reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The official 9/11 story involves 19 hijackers, led by Mohammed Atta, outwitting America's defense systems despite the US military defense drill code named Vigilant Guardian that simulated the exact events of nine eleven.. Three buildings fell in New York, including the Twin Towers and Building 7, with the latter collapsing in a manner resembling controlled demolition. The investigation was underfunded, and the official story is riddled with inconsistencies, including recovered hijacker passports and the failure to identify plane wreckage. Osama bin Laden denied involvement, and the Taliban offered extradition under due process. Evidence suggests a conspiracy beyond the official narrative, involving traitors within the US government, dual nationals, and Jewish Israelis motivated by a "new Pearl Harbor" event to justify perpetual war.

"The amount of energy required to melt the girders, the steel in the tower, cannot be gotten to a melt point with the fuel that was in the airplane." "Not possible." "So any melting did not occur as a result of the hit from the airplane." "What are the puffs of smoke coming from? Well, they claim they're from the collapsing floors." "No, no, no. Those puffs of smoke are controlled demolitions." "That's exactly what they are, because that's exactly how they work." "The collapse of the building was caused by controlled demolition." "Building 7, the owner. He is heard on the video. Okay? And he says, pull it. It's pull it." "And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse." "And that's when the LINK-seven blew up."

- It was more likely executed by very sophisticated, highly intelligent international agents who meant the attack as a cover up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on that same day. - The attacks were intended to cover up the clearing of $240,000,000,000 in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which unknown western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas. - The nine eleven attacks also served to derail multiple federal investigations of crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. - Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. - A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. - A situation needed to be created wherein $240,000,000,000 of covert securities could be electronically cleared without anyone asking questions, which actually happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its emergency powers that very afternoon. - There were three major securities brokers in the World: Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers, and Garvin Intercapital. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest securities dealer in the United States and arguably the primary target. - Forty one percent of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. - Twenty four percent of the one hundred and twenty five fatalities in the Pentagon were from the naval command center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. - 29 of 30 Office of Naval Intelligence employees died. - The naval command center had been moved into the newly opened section of the Pentagon only months earlier. - In the vaults between the World Trade Center Towers, any certificates for bonds were destroyed. - On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency for the first time in US history, invoking its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act section 12 k, easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next fifteen days. - These changes would allow an estimated $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership. - Emboldened by the lack of consequences for subverting the US constitution and breaking international law during the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties, a Bush administration group known as the Vulcans planned a bigger drive to crush communism once and for all. - They waged war against the Soviet Union in Iraq under George H. W. Bush and against Iraq and Afghanistan under George W. Bush. - Belonging to this group were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleezza Rice. - The Vulcan's drive to bring an end to the Cold War was fueled by a covert war chest invisible to congressional oversight. This war chest would be known by several names: Black Eagle Trust, the Marcos Gold, Yamashita's Gold, the Golden Lily Treasure, the Durham Trust, or Project Hammer. - The program also seems to have lined the pockets of the individuals that executed this policy. This was done to the tune of a staggering $240,000,000,000 in covert and allegedly illegal bonds, which appear to have been replaced with treasury notes backed by the US taxpayer in the aftermath of September 11. - The covert securities used to accomplish the national security objective of ending the Cold War ended up in the vaults of the brokers in the World Trade Center and were destroyed on 09/11/2001. They came due for settlement and clearing on September 12. The federal agency investigating these bonds, the Office of Naval Intelligence, was in the very section of the Pentagon that was destroyed on 09/11. - To this key group of senior national security officials called the Vulcans, who had participated in the victory of the economic cold war in 1991, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the four airliners, and their occupants would become collateral damage in the ending of the Cold War. Their debts were required to hide the existence of the Black Eagle Trust and the covert activities it funded for over fifty years. - The destruction of all these lives and buildings constituted a cover up of continued lawlessness by a fraternity or brotherhood of businessmen and criminals, often referred to as the enterprise in the nineteen eighties, though it has remained in the shadows ever since.

On 9/11, Israeli-owned Odigo, located two blocks from the World Trade Center, received warnings about an impending attack two hours beforehand. This information was shared with Israeli and US authorities, yet the public heard nothing. Around 4,000 Israelis were believed to be in the area, but remarkably, only four died. Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Bibi Netanyahu, leased the Twin Towers just six weeks before the attacks, securing a terrorism insurance policy that netted him $4.5 billion. Coincidentally, Silverstein changed his usual morning routine of breakfast meetings at the World Trade Center on 9/11, saving his life. These events raise serious questions about the official narrative and the lack of transparency surrounding 9/11. Dismissing these concerns as "conspiracy theories" or "anti-American" is unacceptable.

The documentary presents a sweeping narrative that the modern era’s wars and security state are driven by deliberate, government-sponsored manipulation—false flag operations and orchestrated crises designed to terrify populations, justify expanded power, and secure global hegemony. It threads together historical examples, contemporary incidents, and testimonies to argue that the public has been misled by official narratives and that truth is being hidden behind “specters of fear.” False flag origins and early precedents - The program defines false flag operations as covert actions designed to appear as if carried out by other actors, with a long focus on the use of terror as a pretext for political ends. - Adolf Hitler’s regime is cited as a classic example: Reichstag fire in 1933, with a patsy framed for the blaze, enabling new laws that consolidated power. The film emphasizes the crisis as a vehicle to drift toward dictatorship and aggression. - The 1953 Iran coup is described as a CIA-MI6 operation (Operation Ajax) that overthrew Mohammad Mossaddegh after his nationalization of oil, with Western intelligence allegedly admitting to terror attacks and propaganda against Mossaddegh. The narrative stresses the role of MI6 and the CIA in orchestrating fear and regime change, and the long-term consequences of SAVAK and imperial influence. - Operation Gladio is presented as an umbrella for Western intelligence-led bombings in Europe (Italy, NATO states) designed to be blamed on leftists; Bologna’s 1980 bombing is highlighted as an instance where officials later spoke of Gladio’s civilian targeting. - The Gulf of Tonkin incident is recounted as a staged pretext to escalate U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia, with declassified accounts and tapes cited to show manipulated intelligence and the subsequent Tonkin Resolution enabling mass casualties. Cold War and postwar covert operations - The film cites Northwoods, a proposed plan to hijack aircraft and blame others to justify war with Cuba; it notes that President Johnson pursued some operational concepts in that vein, linking them to defense planning in the era. - The USS Liberty incident is recounted with claims of an Israeli attack that was allowed to proceed despite clear identification of the ship, and subsequent suppression of details. The narrative includes interviews with figures who allege political orders to sink the ship and to blame it on Egypt. - The 1964 Tonkin incident, the 1967-1968 war moves, and covert operations across the globe are woven into a larger claim that Western powers have repeatedly manufactured or exploited external threats to justify expansion and intervention. 7/7 and London: a modern false flag argument - The film pivots to the July 7, 2005 London bombings, arguing MI6 involvement and suggesting that Al Qaeda links were contrived or manipulated. It points to Madrid’s 2004 bombings as a precursor, noting that officials later admitted Al Qaeda had limited or no connection in some cases. - It presents testimony about MI6 involvement with operatives associated with or acting as assets, including claims about a mastermind linked to MI6 and the protection of a suspect (Aswat) by British intelligence. - The documentary emphasizes anomalies in the official narrative: a single bus diverted to Tavistock Square, eyewitness inconsistencies about the bomber, and post-event claims about surveillance footage and MO incongruities. It asserts evidence of cover-ups, whistleblowers, and political calculations aimed at maintaining fear and martial-law-like measures. - It frames the London attacks as a tool to bolster Tony Blair’s political standing, allow the passage of restrictive laws, and justify overseas military campaigns, while alleging a broader pattern of Western governments staging terror to secure interests. 9/11 and the “inside job” thesis - The centerpiece is a claim that 9/11 was an inside job, with expert and lay testimonies questioning the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, Building 7, and the presence of alternative explanations (thermite, controlled demolition). - The film cites declassified and public materials (Northwoods-like concepts; cited White House memos about luring Saddam into a war through staged actions; investigations into the Pentagon frames) to argue that the government manipulated intelligence and public opinion to justify the Iraq War. - It features a roster of notable figures—former MI5/MI6 whistleblowers, CIA veterans, and academics—who challenge the official 9/11 account, including references to Operation Northwoods, the PNAC document, and analyses suggesting a “false flag” justification for imperial aims. - Charlie Sheen’s public remarks are highlighted as a turning point in mainstream attention to alternative theories, followed by media coverage of new 9/11 footage and debates about Building 7, the Pentagon frames, and thermite evidence. - The documentary cites physicists and engineers who question official explanations, citing molten metal, traces of thermite, and expert analyses of the WTC collapse as signs of demolition rather than collapse from fire alone. Surveillance, civil liberties, and the information war - A recurring claim is that the modern battle is largely informational: psychological warfare, public relations, and control of the narrative are seen as the dominant form of warfare, with public opinion manipulation described as the real battlefield. - Edward Bernays is invoked as the architect of modern propaganda, with quotes about shaping masses and an “invisible government” pulling the strings—an “unseen mechanism” that governs democratic societies. - The film argues that fear and threats are used to erode civil liberties: expanded surveillance, identity cards, free-speech restrictions, and the use of homeland-security rhetoric to suppress dissent, including zones for demonstrations and media suppression in multiple democracies. - It mentions whistleblowers from MI5/MI6 who claim funding of extremist groups and complicity in covert actions, and it frames journalists and activists as agents of influence or targets of state pressure when challenging official narratives. Iraq, oil, and empire - Pentagon and White House documents are cited to claim that post-9/11 strategy sought to counter regional threats and secure access to oil resources, with basing and long-term occupation framed as part of a broader plan for permanent military presence and regional control. - The film argues that the “war on terror” is a pretext for a broader imperial project: redrawing borders, destabilizing regions to facilitate resource control, and exploiting crises to profit defense contractors. - It contends that the “new world order” seeks to keep populations under surveillance and compliance, with public narratives constructed around fear of terrorism and the need for security measures that erode cherished liberties. Closing call - The speakers urge viewers to uncover motive (qui bono), question official stories, and resist the expansion of government power through fear and manipulation. - They advocate for independent inquiry, whistleblowing, and public accountability to stop what they call an ongoing cycle of manufactured crises used to justify a global empire and a police-state governance model. Note: The summary mirrors the documentary’s asserted claims, statements, and testimonies as presented, without endorsing their veracity.

I'm a "no planer," meaning I don't believe planes were used in the 9/11 attacks. People believe what they saw on TV, but there was no plane wreckage at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon. Remotely controlling a plane that size to hit the towers dead center is nearly impossible. Flight 93 allegedly crashed in Shanksville, but there was minimal wreckage, unlike a typical plane crash. The plane supposedly went underground at 580 mph, yet a hijacker's bandana and a passport were found at the site. Also, cell phone calls from the planes at high altitudes wouldn't have been possible with the technology at the time. Experienced pilots couldn't replicate the attacks in a simulator at high speeds, and exceeding a plane's maximum operating speed like that would be extremely difficult and dangerous.

"In the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Osama bin Laden." "NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC seven's collapse." "This man never existed nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention." "They dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it." "The rescue of Jessica Lynch." "This is the story of nine eleven brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about"

"On the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Overpowering the passengers and the military combat train pilots on four commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor." "These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink haired strippers..." "Osama bin Laden." "That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover up from start to finish." "It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed." "This man never existed, nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity." "This has been a public service announcement by Because ignorance is strength."

I have spoken with military contacts and made it clear that 9/11 was an inside job. Showing them footage of the World Trade Center's third building collapsing convinced them. If Americans realize Israel's involvement, Israel will be wiped out. The Zionists see it as a do-or-die situation. The controlled demolition of the third building proves all were wired for demolition. When shown the evidence, people agree that 9/11 was orchestrated by Israel.

They claimed it was a plane, but the building exploded randomly. It's not a plane; that side just blew up after the first explosion. They don't know what they're saying. How could a plane have caused that? It happened too quickly. The building was fine before, then suddenly it exploded. How did that happen?

World Trade Center 7 just before it collapsed on 09/11/2001. It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris and fire. But by 05:20PM, most of the fires have been extinguished. Although the building was 47 stories high, it doesn't fall sideways nor collapse unevenly. For this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time. Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire. But what does it look like to you? The National Institute of Standards and Technology still rules out a controlled demolition. So the question is, do you believe what you can see with your own eyes, or do you believe what you are told?

- "the planes, hit the buildings, and the there was an explosion fire." - "the buildings collapsed due to structural weakening due to the fires." - "Fires in high rises have never brought down steel frame of high rise building at all." - "we have the evidence of the 10 key features of controlled demolition." - "In fact, right is a controlled where you are using or the people who made this happen used demolition." - "There's 40,000 tons of structural steel designed to resist this collapse." - "A football field away from the Twin Towers." - "These have to be easily three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon."

I spoke with contacts at the Army War College and Headquarters Marine Corps, informing them that 9/11 was a controlled demolition. I showed them footage of the third building at the World Trade Center collapsing, indicating that all the buildings were wired for demolition. If Americans ever find out that Israel was behind this, they will retaliate without considering the consequences. The Zionists are playing a high-stakes game, as losing this battle would result in their downfall. The evidence is clear: three buildings collapsed, and the third was not hit by a plane. When I presented this information, everyone agreed that Israel was responsible for 9/11.

- "One reason foreign governments may have had superior information is that the NSA frequently shared signals intelligence details with them details it withheld from our own CIA." - "under the 1947 act that created NSA, we don't have to share that" - "It's striking to see operatives from a supposedly allied country celebrating the mass murder of Americans." - "On the morning of nineeleleven, a group of five Israeli nationals purported to have witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen to be celebrating the event." - "The Israelis caught celebrating the nine eleven attacks had videotaped the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and may have possessed foreknowledge of the same."

"No seats, no luggage, no bodies, nothing but bricks and limestone." "The official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane." "Flight 77 had two Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy and weighs six tons each." "it is scientifically impossible that 12 tons of steel and titanium was vaporized by jet fuel." "From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." "The videos from security cameras, which would show what really hit the Pentagon, were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI, and the Department of Justice has to this day refused to release them." "If these videos would prove that the Pentagon was really hit by a seven fifty seven, most of us would assume the government would release them."

Eyewitnesses describe explosions at the World Trade Center, with initial confusion about the cause. Some report seeing a plane strike the tower, while others claim it was a bomb. A professor alleges 9/11 was an inside job, claiming the government's OBL story is fiction. He suggests a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower impact reveals a "cartoon display," arguing an aluminum plane couldn't penetrate the building as depicted. Others claim there was no plane visible in certain shots. Eyewitnesses describe a large explosion sound and debris, with one reporting the elevator blew up. Another witness near the Pentagon claims there was no plane debris, just a hole in the ground. Some suggest the collapse of the towers resembled a controlled demolition, citing consecutive "bangs" and a waterfall-like descent. One person claims it's impossible for a building to collapse like that unless all columns are blown up simultaneously. A reporter references the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 during a live broadcast while the building was still standing. A speaker claims the government's conspiracy theory involves Islamic radicals armed with box cutters defeating the air defense system, and questions whether to believe the government or the people who lived through it.

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss trillions of dollars missing the day before? The inability to track $2.3 trillion in transactions is mentioned. Other questions include: Why was CNN on site before the attacks? Why were short sales purchased against airline companies beforehand? Why were all passengers incinerated, but a terrorist's passport survived? Why did George W. Bush's administration publish a report a year prior stating the need to aggressively expand military power worldwide, requiring a "Pearl Harbor level event" for public support?

We saw a building collapse after a shockwave ripped through it, and Larry Silverstein mentioned in a TV show that Building 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. He stated that the decision to "pull it" was made due to safety concerns. The speaker contacted the History Channel about the show but was told it was not available to the public. The cause of Building 7's collapse remains uncertain, whether it was intentional or a result of the earlier attacks.

Speaker 1 claims a legitimate investigation into 9/11 never occurred and questions how the perpetrators were identified so quickly. Speaker 1 alleges the Bush administration ignored intelligence, suggesting they wanted the attacks to happen, citing Condoleezza Rice's memo from August 6, which stated Bin Laden planned to use steel planes to attack buildings. Speaker 1 states that every war starts with a false flag operation. Speaker 1 references a BBC report that allegedly broadcast the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 before it actually happened, claiming the reporter spoke of the collapse 27 minutes before it occurred.

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss untraceable trillions the day before? Why was CNN present before the attacks? Inquiries include the unidentified group shorting airline stocks pre-attack, the survival of a terrorist's passport amidst complete incineration of passengers, and a Bush administration report a year prior stating the need for a "Pearl Harbor level event" to justify military expansion.

The official narrative of 9/11 suggests that a group of individuals executed a highly sophisticated terror attack, yet many find it hard to believe. Just weeks before the attacks, Larry Silverstein acquired the Twin Towers and secured an unprecedented insurance policy covering terrorism. Shortly after, the towers were destroyed, resulting in a massive insurance payout. Additionally, the Pentagon reported missing funds the day before, only to be struck the next day. Building 7 collapsed hours later due to a small fire, a claim disputed by engineers who argue it resembled a controlled demolition. Questions remain about the design of the towers, reports of explosions, and the background of the hijackers. Furthermore, the involvement of Israeli individuals and the formation of a group of engineers challenging the official narrative raises further doubts about the events of that day.

The official 9/11 narrative strains credulity, with its tales of improbable feats. Larry Silverstein bought the Twin Towers shortly before 9/11, insured them for double their value with terrorism coverage, and then profited immensely after their destruction. The Pentagon announced $2.7 trillion in missing funds the day before 9/11, only to have their accounting department struck the next day. Building 7 collapsed due to a small office fire according to the news, but structural engineers call that impossible, stating it was a controlled demolition. How did three steel structures collapse due to fire when it had never happened before? Explosions were reported by survivors. Explosive materials were found at Ground Zero. Who were the Israeli artists living in the towers, and why were Israelis arrested for celebrating the towers' collapse? Why do engineers and architects challenge the official narrative?

An architect with 20 years of experience claims the official explanation for the World Trade Center collapses is false. The official reason is that the planes hit the buildings, causing explosions and fires, leading to structural weakening and collapse. However, fires have never caused a steel-frame high-rise to collapse. The speaker claims the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 exhibit 10 key features of controlled demolition. Building 7 collapsed straight down into its own footprint at free fall speed for the first 100 feet, despite 40,000 tons of structural steel. The speaker compares the collapse to controlled demolitions. The speaker states that 700 architects and engineers are demanding a new investigation. They believe the evidence suggests controlled demolitions. The speaker asserts that almost every architect and engineer who reviews the information agrees, but the implications are dark because it suggests someone besides Al Qaeda was involved, given the high security of the buildings.

Speaker 0: Alleging not simply a cover up by the US government, but by the entire American media. It's totally implausible. Like, we would report that if that were true. Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. Speaker 3: That's seen Building 7 collapse, the Sallon Brothers building? No. I wanna show you that right now. Speaker 4: Now here, we're gonna show you a videotape of the collapse itself. Describe that feeling. Now we go to videotape the collapse of this building. It's amazing. Amazing. Speaker 3: I t's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately store destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down. No plane hit that building. Speaker 6: Well, it starts with Building 7. Yes. Where you look at that and it just yeah. I mean, this this is really weird. You know, it it does come down just like a, you know, building demolition type of project. When you start putting together at what temperature steel melts. They had molten steel in the twin towers, and I'm not sure we had a number seven. Speaker 0: I never questioned anything about nine eleven, and I actively attacked people who did. I'm ashamed of that, but that's a fact. Speaker 6: And, of course, the Overton window is is is is about this is what you can discuss without threat or without, you know, risk. And but you gotta go beyond that. Speaker 0: What began to make me wonder, I have no idea what happened in 09/11, but it's very clear that there's a lot of lying around it, was the collapse of Building 7. Speaker 0: because I was part of the cover up, and I feel guilty about it. That's why. And I'm trying to atone for my previous sense. That's the real reason. Speaker 0: I did it on tape more than once because my feeling was, well, you know, like, that's divisive or whatever. I was a child and an idiot.

The discussion centers on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11, which was not hit by a plane. A video clip shows the building's collapse, described as reminiscent of a controlled demolition. One speaker recalls news reports announcing the building's collapse before it happened. Another speaker, with a background in fire protection and insurance, states that a 47-story building doesn't typically collapse due to fire. One speaker admits to previously attacking 9/11 conspiracy theorists but now questions the official narrative, particularly regarding Building 7. An Alaskan structural engineering professor's four-year study allegedly debunks the NIST analysis of the collapse. Molten steel was reportedly present in the Twin Towers. The symmetrical nature of Building 7's collapse is questioned, with one speaker suggesting it resembles a controlled demolition. One speaker suggests they broadened the Overton window on the topic because they were part of the cover-up and feel guilty.