TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This is a warning to Trump supporters. We advise you to be cautious and tread carefully. We are serious and have reached our limit. To those who are experienced in handling such situations, take appropriate action and ensure justice is served.

A whistleblower claimed that a foreign individual gave $5 million to then Vice President Biden, and mentioned money being sent to LLCs. Congress subpoenaed the document, as they have oversight of the FBI. Director Ray refused to provide it initially, but after being threatened with contempt charges, he agreed to show it to the chairman and ranking member only. However, according to the speaker, all members of the committee should have the right to see the unclassified document. If Director Ray doesn't allow this, they plan to move forward with contempt charges on Thursday.

I have taken legal action against those trying to silence Infowars. We are on the offensive, but I need your support. Please visit fightforalex.com to contribute to our victory fund. Humanity is awakening, and we are winning crucial battles against globalists, but the fight isn't over. If you want to resist the globalist agenda and protect our future, support Infowars and me, Alex Jones. We have evidence against them, but I require funds to continue this fight. The power to make a difference is in your hands. You are the resistance, and I’m counting on you to donate at fightforalex.com.

We've stopped the $8,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies for Politico subscriptions. The team is working to cancel the payments immediately. Large organizations inevitably miss things. Claims of widespread waste and abuse haven't been substantiated with evidence. We haven't seen proof of the alleged misuse of funds.

Yesterday, we told you that new documents we got showed that Fonny Willis was recording was working secretly behind the scenes with the Biden justice department, the Biden White House, and the j six democrats to create a double jeopardy, double drain on Donald Trump's supporters by creating a similar indictment to Jack Smith, but in Georgia to move resources and lawyers and and attention span and divide it. We have we're supposed to have a justice system that avoids double jeopardy, but in this case, you can see the plot being created by these lawyers and by the collaboration. Today, we raise a question or we provide some evidence to a question that Jim Jordan raised about a year ago, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman. He believed that Fonny Willis' prosecution of Trump was being underwritten by the justice department because he saw a stream of funding. What we see, what we've provided to the public, is an unusual situation. In the middle of Willis building your case against Donald Trump and 18 of his allies and and to charge them with conspiracy in and racketeering in Georgia to double up on what Jack Smith charged in Washington, The justice department comes to Fonny Willis and says, hey. We just want you to apply for this grant, and we're gonna take this grant, which is normally competitive. We're gonna make it noncompetitive. Basically, you're the only one that's gonna get the money. Just fill out the paperwork and take your cash, about $2,000,000. It's that classic Washington grant, go help kids, not really much specificity, but they move it from competitive to sole source, meaning that it's wired just for her. It looks like the old Boss Hogg way of doing business or Tammany Hall way of doing business. And I think for Jim Jordan or Barry Loudermilk who was on our show last night investigating January 6 from the judiciary committee, this is a pretty serious issue for them to investigate. This looks like a gift grant to Fonny Willis while she's doing the bidding of Joe Biden to pursue and tie down Donald Trump and his friends in a criminal prosecution in Atlanta. It looks just like Tammany Hall, Chicago style politics, and there's now a complete body of documents for congress to look at this. It's it's a pretty pretty clear case of what's going on.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake in this game. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and talking to the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been easy or smooth.

We just received more subpoenas from the special counsel, Jack Smith. Every contribution counts, from pennies to quarters. We appreciate your support. Encourage others to donate if they haven't already. Get creative, like selling gas from your car for $8 a gallon. Let's keep the momentum going.

Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles. Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.

We're concerned about the situation in Maui and want everyone, including billionaires, to help. We've committed to giving $10 million, but haven't actually donated it yet. We're asking for your donations to reach that goal. So, you haven't given the $10 million, you just set a fundraising target. With disasters like this, money is crucial. As a multibillionaire with multiple billions and owning 2,000 acres in Maui, don't you have a moral obligation to help your community? Hello? Oprah? Wait, maybe she's Mitch McConnell.

This poses a serious threat to our democracy. Are you one of the many journalists using scripted phrases to describe Biden? Today, we're offering free thesauruses for journalists. With a thesaurus, you can quickly find synonyms for the words you're instructed to use. This might help compensate for the lack of independent thought, integrity, and creativity in your reporting. Tag your favorite journalist, and we'll send them a free thesaurus to help them stay sharp.

We are contacting witnesses convicted of stealing $80,000,000 from workers' pensions. The star witness, in prison for the scam, cannot testify. Republicans chose him to testify against the president, a low choice. Mister Parnas, you...

Leslie Weston is described as part of a trifecta of sexual abuse scandals, with the speakers pressing for justice for the survivors. One line of questioning targets Johnson, asking, “Are we gonna get some justice for the survivors?” and “Johnson, you ever get tired of telling lies for these people?” Another asks, “Where’s Wexner? What’s he doing today?” and notes that “Wexner’s people right there were chairman John Ziger as his personal lawyer.” The conversation includes a tension-filled interaction where a participant blurts, “I suck. See? I don’t you know?” and a debate over potential conflicts of interest, with one side asking, “You don’t think it’s a conflict of interest,” and the other responding about the university. The speakers discuss public perception and accountability, with one insisting, “To you later. This was fun. Mister Carpenter, we’re gonna get some justice for the survivors today. Mister Marshall?” and another calling out an individual as “This gentleman is here accosting people coming into the courtroom.” There is a debate about whether Wexner’s name should be associated with other controversial figures, such as Woody Hayes, and mentions the trifecta: “and you guys act like you got no power.” The conversation escalates around Leslie Wexner’s influence, with someone asserting, “Leslie Wexner’s been running around this city for forty years being a sex criminal.” A powerful figure is reminded of influence: “I’m just a county commissioner. You’re one of the most powerful people in this county, brother.” The dialogue questions whether information is being hidden “at the national level” and asks about the Wexner facility, noting it was named “with Woody Hayes, the most prestigious name in the university history.” The donors behind the Wexner facility are discussed: “$5,000,000 donation. 2.5 came from his wife. The other 2.5 came from Jeffrey Epstein. His foundation, which is Del Maxwell. 2.5.” A response indicates willingness to investigate if details are forwarded: “If you wanna forward that to me, I’ll look at it. I’ll contact the person.” Language about accountability continues with the notion that a “storm” is coming and a probing question about returning money: “Will you give his money back? … Will you give the money back to charity? Sure.” The exchange ends with a cryptic close, referencing “the question” and “Sad saint of affairs, brother.”

It's great to see such a massive turnout here today! Everyone in the labor movement, and those who value public service, recognize that enough is enough. An injury to one is an injury to all. They're counting on us giving up, but we can't. I know many of you have family, friends, and colleagues in the federal system who are scared. If you can, stand up. If you are able, decline to enforce illegal instructions. If the facts support it, use the whistleblower portals that the Senate Democrats have set up. We may be out of power, but we are not powerless. We're going to win.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake for those involved. I'm conveying this message in my fundraising efforts. Our goal is to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what happens. However, this task has not been easy so far.

We should expand our support to see a different outcome, even if it requires a significant investment. This amount of money is small compared to what those involved in this game have at stake. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and engaging with the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been smooth so far.

We will defeat these people who hate our children. It has been a tough battle, but we will prevail. Let's keep fighting and taking more calls.

I need your help to join the impeachment team by going to impeachmentteam.com. Become a citizen co-sponsor by signing a petition to support Marjorie Taylor Greene's articles of impeachment against the weaponization of government. Call my colleagues and inform them of our support. I will be dropping articles of impeachment on Secretary Mayorkas due to the invasion happening at our border. The individuals to be impeached are Matthew Graves, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland, and Majorcas. This is impeachment week, and I have another announcement tomorrow at the press conference. Join us in taking action.

We will not back down; we will fight back. This is a critical moment. When someone can donate $250 million to a campaign and gain full access to the U.S. Treasury, it signifies a serious conflict. We are at war. Thank you.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

Okay, so this Reuters thing is way bigger than we thought. Elon Musk mentioned Reuters getting government payments, and it goes deeper. I checked out usaspending.gov and found over 41 payments to Reuters. When you look this up on USAspending.gov, you can see all the individual payments yourself. Also, there is a graph at the bottom of the page, and the numbers are insane! We seriously need answers about this.

I am the finance director for Donald Trump in Mississippi. Some wealthy individuals are afraid to donate to Trump because they fear the FBI will investigate them. They believe that making a legitimate campaign contribution to the Republican nominee could lead to a visit from the FBI. This is a reality in the United States of America.

Exciting news: President Trump is aware of Smurfing, having retweeted two related tweets and commented on an article. Additionally, Congressman Brian Stiles is referring Pam Bondi for potential criminal prosecution of ActBlue regarding money laundering. This is significant as it opens the door for an investigation into Smurfing. Furthermore, it's crucial for the FEC to be informed about these issues. If they aren't aware, there should be safeguards in place to prevent such occurrences. Among the six FEC commissioners, at least one is honest and committed to addressing these concerns.

The uproar over the anti-Trump partisan Mueller operation suggests that the Garland Justice Department may be hiding something. Special prosecutor Jack Smith and his team are targeting Trump and other Republicans with unprecedented investigations. It is important for Smith to be held accountable and for transparency to be maintained. The American people deserve to know the truth.

We show up for you every day in DC. We work for the American people and won't tolerate the current bullshit. We haven't abandoned you; we're here to uphold the law and ensure they don't desecrate the Constitution. We'll be in your face, making sure you understand what real democracy looks like. Trump, you and your Twitter friend are about to learn a lesson. Our oversight committee was told to "hold on" when trying to conduct oversight. Trump's trying to turn us into Russia, but we, the people, won't let it happen. A constitutional crisis is already here, but the power belongs to the people. Don't feel powerless.

Weed through a complete searchable database of 26,000 files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker has spent hours and hours examining these files and will spend the coming days giving an inside look at them. A taste of the range of materials includes bizarre emails where Epstein is suspiciously dumping lists of names, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, and Woody Allen. There are emails over the years in which Epstein works with outside consultants to scrub Google search results and essentially bleach the Internet of bad press, claiming they can provide reinforcement from sites like Harvard and other publications they influence to meet Epstein’s needs. In another email, Epstein and Larry Summers, the former Harvard president and board member for OpenAI, are emailing about an article involving Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. Epstein mysteriously says he has some great stories after just coming back from a week of “Jeffrey style” meetings. There are also many emails related to Trump. Despite Trump’s public claim that the whole affair is a scam—with arrows pointing to the Democrats—the files show that he is mentioned in these emails more than anyone else. The speaker invites audiences to follow along as these files are examined and to work to hold everyone involved accountable.