaker 2 interjects, noting that more people died under Biden than under Trump during the year being discussed, and that more people took the vaccine that year, prompting a defense from Speaker 1 that the vaccine is effective and reduces the severity of illness, while if one contracts COVID, the illness is minor with vaccination. - The sequence ends with Speaker 0 labeling what was said as “utter, utter mendacity” and “Lying.” Overall, the transcript centers on a polarized debate over the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, the motivations and actions of public health officials and political leaders, contrasting claims that the vaccine was a dangerous, coerced plot with claims that it was a safe, efficacious public health breakthrough. It also juxtaposes Trump’s mixed public positions from 2020–2021, ranging from criticism of the vaccine push to praise of the vaccine as a major achievement.

An individual states they will not get vaccinated due to a lack of clear information and the speed of vaccine development, which they believe is insufficient. They claim nine months is not enough time for vaccine development. Another individual says they are only speaking in close proximity because they are vaccinated, and that not getting vaccinated will allow the virus to continue spreading. The first individual compares COVID-19 to the flu. Someone states COVID-19 is more serious than the flu, and that while 20-30,000 people died of the flu the previous year, 600,000 Americans have died from COVID-19. The first individual disputes the COVID-19 death toll, claiming it is "you all's number." The first individual believes there is something else going on when people are paid or incentivized to get vaccinated, and that the vaccination campaign incites fear in people, and that the pandemic is fear.

During COVID, I was on the board of my kids' school and initially supported a strict lockdown policy. However, I now realize that keeping kids out of school for longer had a greater negative impact than the risks. We all operated with imperfect information, including myself, the CDC, and the governor. Let's learn from this and hold each other accountable while showing grace and forgiveness. Unfortunately, about 1 in 5 US adults are unwilling to get vaccinated, making them the global runner-up in vaccine hesitancy. This means roughly 56 million Americans are 11 times more likely to die from COVID than the rest of the population. It's embarrassing that some Americans are playing Russian roulette with their lives and the lives of others. Despite this, America's healthcare response to COVID has been a victory, thanks to the vaccines.

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The CDC states that vaccinated people don't carry the virus or get sick. They also say there are no safety concerns for pregnant or lactating individuals and their babies. However, a new paper using government data found a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccination. Despite this, the CDC claims there are very few safety concerns. There was also a 57-fold increase in another outcome.

I spoke with a congressperson who mentioned getting Guillain Barre from a flu vaccine. When discussing vaccination, it's crucial to address concerns and focus on the benefits, data, and safety of the COVID vaccine. Listening to people's worries is essential.

Most people have taken the vaccine, which can feel like a horror movie scenario. If you got the vaccine, you might worry about potential risks, especially if you were previously in favor of it. The push to vaccinate all ages, including pregnant women, has raised concerns due to studies showing a high rate of miscarriages. This research could lead to feelings of shame and guilt among those who received the vaccine.

People in America are skeptical about the information surrounding vaccinations, especially given the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. It traditionally takes years to create vaccines, and many feel that nine months isn't sufficient for safety. The conversation highlights the concern that unvaccinated individuals could allow the virus to spread further. While some compare COVID-19 to the flu, the death toll from COVID-19 significantly surpasses that of the flu in recent years. There are suspicions about the motives behind incentivizing vaccinations, suggesting that fear tactics are being used to encourage compliance. Ultimately, the pandemic is perceived by some as driven by fear rather than genuine health concerns.

Vaccinated individuals are not less likely to get infected with COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and data on vaccine status in hospitals may be inaccurate. Reports show a significant number of deaths following vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety globally. Calls have been made to remove these vaccines from the market due to their perceived dangers. Translation: Vaccinated people may still get COVID but might have less severe symptoms. Vaccine safety is being questioned due to reports of deaths following vaccination. There are concerns about the accuracy of hospital data on vaccine status.

Speaker 0 argues that 'the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media' is a major problem and notes that 'the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people.' He asks, 'COVID nineteen was politicized?' Speaker 1 answers, 'the whole process was politicized' and says 'we were lied to about everything... the vaccines would prevent transmission' and 'they prevent infection'—claims he says are contradicted by 'the animal studies and the clinical trial showed.' He accuses the CDC of letting 'the teachers union' write school-closure orders that 'hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based.' He adds examples: 'Martin Koldor from Harvard' was 'ejected [from COVID]... because he wasn't in the orthodoxy'; 'FDA during COVID' officials 'Gruber and Krausz' criticized Biden mandates; Biden said, 'I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine' then mandated it and fired top FDA officials who said it had not been properly tested.' The exchange ends with 'Yes.'