TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

My name is Silvana Casale, a school neuropsychologist with over 25 years of experience working with over 70 autistic kids. I have noticed a connection between the MMR vaccine and immediate changes in behavior in children. The reaction is often immediate, with some children experiencing a transition overnight. I believe that all 80 kids I have worked with may have been affected by vaccines causing autism. The toxicity of multiple shots given together can be intense, leading to drastic changes in behavior.

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

"autism is such a tremendous, horror show what's happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country." "We will have announcements as promised in September." "We're finding interventions certain interventions now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism." "In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study in history was done in Wisconsin." "They looked at 900,000 children and they were looking for autism." "incident rate of point seven." "Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids." "California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen children American children as autism, one in every twelve point five boys." "So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys." "We will."

Speaker 0 describes a six to eight-year-old child who is not potty trained and, at 2:00 or 4:00 in the morning, fills their diaper. They explain that the child removes the diaper, and soon it’s all over the child, the bed, and eventually them and the other parent. They note they are snapping at each other, while the child remains the only innocent party in the scenario, and they point out that the one thing conspicuously absent is anyone telling them that the shot was safe. Speaker 1 recalls daily life as a party, with the children holding hands, smiling, and laughing, looking at each other. They say they brought the children in at nine months and four days to do one vaccine at a time. On 06/25/2007, they brought them in for the pneumococcal shot—“So just that shot? One shot.” The daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. They proceeded with the boys as well. By noon, Richie clearly shut off. At 2:00, they watched Richie shut off. All his raspberry blowing, and mama dada and the furniture walking, and everything just shut off. All the giggles, all the smiles, and, again, failure to thrive. Speaker 0: here we go. Speaker 1: The worst is when they saw the final one shut down. Robbie looked like he was hit by a bus. Robbie, from that moment on, had a stunned look on his face. If you asked or said his name, he still acted deaf and acted like he couldn't hear, although they did have normal hearing. I had it all tested. Speaker 0: Three months after the shot. Speaker 1: Three months after the shot. They were no longer engaged in anything or anyone. They lost their smiles. They just were in their own little separate worlds. They never held hands again. They never looked at each other again.

Speaker 0 describes a photo sent to Laura around Christmas last year: a 12-year-old boy with more than 50 pharmaceutical bottles in front of him, representing the prescriptions he took that year. The speaker asserts that this is about money, stating that the pharmaceutical industry and doctors aim to make children customers for life, and that if they can break children early, they give them asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, insulin-dependent diabetes, a long list of neurological problems, and cancers from an early age; all of those pills are the reason they do this. The speaker notes a correlation with POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) and links it to Gardasil and to the COVID shot, while saying it can be associated with other vaccines too because of Guillain-Barré syndrome. The speaker mentions that their daughter has Guillain-Barré syndrome. They reiterate that all of those pills, though not every child takes that many prescriptions, almost all have something—an inhaler, something for headaches, something for something—due to disruption of their immune system that happened when they were six, eight, or ten pounds old. The speaker emphasizes that this disruption is intentional and that this part is particularly sinister.

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

At the pediatric office, one twin screams while the other gets shots. The nurse accidentally gives an extra shot to the screaming twin. The next day, the baby shows signs of distress and is later diagnosed with autism. The mother feels guilty but decides not to vaccinate the other twin. Despite the challenges, she is grateful that her son is alive, but her dreams for his future seem distant.

We are vaccinating infants against risks that don't exist. There has to be a quantifiable risk that we're trying to prevent. We introduce a synthetic vaccine to their little immune system before they've even had breast milk, causing a reaction to a disease that they don't have and weren't exposed to in the first few days of life. This is why we have skyrocketing rates of autism, attention deficit disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. When I graduated high school in 1988, I didn't know a single autistic child. Now, my 16-year-old daughter knows 10.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

The documentary follows a growing concern: the rise of chronic illness and neurodevelopmental disorders in American children, with speakers outlining striking statistics, personal stories, and contested science around vaccines. Key facts and patterns: - A shift from decades ago to today: more than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition; estimates cited include that over fifty-four percent of kids have a chronic disease, up from twelve point eight percent in the 1980s. One speaker emphasizes that in forty years there has been “the greatest decline in human health ever recorded.” - Autism rates have surged: just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism; today, one in thirty-one. Other listed conditions include ADD/ADHD, tics/Tourette’s, narcolepsy, sleep disorders, IBS, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s), eczema, asthma, seizures, and various neurological issues. - The central question raised: what is causing this epidemic of chronic illness in kids? The film argues that rapid increases in incidence cannot be explained by genetic change alone, which would take generations. Story and study arc: - The narrative centers on a scientist who was willing to conduct a study into vaccine safety and vaccine injury, but who faced career-risking consequences when attempting to publish or disseminate results. - The film’s narrator and investigators say they compiled hidden-camera testimonies, interviews, and raw stories from parents whose children experienced serious adverse events after vaccines (eczema, seizures, chronic GI issues, sleep apnea, language loss, autonomic and neurological symptoms, and death in some cases). Stories include a child who lost language after vaccination, triplets who regressed into severe autism after their pneumococcal shot, and families describing chronic, ongoing medical crises following vaccines. - The film frames a broader debate: vaccines are safe and effective, with extensive global use and long-standing public health endorsement. Yet it argues that the vaccine safety narrative lacks certain types of trials, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines. It claims that, in some cases, no such trials exist prior to licensure, and that post-licensure safety surveillance is limited or incomplete. Vaccine safety testing and regulatory claims: - The film argues that none of the 72 vaccine doses on the childhood schedule has ever been subjected to a pre-licensure double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which is presented as the gold standard of safety testing. It asserts that safety assessments and post-licensure surveillance often rely on observational data rather than randomized trials. - A critical example is the hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB): the FDA-approved trial cited shows safety monitoring for only five days after each dose, with no placebo control. The film argues this is insufficient to detect autoimmune or neurodevelopmental issues that could emerge years later. - Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a leading vaccine expert, is interviewed regarding whether five days of safety monitoring captures potential autoimmune or neurological adverse events; the dialogue suggests concern about the adequacy of such safety windows and controls. - The documentary presents the notion that the absence of a placebo-controlled vaccine safety trial is used to argue safety, while retrospective studies and unblinded cohort analyses hints at potential signals that would merit more rigorous testing. Henry Ford Health System and the “vaccinated vs unvaccinated” study: - Dell and others pursue a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study using Henry Ford Health System data, with the aim of comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. They argue that this kind of retrospective cohort study can reveal safety signals when randomized trials are unavailable. - The study reportedly found that vaccination exposure was associated with higher risks of several chronic conditions, including asthma, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, Guillain-Barré syndrome), and neurodevelopmental disorders. They summarize that by ten years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children; overall, two to four times higher risks across several categories were reported, with notable differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reportedly found zero chronic conditions in the unvaccinated group for several categories, though the vaccinated group showed higher incidence in many categories. Autism did not reach statistical significance in this study due to small numbers. The presenters emphasize that retrospective studies have limitations (confounding, follow-up length, healthcare-seeking behavior), but argue that the signal deserves publication and replication. - The Henry Ford study reportedly faced professional and institutional barriers: a threat of defamation, failed attempts to publish, and internal resistance. The documentary showcases a dinner meeting where Dr. Marcus Zervos expresses willingness to publish but ultimately faces career risk, leading to discussions about “Galileo moments” and whether data should be released despite pushback. Industry and public health responses: - The film juxtaposes the public health consensus—vaccines save lives, the schedule is well tested, and billions of people have been studied—with dissenting voices from physicians, scientists, and parents who argue that independent, large-scale vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analyses are necessary to truly assess safety outcomes. - It includes testimonials from doctors who faced professional pushback after expressing concerns about broader vaccine safety questions or demonstrating adverse effects in patient populations. - The documentary frames a call to replicate the retrospective study in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to determine whether the Henry Ford findings hold across populations, and whether impaired health outcomes correlate with the breadth of vaccination exposure. Conclusion and call to action: - The film asserts that if the data are valid, this would constitute a sea-change in our understanding of off-target and nonspecific effects of vaccination and would necessitate reconsidering how the vaccination program is designed and implemented. - Viewers are urged to consider the evidence, demand replication, and reflect on the moral and ethical implications of vaccine safety research, balancing public health benefits with potential risks, and exploring alternate strategies to protect child health.

My son, born in 1991, has Asperger's, and I've heard from many parents of children with similar conditions. Since 1989, the vaccine schedule increased significantly, exposing children to much higher levels of mercury than deemed safe. For instance, newborns receive a hepatitis B shot that would require a child weighing 275 pounds to safely absorb under EPA guidelines. In 1988, 1 in 2,500 American children had autism; now it's 1 in 166, with many also facing learning and neurological disorders. Despite the alarming trends, the federal government claims there's no solid science linking vaccines to these issues. While we can't definitively prove a connection now, I believe future research will reveal a link between vaccines and autism.

In 1989, the vaccine schedule increased from 10 to 24 vaccines, all containing thimerosal with mercury. Children are injected with 400 times the amount of mercury considered safe by the FDA or EPA. A newborn receives a hepatitis B shot, but under EPA guidelines, would have to be 275 pounds to safely absorb it. In 1988, autism affected 1 in 2,500 children; now it affects 1 in 166. Additionally, 1 in 6 children have learning, neurological, speech, or language disorders, ADD, or hyperactivity, all connected to autism. The federal government claims there's no good science linking vaccines to autism, but science is often diluted in politics. While it can't be proven now, intuitively, the speaker believes that thimerosal causes autism.

Our next witness is miss Polly Tommy. Miss Tommy is the director of children's health defense. My son, Billy, entered the world as a healthy, perfect baby with an Apgar score that reflected his perfection. The day he received the MMR vaccine hours after the vaccination, Billy's perfect world shattered. He became lethargic, sleeping for long stretches. My husband came home that afternoon and went to check on him, Billy was convulsing. His tiny body gripped by seizures. We rushed him to hospital desperate for answers, but the doctors, after hearing he'd had the MMR said, it's perfectly normal, it's perfectly common. Lots of children have seizures. He'll be fine. No more Pfizer sponsored science.

A film festival featured a documentary about vaccines by Del Bigtree. The speaker mentions an interview where the host tried to shut down a discussion about the documentary. The interviewee has an autistic son and believes there's a link between vaccines and autism. One speaker questions why people can't ask about the potential link between vaccines and autism, noting that an additive was removed from vaccines, though it supposedly had nothing to do with autism. The World Council For Health urges parents to consider a "safer to wait" approach, deferring the childhood vaccine schedule. Five studies allegedly show that unvaccinated children are healthier, with lower rates of food allergies, asthma, dermatitis, need for ear tubes, attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, and autism. The speaker concludes that excessive vaccination is likely harming children.

The child we brought home from the doctor's office is not the same that we brought to the doctor's office. Well, it means that my son was changed by the vaccine shot. The first day that we took our son Joshua to the doctor for his well baby visit, we had a healthy baby. Twenty one days after that doctor's visit, he had his first grand mal seizure. What happened is that my son developed an uncontrolled seizure disorder following that vaccination shot, and it's a seizure disorder he had for his entire life. I didn't make a conscious decision to take my son to the doctor that day for his vaccine shot. I just did what was expected of me. I put in zero research into what they were getting injected into my son that day.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

As a child, there were only 3 shots in 1960, but today's kids face 108 shots. After 13 shots at one visit, there's a 40% chance of brain injury and autism if a child has a seizure.

A 2-month-old boy's life is described as destroyed after receiving DTaP, HIB, and polio vaccines at 4 months. The speaker states the child is frozen in time due to the shots. At a 2-month well-baby visit, a child receives DPT (3 antigens), HIB, Prevnar, Hep B, polio, and rotavirus, totaling 6 shots and 8 antigens. Some people interviewed had to remain outside the bus due to their condition. The speaker says, "We are going to stop this because this see? She knows," while addressing a child named Kelsey.

The speaker, an early AI developer and techno optimist from Silicon Valley, discusses how her daughter's autism diagnosis led her to a different understanding. Her daughter was healthy until she received a shot at seven months old, after which she changed. The speaker experienced grief and confusion, compounded by the inability to discuss the possibility of a vaccine reaction due to societal constraints. She mentions Andy Wakefield, who was canceled for suggesting the MMR vaccine causes gut inflammation in some children, leading to autism-like symptoms. The speaker felt isolated, especially during COVID, and this isolation, combined with the challenges of raising her daughter, brought her to a point of utter destruction. She states that this experience either leads to isolation or transforms one into a "warrior mom."

Every day was a party for our family. We brought our children in for vaccines, starting with the pneumococcal shot. After the shot, our daughter Claire shut off, becoming blind and deaf. Our son Ritchie followed suit, losing his ability to interact and thrive. They lost their reflexes and showed no response to stimuli. Rosie shut down next, leaving us devastated. Finally, Robbie had a stunned expression and acted deaf, although his hearing was normal. Three months after the shot, our children were no longer engaged, lost their smiles, and lived in their own separate worlds. They never held hands or looked at each other again.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.

In 2004, after receiving a tetanus shot, Speaker 1 became extremely sick and started researching autism. They noticed a connection between the word "thimerosal" and autism, which intrigued them. Speaker 1 woke up one day with heightened sensitivity to noise and light, along with various physical symptoms. They saw multiple doctors but received no answers. Eventually, Speaker 1 discovered they had been exposed to mercury through the tetanus shot. They experienced psychological symptoms and intense anxiety. Speaker 1 researched extensively and found a book by Dr. Andrew Cutler, which gave them hope for recovery. Following Cutler's protocol, Speaker 1 gradually improved and returned to work. This experience led Speaker 1 to question the effects of thimerosal on babies receiving multiple shots in one day. They became obsessed with the science behind it.