reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the spread of bird flu and the potential for mass culling of poultry. They mention the development of bird flu vaccines and the possibility of human-to-human transmission. The conversation also touches on the lack of human trials for vaccines and the FDA's approval process based on preclinical data. The focus is on the need for vaccination, particularly for farm workers.

What do you think led to this situation? They mentioned rabies, and I looked it up. The symptoms are severe, so couldn't they have just observed the squirrel and raccoon to determine they weren't rabid? We didn't hear from the DEC directly; we learned from another news station that they killed Peanut. Since their visit, no DEC or state official has contacted me. They even asked my wife about her immigration status and if I had cameras in the house. Local sheriffs and the DA approved this action, and a judge signed a search warrant to take the animals. The person who claimed to be bitten was surrounded by professionals wearing gloves. How could they say they were bitten by a squirrel?

There are thousands of pets out there dining out every day. While we sat at this table, five, six pets died in The United States from a rabies vaccine they didn't need. Anybody can walk in here, sit down and say whatever they want, but I gave you silence. I said to the state board, if I had to kill an animal to obey that law, would I have to do They said yes. One rabies vaccine is good for life. All this is unnecessary if that dog had a titer check, it would not need a vaccination. So this is the real problem here. I had put upstairs in the public health department 45 articles that show vaccines are dose dependent. Titers indicate immunity. It's been proven. Okay. But who's the we? Who's the we? The researchers. The researchers. These are the researchers. They're the ones who do the research. Okay. I spent a career the pharmaceutical. And I spent a career being a veterinarian watching the animals die. See. Think that happened before. But I completely don't agree with what you're saying. Do you know of any studies that the vaccine can sometimes create other health concerns for animals? Can you talk a little bit about that? Absolutely. You get tumors at the injection sites. You get autoimmune diseases that start later in life, but you get the immediate reactions. Some dogs die immediately of anaphylaxis. Others get just serum sickness and they vomit. Maybe you hide under the bed for a day or two. But if I lower my dose to protect the animal, then I'm in trouble. So I have to do what the manufacturer says. And like the State Board of Connecticut said, if I have to kill my pet, I have to kill my pet. It's the law. Well, guess what? I have a Hippocratic oath that is greater than any law that's passed in the state of Connecticut that would make me kill my patient. I won't do it.

The USDA approved self-amplifying mRNA injections for rabies and other diseases in cats and dogs. These injections are authorized, widely available for online purchase, and administered by veterinarians. The speaker claims that these injections can possibly shed onto humans. The platform, Nobivac NXT developed by Merck, is available for purchase online. According to the speaker, if pets receive Nobivac NXT, they might shed self-amplifying RNA or antigens onto owners through bodily fluids. The speaker asserts that this was not tested and was authorized regardless. The effects are currently unknown.

Technology is being rapidly advanced and implemented in humans, particularly messenger RNA vaccines. These advancements are being fast-tracked, and it's important to acknowledge that our food species will also be affected by these vaccines.

The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it. They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation. The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis. They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others. On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.” The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).

The speakers discuss rabies and vaccinations in a provocative, conspiratorial frame. They claim rabies is nonexistent and that the treatment, the vaccine, is worse than the disease. They question the idea of compulsory vaccination, asserting that mandates are voluntary until you agree to them, and describe mandates as a game. They compare the rabies test to the pandemic-era testing method, suggesting the test for rabies relies on tests that produced positive results for illnesses, implying deception. They note that in the early 1900s, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool: brain tissue from a suspected dog injected into two rabbits; if the rabbits died, rabies was proven. They present the vaccine as having many side effects and cite an instance where 38 dogs and cats given a Merck vaccine experienced seizures, aggression, and death, labeling the vaccine “Safe and effective” as something they dispute. They propose solutions: finding a holistic veterinarian who can grant a medical exemption, or simply saying no to vaccination. They claim it’s possible to make a vet sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to an animal after the injection, and suggest vets won’t sign such a guarantee. The conversation closes with a clip asserting that if you are unvaccinated, the virus will hunt you out or find you, repeating the claim that the virus will locate unvaccinated individuals. Overall, the dialogue presents a skepticism toward rabies biology and vaccination, asserts that vaccines have harmful side effects, questions mandates, and promotes exemptions or refusals, culminating in the assertion that viruses target the unvaccinated.

- The speaker presents a checklist for healthy cats and dogs and raises controversial claims about vaccines, diet, and technology used on pets. - Vaccination critique: Vaccines are pushed because “there’s money in the side effects,” and a claim is cited from the book Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean that “Rabies doesn’t even exist, but they poison the animals anyways.” - Diet recommendations: Advocates raw diets for dogs and cats, specifically “Raw meat, raw milk. Not kibble, processed garbage.” Cites Doctor Pottinger (Dr. Pottinger) who fed 900 cats raw meat and raw milk, reporting no parasites, no dewormers, and silky skin and fur. - Personal anecdote: A friend reportedly gave raw meat and “superfoods” to their dog; the dog supposedly showed no teary eyes, no skin allergies, and no deworming. - Parasites and metals claim: The speaker asserts that parasites are caused by heavy metal pollution; kibble is “loaded with metals,” leading animals to develop worms to counter the metals. - Vaccines and implants claim: Vaccines and RFID/chip implants are described as treating animals like lab experiments, allegedly causing tumors in the region where they are placed. - Alternative remedies: Mentions a case where Pearl Powder Shiloh Shot in Dragon’s Blood with a raw diet was given to a puppy, and the puppy was described as happy and healthy with complimenting observations. - Wireless/chemistry claim: Ends with the idea of an “invisible rainbow” (WiFi) that harms animals, suggesting microwave frequencies cook them. List of perceived hazards includes vaccines, kibble, WiFi, RFID chips, and dewormers, all said to contribute to health issues in dogs and cats.

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without undergoing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was initially started but stopped due to the animals dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as test subjects. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the experimental vaccine mandatory for employees, and this issue is being ignored.

The speaker states that mRNA in food is a critical issue, but also highlights the potential for transgenic mosquitoes to deliver vaccines via saliva. They reference a presentation about producing a transgenic mosquito as a "flying syringe" to deliver protective vaccines. The speaker claims the Gates Foundation is funding genetic engineering of mosquitoes with the intention of using mosquito bites for vaccination. While they don't have definitive proof of its viability, they assert that this research is underway. The speaker clarifies they are not claiming current mosquitoes are injecting people with anything. However, they state they have indisputable evidence that efforts are being made to enable mosquitoes to inject people with substances in the future.

A person knows a kid who works at a feedlot in Nebraska. The feedlot was bought out by a company, leading to an increase in vaccine use. The company plans to implement mRNA vaccines for cattle, which was trialed on pigs. The pigs experienced negative effects, with some dying and traces of the vaccine found in their meat. This raises concerns about the potential impact on humans.

- The speaker asserts that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep veterinarians in business. - If a vet recommends rabies shots, the speaker says you should fire them, alleging the shots promote poison to immunize and then cause a debilitating disease, creating a lifetime patient. - The speaker claims there are no rabid dogs roaming about, and that rabies is fabricated. - They describe the origin of rabies studies as involving rabid dogs kept in cages that went nuts, with the vaccine being placed in the dogs’ heads after they died, and claim this demonstrated the vaccine’s effectiveness. - The speaker asserts that today dogs are still injected for rabies to poison the dogs and create lifelong patients. - Two books are cited as debunking this view: The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean. - The speaker generalizes that professionals, including vets and doctors, are there to keep you as a patient for life.

Speaker 0 claims that people lie about tetanus and rabies, asserting that rabies doesn’t exist and that dogs are poisoned. They allege veterinarians administer 13 vaccinations to keep the veterinary industry in business, and that the first vaccination against dogs was injected into their brains, followed by more vaccines to sustain the vets. They describe the entire system as intended to keep “these terrorists in business” who constantly poison people and animals, and they state that if a vet truly cared about an animal, they wouldn’t inject it. The speaker asserts that injections of poisons into animals would not lead to health, applying this logic to horses, cats, and wildlife as well. They claim wildlife are vaccinated by the government, referencing deer “spinning around in circles” in the forest as evidence. The call is for people to be aware and to say no, defending their dogs, cats, and even their grandmother, framing it as a constitutional right. They urge listeners to resist vaccination or other medical interventions for family and animals, insisting on a stance of defiance against forced measures. The speaker emphasizes personal agency and the obligation to defend family and animals, portraying vaccination as coercive and harmful. They allude to expressing censored language that would condemn the alleged actions, but refrain from explicit terms. The overall message is a condemnation of vaccines and veterinary practice, framed as a political and constitutional violation, and a directive to resist vaccination and to advocate for personal choice.

Pets have died in the US from unnecessary rabies vaccines. The speaker questions the need for these vaccines, suggesting that a tire check would indicate immunity. They mention having provided articles to the public health department that support the idea that vaccines are dose dependent. Another speaker, who has a background in the pharmaceutical industry, disagrees. The first speaker explains that vaccines can cause tumors, immune diseases, and immediate reactions in animals. They express their refusal to follow a law that would require them to harm their patients.

The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase. And so veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets. If you look up Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck. You will find it online, and you can even buy it. It's possible if their dogs or cats receive the Nobivac NXT self self amplifying RNA particles. It's possible they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids. And so, none of this was tested by the way. They just authorized it anyways because they don't care.

The transcript discusses self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections and asserts that they are being deployed for both humans and animals globally. It states that the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 vaccine for adults over 18, and that the European Union previously approved the same inoculation for adults, placing it in both the EU and the UK. It also claims that Japan approved it in 2023, and that India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating a global rollout. It highlights that in the United States, the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for pets, specifically mentioning Merck’s Novavax NXT for dogs and cats, and asserts that this is being injected into pets and that shedding onto human owners across the US is possible. It notes that the FDA has fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, emphasizing concern about these developments. The speaker outlines purported dangers of these replicating genetic materials, including the possibility of shedding from humans to humans or from pets to humans, and the potential for recombination with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. It emphasizes the claimed approval of Arcturus Therapeutics’ injection “everywhere in the clinical trials” and then provides adverse event statistics: eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events, and fifteen percent required medical attention. A Uganda study is cited, claiming that the replicon injections induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, with thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia reported, implying degraded immune systems and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The Uganda study is also described as showing eighty-five percent experiencing vomiting, high fevers, and feeling absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes with a strong stance against these injections, calling them a “self amplifying assault on humanity” and arguing that they should be pulled off the market and banned for human use. The overall message is a warning about global deployment, potential shedding and recombination risks, significant adverse event rates, and a call to ban self-amplifying mRNA injections for humans. The named entities include Arcturus Therapeutics, Merck, Novavax NXT, and references to regulatory actions in the UK, EU, Japan, India, and the US.

There's a Pfizer subsidiary called ZOTIS that has mRNA injected over 100 million wildlife in the U.S., including pets. This initiative, funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, has been ongoing for the past year and a half. Hunters were the primary source of information about this, as it was published in their magazines. A study on Staten Island involved injecting 100 white-tailed deer with Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, leading to widespread administration across the country without public knowledge. Concerns arise about hunters consuming venison, believing it to be organic. Additionally, mRNA technology is being used on vegetables and cattle, raising further worries about food safety.

The speaker questions why a large dog and a small dog receive the same volume of rabies vaccine. They suggest over-vaccination may contribute to the rising incidence of cancer in dogs. Bombarding dogs and cats with multiple antigens yearly can cause an inappropriate immune response, preventing the immune system from working correctly, potentially leading to uncontrolled cell growth, like cancer. Some vaccine protocols list up to eight or nine different vaccines given to dogs and cats almost yearly.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

Vaccinating birds with a leaky vaccine, one that doesn't provide sterilizing immunity, turns the flocks into mutation factories, teaching the organism how to mutate. This destabilizes the organism and makes it more likely to jump to animals. The speaker claims that all agency heads from NIH, CDC, and FDA advised against bird vaccination because it is dangerous for human beings.

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

Speaker 0 states that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep vets in business. They assert that if your vet tells you your animal needs rabies shots, you should fire them. They claim all they’re doing is promoting poison so they can inject your animal, then your animal can come down with a debilitating disease, and then they have a patient for life. They define rabies as “There is no rabid dogs running around, and they're gonna get you in anything else.” They describe the first studies on rabid dogs as dogs that were locked in cages and went completely nuts, and allege the guy who created the rabies vaccine stuck it in the dog's head and said that the rabies vaccine worked after the dogs died. They assert that to this day, they are still injecting dogs for rabies, calling it a fake illness, to poison the dogs to have patients for life, calling it truly sick and twisted. They cite The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean as debunking this, and claim vets do the same thing as doctors—there to keep you as a patient for life. That is what they’re going to say about.

Speaker asserts that extremely dangerous self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals worldwide. A few days ago, the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 injection for adults over 18, and previously the European Union approved the same replicon injection for adults, so it is in the EU and the UK. Japan approved it in 2023, and India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating rollout across the globe. In the United States, it is claimed that the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for dogs and cats, specifically Novavax NXT by Merck, suggesting active injection into pets and potential shedding onto human owners in the US. The speaker states that the FDA fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, raising concern given the alleged dangers of these products. The speaker emphasizes the potential for shedding of replicating genetic material from humans or from pets to humans, and the possibility that these replicating constructs could recombine with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. They highlight a high rate of adverse events associated with the Arcturus Therapeutics injection, claiming that eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events and fifteen percent required medical attention. A recent study in Uganda is cited, alleged to have induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, including thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia, with immune systems degraded and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The report also claims that eighty-five percent experienced vomiting and high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes that this self-amplifying assault on humanity needs to end, calling for these injections to be pulled from the market and banned for human use.

The speaker treats vaccine injuries, stating that 70% of their practice involves them. They claim rabies vaccines are among the worst. They were shocked to learn that there has been no canine strain of rabies in the US for 14 years, suggesting that dogs are being unnecessarily killed or restrained. The speaker believes that over-vaccination is occurring constantly. They assert that no vaccine is safe, and no vaccine is 100% effective.