reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are buying churches and converting them into masjids, having already converted three. They are now buying a church with a school to serve the community, with the belief that the people will one day be Muslims. The plan is to turn the church into a masjid and the school into an Islamic school. The speaker claims that 100 years ago, others invaded the Muslim world, building missionary schools and destroying Islamic schools and masjids. Now, they are returning the favor by converting churches into masjids and schools into Islamic schools to bring the light of Islam. They are buying ready-to-go institutions that have emptied out and are ready to be filled with Muslims. The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the current election candidates and hopes for Islam to achieve victory in the country.

The speakers assert that certain groups should be prevented from entering the country and proselytizing in mosques about overthrowing the government and replacing it with Sharia law. They argue this is sedition, not freedom of speech or religion, and that the battlefield is domestic. One speaker states that dismantling injustice involves replacing the system with people who represent the prophet and that Islam is jihad. Another speaker claims that spreading Islam involves jihad and fighting those who don't accept Islamic rule, which is a command of Allah. For Muslims in the West, jihad means establishing the deed of Allah through all means necessary, including using protests to overthrow non-Muslim governments.

The problem with Islam is that Islam is an absolutist religion where Muslims believe this is the word of God aka Allah and no man can ever question the word of Allah which is extremely problematic and it has no place in any civilized culture. Chapter two verse 98. Allah is an enemy of non muslims. Chapter three verse 85: No other religion is accepted other than Islam. Chapter eight verse 12: Allah will instill fear in the hearts of those who disbelieve Islam and Muslims. You cut their limbs by hitting their necks. Chapter three verse 118. Make only Muslims your intimate friends. Chapter three verse 28 and chapter nine verse 23, do not make friends with non Muslims. Chapter eight verse 39. Fight non Muslims until the faith of Allah is fully established. Chapter 22 verse 30. Idols are filth. Chapter nine verse five, ambush and kill the idolaters and wherever and whenever you can find them. Chapter 33 verse 61, wherever the faithful and the idolaters are caught, they will be brutally killed. Chapter three verse 62, chapter two verse two fifty five, chapter 27 verse 61, and chapter 35 verse three. There is no other god than Allah. Chapter 21 verse 98 Those who worship anyone other than Allah are the fuel of hell. Idolaters are pure and unholy. Chapter four verse 101 Kafirs are open enemies and kafirs are basically sinners so anyone that doesn't believe in Islam will. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal, and that refers to the fact that Muhammad said that if Muslims go and conquer the land, then the women in that land are halal or permissible to the soldiers. Chapter nine verse 29 by humiliating infidels make jizya from them so if you don't know what jizya is, jizya is basically a tax imposed on non muslims when muslims govern the land so what used to happen was is that muslims attacked such 10 countries and they established a caliphate, so they either killed people that didn't convert to Islam, but some groups they were like okay if you don't want to convert to Islam you have to pay us an extra tax and that was called the jizya. Chapter 66 verse nine Do jihad war with the infidels and the beneficiaries. Chapter four verse 56: Will cook the skin of the disbeliever and you see that sometimes you know it happens in Pakistan, happens in Afghanistan when someone is blasphemous towards the Quran or Muhammad, they burn them to death, and it actually happened recently to some girl that was accused of ripping up the Quran and they burned her to death in public. Chapter eight verse 57: Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Chapter thirty two verse 22: take revenge on those who leave islam so as you know the punishment for apostasy is death in islam and I'm considered an apostate because I'm an ex muslim so I just went through these verses okay to just spread awareness first of all but at the same time I want to know from the Labour government and from Kyrgyzstanbul are we as a homophobic if we question these things? It says in the Quran right and I didn't go for the hadiths because the hadiths are a thousand times worse. Are we as a homophobic if we question the life of Muhammad? Because he took part in 29 offensive battles.

The speaker states they have bought three churches and converted them to masjids. They are now buying a church with a school to convert into a masjid and Islamic school. The speaker believes that the people who were part of the church community will one day be Muslims. They state that 100 years ago, others invaded the Muslim world, building missionary schools and destroying Islamic schools and masjids. The speaker says they are returning the favor by turning churches into masjids and schools into Islamic schools to bring the light of Islam.

Speaker 0, who identifies as a Muslim, expresses a desire for Islam to be worldwide, including in Germany. When asked if they would undermine the German constitution, they affirm that they would. Speaker 2 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, to which Speaker 0 explains that according to their beliefs, if Muslims are in the majority, they are commanded to take over Germany, even by force if necessary. Speaker 1 asks about the treatment of homosexuals, and Speaker 0 suggests they would be thrown off a mountain, indicating support for the death penalty. Speaker 2 inquires about the possibility of reforming Islam, but Speaker 0 asserts that it remains unchanged. When asked about Germans resisting the acceptance of Sharia, Speaker 0 states that they would be attacked and violence would be used if they do not comply.

A person asks why Speaker 1 lives in a white country instead of a Muslim country. Speaker 1 says it's not a white country, and they live in the UK to tell people about Islam, engaging in interfaith dialogue with people of different faiths. Speaker 2 asks if a Christian could move to a Muslim country and freely convert people from Islam to Christianity. Speaker 1 responds that under Islamic law, this is not allowed because Christianity is false and Islam is the truth, and Islam doesn't allow harmful ideologies to infiltrate its people. Speaker 3 states that when tolerance is one-way, it leads to cultural suicide. They say that when they can fly to Saudi Arabia with a Bible and cross, go to Mecca, and attend a church, then "we're good to go," but until then, it's important to understand the objectives and goals that Islam has set forward.

Jizya is taken from the non-Muslims, the combatants, the enemies of Allah, in exchange for something other than a council or road tax. In this framing, we pay with our blood, with our lives, in exchange for protection. This is how the commentators of the Quran describe it, with the classical fiqh scholars (fuqaha) detailing the rationale. The payment is because you are rebellious against Allah and His Messenger, and, out of mercy, Islam requires you to pay Jizya. The amount is not specified here, as the fuqaha have explained there are details about the rate, but the core principle is the exchange for protection rather than battlefield bloodshed. When you pay the Jizya to the Imam, the commander of the Mujahideen, or whoever is in charge at the time, you are guaranteed protection for yourself, your property, your family, and your children, and you will have defense against any enemy that attacks you. The speaker then offers an example to illustrate the point: in 2024, an article in The Guardian reported that Islamophobia and attacks against Muslims in that year rose to approximately 73 percent. The comparison is made to other taxes—Roe tax, council tax, green taxes—emphasizing that even with these taxes, a value is not necessarily provided to Muslims. In contrast, Jizya is presented as a protection in exchange for the payment, ensuring that if an outsider attacks you, you will be protected. The speaker reiterates that this is not about shedding blood on the battlefield for non-Muslims; rather, Jizya is paid, and in return, protection is guaranteed. The underlying rationale is tied to rebellion against Allah and His Rasul, with the aim of offering mercy through a contractual protection arrangement. The discussion centers on the concept that the non-Muslims who pay Jizya receive security for their lives and property and a defense against external threats in exchange for their non-participation in the military obligations required of Muslims.

The speakers discuss the possibility of offensive jihad if Muslims were to become a majority in Great Britain. They emphasize the importance of having enough authority and power to implement Sharia and take authority away from those who currently hold it. The concept of power is repeatedly emphasized throughout the conversation.

In this video, the speaker provides a brief overview of Islamic history. They explain that Prophet Mohammed initially preached in Mecca but failed to gain many followers. He then went to Medina to recruit Jews, but when they refused, he turned against them and started killing and expelling them. Islam transformed from a spiritual movement to a political one. Jews and Christians became second-class citizens and had to pay a tax to stay alive. They were also restricted in various ways, such as not being able to ring church bells or gather publicly. Jews were identified with a yellow star, while Christians wore a belt.

Mohammad's three steps were immigrate, increase, eliminate. The speaker frames immigration as a path to increasing followers and demanding political accommodation, then eliminating the previous culture. In Detroit, Fazl bought houses on the street, has a wife in each one; the wives go to welfare, and the more kids they have, the larger the checks get; he's living like a king at state expense, and the kids in the street are his. He's practicing Sharia law on his block. They take over blocks, vote in the school boards, police, and fire departments; in Hamtramck they gain influence, including the majority of the city council; minarets and calls to prayer five times a day are described as no different than Pakistan. The pattern is immigrants first seem nice, then burqas appear; neighborhoods change; random violence occurs with no witnesses; neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city, block by block, they take over countries—Egypt, Syria, Turkey, North Africa, Spain.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 2 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 suggests that when Muslims are the majority, they should use force if necessary. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the existence of a liberal Islam. Speaker 0 confirms that Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics. Speaker 1 asks about the means to establish Sharia and an Islamic state, excluding acts of terrorism. Speaker 0 suggests using force when Muslims are in the majority. Speaker 2 appreciates Speaker 0's honesty and shares similar thoughts, having advocated for Islamization in Germany. They emphasize the importance of Islamic practices in mosques.

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

Speaker 0: "What message do you want to give to the far right people? The message I wanna give to the far right people is we're here to take over your country. You can't stop us. You can try, but we're here to uphold Sharia law and yeah. That's it."

The speaker believes that if the American public is properly informed about Sharia law, they will support it and demand its implementation, overriding the agendas of politicians and senators. The speaker envisions a future where Sharia rules the world, and Islam is the only accepted religion.

Speaker 0: I’d implement Sharia in Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance? Speaker 0: Definitely. If you are in the majority, as you’ve explained, we are commanded to take over Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: By what means do you want to install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? Speaker 0: If Muslims are in the majority, then if it must be done with violence. Speaker 1: That’s it. Speaker 0: That’s it. For sure. Speaker 1: You would then invite, so to speak, the German population to adopt Islam, to accept Sharia. What happens if the Germans resist? If they do not want it? Then they will be attacked. Then violence will be used. Speaker 0: For sure, yes. Speaker 1: And then violence will be employed. Speaker 0: If you don’t listen, then yes.

Some Muslims claim that Islam was never spread by force, but this is not true. In the past, Islam was indeed spread through the use of the sword. Turkey, for example, was not originally a Muslim region. Muslims came with force, established Sharia law, and many people converted to Islam to avoid conflict.

Die Diskussion dreht sich um die Einführung der Scharia in Deutschland. "Ich will die Scharia in Deutschland auf jeden Fall." "Jeder, der sich als Muslim bezeichnet, muss die Scharia wollen auf der ganzen Welt." "Würdest Du die deutsche Verfassung aushebeln, wenn Du die Gelegenheit hättest – Auf jeden Fall." Es wird gefragt, wie man aus Deutschland einen islamischen Staat machen könnte: "Laut den Werken ist das so, dass man, wenn man in der Mehrheit ist, ... wir dafür befohlen, Deutschland einzunehmen, auf jeden Fall." "Also es ist den Muslim, das ist eine islamische Pflicht, auch Deutschland einzunehmen." Es wird der Liberalismus diskutiert: "Es gibt diesen liberalen Islam." "Wie könnte man ... Mitteln wollt ihr die Scharia hier installieren und islamischen Staat machen? Mit welchen Mitteln? Ich rede nicht von Anschlägen ... Das ist falsch. Ich rede davon, wenn die Muslime in der Überzahl ist ... mit Gewalt." Speaker 2 erinnert daran: "Deutschland verdient eine satte Islamisierung." Die Scharia wird als "Regelung, wie Du betest, wie Du fastest, wie Du zu Hadsch gehst" beschrieben und als "in jeder Moschee lebendig." English translation: The discussion centers on introducing Sharia in Germany. "I want Sharia in Germany, in any case." "Every person who calls themselves a Muslim must want Sharia in the world." "Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance – In any case." It asks how to make Germany an Islamic state: "According to the works, if we are in the majority, we are commanded to take Germany, in any case." "So it is, for Muslims, an Islamic duty to take Germany as well." The liberalism debate is touched: "There is this liberal Islam." "With what means would you install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? With which means? I’m not talking about attacks ... That is wrong. I’m talking about when the Muslims are in the majority, then, if necessary, with violence." Speaker 2 adds: "Germany deserves a solid Islamization." Sharia is described as "the rules of how you pray, how you fast, how you perform Hajj" and as "alive in every mosque."

Muslims are encouraged to fight Jews and Christians for expansion. Peace with non-Muslims is not possible as Islam is a warrior religion. Living in non-Muslim countries like Britain is seen as being in a state of war. Treaties with non-Muslims can be temporary and should end when Muslims become stronger.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality, suggesting they should be thrown off a mountain. Speaker 1 confirms that this is supported by a Hadith. Speaker 0 also mentions the destruction of buildings as a form of punishment, indicating support for the death penalty.

The speaker states that instead of force, laws are now being used, citing Canada's Islamophobia law M103. Another speaker says the only options are "ballot or bullet" and that participating in democracy is now their "jihad." Voting is now considered an obligatory action, a "jihad" to elect people who want Sharia law. It's claimed that in the last U.S. election, over 800 Muslim candidates ran for office. One speaker suggests that within six years, there could be 50 Muslims in Congress, replacing the current system with people who represent the prophet.

The speaker asks if the other person would accept Islam if "the great white hope" did. The response is no, because the person is Christian. They have looked into Islam to understand it better, but do not trust it. They claim that Islam teaches its followers to lie and deceive Christians and Jews, who are seen as infidels that should be destroyed. They believe Muslims want to conquer the world. The speaker asks why Muslims would want to conquer the world.

Speaker 0 describes a conversation with a Somali neighbor about what he calls "Somalian fraud" in Minnesota. The neighbor explains that many Somalis come from clan-based and Muslim-majority backgrounds with distinct beliefs about spoils, subjugation, and taxation. He says that, in Somalia, Muslims believe the spoils of war are rightfully theirs and that, when they subjugate non-believers, they impose a tax on them. He asserts that Somalis in Minnesota view their “plunder” as something that non-believers pay to them, effectively framing it as a tax paid by white people to Somalis and Muslims. The neighbor further claims that Somalis “do not comprehend the Western laws” and do not see them as competing with the Sharia law they practice. He explains that the outrage over fraud is hard for them to grasp because, in their belief system, these actions are permitted. He also states that in their religion, they are permitted to lie, and that their behavior in Minnesota—being outraged when fraud is exposed—aligns with teachings that permit lying, taxing non-believers, and plundering because it is viewed as rightfully theirs. The speaker reflects that this perspective might make sense if one is raised under one belief system and moves to another, and notices dissonance with Western norms. He adds a postscript noting that the neighbor suggested people might be upset about issues like marrying very young girls, pointing to cultural practices they say have been happening in Somalia. In sum, the speaker relays a neighbor’s claim that Somalis view Western laws as subordinate to their Sharia-based beliefs, justify exploitation as rightful “plunder” and taxation of non-believers, and may excuse deception as permissible, framing these actions as consistent with their religious and cultural background.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 replies affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality according to their beliefs. Speaker 1 confirms that it is part of Islam, citing past instances of punishment.

The speaker outlines a three-step pattern: immigrate, increase, eliminate. Immigrate as a religious refugee, increase the number of followers and demand political accommodation, and then eliminate the previous culture. In Detroit, listeners report a ministry to pregnant mothers where a Muslim household shows up with a present and a room with multiple pregnant Muslim mothers, all pregnant by the same man who is practicing Sharia law in his house. Another account describes Fazl buying several houses on a street, with a wife in each house; he visits wives who are at welfare offices, and the more children they have, the larger their welfare checks, enabling him to live like a king at state expense, with his many children playing in the street and identified as his. The speaker claims he is practicing Sharia law on the block, and that his influence expands to take over more blocks, leading to votes in the school board and the establishment of Sharia in the schools. The pattern purportedly continues as more blocks are taken over, with influence reaching the police department and fire department, and ultimately a majority of the city council in Hamtramck, Detroit, including minarets and calls to prayer five times a day, described as no different than Pakistan. The speaker explains the trajectory: initial immigrants are nice and non-threatening, leading to the belief that there is nothing to fear. As more Muslims move in and form a connected community, an Imam advises becoming more serious and fundamental in practice, followed by the appearance of burkas. Communities resist moving out, but violence by Muslim youth occurs with no witnesses because Muslim families do not testify against other Muslim families on behalf of non-Muslim residents. Over time, neighborhoods are claimed block by block, city by city, until entire regions are taken over, a process said to have occurred over fourteen hundred years, with historical references to conquests of Egypt (formerly Coptic Christian), Syria (Christian), Turkey (Christian), North Africa, and Spain, which supposedly was held for seven hundred years until Spaniards drove them out.

When Muslims conquer a neighboring country, the prophet advises calling them to Islam first. If they refuse, they are obligated to pay taxes in exchange for Muslim protection. This ensures they can live peacefully in their homes and country, following Sharia law by not engaging in activities like opening nightclubs or engaging in fornication. However, if they still refuse, then fighting becomes necessary. If captured, they become slaves and their land is taken. The speaker believes that in the next few decades, Muslims will become stronger and offer these options to non-Muslims.