TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes someone is a "crazy person" who hates Trump and wants to be remembered in history for opposing him and helping the economy. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, this person allegedly raised interest rates instead, acting contrary to Trump's wishes. The speaker indicates "we don't want Trump to be in the clean government."

Harrell Hizmo, a principal economist at the Federal Reserve who writes speeches for Jerome Powell, was recorded discussing internal Fed matters. Hizmo stated that the Fed's work is "all classified." He said Powell wants to be remembered for "holding the line" against Trump and that the Fed is considering equity, racial issues, wealth inequality, and climate change as part of its mandate. Hizmo believes Powell is slow-rolling solutions to avoid a recession, especially during an election year. He also suggested the Federal Reserve might discriminate against conservatives depending on how "out there" they are. Hizmo claimed that the Fed introduced new regulations to offset actions taken by Trump. James O'Keefe confronted Hizmo about the hidden camera recordings, but the call was cut short.

Speaker 0 says that on Friday the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June about a multiyear project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. They emphasize respect for the rule of law and state that no one, not even the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. The speaker argues this unprecedented action should be understood in the broader context of administration threats and ongoing pressure, stating the threat is not about the June testimony or the renovation project, nor about Congress’s oversight role. The Fed, through testimony and other public disclosures, allegedly tried to keep Congress informed, and the speaker asserts those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges, according to the speaker, arises from the Fed setting interest rates based on what will serve the public, rather than following the President’s preferences. The core issue, the speaker says, is whether the Fed can continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation. The speaker notes service at the Fed under four administrations, both Republican and Democrat, asserting a record of carrying out duties without political fear or favor, focused on the mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service, the speaker adds, sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. Finally, the speaker commits to continuing to perform the job the Senate confirmed them to do with integrity and dedication to the American people, and thanks the audience.

Harel Hizmo, a principal economist at the Federal Reserve, discusses his role in writing speeches for Jerome Powell and the Fed's focus on equity issues, racial equality, and climate change. He mentions that Powell wants to be remembered as someone who held the line against Donald Trump and helped the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hizmo also mentions that some people think conservatives are discriminated against at the Federal Reserve, depending on their views. He emphasizes that the Fed's decisions are classified and discusses the Fed's portfolio and decision-making process. Hizmo states that the Fed aims to avoid a recession during an election year and talks about the impact of policies on people's lives.

Speaker 0 believes Trump is a "dumb guy." Speaker 1 asks if the feeling towards Trump is neutral. Speaker 0 says she wants to be remembered in history as someone who held the line against Trump and helped the economy. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, she started raising rates, doing the opposite of what Trump wanted. The feeling is that they don't want Trump in the government.

The video argues that a “new world order” is unfolding in real time, signaling the start of a “great reset.” The host points to events from the past Friday as evidence: 3,000,000 Epstein files released, the biggest one-day drop in the history of the precious metals market, and a large arbitrage developing among Chinese, London, and US precious metals markets. Gold is described as the indicator that a full-blown reset is upon us, with attention drawn to pathways like the US’s approach to Iran and the Epstein files, while claiming a broader resetting dynamic is at work. Context for the moment centers on Friday’s nomination of Kevin Warsh (referred to as Kevin Walsh in the transcript) as the new Fed chairman. The host notes baggage around Warsh, including his appearance in Epstein files, but emphasizes his views: Warsh “hates stimulus money,” “hates quantitative easing,” and “voted against it,” believing it pushes inflation higher. He is said to have shifted on interest rates, from believing higher interest rates were good for the dollar to a different stance, and he allegedly favors slashing the Fed’s balance sheet to lower rates. The implication is that the nomination marks a shift toward a new dollar era and a shift away from a strong USD, which the host frames as a response to concerns about the US owning precious metals and controlling energy markets. The host ties these changes to a new petrodollar era, arguing that the United States, now the largest producer of oil and natural gas, has moved the petrodollar structure away from Saudi Arabia and toward the US. This trifecta—new dollar policy from the Fed, a drop in the precious metals market driven by speculators, and US control over energy policy—constitutes a “reset.” The video asserts that the traditional petrodollar system, once led by OPEC, has shifted, reducing outside leverage over Washington in energy matters. The host also claims a debate over foreign influence in the Middle East and calls for ending involvement in regional wars and bringing troops home, while criticizing mainstream outlets and certain political figures. Four main points are then presented as the crux of the reset: 1) Trump desires a weaker US dollar and is pursuing greater domestic manufacturing to compete with China and India, including the aim to export more and import less; the host frames this as a deliberate strategic shift rather than inflationary debasement. 2) The end of the Fed’s independence, with a collaboration era between the Treasury and the Fed, led by figures like Scott Pissent and Warsh, suggesting much lower interest rates and a shift of debt ownership back to American hands, with foreigners potentially selling US Treasuries. 3) Energy wars are emerging, with the US drilling and producing more oil and natural gas than Russia and Saudi Arabia combined, changing the energy dynamic with China, which remains a large importer of oil and vulnerable to such shifts. 4) Sustaining public support for volatility, with Trump’s team allegedly aiming to declare a housing emergency to lower rates, discourage Wall Street from buying single-family homes, implement tariff dividends to Americans, deliver veterans’ checks, and lower inflation and gas prices in the lead-up to midterms. The host contrasts reactions within the Trump-supporting and anti-Trump camps, asserting the reset is underway regardless of opinion. A sponsor segment then pivots to copper, arguing that copper demand is surging due to global competition for materials, and highlighting Giant Mining Corporation (ticker: BFGFF) as a primary copper idea tied to the Majuba Hill Copper Project in Nevada, noting its favorable infrastructure, past production, and strategic importance to American copper independence. The segment cites executive actions and tariff movements, including a 50% tariff on semi-finished copper products effective August 1, 2025, positioning copper as central to the new industrial reality. The host reiterates Giant Mining as the foremost copper idea and invites viewers to conduct their own research.

A principal economist working at the Federal Reserve, Harel Hizmo, discusses his role in writing speeches for Jerome Powell, the chairman of the board of governors. Hizmo reveals that the Federal Reserve deals with classified information and that Powell wants to be remembered as someone who held the line against Donald Trump. Hizmo also mentions that the Fed has shifted its focus to include equity issues, racial issues, and climate change. He suggests that conservatives may face discrimination depending on their views. Hizmo explains that Powell didn't want to create a recession during an election year and discusses the impact of Trump's presidency on the Fed's regulations. The video ends with a call for insiders to share information with the media.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell initially indicated that interest rates would remain high, but later suggested that rate cuts were being considered. This sudden change led some to speculate that it was politically motivated, aimed at helping Joe Biden's presidential campaign. However, there is a deeper concern that the US economy's underlying fundamentals are weak, forcing the Fed to scramble for solutions. The zero interest rate policy has fundamentally changed the world, allowing for increased debt despite low unemployment. This unsustainable debt-based economic scheme is causing the deficit to rise. Society and long-term economic cycles are undergoing radical transformations, as seen in changing attitudes towards environmentalism, women's rights, and political elections.

Trump has been challenging the Fed's autonomy since taking office, aiming to sack Jerome Powell and appoint a loyalist, but he cannot remove the chair because a Federal Reserve chief has a fixed four-year tenure. So Trump is doing the only thing that he can: he's attacking the Fed chief. We have a moron at the head of the Fed. He's a moron. Speaking of the executive chief, now you have a top choice. Do. I have I have two or three top choices. Such remarks have made investors jumpy and all of this is hurting the dollar's reputation, pushing investors towards other assets like gold, the euro, the franc, and the yen. And this does not bode well for America.

Confrontation over the phone with a Federal Reserve economist about comments on Jerome Powell's legacy. Economist denies statements made on video, refuses to comment further. Reporter questions economist on Powell's actions, but economist avoids answering. Economist is seen denying statements and driving away. Reporter promotes medical emergency kit during video.

The speaker believes Trump is a "crazy person." They feel that someone wants to be remembered in history as holding the line against Trump. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, this person allegedly raised interest rates and did the opposite of what Trump wanted. The speaker concludes that "we don't want Trump to be in the clean government."

Speaker 0 lays out a sequence of observations and interpretations regarding financial markets and political moves. They begin by noting a pattern: gold and silver prices had been moving up by record amounts, the dollar had fallen to a four-year low in the dollar index, and the dollar had even fallen to an all-time record low against the Swiss franc, while the bond market was starting to roll over. From this, the speaker infers that something unusual and potentially destabilizing was occurring in the financial landscape, and they suggest that this situation prompted a response from the administration. The speaker then posits that Scott Bessent, along with other people who are close to the president, communicated a message to the president indicating that there was a problem that needed attention. In the speaker’s view, the Trump administration recognized the need to act in order to stop the perceived slide or derail the momentum of the developing situation and to buy some time. The implication is that the administration deliberately sought to intervene in the markets in a way that would slow or modify the trajectory of events. Following this assessment, the speaker asserts that the administration coordinated with short sellers and with big banks to target silver, suggesting a conspiratorial collaboration aimed at affecting market dynamics. This is presented as part of a broader strategy to exert influence and to create the impression that actions were being taken to counter the market’s movement. A key element of the narrative is the announcement of Kevin Walsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve. The speaker describes there being a coordinated public relations campaign around Walsh’s appointment, implying that the public portrayal of the move was designed to show that Trump had done something unexpected. The narrative further claims that the campaign depicted Walsh as an inflation hawk and suggested that he might advocate for rate hikes and perhaps even return to quantitative tightening. Crucially, the speaker asserts that Walsh was selected because he has marching orders to do exactly what Donald Trump wants him to do. The claim is that, if this were not the case, Walsh would not have been chosen for the job. The speaker contrasts this with any public portrayal of Walsh as independent or hawkish in a neutral sense, arguing that those portrayals are not genuine according to the speaker’s interpretation. In sum, the transcript presents a view that a set of market signals prompted a deliberate, coordinated intervention by the Trump administration, including collaboration with short sellers, the strategic targeting of silver, and the appointment of Kevin Walsh to the Fed as a means to implement a policy direction aligned with the president’s objectives.

Speaker 1 stated that Jerome Powell is too late and slow, and that he is not happy with him. Speaker 1 claims he has let Powell know this. Speaker 1 believes that if he wanted Powell out, Powell would be out of his position very fast.

Fed Chair Powell stated he wouldn't resign if asked by President Trump, citing legal protections. However, the real issue is the existence of the Federal Reserve, which many believe operates outside constitutional authority. The Fed prioritizes its own survival and that of major banks, undermining a genuinely free society. For true economic freedom, sound money is essential. Education is key to helping the public understand these issues, as seen with other political matters. If the central bank continues to create money at will, currency value will decline, leading to rising prices. The founders understood that true wealth comes from productivity, not money creation. Emphasizing freedom can maximize productivity and prosperity.

The speaker believes someone is a "crazy person" who hates Trump and wants to be remembered in history as someone who opposed Trump and helped the economy. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, this person allegedly raised interest rates and did the opposite of what Trump wanted. The speaker's feeling is that they don't want Trump in the clean government.

Confrontation over the phone with a Federal Reserve economist about comments on Jerome Powell's legacy. Economist denies statements made on tape about Powell's views on Trump. Refuses to elaborate, claiming not to work closely with Powell. Journalist questions economist's role and contradictions in statements. Economist avoids further discussion and leaves. Journalist promotes medical emergency kit. To order, use code "OMG" for a discount. Visit twc.help/omg.

The speaker argues that Jerome Powell is keeping interest rates too high despite inflation being under control, potentially due to personal feelings about the president. Inflation is near a four-year low after five consecutive better-than-expected readings, yet interest rates remain near twenty-year highs, with mortgage rates near 7% and credit card rates above 20%. The proposed solution is for the Federal Reserve to livestream its meetings, similar to the SEC, FTC, and FCC, to provide public scrutiny of their deliberations. The speaker believes the public deserves to know what this "secret group of bankers" is doing, as they are setting the cost of money.

Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, criticized federal spending, stating that the current path is unsustainable. This is significant because Powell has been supportive of Congress's spending habits. The US is facing massive deficits and increasing debt, which is draining the economy and posing a threat to the financial system. The Fed's role is not to manage the economy but to print money and deliver it to Wall Street and Congress through cheap debt. Powell's criticism is noteworthy as it shows concern about excessive printing. However, Congress continues its spending spree without any checks or balances. The media fails to address this issue, leaving most Americans unaware of the impending crisis.

London and Wall Street are in a total panic today because their era of free money for the elites is over. Kevin Warsh is president Trump's new pick for the Fed, and this is about much more than interest rates. It marks the beginning of what president Trump is calling a Republican new deal. Their proposal was to raise taxes very substantially. And our proposal, which is in the great, big, beautiful new deal. It's a new deal in its own way. It's a republican version of the new deal. Right behind you is a nice picture of FDR. This is a much better deal than the FDR deal. Warsh didn’t just accept the nomination; he declared war on the globalist economic model. He explicitly said that the Fed must abandon the dogma that paying workers causes inflation. He’s calling out the real culprit, money printing and Wall Street bailouts. This follows Ambassador Jamieson Greer’s shockwave speech in Davos last week, where he dusted off Alexander Hamilton to tell the elites, your system is over. Susan Kokinda explains that since the mid 1970s she’s tracked the war between the American system and the British empire. The show will cover why the globalists fear a Republican new deal, and what the real content of president Trump’s Republican new deal is. Mainstream media coverage of Warsh has been restrained, but The Atlantic Council worries that Warsh and treasury secretary Besant are in sync in their attacks on how the Fed has saved Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. The Atlantic Council’s lead international economist says Walsh believes the Fed has distorted the healthy functioning of the US economy through injections of money into the market, helped assets on Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, and taken on the role of implementing fiscal policy. Treasury secretary Besant agrees with that assessment. CNBC headlines also frame Warsh as touting regime change at the Fed. The CFR and Mark Carney offer mixed responses, with some consoling that Warsh won’t revolutionize the Fed, while others praise him. The key is not just interest rates in isolation. The CNBC headline’s other part notes a partnership with the treasury. Warsh has stated in 2010 that the Fed’s financial stability responsibilities should not give license to central bankers to be emergency capital providers; capital allocation should reside with the fiscal authority and its fiscal agent, the Department of Treasury. This frames the fight as two centuries of struggle between the American system of Alexander Hamilton and the British imperial system. Prominent Davos moments included Trump and Commerce Secretary Lutnick telling elites that globalism had failed; Scott Beson’s takedowns of Gavin Newsom; and Jameson Greer’s Hamiltonian economic system speech, which quotes Hamilton’s 1791 Report on Manufacturers advocating tariffs and subsidies to incentivize industrialization to promote an America competitive with foreign producers. Greer’s speech is framed as the resurrection of the American system. Trump’s cabinet meeting is presented as focusing on workers, production, and Main Street, with tariffs and deregulation fueling manufacturing restarts. John Deere announced two new large plants in Indiana and North Carolina; one will build excavating equipment, relocating from Japan due to tariffs. A graphite processing plant in New York is described as the first in seventy years. Secretary Beson claims the US produced more steel than Japan for the first time in twenty-six years, driven by tariffs; there are other factory restarts and a supposed “golden age” for the economy. The narrative concludes that the empire fears an American system revival and that the fight is out in the open. The modern British empire is panicking because the fight is visible, with globalists asserting Main Street, not Wall Street. The piece frames Warsh’s nomination as a declaration of war on the Wall Street bailout machine and a direct challenge to decades of central banking independence, with Davos heralding the Hamiltonian revival and Trump’s Republican new deal delivering production for workers, not bailouts for banks.

Moody's downgraded America's credit rating, but the speakers claim Moody's doesn't disclose who is on the decision-making committee. According to Laura Loomer, Moody's CEO since 2021, Robert Faubber, is committed to DEI and ESG, which the Trump administration opposes. One speaker says Faubber is a "total lib" who hates Trump. The speakers question what race or gender has to do with repaying debt and ask if Moody's is implying someone's sex determines loan repayment ability. They also question why the downgrade occurred now, after alleged excessive spending by Democrats under Biden, and economic shutdowns. One speaker says that credit rating agencies did nothing as the economy was destroyed, but now sound the alarm when Trump calls for spending cuts and a balanced budget.