reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Germany, insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially incurring higher fines due to their permanence. Even reposting untrue statements can be considered a crime. Authorities are actively curbing online hate speech, as demonstrated by coordinated raids targeting individuals posting racist content. Despite growing concerns over migration and related issues, there's a lack of political will to address these problems effectively. The focus seems to be on prosecuting opinion crimes rather than deporting criminals. My party, the AFD, faces persecution despite being a major opposition force. We're smeared as Nazis and right-wing extremists, but this isn't true. Free speech is eroding, with new laws targeting online expression. People risk punishment for criticizing mass migration. Even if the AFD performs well in elections, other parties may refuse to cooperate, maintaining a firewall against us. It is time to vote to make Germany great again.

The speaker claims Germany has a profitable "hate speech persecution" industry targeting citizens for online posts. Police raids occur for minor offenses, like a €600 fine for a poop emoji. Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck has filed over 800 criminal reports. Germany makes the most legal demands for user data from X within the EU. The German justice system uses AI surveillance to prosecute benign offenses. A law change in 2021 allows harsher punishment for insulting politicians. The company Soldan, described as a "hate crime persecution mafia," scans posts using AI, files thousands of criminal complaints monthly, and shares profits with politicians, with legal costs borne by taxpayers. Hate Aid, funded by the German government, also works to criminalize hate speech and wants to sue X to allow doxxing. The speaker urges support for free speech and fighting against tyranny.

It is illegal to display Nazi symbolism, like a swastika, or deny the Holocaust. Insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially leading to higher fines because they persist indefinitely. German law also prohibits malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes. Reposting untrue statements is also a crime because the reader can't distinguish whether you just invented this or just reposted it. Punishments for hate speech can include jail time for repeat offenders, but often involve stiff fines and device confiscation. People are shocked when their phones are taken away, and they see it as a severe punishment, sometimes worse than a fine, because so much of their life is on their phone.

A 98-year-old lady's home was raided by police due to her grandson, an online user known as the official 1984, allegedly using her identity to avoid giving his information to Israeli intelligence. The police were investigating posts that violated the IHRA definition of antisemitism. The lady refused to disclose the number of computers in her house and demanded the police leave.

In three minutes, that man that assaulted that young woman yesterday will be released from custody. He'll be released from custody because he's not a citizen of Germany. He's not a citizen of the EU for that matter. He doesn't even belong in here. He's an immigrant, an illegal one, a drug dealer, and very popularly known here, especially by the police. This is not the first time this has happened. It's not the first time that man had beat up a woman. And it's not the first time that the other guy decided to take a swing at my face with a six inch blade. If they could do this to the people of Germany and then just get released twelve hours later, even less at this point, where is the law? Where is the structure? If the Germans are held to that law and that structure, but these people could just come in, swing knives, and hurt, abuse, terrorize, and oppress citizens of Germany then. What do we do?

A massive conspiracy involving German and American intelligence agencies is framing the AfD, a German political party, by associating them with Saxon separatists. Leaked case files reveal that the initial investigation focused solely on six suspects, unrelated to the AfD. However, the investigation was later expanded to include individuals connected to both the separatists and the AfD, highlighting any connection, no matter how tenuous. The media will distort this information to damage the AfD's reputation. This is an attack not just on the AfD, but on all those who think for themselves and reject mainstream media narratives. The AfD maintains they have no connection to the separatists. We must expose this conspiracy before it’s too late and the AfD, the only party that can save Germany, is unjustly destroyed.

Earlier this week, state police in Germany conducted raids, seizing electronics from individuals suspected of posting racist content online. Over 50 similar raids occurred across the country, targeting what prosecutors describe as coordinated online hate speech. It's absurd. They're modeling their laws after Europe's. Imagine armed agents raiding homes and seizing devices over internet posts? What if the content was Jewish, like menorahs? Suddenly, the anti-Nazi stance seems contradictory. The very principles they claim to uphold are being violated. It's nonsensical. Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Go to the AlexJonesstore.com. Infowars is recognized as the tip of the spear in the fight against the globalists. We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. These new viewers aren't getting product and it is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you that are keeping us on the air. Check out the AlexJonesstore.com today, and I thank you for keeping us on the air.

We handle approximately 3,500 cases per year with nine investigators. We receive hundreds of tips monthly from various sources. The cases involve the worst of the internet, filled with online slurs, threats, and hate speech, which constitute criminal offenses. For example, one case involved a hateful suggestion about refugee children that resulted in the accused paying a significant fine. We build our cases by scouring social media and using public and government data. While social media companies sometimes assist, we also employ special software to unmask anonymous users. Over the past four years, we've successfully prosecuted about 750 hate speech cases.

Speaker 1 recounts an incident where “eleven police officers” arrived at their house, which they describe as completely ridiculous. The speaker explains they had left the front door open and were waiting for their dad, actually being in the bath at the time the officers entered. They recall hearing their name called, noticing one female officer among the group of ten male officers. They initially thought the name might belong to their sister because they were upstairs in the bath. The officers then came up the stairs without giving them any privacy, and the speaker confirms they were naked. The speaker describes feeling disgusted and very upset, crying their eyes out. They asked that the female officer stay downstairs and that the male officers be the ones to handle the situation, expressing that they were upset about the lack of privacy and the presence of officers while exposed. Despite this, the males were sent downstairs, and the female officer sat with the speaker, who was crying and very distressed. When asked what the officers were there for, the speaker says they asked for clarification. The female officer explained that the police were there for “malicious communications. Hate crime and malicious communications.” The speaker pressed for more information about the reason behind the visit, and the officer indicated they would discuss the details “when we get to the police station” or “to the” authorities, but the exact phrasing in the transcript cuts off here.

Publishing or distributing insulting or abusive material that is intended to or likely to stir up racial hatred constitutes an offense. Retweeting such material is considered republishing and can lead to prosecution. Dedicated police officers monitor social media to identify this material, leading to identification and arrests. Individuals may not realize the harm they are causing, but they will face consequences.

We've seen police raids against citizens suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online, framed as combating misogyny. I must address the US Vice President's speech. Our motto in the Bundeswehr is "We fight for your right to be against us," and it represents our democracy. The Vice President questioned this democracy, not just in Germany, but across Europe, likening Europe's condition to authoritarian regimes. Early Tuesday morning, we accompanied state police as they raided an apartment in Northwest Germany. Six armed officers searched the suspect's home, seizing his laptop and cell phone. Prosecutors allege these electronics were used to post a racist cartoon online. Simultaneously, over 50 similar raids occurred across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech.

It is illegal to display Nazi symbolism, like a swastika, or deny the Holocaust. Insulting someone in public is a crime, and it is also a crime to insult someone online, with fines potentially higher due to the enduring nature of online content. German law prohibits malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes. Reposting false information is also a crime, as it's treated the same as creating it. Punishments for hate speech can include jail time for repeat offenders, but typically involve hefty fines and device confiscation. People are often shocked when their phones are taken away, viewing it as a severe punishment, sometimes worse than the fine itself, because their entire lives are often on their phones.

I am Naomi Zeigt, a German political commentator. I exposed German comedian Al Hodso for wishing death upon Donald Trump, spreading toxic beliefs to his 700,000 followers. He is funded by taxpayer money and promotes anti-humanistic views. He should be banned from his main platform, x. Do you agree with me? Translation: I am Naomi Zeigt, a German political commentator. I exposed German comedian Al Hodso for wishing death upon Donald Trump, spreading toxic beliefs to his 700,000 followers. He is funded by taxpayer money and promotes anti-humanistic views. He should be banned from his main platform, x. Do you agree with me?

Yes, it is a crime to insult someone in public, and it's also a crime to insult them online, with potentially higher fines because it stays there. Even reposting untrue statements is a crime, as readers can't tell if you created or simply shared it. Punishments for hate speech can include jail time for repeat offenders, but often involve stiff fines and device confiscation, which shocks people. Recently, we accompanied state police during a raid in Northwest Germany. Six officers searched the suspect's home and seized his laptop and cell phone because prosecutors believed they were used to post a racist cartoon online. Simultaneously, over 50 similar raids occurred across Germany as part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech.

A person is accused of writing a swastika on a Tesla. The Tesla owner says it's a "heat crime" and that the act was caught on video. The car is currently with the police being fingerprinted, and Facebook helped track down the accused. The Tesla owner suggests the accused apologize to Facebook for writing the swastika. The accused apologizes, stating they have nothing against the car or the owner, but admits to having something against Elon Musk. They claim they did not intend to do this.

You are being arrested for improper use of an electronic communications network under the Communications Act. Your comments on Facebook were offensive and obscene, leading to complaints. You will be questioned at the police station. Personal items will be searched for safety. You may not be locked up for the night, hopefully.

The Irish government is trying to pass a law allowing police to search homes and seize phones and computers. This threatens free speech and independent journalism. It's a global crackdown on thought control. We must stand up for Ireland to prevent this from spreading. Share this message and support a free speech fund. Act now to stop this from becoming reality.

A federal judge ordered the release of a heavily redacted affidavit related to the raid on my newsroom. Almost every detail regarding probable cause for the search has been redacted, including the names of individuals and organizations involved, even my birth year. The redactions conceal the reasons for the raid, which involved the seizure of my cell phones and the use of my biometric data to unlock them. The affidavit mentions potential crimes, like conspiracy and possession of stolen goods, accusations I vehemently deny. The excessive redactions prevent public scrutiny of the justification for this aggressive action against a news organization. This is a national disgrace, and we will be pursuing legal action.

Hidden camera footage shows the FBI raiding the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. This invasion of First Amendment rights is alarming for journalists nationwide. The government targeted Project Veritas, following our lawful acquisition of materials related to Ashley Biden's diary in 2020, which we chose not to publish and returned to local law enforcement. This raid is part of a broader effort to intimidate and silence journalists, but Project Veritas remains committed to defending our rights and those of all journalists. More revelations about the SDNY's attacks on journalism are forthcoming, and we will continue to fight for our First Amendment protections.

The Irish government is attempting to pass a law allowing police to search homes, confiscate devices, and arrest individuals for online activities. This global crackdown on independent journalism is a threat to free speech. We must support Ireland to prevent this from spreading. Stand up for the right to speak out against political issues. Take action now to stop this dangerous reality from becoming widespread. Share this message and consider donating to a free speech fund. Our future generations depend on our actions today. Let's prevent this dystopian scenario from becoming a reality.

Earlier this week, state police raided an apartment in Northwest Germany, seizing a suspect's laptop and cell phone for allegedly posting a racist cartoon online. This was one of over 50 similar raids across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech. It's absurd how these anti-nazi principles are being violated. The authorities are going after people for posting Jewish propaganda, like pictures with the Star of David or menorahs, claiming they're illegal symbols. It's like, how is this any different from what the Nazis would do? Also, go to AlexJonesStore.com and get great supplements and gear. We're reaching over a million people a day, but these new viewers aren't necessarily supporting the show. It's the hardcore patriots who are keeping us on the air. Become a VIP member for $30 a month and get $40 to spend in the store.

Speaker 0 states: "You're under arrest for your breach of CSO. Can you come inside with us, please? We can do it right here." They ask, "Do you drop it? Sounds good." The conversation then shifts to the reason for the arrest: "Are you aware of that? I am not aware of that." The arrestee or another speaker questions the justification, asking, "You know why you're arresting this man for? He refused to apologize for his religious beliefs." A subsequent accusation is made: "So you have become a modern day Nazis right now doing the beatings." The location and context are referenced: "This is Calgary, Alberta, Canada, twenty first century right now."

Across Europe, free speech is in retreat. In Brussels, EU commissars intend to shut down social media during civil unrest if they spot hateful content. In this very country, police have raided citizens suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online. Sweden convicted a Christian activist for participating in Quran burnings, noting free expression doesn't grant a free pass to offend any group. In the UK, the backslide away from conscience rights is concerning. Adam Smith Connor, an army veteran, was charged for silently praying 50 meters from an abortion clinic. He was found guilty and sentenced to pay thousands in legal costs. In Scotland, the government warned citizens that even private prayer within their own homes may break the law, urging them to report suspected thoughtcrimes.

An individual is accused of writing a swastika on a Tesla using a key. The Tesla owner states that the act is a hate crime and that the key is being fingerprinted by the police to track down the individual. They also mention that Facebook tracked the individual down. The Tesla owner suggests the individual apologize to Facebook for writing the swastika. The individual apologizes, stating they have nothing against the car or the owner, but may have something against Elon Musk. The Tesla owner clarifies they own the car and it was bought and paid for. The individual admits their actions were misguided and unintentional.

The chief editor of Deutschland Kurier, David Bendelz, received a seven-month prison sentence for a meme posted by his team accusing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser of hating free speech. The speaker argues that the verdict proves Faeser hates free speech and questions if she is "retarded or just a power obsessed bitch." German defamation law, specifically paragraph 188, gives politicians special protection, making it illegal to insult them. The speaker claims the judiciary has criminalized speaking the truth if it damages a politician's reputation, calling it tyranny. The prosecutor in Bendelz's case, Alexander Baum, also initiated a house raid against Stefan Mihov for calling Minister Robert Habeck a "stupid head," traumatizing Mihov's daughter with Down syndrome. The speaker asserts that Faeser ordered the raid. They vow not to limit their free speech and accuse Faeser of being a fascist, while noting it is still legal to insult politicians from the AFD party.