TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker mentioned that the defense attorney was upset about having to listen to a defense motion in court. The judge had to ask the attorney to calm down as he was losing control. The speaker believes that the unveiling of evidence, including details about the Mar a Lago raid and an operations order, has angered those involved in the case. They feel that Judge Cannon is exposing the corruption and misconduct in the investigation from the beginning.

Speaker 1 states that he and Linda have had disagreements over Lyndon ordering Mike Wallace to assassinate the president. Speaker 1 says Lyndon should not have issued that order, but refers to Lyndon's embarrassment caused by Kennedy in Texas. Speaker 0 says Lyndon could have helped him, but Speaker 1 claims Lyndon only cares about himself. Speaker 0 says he was blackmailed to keep quiet about the Henry Marshall killing, and that 17 people were killed mysteriously. Speaker 0 says he has lost money and it has hurt his family. He is disgusted with Lyndon, but also feels sorry for him.

A reliable source claims that someone from Washington called the Atlanta district attorney on Friday, urging them to indict on Monday to cover up previous mistakes. The district attorney explained that the jurors wouldn't return until Tuesday, but the caller insisted on Monday. The timing didn't matter to them. The identity of the caller is unknown, and this information is hearsay. However, it aligns with the leaked documents, the exhausted clerk, and the late-night press conference.

Life has been challenging lately due to tensions between Linda and me over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. It's been a hectic time, but we've managed to get through it. I’ve always been loyal to Lyndon, but this order is unforgettable. Reflecting on our past in Texas and the embarrassment Lyndon faced with Kennedy, I understand why he acted as he did. However, Lyndon is someone who prioritizes himself above all else. I felt pressured regarding the Henry Marshall situation, and I had to keep quiet due to blackmail. Many have mysteriously died in this mess, and it has caused me significant personal and financial distress. I’m left feeling disgusted with Lyndon, yet I also feel a sense of sympathy.

Reporters described a disturbing moment during the verdict when Ruth appeared to attempt self-harm with a pen. As the verdict was read, it seemed to our producers inside the courtroom that Ruth tried to stab himself in the neck with a pen, a claim echoed by the observation that this was what it appeared to look like. Four marshals swiftly intervened, dragging him out of the courtroom, removing his coat, and then shackling him at the waist and ankles before bringing him back into the courtroom. The on-site account repeated that, as the verdict was being read, Ruth tried to hurt himself in the neck with a pen.

I told them they wouldn't get a billion unless the prosecutor was fired. I was leaving in 6 hours. They fired the prosecutor, and I'm getting a new one.

The speaker states that despite an executive order for full declassification, files related to the murders of his uncle, father, and Martin Luther King have not all been released. He believes evidence confirms his uncle was killed by a conspiracy, referencing the Church Committee's findings and numerous confessions. Regarding his father's death, he claims the case was never properly investigated. He alleges Sirhan Sirhan did not act alone and couldn't have fired the shots that killed his father, citing eyewitness accounts and autopsy reports. He points to a security guard, Thane Cesar, as a possible shooter, noting Cesar's CIA ties and the destruction of evidence by the LAPD. He is confident President Trump will release accessible documents, but doesn't expect groundbreaking revelations regarding his uncle's case, as much is already known. He believes existing evidence is sufficient to prove a conspiracy in court.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

Life has been challenging lately due to tensions between Linda and me over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. It's been a hectic situation, but we’ve managed so far. I’ve always been loyal to Lyndon and followed his orders, but this one is unforgettable. The embarrassment he faced from Kennedy may have driven him to this decision. Lyndon is primarily focused on his own interests and tends to avoid confrontation. I’ve also been pressured regarding the Henry Marshall killing, facing blackmail to stay silent. A lot of people have mysteriously died in this situation, and it has taken a toll on my finances and family, leaving me feeling disgusted and frustrated.

Two of the accused in the courthouse took a plea deal on weapons trafficking charges, while the conspiracy to commit murder charge was dropped. The guilty pleas resulted in time served, leading to their release later today. The speaker believes there was a miscarriage of justice due to the lengthy pretrial detention. They hope for an investigation into the proceedings and public pressure on the authorities.

According to William Pepper, Raul, allegedly James Earl Ray's handler in the Martin Luther King assassination, was connected to Jack Ruby in 1963 through an arms smuggling network linked to a top Israeli Mossad official. Information suggests Jack Ruby's move to Texas in 1948 was not for Chicago mafia work. Instead, he was allegedly involved in smuggling aircraft parts stolen from U.S. military installations to Israel, leveraging his background as an aircraft mechanic. Texas was reportedly a major hub for arms smuggling.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

Paul Shrade, a union leader and close friend of the speaker's father, was present when his father was shot. Shrade believes that Sirhan did not kill the speaker's father. The speaker explains that Sirhan fired two shots, one hitting Shrade and the other hitting a door jam behind his father. Several people grabbed Sirhan, but he managed to fire six more shots, hitting multiple people. The speaker suggests that a security guard named Eugene Saint Saeser, who was holding his father's arm, likely fired the shots that killed his father. The LAPD's investigation was botched, with evidence and photographs destroyed. The speaker also mentions the involvement of a mob attorney representing Johnny Roselli, who had ties to the CIA.

It continued after that. When the church committee happened and Frank Church brought it out that MKUltra existed, well, the stuff hit the fan, and everybody started screaming, we need more of this. Well, Richard Helms, the director of the CIA, immediately destroyed 10,000 MKULTRA documents so that Congress couldn't see them and then threatened the CIA officers who were due to testify with prison if they violated their secrecy agreement. They tried that with me. So that's one of the means of control. So MKULTRA, they said after the church committee, well, we don't do that anymore. It's been done away with. Victor Marchetti, who wrote CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, I don't know if you're aware of that book. He was the first real CIA whistleblower. He said they claimed MK Ultra stopped at 1973, but he said that's just a cover story. It continued after that. He believes MK Ultra still exists, and one of the classic examples is Sirhan Sirhan, who was one of the shooters that killed Robert Kennedy senior. Sirhan Sirhan claimed he didn't remember anything about the event at all afterwards, and they went in there and tested him psychologically. And he was so programmable, they had him climbing his cell like a monkey. I have become friends because of our both of our kinds of disenchantment to say that with the CIA. And Bobby met with Sirhan Sirhan. He said he did he had no idea of what he'd done at all. No memory of it at all. And the psychiatrists were so easy, it was so easy rather to program him that they had him climbing the cell, like I said, like a monkey. And he was, I'm convinced, an MK Ultra subject. I'm absolutely convinced of this. I don't wanna speak for Bobby Kennedy Jr. We've become friends since, but I think he would probably agree with that as a classic case of it still existing. And why would Why would they give up such a powerful weapon? You can mind control individuals who can carry out assassinations or pretend to be an assassin as a patsy and be caught while actual CIA agents are actually shooting and killing JFK or shooting and killing RFK in a kitchen in Los Angeles. So it's a very convenient

On 04/26/1913, in Atlanta, 13-year-old Mary Fagan, recently laid off from the National Pencil Company where Leo Frank, a 29-year-old Jewish superintendent of German descent, was in charge, went to collect her pay. The next morning, night watchman Newt Lee found Mary’s brutally beaten body in the factory basement, with a cord around her neck and autopsy revealing she had been raped. Beside the corpse were two notes describing her murderer, a long tall black man called the Night Witch, written as if Mary herself were jotting them in her final moments. The black night watchman who discovered the body was initially treated as a suspect, including an attempted coerced confession, but no confession emerged. Two main suspects remained: Jim Conley, the factory’s black janitor, who was paid more than white child laborers and granted special privileges, and Leo Frank, the last to claim to have seen Mary alive. Conley was seen washing red stains from his shirt at the factory, later determined to be rust; Frank had hired a top defense team to prove his innocence as the murder trial drew national attention. The case intensified when Conley admitted he wasn’t illiterate as he had claimed and swore that Frank paid him to write the murder notes, framing Conley as an accomplice with Frank as the main suspect. Frank’s accounts about what happened after Mary left his office changed over time, including an alleged unconscious bathroom break that would have placed him near the metal room at the suspected time. A young worker testified that she went to Frank’s office right after Mary left and found Frank not there; several female witnesses portrayed Frank as a lewd man with a penchant for young girls. After a drawn-out trial, a grand jury, which included Jewish members, unanimously found Frank guilty. He was sentenced to death by hanging, to be carried out that October, but after unsuccessful appeals up to the federal level, Governor Slaton commuted the sentence to life in prison. Public anger surged, with accusations of corruption and conflicts of interest in the justice system. In 1915, about 25 men calling themselves the Knights of Mary Fagan kidnapped and lynched Leo Frank in Marietta, Georgia. Meanwhile, Bene B’rith (Bene Berith) had already faced public accusations of espionage during the Civil War and had connections to Confederate and Freemason circles; after Frank’s conviction, the organization allegedly emphasized Conley’s testimony. The ADL (Anti-Defamation League), formed that same year, claimed to defend Jewish people and combat anti-Semitism, while later campaigns elevated Frank’s innocence. In 1982, Alonzo Mann, then an elderly former office boy who had lied in 1913, corrected his testimony, saying he witnessed Conley carrying Mary’s body and was threatened if he spoke. This renewed ADL efforts to seek a pardon for Frank. Frank was posthumously pardoned in 1986, but not absolved; the ADL continues to advocate for exoneration, aided by attorney Roy Barnes, a Freemason and former Georgia governor. The narrative frames Leo Frank’s guilt as contested, with ongoing debate about anti-Semitism, justice, and historical memory. The video invites viewers to consult sources and form their own conclusions.

The speaker discusses the assassination of his father and uncle, stating that his father was shot from behind despite always being in front of him. They mention the possibility of government involvement, particularly the CIA, and how his father, who was the attorney general at the time, lost investigative capacity after his brother's death. The speaker finds it remarkable that someone in such a position would suspect their own CIA, especially since documents related to the assassination are still being withheld. They also mention new evidence that raises doubts about the guilt of the convicted assassin, Sirhan.

There's no way they would run the same playbook twice. On 04/04/1968, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. stepped onto the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee at 06:01 PM. Authorities say a single 30-odd-six rifle shot struck him in the jaw and neck, one shot, one kill. The police also find a bundle near the crime scene containing a Remington Model 760 rifle, binoculars, and personal items tied to one James Earl Ray, an escaped convict from Missouri. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover quickly pronounced Ray to be a lone, racist, hate-filled assassin and there were no co-conspirators, no second shooter, and no larger plot. Didn't something like that happen just recently? Years later, the FBI and also the House Select Committee on Assassinations both admitted they could never conclusively match the fatal bullet to Ray's rifle. So in other words, the single most important piece of forensic proof tying Ray to the murder does not actually exist. And then there were the contradicting eyewitnesses. This is from the Washington Post: some witnesses, including then New York Times reporter Earl Caldwell, said that they saw a man moving in the thick bushes behind Jim's grill, which is near the crime scene, but in a location not where Ray was said to be. Then they say, for reasons unknown, Memphis Public Works employees cut down the bushes and destroyed a possible crime scene the very next morning. As always, when you follow the evidence or lack thereof, things just stop adding up.

I don't remember the details of cheating or the shooting. I started remembering things clearly when facing death row, maybe a year or two later. The crime was beyond tragic, impacting not just the Kennedy family but also the public and victims. It was a nightmare for everyone involved.

The speaker discusses the suspicious circumstances surrounding his father's assassination, implicating a security guard named Eugene Caesar. He mentions Caesar's involvement in steering his father into the line of fire and the discrepancies in the autopsy report. The speaker also touches on the possibility of hypnosis being used on Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin. Additionally, he hints at potential connections to MK Ultra and strange incidents involving Sirhan at a horse track and a hospital. The speaker expresses a desire to ask unanswered questions about the case.

According to the speaker, Jack Ruby had connections to Israeli newspapers. Dr. William Pepper, who investigated Martin Luther King's assassination, found that Raul, allegedly James Earl Ray's handler, was connected to Ruby in 1963 through an arm smuggling network linked to a top Israeli Mossad official. The speaker claims Ruby's move to Texas in 1948 was not for the Chicago mafia. Instead, he was involved in smuggling aircraft parts stolen from U.S. military installations to Israel, leveraging his experience as an aircraft mechanic during World War II. The speaker asserts that Texas was a major site for smuggling arms.

The speaker discusses the assassination of their father, Robert Kennedy, and their belief that Sirhan Sirhan was not the true killer. They mention Paul Schrade, a close friend of their father who was also shot that day, and how he convinced them to read the autopsy report. According to the report, Sirhan fired two shots at their father, but the fatal shots came from behind. The speaker believes that Eugene Dan Sazer, a security guard and CIA operative, was the real shooter. They emphasize the need for further investigation into the case.

William Kunstler, a radical lawyer, wrote about his interactions with Jack Ruby, who claimed to have killed Lee Harvey Oswald to protect Jews from being implicated. Ruby believed Oswald's association with a group that had Jewish members would link the Kennedy assassination to Jews. Kunstler described Ruby as violent and paranoid. This sheds light on Ruby's motives for the murder.

The speaker believes "he was murdered" and was shocked by the event. As a scientist, the speaker was sure "he" would appeal and was covered by a non-prosecution agreement. The speaker was not mentioned in the indictment or listed as a co-conspirator. The speaker wishes they had never met "him" and regrets not staying in England. After 1998-99, the speaker tried to move on, becoming a banker, but wishes they had been more successful at moving on completely. At the time, the speaker would have introduced "him" to friends because they didn't know "he was so awful." "He" was friendly with many people, and there was no reason to think "he was someone of interest to people."