reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Doctors reportedly risked losing their licenses for prescribing ivermectin. The Federation of State Medical Boards, a private entity in Texas that oversees state medical boards, allegedly sent a directive to state medical boards concerning ivermectin and misinformation, encouraging them to target doctors. Some doctors are reportedly still dealing with medical boards to clear their names. This reportedly occurred in the fall of 2021, when Biden mandated the shots.

These ten deaths are the tip of the iceberg. There is a vast number of deaths in the peer reviewed literature. These have cases have already been vetted. We don't need FDA officials to comment to them on them. They're deeply concerning. And then our US CDC vaccine administration adverse event system, VAERS, has in total now, this is shocking for United States residents, nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty deaths. About two thousand of these have occurred right within forty eight hours of the shot, and then nineteen thousand two hundred seventy nine Americans reported to be permanently disabled. These are reported to VAERS by doctors like myself who have already determined the vaccine is the cause of the injury, disability, or death. Because if the vaccine was not the cause, then we wouldn't do the report to VAERS. So this is the VAERS does indicate causation by proxy of reporting. This is very important. The VAERS system, I'll say it again, indicates the vaccine is the cause of the problem because the doctor or the health care provider in the field at the scene who's examined the patient, examined the autopsy and the medical record information, examined the clinical record, the vaccine administration has determined the vaccine is the cause. Otherwise, a VAERS report would not be made. So this is very important. I would say at this point in time, both Macron and Prasad should immediately call for the COVID nineteen vaccines to be removed from the market. Every day they continue to delay on this, the more Americans will be hurt by boosters. We've already had several hundred deaths this year that have occurred on their watch. B, they should initiate a safety review of the 19480 deaths with an independent panel to review all the information. The CDC has the patients and their families' phone numbers, emails, addresses. There ought to be interviews of family members for the deceased, interviews of the patient themselves for injuries and disabilities to to get their side of the story. The CDC has all that information. The review should be done independently by people who are not CDC or FDA employees, And there should be multiple reviewers and should be an adjudication process and finally, a determination of causality for the vaccine. And then I would say, finally, the FDA officials, including Macari and Prasad, needs to start showing up to important proceedings in Washington. There have been multiple hearings on vaccine safety. One that I was the lead witness on, 05/21/2025. Yeah. We published a report indicating that there was a government cover up of COVID nineteen vaccine induced mild pericarditis, including fatal cases.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

There are 1,800 big pharma lobbyists in Washington, influencing policies significantly. This raises concerns about their impact on public health and safety. To combat this, one solution is to prohibit government officials from becoming lobbyists after their term. Currently, there are regulations that limit this, but they often allow for loopholes, enabling former officials to work for companies they once regulated. This creates conflicts of interest, as seen with the Sackler family and the FDA. While addressing these issues is crucial, it often gets sidelined by other pressing matters.

It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative, preventing doctors from finding solutions. The speaker has conducted clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine studies, and has brought vaccines and other drugs to market. Some drugs never made it to market because they killed people. Clinical trial guidelines ensure safe drugs, but these guidelines were not followed during the pandemic, affecting everyone. COVID should have been a time for doctors to unite, but interference with research occurred. Science evolves through experiments, skepticism, and an open mind. Challenging current knowledge must be allowed to move science forward, but what the speaker witnessed during the pandemic was not science.

No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Preliminary findings indicate that most of the allegations are credible, leading us to believe the accusers. The government will take action as a result. There are issues of sloppiness and laziness, but some level of competence exists. The situation is currently unsustainable, and the minister will likely react strongly, possibly shutting everything down. It is unlikely that certain board members and executives will be able to continue serving due to a loss of confidence. The focus now is on finding ways to remove them, starting with gaining control of the board and securing a majority vote. The report highlights the board's failure to follow processes, COI regulations, and act as responsible fiduciaries.

The speakers discuss the issue of trusting medical information from experts versus doing personal research. They highlight the criticism faced by individuals who seek to be informed about medical treatments, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The speakers argue that shaming people for doing their own research is counterproductive and that relying on expert advisory groups is important. They also mention the lack of expertise among the general population and even some doctors. The conversation touches on the influence of big pharma and the corruption within regulatory agencies. The speakers suggest that many YouTube shows do not provide critiques of these issues.

Dr. Paul Oosterhuis, the first doctor to be suspended by APRA, shares his story of fighting against suspension due to his criticism of COVID policies. He expressed concerns about the harm caused by lockdowns and mandates and advocated for early treatments. Dr. Oosterhuis was suspended after tweeting about the low risk of COVID-related deaths in children receiving the experimental gene jab. Despite representing himself in court, he sued the Medical Council of New South Wales and eventually had his suspension lifted. Dr. Oosterhuis emphasizes the need for a precedent to protect other doctors and discusses his passion for anesthesia and making a difference in people's lives. A more in-depth discussion is planned for the future.

Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

In 2022, Australia had over 10 million COVID cases, with over half the country infected despite vaccination efforts. The excess deaths in 2021 were higher than expected, and there were over 140,000 reported vaccine injuries, three times higher than previous years. The TGA, responsible for monitoring vaccine injuries, ignores these signals. The head of the organization, Professor Skerritt, has a conflict of interest as it is funded by Big Pharma. The chief health officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, hadn't read the non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine and made incorrect statements about it. The law in Australia states that vaccination cannot be coerced and individuals must be properly informed about the vaccine's contents.

Long COVID, caused by the spike protein, is affecting multiple medical disciplines. Since 2022, I've seen over 2,000 patients with COVID-19 or vaccine-related issues. Many patients had faith in medicine shattered due to adverse effects. Some were forced to choose between vaccination or losing their careers. Military service members are being harmed, with 30 individuals in my clinic facing significant issues like myocarditis and being medically discharged.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

Mr. Fletcher is questioned about the risks of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The latest Pfizer report lists various side effects, and it is suggested that doctors should inform patients about these risks. However, Mr. Fletcher states that it is not their responsibility to do so. Concerns are raised about the thoroughness of vaccine testing, and some health professionals have had their licenses suspended for expressing these concerns. Mr. Fletcher emphasizes that practitioners should use their professional judgment and provide information based on the best available evidence. The discussion also touches on the importance of discussing side effects and the need to address a culture of fear among health practitioners.

The Australian government is accused of suppressing COVID vaccine adverse reactions and deaths. Excess deaths in 2022 are around 26,000, but no questions are being asked. Doctors are not reporting adverse effects or deaths, with only 14 deaths officially attributed to the vaccine out of over 1,000 reported. Doctors fear losing their livelihoods if they report accurately. The spike in deaths after COVID was attributed to the vaccine, leading to anger over the situation.

No. There's a lot of doctors that I know that were in danger of losing their license because they had prescribed ivermectin. And that was another thing. You know, the the Federation of State Medical Boards, is this private entity, they're actually located in Texas, who oversees all the state medical boards. They sent out a directive to all the state medical boards concerning ivermectin, concerning misinformation, and basically encouraging the medical boards to go after doctors like myself. And, I mean, I'm still I'm still tangled up with the medical board trying to clear my name. But they did that. That was it all happened in that 2021. Right when Biden mandated the shots, They really came down hard on the doctors.

The speaker states the vaccine recommendation panel has been under attack for 20 years. A 2002 congressional investigation allegedly found 97% of panel members had conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. One instance cited four out of five members working for a company when they approved its vaccine, and one voting member held a patent on that vaccine, later sold for $186 million. The speaker says the goal is to ensure the panel consists of individuals without conflicts of interest who are not profiting from their votes. The speaker claims that since the panel's inception in 1986, the vaccine schedule has expanded from 11 doses of five vaccines to 69 to 92 doses of 19 vaccines, none of which have been tested for safety. The speaker asserts this is malpractice and aims to ensure all vaccines are tested for safety so physicians and patients understand the risk profile and benefits of each vaccine.

Doctors are generally educated and capable of understanding evidence, yet many have made incorrect statements about vaccines, causing harm. It's surprising that most American doctors haven't acknowledged their mistakes. Personally, I wouldn't trust a doctor who continues to misrepresent COVID information. One doctor I know treated me after I experienced vaccine-related issues. She recognized early on that something was wrong and treated her patients with steroids when others wouldn't, leading to better outcomes. Unfortunately, many people lack access to compassionate and knowledgeable doctors like her. It's hard to overlook the lack of accountability from many in the medical field, as credibility hinges on acknowledging past errors and the reasoning behind them.

Speaker 0 describes finding vaccine insert materials with no printed content and says this is disheartening and “disgusting,” then adds that it “gets better” and that “more” continues to happen. Speaker 0 claims the CDC redacted every word of a 148-page study on myocarditis after COVID vaccination, and that when they asked to have the study printed, the entire document was redacted. They question what the study could have contained that required redaction and say this is “even scarier.” Speaker 1 says they are witnessing “an active cover up” of a “colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved, and that similar actions occur in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each of these regulators requires product companies to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after a product comes out, describing this as a regulatory dossier. They say that if problems arise and are reported to a company (such as Pfizer), the company must report, compile, and produce a report that is made publicly available. Speaker 1 claims that for Pfizer, whose first vaccine was approved 12/10/2020, Pfizer did not produce a report after the ninety days. They add that when people asked what was happening, Pfizer allegedly did not disclose what occurred, leading to court proceedings. Speaker 1 states that the FDA’s lawyer allegedly said the dossier should not be released for fifty-five years, and that after pressure, the Pfizer dossier was eventually released. They then claim Pfizer recorded 1,223 deaths with their product within ninety days of release and recorded over 1,200 new adverse events. Speaker 1 also says the FDA worked to cover this up, and that FDA should have regulated Pfizer with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about “novel vaccines,” which they describe as a “genetic transfer technology platform,” the first time human beings had been injected with foreign genetic material in world history. Speaker 1 ends by stating that two thirds of the world’s population took these.

The COVID story reveals corruption in science, journalism, and universities, with tangible consequences like injuries. This corruption warrants a complete reboot of the system, but the system refuses to learn. Many doctors who were previously vaccine advocates are now skeptics after investigating adjuvants and the mRNA platform, realizing their previous understanding was incorrect.

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

Speaker 0: Twelve months ago, my local government in Port Hedland, Western Australia moved and passed a motion demanding the prime minister, the state leaders, health ministers across the country validate what is now verified science, and we demanded a suspension of the mRNA injections that Australians' mRNA COVID injections are dangerously contaminated with foreign DNA contaminations and foreign DNA fragments. Now this Australian local government action has now been successfully followed and replicated in towns and cities all across Australia. We've also had over 200,000,000 views on our on social media of our council meeting. This put some serious pressure on the Australian TGA, which is Australia's drug regulation body akin to Europe's EMA or the FDA in The USA. For those of you who don't know, the Australian drug regulator, the receives around about 95 of its funding from big pharma. It's like regulatory capture on steroids. To make matters worse, the unelected bureaucrats who approve or deny applications for new drugs or medical interventions have no legislative requirement to declare any conflicts of interest. So when over 90% of the TGA's budget is supported by industry it regulates and when the conflicts of interest of those marketing drug approval decisions is hidden, is it any wonder in the West that we've lost our faith in our health institutions? Only in Australia could a regulator funded by the industry it regulates still call itself impartial with a straight face. I tell you this story to point out the inherent risks that we all face in speaking truth to power. Last month, my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections canceled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government, we dared to ask uncomfortable questions that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with big pharma.

Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license. Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries. Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice. Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement. Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care. Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic. She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.

Colleges are accused of destroying medical ethics and the patient-doctor relationship. Danielle Smith, running for Premier of Alberta, spoke up for the unvaccinated, calling them persecuted. She suggested dissolving the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for change. Elect politicians willing to make major changes, not just tinker with healthcare. Support doctors who upheld the Hippocratic oath during the pandemic, as the healthcare system may collapse.