reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video discusses the body cam footage from the Trump assassination attempt and raises questions about the actions of the police officers involved. The speaker analyzes the timeline of events and highlights inconsistencies and odd behavior. They question why it took a patrol officer less than two minutes to locate the suspect on the roof while other law enforcement officers seemed unaware. The speaker also wonders why the officer did not yell or communicate more effectively during the incident. The video concludes with a list of unresolved questions and a request for more information. (149 words)

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president and take shots without help from insiders. He offers to protect the president for free.

The speaker demands the resignation of the director of the Secret Service due to security failures during an event where President Trump was shot. Questions are raised about why the threat was not neutralized sooner, despite warnings from the crowd. The director is pressed on whether there was a stand-down order or conspiracy. The director states an investigation is ongoing, but the speaker insists on her resignation.

The speaker questions the director about security lapses at an event where the president was present. They criticize the director for not securing a dangerous rooftop, highlighting their own shooting skills to emphasize the potential danger. The speaker expresses frustration with the director's leadership and calls for their immediate dismissal.

I wish Trump had better security. The Secret Service won't talk about the threat on his life or why they ignored it. We will get answers.

Good morning. I've been asked about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, and I want to share my perspective. With 17 years in the military, including 14 in a special operations unit, I have experience in close protection for VIPs, including the Prime Minister in dangerous areas. The recent incident raises serious concerns. The shooter’s ability to access a rooftop so close to the president during daylight seems implausible without assistance from an agency or organization. The aerial photo made it clear that security measures were insufficient. It appears that this was not just a random act; it had to be planned, whether through negligence or strategic intent.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free.

The speaker discusses potential security failures in protecting the president at an event. They suggest the need for a thorough investigation to understand what went wrong and prevent future incidents. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in addressing security concerns. They stress the need for a comprehensive inquiry before making any accusations. The conversation highlights the significance of ensuring the safety of the president and the American people.

Two men on a roof near Trump missed spotting a potential threat despite people yelling. The Secret Service failed to act when a man with a gun was reported. Candace Owens questions how the security breach occurred, emphasizing the thorough security measures usually taken. She expresses disbelief in the failure of intelligence and demands accountability from the Secret Service agents involved.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could have accessed the area and fired shots without inside help. The speaker offers to protect the president for free if needed.

Assassination attempt discussed, questions raised about lack of security. Concerns about how gunman went unnoticed on roof. Criticism of lack of transparency in Biden administration. Call for declassification of files to clarify incident. Frustration over failure to prevent tragedy.

The speaker questions the lack of immediate action by law enforcement in response to threats. They suggest negligence or intentional failure in security measures, prompting the need for a thorough investigation. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring the safety of public officials. They advocate for a comprehensive inquiry before making any accusations.

Whistleblowers claim the security plan for the former president called for law enforcement on the roof and around the building, but there was no one except the shooter on the roof and no one around the perimeter. The excuse given was that it was too hot that day. Whistleblowers also say the lead site agent was not trusted or highly regarded by other Secret Service agents and didn't know what she was doing. The speaker questions why these individuals were running security for a former president and current major party nominee, calling it inexplicable and stating that the lack of answers is making the situation worse.

The speaker questions why a potential threat was allowed on stage without informing the security team, especially when snipers were present. They demand answers from those responsible for the safety of the president and past presidents.

The speaker questions the Secret Service on transparency and cooperation regarding an attempted assassination of Donald Trump. The Secret Service is criticized for not providing requested information to the committee and being uncooperative. The speaker accuses the Secret Service of dishonesty and evasion. They question the lack of personnel consequences and training improvements after the incident. The Secret Service is pressed for answers on timelines and actions taken during the assassination attempt.

The speaker expresses disbelief at the security failure allowing someone to scale a roof near the president. They argue that the Secret Service should have thorough security measures in place to prevent such incidents. The speaker questions the intelligence failure and demands accountability from the Secret Service agents involved. They emphasize the importance of prior security checks to ensure the president's safety. The speaker's personal experience with security incidents adds to their skepticism about the reported events.

The speaker questions why snipers initially assigned to a second-story window with a clear view of the roof where the shooter stood and tried to kill President Trump were withdrawn before the shooting. The speaker emphasizes that these are basic questions the Secret Service should easily answer, especially given the seventeen days since the attack. The speaker expresses frustration that the response from the Secret Service has repeatedly been "we're looking into it," which they deem insufficient.

The speakers discussed a call with Secret Service and FBI regarding the security breach at a Trump rally. They questioned why the event wasn't paused when a threat was identified before Trump went on stage. They criticized the lack of action and accountability within the Secret Service. Despite the incident, they expressed gratitude that Trump was unharmed. They highlighted the need for better security protocols and transparency. The conversation ended with thanks and a promise to continue advocating for change.

The speaker questions the Secret Service's effectiveness, citing a shooting of Trump and a recent shooting attempt. They claim the Secret Service's current methods are not working and that whistleblowers have revealed the agency isn't following its own protocols. The speaker believes the core issue is a failure of leadership, not the agents themselves. They advocate for firing people, implementing new protocols, and ensuring the protection of Trump and attendees at his rallies. The speaker expresses a lack of confidence in the Secret Service's current protective measures.

New reports reveal that the Secret Service had eyes on the would-be assassin 62 minutes before the shooting, but did not approach him. They lost sight of him 18 minutes before the incident, yet did not take action to protect Trump. Despite the identified threat, no measures were taken to remove Trump from the stage. This potential scandal in Butler, Pennsylvania, where the assassin was allowed to freely fire shots at Trump, needs further investigation to determine accountability.

The Secret Service director should be fired for allowing a suspect with a range finder near the White House. Local police are upset about being blamed for the security breach when it was the Secret Service's responsibility. Money should be reallocated from Ukraine to better protect elected officials. The lack of protection for the president is concerning, and the truth needs to be uncovered.

The speaker discusses the shooter's close proximity to a fairground and the president's location. They question why law enforcement did not see the shooter on the low roof before the incident occurred, given the close quarters and visibility. The speaker expresses confusion over the lack of intervention before the shooting began.

The speaker criticized the Secret Service for claiming a sloped roof was unsafe when it wasn't. They demonstrated shooting accuracy on a similar roof to highlight the danger. The speaker blamed the Secret Service for failing to secure the rooftop during a past event, putting the President at risk. They called for the director's immediate dismissal due to incompetence.

The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president with a rifle without inside help. Urging focus on those who allowed the incident, he offers to protect the president for free if needed.