reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In recent days, many Democrats and progressives have been awakened to the issue of antisemitism on the left. It is surprising that some people are more shocked by the dehumanizing language used by world leaders to describe Hamas than by the actions carried out by Hamas itself.

The speaker asks if the person supports Israel's right to defend themselves against acts of violence committed by Hamas. They repeatedly mention horrific acts such as chopping off baby heads and burning children alive, asking for a comment on these actions. They express disbelief and ask if there is no comment on the matter.

I understand the concern about the hypocrisy of feminist groups who remain silent on the atrocities committed by Hamas, while being vocal about other issues. I want to see a list of these feminists and know if they have condemned Hamas for the rapes and murders. I am glad that the papers have been released, as I have always maintained my innocence. However, I worry that some documents may have been withheld, and I want everything to be made public, including evidence that may affect the credibility of the accusers and the accused. We should not judge based on accusations alone, but rather on the evidence presented.

The speaker is asked if they support Hamas killing 700 Israelis, including children, and kidnapping children. They respond by saying that the question is framed to make them look bad. They clarify that they do not support the United States, but they believe that the Israeli government is the real terrorist. The speaker is then asked a yes or no question about supporting the 700, but their response is not provided in the transcript.

"Anti defamation league gets a green light." "Only for some. Yes." "You may not cite them." "You can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore." "Not to my knowledge, except now there is a congressional investigation." "I don't know if my tweet had anything to do with the start of that." "I think it had more to do with the reporting of Ashley Rinsberg." "And well, of course, Israel and I would add, Hindus are very bothered with the way that their ethnic groups are treated in Wikipedia." "And both of both a whole bunch of Jews and Hindus have been after me in the last couple of years saying, you've got to speak out." "You've got to speak out." "People who are organized have a way to push back against the lying." "I think that if, like, Israeli intelligence, for example, got together and made a real concerted effort to to fight against the this group of 40 Muslim activists that Ashley Rinsberg identified." "They might be able to make some inroads." "It really depends It's possible."

I understand the concerns of feminist groups and radicals who criticize any association with Jeffrey Epstein. However, I question their silence on the mass rapes and abuse of young Jewish girls. The hypocrisy of the Me Too movement is evident when it comes to Jewish victims. I want to see a list of radical feminists who actively support revealing names and condemning Hamas for their crimes. I am glad that papers have been released, as they exonerate me. I only worry that some documents may have been withheld by judges. I believe every document, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, should be made public. We should not assume guilt based on accusations or associations.

The speaker questions whether Hamas is holding female hostages to prevent them from speaking about atrocities. During a negotiated pause, Hamas failed to release women as agreed, leading to suspicions. The speaker acknowledges this is not a proven fact but a belief held by many.

The US government has seen Hamas commit atrocities and hold female hostages. There is no evidence for why they have not released the remaining hostages. It is hoped that they will change their mind and release the women. There is a desire for the hostages to speak about their treatment.

A Muslim American leader accused a congresswoman of lying about Hamas committing rapes against civilians. Israeli authorities have started investigating these allegations, but evidence has been difficult to obtain. Witnesses have described the brutal killings and sexual violence inflicted by Hamas during the attacks. Israeli police have found trauma consistent with rape and assault on the bodies of the victims. Women were humiliated, paraded through the streets, and subjected to gender-based violence. Shockingly, there has been little international outrage or acknowledgment of these crimes. The silence from the international community, including the United Nations, is seen as a failure to recognize the suffering of Israeli women and a failure of humanity.

The speaker questions the credibility of a report on sexual violence in Gaza, referencing a meeting with a Zaka volunteer. They express concerns about the report being used to perpetuate violence and emphasize the need for a thorough investigation. The speaker highlights the importance of verifying information and mentions the involvement of civil society organizations in pushing for accountability. They stress the need for a comprehensive investigation to uncover the truth.

The speaker blamed Hamas for the atrocities and emphasized the need to gather information. They acknowledged Israel's frustration and recommended providing access for investigation.

The speaker asks if the organizers are part of Global Antifada, but they clarify that they are with Jewish Voices for Peace. The speaker then questions their stance on Hamas and asks if they denounce them. The conversation becomes unclear as the speaker mentions going to the bathroom and the fact that the person they are speaking to is not Jewish. The transcript ends with a comment stating that this is not surprising.

The speaker expresses outrage over reports of the Israeli military sodomizing Palestinians and debating its acceptability. They claim the Israeli military is using sexual assault claims from October 7th to dehumanize Palestinians, labeling them as animals. The speaker alleges Israel is using sodomy as an act of war to terrorize Palestinians, with politicians suggesting it is permissible against Hamas members, a label they broadly apply to include women, children, and the elderly. The speaker also mentions that college students in the US have been called part of Hamas. The speaker references Sheryl Sandberg's documentary and her stance that silence is complicity, and expects her to speak out against these actions by Israel.

The speaker was asked why not blame Hamas for the atrocities. They explained their mission was to gather information, not assign blame. The speaker acknowledged the frustration of the people of Israel and emphasized the need for the government to provide access for further investigation.

Disturbing news from Israel: Hamas is reportedly kidnapping children, putting them in cages, and killing women and the elderly. This is cowardly and unacceptable. It is never okay to harm innocent people, regardless of their background or beliefs. It is especially despicable to use children as human shields. Politicians who remain silent and those who support Black Lives Matter but stay quiet now are called out. Israel is a place where I have studied, toured, and enjoyed kosher food, and this cowardly behavior is deeply disappointing. My mother and I have no respect for those involved in these actions.

I find it ironic that those defending Hamas online are the ones most likely to be targeted by them. They claim to be freedom fighters, fighting for their land, while I fight for my right to express myself. It's like being in a toxic relationship. I understand you may have a different perspective, but I can't empathize with someone who kidnaps, murders, and commits horrific acts. Just because someone had a difficult childhood doesn't mean I sympathize with them. If you want a free Palestine, free it from... [transcript ends]

Speaker 0 says that, amid recent news about sexual harassment, they noticed a disturbing pattern: many of the predators (not all) are Jews. They state that they have three words to say to that, but the transcript does not include the three words.

The speaker questions why not blame Hamas directly for the atrocities. They clarify their mission was to gather information, not assign blame. Despite survivors' accounts, the speaker emphasizes the need for the Israeli government to provide access for verification. They acknowledge the frustration and trauma in Israel.

Children were tragically killed and taken hostage in Gaza, while terrified girls were paraded through the streets surrounded by hateful mobs. Hamas, an organization driven by global jihad, must be held accountable for these atrocities. It is important to acknowledge these events and not turn a blind eye. To ensure the safety and well-being of humanity, Hamas must be dismantled.

I can't understand why you wouldn't want to read about this case, especially as a paid commentator. I have read newspaper reports, but not the full transcripts because it's difficult to imagine what those girls went through. It's not about feeling sick, it's about doing something. You said last week you hadn't read the transcripts, and you still haven't. Knowing the details should make you feel more strongly that something needs to happen. It makes me sick that people haven't grasped the disgusting nature of what happened, and I'd bet it's still happening today. It's unacceptable for the media to turn a blind eye. I am not turning a blind eye. You haven't read the details. I feel like you have. People in the media refuse to understand. People turn a blind eye because of class. They look down on these girls because they are working class.

The speaker discusses the dismantling of Hamas and argues that if Hamas is to be dismantled for its actions, then the Israeli government should also be dismantled multiple times for its own actions. They mention past operations and the number of Israeli hostages, as well as the number of casualties in Gaza. The speaker emphasizes the need for a single standard and asks for the speaker's opinion on the matter.

I understand the concern about ties to Jeffrey Epstein, but where are radical feminists when it comes to Hamas' crimes against Jewish girls? The hypocrisy of the Me Too movement is evident in their silence on this issue. I want a list of feminists who condemned Hamas for their rapes and murders, and how many stayed silent or even supported them. Let's consider this context.

Speaker 0 expresses disdain towards Hamas supporters. Speaker 1 accuses them of celebrating the Israeli massacre and questions their morals. Speaker 2 asks for evidence of decapitated babies. Speaker 1 describes gruesome acts committed by Hamas. Speaker 2 mentions supporting Palestine and freedom of identity. Speaker 1 dismisses the possibility of Palestine being freed and criticizes those who support Hamas. They claim that Hamas manipulates political correctness and diversity to legitimize terror. Speaker 1 urges support for Israel and expresses hatred towards Christians and Jews. The conversation ends with a threat of violence.

I understand the concerns about the hypocrisy of certain feminist groups who remain silent on the issue of Hamas' abuse of young Jewish girls. I believe it is important to reveal the names of these feminists and assess their stance on Hamas' actions. I am glad that the papers have been released, as I have always maintained my innocence. However, I worry that some documents may have been withheld, and I urge for the release of all documents to ensure a fair judgment by the public.

I understand the concern about the hypocrisy of feminist groups and their silence on Hamas atrocities compared to their strong stance against Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker questions how many feminists have condemned Hamas for the rapes and murders committed. They express satisfaction that the released papers have vindicated them and express a desire for all documents, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, to be made public. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not assuming guilt based on accusations alone, but rather on evidence.