TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 states that 2017 will be the year of offense and promises to push the case against Russia in Washington, advocating for a heavier price for Russian aggression. The speaker clarifies that the fight is not with the Russian people, but with Putin, and pledges to inform the American people of the bravery displayed and make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1 expresses belief in their victory and promises to provide what they need to win, emphasizing that their success is due to courage, not equipment. Speaker 1 thanks them, noting the world is watching because Vladimir Putin cannot be allowed to succeed, as success in this situation would lead to success in other countries.

In this video, the speaker claims that the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was orchestrated by Jewish individuals with the aim of creating a new world order. They argue that Zionism, a political program, is responsible for destroying Russia and is now working towards bankrupting the United States. The speaker also suggests that Zionism desires another world war to enslave people. Another speaker discusses the brutal killings and random executions that took place during Stalin's regime in Russia. The authorities would fulfill quotas without considering the names of the victims.

The speakers discuss the US policy on Russia and Ukraine. Speaker 0 questions the idea of allowing Russia to take Ukraine in exchange for not forming an alliance with China. Speaker 1 argues for a hard deal with consequences, such as sanctions, to prevent Russia from aligning with China. They believe the current policy is pushing Russia closer to China. Speaker 0 expresses concern about giving up Eastern Europe and criticizes the amount of aid given to Ukraine. Speaker 1 suggests that protecting American interests should be the priority. They mention historical examples and disagree on the effectiveness of military intervention. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 thanking Speaker 1 for joining the discussion.

The speaker discusses the achievements of the Jewish people and their influence in various areas, such as finance and politics. They mention the creation of Israel and the role of Jews in the Soviet Union. The speaker suggests that the Jewish community aims to save Israel and predicts that if they fail, they will return to Russia. They also mention the influence of Jews in America and their alleged plans to provoke a war between Muslims and Europe. The speaker concludes by stating that creating a Jewish state is challenging and that America is not a viable option due to its changing demographics.

The speaker asserts that Germany is undergoing a destructive process orchestrated by international forces, particularly Jews, who gained political power 120 years ago. He claims Jewish people form a state within a state and control the economy through the stock exchange, which is alien to other peoples. Western Europe, unlike Central and Eastern Europe, was less aware of this threat due to fewer Jews who assimilated and manipulated the masses through press propaganda. In Germany, a large Jewish population and aversion from the masses made political contamination more difficult, especially with the monarchy. The speaker claims Jews took control of the working class by founding social democratic and communist movements, inciting greed and ruthlessness. They corrupted the upper classes through intermarriage and manipulated the press to divide the population. Russia is presented as a ruined culture exploited by foreign capital. The speaker criticizes the lack of criticism towards these conditions and calls for resistance. He defines a true socialist as a nationalist who prioritizes the welfare of the German people. He urges young people to join storm divisions to protect Germany and fight against Jewish influence, believing this fight is inevitable for Germany's future.

Speaker 1 believes the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful, even for the interests of Israel, because they pressure too many people. They have many means at their disposal to pressure people. The President of the United States pays attention to the lobby because they are strong and control many things, including newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 1 believes the Jewish community in the United States is powerful enough to make the media reflect their view of foreign policy.

You know what they told me? Exactly. They said, when the Holocaust happened, we allowed them to come because they were facing pain, and we wanted to make sure they had a safe place where they were safe. In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar. They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice. The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia. The Jews financed by Wall Street, go in and try to kill the Russian head. We'll bring America into the war. It's the Balfour Declaration. Right? They had won the war. It was really over. The Jews took over. It wasn't about getting Palestine. That wasn't it. Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give.

Speaker 0 states that 2017 will be the year of offense and promises to push the case against Russia in Washington, advocating for a heavier price for Russian aggression. The speaker clarifies that the fight is with Putin, not the Russian people. The speaker promises to take their calls to Washington, inform the American people of their bravery, and make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1 believes they will win and promises to do everything possible to provide what they need to win. Speaker 1 attributes their success to courage, not equipment. Speaker 1 states that the world is watching because Vladimir Putin cannot be allowed to succeed, because if he succeeds there, he will succeed in other countries.

Many wealthy individuals, including Jews, who have supported the Communist Party and Mao Zedong in China, are now realizing that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses a threat to them. The speaker warns Jews not to risk their future or lives for money. The speaker believes that Iran is behind the conflict in Palestine, and China and Russia are behind Iran. The CCP is accused of being on the side of Palestine and condemning Israel, accusing Jewish racism and instigating the conflict. The CCP's state-controlled media supports Palestine and encourages them to fight and kill more Jews. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the CCP's anti-Semitism and contempt for Jews.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

The speaker discusses the historical influence of Jews in various empires, attributing their rise and fall to how they treated the Jewish population. They highlight examples such as the Roman Empire, Greece, Babylon, Persia, Iran, Germany, Spain, and Russia, where the treatment of Jews correlated with the rise and fall of these empires. The speaker emphasizes the importance of how societies treat Jews in relation to their own prosperity and longevity.

Speaker 0 states that "they" don't believe in the same things and find certain values corny, preferring "pornographic stuff." Speaker 1 mentions an invitation from Time magazine for lunch with their editors. Speaker 0 says Mrs. Megger supports him because Democratic candidates will cater to the "domestic Jewish folk." Speaker 1 claims "they" are putting out pornographic material. He says the Bible distinguishes between two groups of Jews: the "synagogue of Satan" and the "remnant of God's people." He believes the "synagogue of Satan" is energized by supernatural power and possesses a strange brilliance. He asserts that "they" had a stranglehold on Germany's banking, media, and everything else, and that this stranglehold must be broken to save the country. Speaker 0 agrees but feels he cannot say it publicly. Speaker 1 suggests that Speaker 0 might be able to achieve a second term.

Speaker 0 states that the left wants to destroy Western culture and promotes racism against whites to condition people. Speaker 1 agrees, adding that the Republican party has been taken over by Jewish communists. He claims his book proves the communist movement was overwhelmingly Jewish, naming Leon Trotsky and Lenin as examples. He says Jewish people took over communism and capitalism. Speaker 1 references Winston Churchill's article "Zionism versus Bolshevism," claiming Churchill said Jewish communists gripped the Russian people. Speaker 0 acknowledges Jewish leaders in the Bolshevik takeover but notes Stalin's later purge. Speaker 1 claims Stalin removed Jews from the intelligence apparatus and Politburo, leading to the Cold War. He says Jewish oligarchs took over Russia's resources under Yeltsin.

"I almost don't know these Jews." "Yeah. I saw what happened in Palestine." "In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar." "When the Russians found out what happened, they stopped them and put them out." "The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia." "They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice." "They tried to kill the czar." "The Germans let them get into banking." "Everything is made in Germany now." "The Jews took over." "Germans won World War one." "It's the Balfour Declaration." "America stepping into World War one made zero sense." "We want them at war with each other." "They told them, just give us Palestine as our homeland, and we get it." "Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give."

Speaker 1 leads a march against the Russian consulate, claiming that the Russians are fighting the Khazarian mafia and trying to eradicate those who have been destroying the planet. They believe that the Russians, along with other nations, are engaged in a secret war to exterminate vermin. They argue that COVID mandates are part of a larger plan to depopulate the planet. Speaker 1 dismisses criticism from former colleagues and urges people to do their own research. They believe their messages have broad appeal and that major political parties are falling apart. They express hope to be proven wrong about the dire consequences they predict.

Speaker 0 believes the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful, even for Israel's interests, because they pressure too many people. This pressure, exerted through various means, ultimately doesn't help Israel. The president of the United States pays attention to this lobby because they are strong and control many things. When asked to elaborate on what they control, Speaker 0 lists newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 1 expresses surprise and asks if Speaker 0 really believes the Jewish community in the United States is that powerful.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a cascade of developments around Ukraine, Russia, and Western policy. - Speaker 0 notes that Trump reportedly changed his stance on Tomahawk missiles, mentions a meeting with Zelensky where Zelensky supposedly urged acceptance of a Putin deal, and recalls that the Trump-Putin meeting was canceled. Speaker 1 responds that Russia has 100% made clear there will be no freeze and that for the war to end, Ukraine must leave all Russian territory. He says Tomahawk missiles were never on the table, that this was a pressure ploy by Trump to push Russia, and that it could have led to a thermonuclear war, which Putin reminded the US about in their conversations. - According to Speaker 1, Ukrainians will die, Russians will advance, Ukrainian economy will be destroyed, and Ukrainian energy infrastructure will be annihilated, leading to the collapse of Ukraine as a nation. Speaker 0 sketches a timeline: initial plans for a Putin-Trump-Zelensky sequence, Putin’s call after Trump hinted at Tomahawks, then a Zelensky meeting where Zelensky allegedly pressed Trump to accept a Putin deal, after which Tomahawks were no longer on the table and the Trump-Putin meeting was canceled. - Speaker 1 repeats: Tomahawks were never on the table; this was a pressure tactic. He explains the Russia-US exchange as frank, with Russia laying down the law; he asserts that the US would have faced a major escalation if Tomahawks had been supplied, because Tomahawks are nuclear-capable. He claims Ukraine would have been made a party to the conflict through US involvement. He adds that Russia will not accept a freeze because, constitutionally, Ukraine must leave all Russian territory, including Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Lugansk. - Speaker 0 asks why Tomahawks would matter, and Speaker 1 reiterates that Storm Shadow and Scout missiles are not nuclear capable, while Tomahawks would be, and contrasts this with Ukraine’s Flamingo drone, dismissing Flamingo as a propaganda tool. He describes Flamingo as a wooden drone designed to mimic a flock of birds and says it will be shot down and is not a serious threat; Ukraine’s drone capability is strong, with Ukrainians as the second-best fighters and drones in the world, while Russians are first in drone capability. - They discuss the trajectory of the war: Speaker 1 emphasizes that Russia’s advance is strategic, with drone warfare transforming the battlefield into piecemeal advances. He asserts Russia’s kill ratio of 36 Ukrainians to 1 Russian, and argues the West’s narrative of Russia suffering more is fantasy. He notes the West’s support for Ukraine drains Ukraine’s resources while Russia’s defense industry booms, and that Russia’s economy, energy, and sanctions resistance show resilience. - On economics, Speaker 1 claims the Russian economy is thriving; gas is cheap in Russia, Novosibirsk and Ekaterinburg are booming, and sanctions have not toppled Russia. He argues Europe’s sanctions are not beating Russia and that Russia’s ruble remains strong; he contrasts this with Western expectations of Russia’s collapse. - They discuss casualty figures and manpower. Speaker 0 asks for a definite casualty number; Speaker 1 cites Ukrainians dying daily (tens of thousands over time) and asserts Russians suffer hundreds daily on their worst day, noting Ukraine’s manpower shortages and Russia’s mobilization efforts: Russia conducted a one-time 300,000-mobilization; Ukraine has mobilized seven or eight times and relies on volunteers and external manpower, including Western units in some cases. He contends Russia’s total forces expanded to 1.5 million due to NATO expansion and ongoing operations. - On battlefield tactics, Speaker 1 explains Russia’s algorithm: three-man assault teams using drone support to seize bunkers held by larger Ukrainian forces, followed by reinforcement, all while drone warfare dominates. He asserts Ukraine’s drone capacity is strong, but Russia counters with its own drones and targeting of Ukrainian drone operators. - They debate why Russia would not freeze lines even if Ukraine yielded Donbas, Lugansk, and Donetsk. Speaker 1 insists those regions are Russian territory per referendum and constitutional absorption in September 2022, and argues that Ukraine cannot give up Donbas, which is Russia’s, and that a freeze would not be acceptable to Russia. He asserts that Moscow will not abandon these territories and that any idea of a freeze is a Western fantasy. - The discussion touches on the Minsk accords, the Istanbul talks, and the argument that Ukraine’s leadership initially pursued peace but later prepared for renewed conflict with NATO backing. Speaker 1 contends that Minsk was a sham agreed to buy time, and that Russia’s goal was to compel Ukraine to honor commitments to protect Russian speakers; Ukraine’s leadership is accused of pursuing war rather than peace after early negotiations. - They discuss Wagner and Prigozin’s role: Wagner provided a vehicle to surge capabilities into Lugansk and Donetsk; after September 2022 these troops were to be absorbed into the Russian military, but Prigozin continued operations in Bachmuth, recruited prisoners, and pressured for offensive allocations; this culminated in a confrontation with Shoigu and Gerasimov, and Wagner eventually faced disbandment pressure and a mobilization response. - In closing, Speaker 0 notes recent sanctions and Putin’s response condemning them as attempts to pressure Russia, while Speaker 1 reiterates that Russia seeks to end the war and rebuild relations with the US, but not under ongoing Ukraine conflict. He emphasizes that India and China will stand with Russia, citing strategic partnerships and the desire to maintain sovereign energy decisions, and predictsRussia will endure sanctions while seeking new buyers and alliances. - The exchange ends with Putin signaling that new sanctions will have costs for the EU, while Speaker 1 reiterates that Russia will adapt and maintain its strategic position, with China and India aligned with Russia rather than yielding to Western pressure.

Speaker discusses the protocols published 1901, containing minutes of meetings by 'the leaders of the Jewish community' outlining their 'plans for continuing the process' toward subversion, ownership, and power. They purport to describe aims to 'gain control of the banking systems', 'foment wars and revolutions', 'corrupt music and art and education', 'subvert various gentile institutions', and 'take over the press everywhere'. The speaker notes the protocols circulated in Russia before and after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution and cites Henry Ford’s view that it fits what was actually happening whether or not it is a forgery. It claims in America that our people are in charge of America's state department, America's defense department, America's federal reserve system, and America's Treasury Department and that we control America's educational system and the mass media; ending with 'Long live our mass media. Long live democracy. Long live the power of triumphant Zion.'

Speaker 1 believes that the Jewish lobby in the United States has too much power, even for the interests of Israel. They claim that the lobby pressures and controls various aspects, including newspapers, media, banks, and finances. Speaker 0 questions why the president would pay attention to this lobby if it is true. Speaker 1 confirms that they believe the Jewish community influences the media's view on foreign policy, although not all newspapers are biased. Speaker 0 mentions the New York Times and Washington Post, suggesting they may have a bias. Speaker 1 suggests analyzing all articles to draw a conclusion. They also mention that the networks have less influence.

Speaker 0 suggests that excessive activism is inappropriate, advocating for gradual, individual actions. Speaker 1 states that Russia did not abandon the dollar; instead, they were forced out of using it. They claim that 95% of Russia's external trade is now in national currencies. Speaker 1 asserts that this shift was a result of actions taken against Russia, and that predictions of Russia's collapse have been proven wrong.

Speaker 1 asserts that Hitler was the aggressor of World War II, beginning the war by driving east with the intention of destroying communist Russia. He states that Britain intervened and declared war to prevent Hitler from achieving that objective, and as a result, Britain “today” has to maneuver back and forth between America and Russia. He claims that Britain has “lost the empire,” that 25,000,000 Europeans were killed, and that he is proud to have done his utmost to stop what he describes as a suicidal war that “has destroyed Great Britain.” Speaker 0 acknowledges this sequence and asks for the precise words spoken in 1939, requesting to know what Speaker 1 claimed at that time, specifically referencing the assertion that the conflict was “simply a Jewish financier's quarrel.”

Speaker 0 states that 2017 will be the year of offense, and they will push the case against Russia, asserting it is time for Russia to pay a heavier price for its aggression. Speaker 1 expresses belief in the speaker's victory and pledges to provide whatever is needed to win.

The speakers assert that no government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschilds’ support, highlighting the family’s incredible influence and power. They reference a famous correspondence as well: the “Dear lord Rothschild” letter, asking why this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to Walter Rothschild. They note the movement from Eastern Europe and that it was primarily in Great Britain, but that it did not clarify who was in charge of that movement, and they say the Rothschild family should be the one to whom the letter was addressed. The conversation then shifts to the Bilderberg group. One speaker says, “And look, I like the British Aristocrats in lot of many ways, but we're not really part of that world.” They ask about Bilderberg participation, with the reply, “You weren't there? No. Not this year. Last year? No. I wasn't there last year. Last I think that was my cousin.” The other responds, “Your cousin was there? Yeah.” The exchange concludes with the remark, “In our family, we've always tried to keep love in the family.”

Speaker 0 states that Jewish individuals own much of the media, fund politicians who demand reparations for the black community, and take the intellectual lead in combating initiatives proposed by the first group. Speaker 0 claims this results in black and white workers fighting each other while Jewish individuals profit and assume leadership. Speaker 1 agrees with Speaker 0, except for the claim that Jewish individuals profit. Speaker 1 believes Jewish leaders are doing what they think is correct. Speaker 1 states that Jewish individuals tend to take the intellectual lead in most movements. Speaker 0 claims that Jewish individuals create issues, and that the issue of reparations didn't exist until created by Jewish individuals. Speaker 1 is inclined to agree, and says Jewish individuals take the lead in civil rights generally. Speaker 0 claims they take the lead in opposing them, creating issues and dividing people.

I have often been ridiculed for my prophecies, especially by the Jewish race. If a world war is instigated by international Jewish financiers, it will lead to the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe. Workers of all classes and nations must unite against their common enemy. The previous administration involved the nation in prolonged wars under false pretenses, causing economic strain. The promised victories have not been achieved, raising doubts about the feasibility of continued military engagement.