reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly welcomes Dave Rubin to discuss various topics, starting with their dogs and transitioning to serious political issues. They address the controversial "Don't Say Gay" bill in Florida, clarifying that it prohibits discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in K-3 classrooms, emphasizing that the media misrepresents it as a homophobic measure. Rubin argues that the bill is about parental rights and age-appropriate education, while Kelly shares her experiences with her children and the confusion surrounding gender identity discussions in schools. They express concern over the influence of teachers' unions and the potential indoctrination of children. Rubin highlights the dangers of pushing gender identity discussions on young kids, suggesting that it could lead to confusion and harm. They also touch on the broader implications of educational policies and the need for parents to be vigilant about what their children are taught. The conversation shifts to the ongoing investigation by John Durham into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Paul Sperry joins to explain the role of Rodney Joffe, a tech executive accused of improperly accessing Trump’s data. Joffe's questionable background, including past scams, raises concerns about how he gained access to sensitive information. Sperry details how Joffe and his associates allegedly spied on Trump and his campaign, using their positions to push a narrative that Trump was colluding with Russia. They discuss the media's reluctance to cover these revelations, fearing the unraveling of the Russiagate narrative, which could jeopardize their credibility. The conversation concludes with a focus on the implications of these investigations for privacy rights and the integrity of political processes, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in government actions.

Megyn Kelly hosts James O'Keefe from Project Veritas, discussing his legal battle with the U.S. Department of Justice over an alleged stolen diary belonging to Ashley Biden. The FBI raided Project Veritas employees' homes, seizing phones and computers, which raised concerns about press freedom, even prompting the ACLU to defend O'Keefe. Microsoft revealed that federal prosecutors compelled them to access emails from Project Veritas staff, leading to the discovery that the government also sought information from Google and Apple. O'Keefe explains that he received a tip about Ashley Biden's diary in September 2020 but chose not to publish it due to its sensitive content. After contacting Biden's legal team for comment, the situation escalated, resulting in FBI raids. O'Keefe describes the raids as unprecedented violations of the First Amendment, emphasizing the chilling effect on journalism. He asserts that the government has no evidence of wrongdoing, arguing that receiving stolen information is permissible for journalists as long as they do not participate in the theft. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of the case, highlighting the government's overreach and the need for transparency regarding the secret warrants issued against journalists. O'Keefe expresses frustration over the lack of due process and the violation of journalistic privileges, noting that the case could set a dangerous precedent for press freedom. In the second segment, Kelly speaks with Maximilian Alvarez about the current labor movement and unionization efforts in the U.S. Alvarez shares his background, detailing how the 2008 financial crisis shifted his perspective on labor and economic inequality. He discusses the struggles of workers in various sectors, including education and healthcare, emphasizing the need for solidarity and support for unionization efforts. Alvarez highlights the disconnect between corporate profits and worker wages, particularly during the pandemic, where companies like Amazon and Starbucks have seen significant profit increases while workers continue to face harsh conditions. He argues that the labor movement is essential for giving workers a voice and ensuring their rights are protected. The discussion concludes with a call for collective action and the importance of addressing the systemic issues affecting workers today.

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly Show. The jury is deliberating the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, an 18-year-old accused of shooting three men during a Black Lives Matter riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020. The defense claims self-defense, which, if proven, would exonerate Rittenhouse. In Wisconsin, the prosecution must disprove self-defense claims, which hinge on four questions regarding the nature of the threat Rittenhouse faced and whether his response was reasonable. Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger argues that Rittenhouse was not facing an imminent threat when he shot Joseph Rosenbaum, the first man he killed, asserting that Rosenbaum was unarmed and chasing Rittenhouse. Binger contends that Rittenhouse became an active shooter after killing Rosenbaum, justifying the actions of those who attacked him afterward. The defense counters that Rittenhouse ran toward police after the shooting and only shot the subsequent attackers, Anthony Huber and Gage Grosskroyd, in response to their aggression. Binger's strategy has shifted to arguing that Rittenhouse provoked the violence, which could negate his self-defense claim. However, provocation can only eliminate self-defense if Rittenhouse intentionally provoked an attack or engaged in illegal conduct likely to provoke violence. The prosecution's claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another individual before the shootings relies on blurry drone footage, which the defense argues is unreliable. The defense highlights Rosenbaum's criminal history, including being a convicted child molester, to argue that Rittenhouse acted in self-defense against a perceived threat. The prosecution's case relies on portraying Huber and Grosskroyd as heroes trying to stop an active shooter, but the defense maintains that Rittenhouse's perception of danger is what matters. The discussion also touches on the political implications of the case, with the defense arguing that Rittenhouse has been demonized due to his presence at the riot with an AR-15. The defense asserts that the prosecution is under pressure to convict someone to appease public sentiment, while the jury faces the challenge of navigating the complex legal standards surrounding self-defense and provocation. In a separate segment, attorney Harmeet Dhillon discusses the FBI's raid on James O'Keefe's home and the homes of Project Veritas employees in connection with Ashley Biden's diary. Dhillon argues that the DOJ's actions are unprecedented and threaten journalistic freedom, as they seized materials that could expose confidential sources and attorney-client communications. She emphasizes the chilling effect this could have on journalists and the broader implications for First Amendment rights. The discussion raises concerns about the politicization of the DOJ and the potential misuse of power against critics of the government.

Tucker Carlson emphasizes the First Amendment's protection against government censorship of news, criticizing Democrats for attempting to shut down conservative news outlets like One America News (OAN). He argues that the term "disinformation" is misused to silence dissenting voices, particularly regarding topics like the COVID vaccine and the Hunter Biden laptop story. Dan Ball, a host at OAN, recounts how the network faced pressure from Democratic lawmakers, leading to its removal from major cable providers and loss of advertisers. He highlights that OAN was targeted for reporting truths that contradicted mainstream narratives. Ball asserts that the government’s actions against OAN are illegal and reflect a broader trend of silencing conservative viewpoints. He expresses hope for OAN's survival and growth, emphasizing the importance of free speech and the press. Both Carlson and Ball agree that the current media landscape is shifting, with traditional outlets losing credibility while alternative platforms gain traction. They call for a defense of First Amendment rights against government overreach and media manipulation.

A concerning First Amendment issue emerges as the FBI executes a search warrant at a Washington Post reporter’s home in a leak investigation tied to a government contractor. Critics warn that seizing a journalist’s devices intimidates sources and risks chilling reporting on national security, echoing past Rosen and Assange cases. The incident underscores tensions between leaking classified material and press protections, highlights evolving government overreach, and raises questions about media ownership, editorial independence, and whether current rules enable aggressive tactics against outlets the administration dislikes.

In communist countries, 98% of people opposed the regime but feared the 2% in power. James O'Keefe, described as a "boogeyman" of journalism, discusses the FBI's raid on him, where they seized his phones without charging him. The raid was linked to his investigation into Ashley Biden's diary, which he chose not to publish due to uncertainty about its authenticity. O'Keefe emphasizes the constitutional protections for journalists and criticizes the FBI's actions as unconstitutional. He highlights the challenges faced by whistleblowers and the fear of repercussions for exposing truths. O'Keefe argues that ethical journalism often harms powerful interests, and he believes that the public's right to know outweighs individual privacy concerns. He asserts that Project Veritas maintains rigorous ethical standards and has never lost a lawsuit, despite facing significant scrutiny and accusations.