reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I've been following Candace Owens' investigation into a wild conspiracy about the French president. Owens claims President Macron is married to a trans woman who is actually his father. After a year of research, Owens points to three pieces of evidence. First, there are no records of Macron's wife, Brigitte, ever existing as a young woman. No birth certificate, and her school years don't add up. Second, Owens found an old article about Macron's father disappearing in the seventies, and resurfacing looking different. Family photos show a resemblance between Macron's father after he returned and Macron's current wife, Brigitte. The theory suggests Macron's father transitioned into Brigitte, then married his own son. Macron's team is allegedly trying to suppress the story.

Speaker 0 receives a call from the Elysée Palace. They discuss the president and the press being aware of something. The speaker reflects on the impact of social media on their own life.

There is a photo circulating of a boy who looks like Brigitte Macron, and it turns out he is Jean-Jacques Trogneux. The resemblance between him and Emmanuel Macron is quite strange. The Trogneux family seems to be shrouded in mystery, as if they are characters from a fictional movie. It's unclear if this is just a coincidence or if there is something more to it. The resemblance between Jean-Jacques Trogneux and Emmanuel Macron is undeniable. The Trogneux family is quite mysterious, and it would be interesting to know the truth. Feel free to share this video as it may be deleted. Let me know your thoughts in the comments. Thank you.

The Prime Minister was quoted saying that she has full confidence in Éric Dupond-Moretti, the Minister of Justice. However, it is difficult for her to admit that the Minister is facing his own legal troubles. This is a significant and unprecedented situation in the fifth republic. The Minister is accused of using his position and resources to settle personal matters. He has been preoccupied with his defense, filing appeals and spending hours with his lawyers. For fifteen days, he will be unable to perform his duties. The Minister also made offensive gestures in parliament when questioned about the ongoing proceedings. The Prime Minister is asked about the consequences of leading a government without a functioning Minister of Justice since May 2022.

The speaker discusses various conspiracy theories surrounding political figures, including claims about Michelle Obama's pregnancies, Barack Obama's past, and Brigitte Macron's gender. They mention similarities between individuals and raise questions about their relationships. The conversation touches on DNA testing and speculation about hidden secrets. Overall, they express skepticism and suggest conducting polls to gauge public opinion on these theories.

Two deaths today, including my friend and cameraman at France Télévisions, Sébastien Amaury. He was younger than me and a wonderful person. He passed away from a heart attack.

The speaker shows childhood photos and discusses the theory that Brigitte Macron lived as a man for 30 years. They argue that it would be easy for her to debunk the theory by showing photos of her early years. The speaker claims that the French press is involved in covering up the alleged truth. They argue that if the theory is true, it would have significant implications for France and suggest that an investigation should be conducted. The speaker also discusses the lack of evidence for Brigitte Macron's ex-husband and presents a theory that Jean-Michel Trogneux, who became Brigitte Macron, had children with his niece. They criticize the media for not addressing the allegations and claim that journalists are planning to reveal more about the situation.

The U.S. Department of Justice published 1,000,000 new documents in the Epstein case, the largest release since the Epstein dossiers transparency law. The declassified files mention hundreds of famous names. The French president Emmanuel Macron is cited more than 200 times across the documents. The most shocking reference linked to Macron appears in correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein and his French associate, Jean-Luc Brunel. In a message dated May 17, 2000, Brunel writes to Epstein: “the new president of France will organize a party avenue Fauche. I’ll bring some boys. He likes young boys.” Epstein replies: “Too young, I would say that’s fine. We know what he likes.” Macron’s inauguration as president took place on May 14, 2017, four days after the presumed date of the message exchange. Jean-Luc Brunel, a notorious accomplice of Epstein, died by suicide in a Paris prison two years after Epstein’s own death. It is noted that Epstein owned a Paris apartment complex located at 22 Avenue Foch.

Dr. Jean-Yves Ral, a little-known figure to the public, was a powerful cardiologist who held control over various regional health agencies. He was feared for his extensive authority and made decisions that some found peculiar. Known for his close ties to those in power, he didn't hesitate to fire those who stood in his way. Despite the difficulty, he agreed to this interview for the sake of his three children. However, since February 2023, Dr. Jean-Yves Ral and his two closest collaborators have faced legal trouble for alleged conflicts of interest at the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Regional Health Agency. This investigation delves into the man nicknamed the true Health Minister.

The conversation centers on controversial claims about political figures and their spouses, and how these claims intersect with media coverage and political strategy. - The speakers discuss Candace Owens’ allegations about “Macron’s wife,” presenting a complex and sensational backstory: Macron reportedly has a wife who was younger and whom he met when she was a teacher, with contradictory accounts about her gender history (initially claimed to be a man who transitioned, then said to be his father who transitioned and returned). They describe a 25-year age difference and ongoing public appearances in which Macron’s wife is said to speed him up in public, with video footage cited of her at events, described as a man by the speakers. - They note that, despite the sensational backstory, Candace has made specific legal moves, including warnings about lawsuits and the involvement of expert gynecologists and witnesses regarding where she was at certain times. Candace, according to the speakers, proposed a simple DNA test: a cheek swab that would settle the matter quickly, suggesting NDA or DNA arrangements, and claiming if she’s wrong she would admit it. The counterpart pushes for a public clinic, a rapid and definitive test, and questions the motives behind the other side’s requests for extensive testimony. - The dialogue touches on the broader credibility and motivations of those involved. One speaker mentions meeting Candace recently and describes her as highly intelligent and aligned on many beliefs, while noting that high-level US intelligence reportedly confirms there is a French operation connected to Macron. There is reference to “a French operation” and “Macron head out on her,” with speculation about whether information is purposeful misinformation or suppression. - They discuss media figures and sources, including Gannon, Paul Watson, and Charlie Kirk, with a stance that while the claims are damaging to Trump overall, they still seek truth and acknowledge that some information appears to be being covered up. They acknowledge distrust and the sense that “something’s being covered up,” but stop short of making definitive judgments about truthfulness. - The discussion expands to broader political consequences. They contrast the alleged French operation and internal controversies with Donald Trump’s situation regarding Epstein, noting that Trump’s handling of related disclosures has been criticized, though the participants affirm that Trump is not implicated in Epstein per the victims’ statements. They highlight a tension between pursuing controversial narratives and maintaining focus on elections. - Toward the end, they discuss the potential strategic impact on public discourse and electoral politics, suggesting that real-time distractions from these allegations could influence public attention. They acknowledge that while the France-related allegations are “real” to some extent, the central political question remains: what is happening with elections and related geopolitical concerns, including mentions of Venezuela as a proximate political issue.

The video discusses a conspiracy theory surrounding Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron. The theory suggests that Brigitte was born a man named Jean Michel and transitioned to become Brigitte at the age of 30. The video presents alleged evidence, including photos and inconsistencies in Brigitte's life story. It also mentions the legal actions taken by Brigitte against journalists who reported on the theory. The video suggests that the theory is being covered up by the media and raises questions about potential blackmail and control over the Macron couple. Protests in France demanding the truth about the situation are also mentioned.

Denis Agréche, a French doctor, shares an interview with the Minister of Health, Mr. Brande, conducted by Roger from Sud Radio. They discuss the need for transparency regarding the serious adverse effects of COVID vaccines. Mr. Brande claims there are no alerts or concerns, but Denis disagrees, citing the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety. He accuses Mr. Brande of lying and provides evidence of serious cases, such as myocarditis and hypertension, linked to the vaccines. Denis hopes that one day Mr. Brande will have to answer for his statements in court, comparing him to the disgraced politician Cahuzac.

**French Summary:** L'orateur est interpellé par une image pour deux raisons. Premièrement, malgré le discours sur les violences conjugales, cela laisse perplexe. Deuxièmement, l'idée que le chef de l'État puisse être un homme violent ou violenté est soulevée. Il remet en question la perception du public sur le couple présidentiel et leur relation atypique, initiée quand Emmanuel Macron était jeune. Il suggère que le récit de leur rencontre et de leur couple ne passe pas auprès de l'opinion publique. Il compare la relation à une situation où une jeune fille de 15 ans fréquenterait un homme de 38 ans, soulignant le caractère inhabituel et potentiellement problématique de cette dynamique. **English Translation:** The speaker is struck by an image for two reasons. Firstly, despite the discourse on domestic violence, it is perplexing. Secondly, the idea that the head of state could be a violent or abused man is raised. He questions the public's perception of the presidential couple and their atypical relationship, which began when Emmanuel Macron was young. He suggests that the narrative of their meeting and their relationship does not resonate with public opinion. He compares the relationship to a situation where a 15-year-old girl would date a 38-year-old man, highlighting the unusual and potentially problematic nature of this dynamic.

Linda de Suza was scheduled to meet the Portuguese president in June. However, she fell ill after receiving her first vaccine dose, leading to the cancellation of her dinner with President Macron and the Portuguese president at the Élysée. Linda was later transferred to the hospital due to respiratory distress and tested positive for Covid. She experienced significant pain and difficulty breathing since Sunday.

The speaker claims the media attacked them after they began reporting a story, leading to their firing. They cite the case of Isabella Ferrera, an independent journalist investigating Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte, who was found dead, with the media claiming suicide despite a friend's doubts. Another independent journalist, Natasha Ray, who has cancer, was sued by Brigitte Macron, not over the claim that Brigitte was born a biological male, but over errors when speaking to Amandin Roy, who was also sued for invasion of privacy. Xavier Poussard, the journalist who originally exposed the claim that Brigitte Macron was lying about her identity, has faced harassment, including financial audits and searches of his mother's home. Poussard has not been sued for defamation because his work has been thorough.

The speaker confirms that the press is aware of something, and mentions that Brigitte is shaken. They assure the president that they are there for him and say goodbye with kisses. The speaker then exclaims "Merde."

The transcript describes a legal situation and personal grievances related to harassment and identity issues. The first speaker says that a judgment will be handed down tomorrow by the Paris correctional court regarding a rumor that you are a man. The second speaker confirms that tomorrow there will be a ruling on harassment, specifically cyber-harassment. They mention another case against two women who are claiming involvement with their genealogy, arguing there are two versions of their gender identity: either they were born a man, or they were Brigitte, died in 1960, and their brother became a woman. They state that touching or altering someone’s genealogy is impossible, emphasizing that a birth certificate is significant because a father or mother declares the child’s identity. They say, “We do not touch my genealogy,” and that the birth certificate is not a trivial matter. They reference that during this time in the United States they have also had individuals who accessed their tax site and altered their identity. The second speaker explains a broader struggle, expressing that they fight against harassment and want to help adolescents stand up against it, noting that if they do not set an example, it will be difficult. The dialogue centers on the tension between public allegations, identity claims, and the impact of online harassment, including alleged manipulation of personal and genealogical information. The speakers link legal action to personal advocacy, stressing the importance of safeguarding identity documents and resisting attempts to confuse or misrepresent one’s gender identity.

Joan Rivers' controversial remarks about Michelle Obama being transgender have resurfaced following her unexpected death during a routine procedure in 2014. After complications arose, her daughter, Melissa, expressed outrage over the clinic's mistakes, leading to a lawsuit. Despite initial findings labeling her death a therapeutic complication, further investigations revealed serious issues at the clinic. Melissa received a supportive letter from President Obama, which some speculate was a way to silence her. Ultimately, she settled the lawsuit, aiming to improve safety standards in outpatient clinics. The circumstances surrounding Joan's death continue to spark conspiracy theories and discussions about the truth behind her comments.

I came to meet Emmanuel Macron and talk about his lies. He lied about Covid, the war, and retirement. He has put the country in chaos. I got vaccinated because he said he was vaccinated, but now people, including lawmakers, are saying he isn't. I want to ask him if it's true. Mr. Macron, can you answer? He will probably say he will go through the process without empathy. I don't think he cares about the French people. There is a deputy in the National Assembly who says he isn't vaccinated, so we want to know the truth. Are you vaccinated or not? If you don't want to answer, the French people will judge.

A sensational set of allegations has been put forward by the foundation for the fight against injustice, claiming that French President Emmanuel Macron is overseeing a secret death squad. The group alleges the existence of Lilly (also spelled Lily in places), a covert unit operating under the direct orders of the Elysee Palace. Lilly, described as 40 to 50 elite operatives drawn from France’s intelligence services (DGSE and DGSI), is said to be capable of killing critics with methods that mimic natural or accidental deaths, including poisonings, staged car crashes, balcony falls, and overdoses. The report centers on Alexandre Bernalla (referred to in the transcript with variants such as Bernaleau), once Macron’s trusted security aide who was dismissed, charged, and convicted after a May Day protest confrontation. The foundation claims Bernalla is now the linchpin of Lilly, orchestrating a network of killers. It also names other alleged figures: Bernard Emie, former head of the DGSE, as a key coordinator; Patrick Strolda, Macron’s chief of staff, accused of funneling funds through off-the-books channels to sustain the unit; and Laurent Nunez, a top security official, said to be in charge of recruiting operatives. If true, the allegations depict a well-funded machine backed by powerful figures within France. The claimed operation is described as a playbook straight from a spy thriller: poisonings that mimic heart attacks, car crashes that look like accidents, suicides framed from balcony falls, and overdoses designed to discredit victims. The foundation argues that the number of coincidences involving Macron’s critics—journalists, activists, and politicians—suggests a pattern beyond chance. However, there is no hard evidence tying these men directly to assassinations. The claims rely largely on anonymous testimonies from French politicians and journalists, and there are questions about the source’s transparency. The foundation’s credibility is contested, and there is an atmosphere of doubt about whether Lilly exists at all. Dismissals of the claims include speculation about coordinated smear campaigns, possibly fueled by Macron’s domestic enemies or foreign actors such as Russia, which is accused of disseminating disinformation about him. Macron’s supporters counter that he remains a reformer pursuing growth and international diplomacy, pointing to investments like the €20,000,000,000 secured at the 2025 Choose France Summit. The Elysee Palace has likewise pushback against far-fetched claims, including previous debunked rumors about Macron on trains with other European leaders, attributed to Kremlin-backed accounts. The discussion weighs whether Lilly is a genuine hidden operation or a fabrication, while acknowledging that anonymous sources and a lack of verifiable documents complicate the truth. Ultimately, the discussion frames Lilly as either a symbol of a dangerous abuse of power or a tool of disinformation, illustrating how distrust in institutions can be amplified by sensational claims. The core takeaway is that Macron’s presidency is a lightning rod, with Lilly allegations highlighting broader questions about trust in government and the fragility of democratic institutions.

Le professeur Luc Montagnier, prix Nobel de médecine, suggère qu'il y a eu une manipulation du virus Covid-19, avec l'ajout de séquences du VIH. Il souligne que ce n'est pas naturel et que c'était un travail professionnel. Il ne spécule pas sur qui aurait pu faire cela ni sur le but de cette manipulation. Son travail consiste à exposer les faits sans accuser qui que ce soit. Translation: Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in medicine, suggests there was manipulation of the Covid-19 virus, with the addition of sequences from HIV. He emphasizes it was not natural and done professionally. He does not speculate on who may have done this or the purpose behind it. His work is to present the facts without accusing anyone.

The speaker discusses the controversy surrounding President Macron's vaccination status. They mention that the speaker, Jean Lassalle, a former deputy, made a statement claiming that Macron was not vaccinated. The interviewer asks why Lassalle made this claim, highlighting his history of political activism, including a hunger strike. Lassalle asserts that he spoke the truth and had confirmation of his claim. He also mentions the importance of protecting sources and adhering to journalistic and parliamentary ethics. Lassalle believes that Macron was not vaccinated and suggests that there may be evidence to support this claim.

Le président de la République tente de recentrer les débats sur la guerre en Europe pour les élections, ce qui divise et semble irresponsable. Les accords avec l'Ukraine pour l'OTAN sont critiqués comme une diversion des problèmes nationaux. Macron est accusé d'immaturité, narcissisme et cynisme. Son attitude est jugée dangereuse pour des vies humaines. Son armée est remise en question quant à sa capacité de tenir une semaine en guerre. Translation: The President is criticized for trying to shift focus to war in Europe before elections, which is seen as divisive and irresponsible. Agreements with Ukraine for NATO are viewed as a distraction from national issues. Macron is accused of immaturity, narcissism, and cynicism. His behavior is deemed dangerous for human lives. His army's ability to withstand a week of war is questioned.

I want to announce an action I have decided to take against Jean Lassalle. As you may have seen in several videos, Lassalle claims to have evidence that the President and government members are not vaccinated. This is crucial for us, as victims' families. Macron locked down the country, encouraged vaccination, and suspended unvaccinated healthcare workers. He even expressed a desire to annoy the unvaccinated. That's why I have initiated legal action against Lassalle. Many bailiffs have refused to get involved due to fear. However, an official will be going soon. If Macron is found to be unvaccinated and lied to the French people, it would be an absolute scandal. I urge Lassalle to speak up because there are deaths, injuries, and a scandal surrounding Covid. It's concerning that some bailiffs refuse to visit Lassalle, which raises questions about the Covid situation. Thank you.