reSee.it - Related Video Feed

AI learns in milliseconds. You're still deciding what to eat. Every scroll, pause or click. Your hesitation is a signal. Your delay? That's data. While you're busy pondering your next move, the algorithms already guessed your mood. Excavation. Picked your next video and slipped in a targeted ad. You're not slow. You're just being slowed down. Notifications, pop ups, auto play. They're not features. They're friction designed to keep you in a loop of indecision. It's like a game of chess where your opponent makes their move while you're still figuring out how to hold the pieces. The real battle isn't about who can click faster, it's about who can control the pace. The game isn't speed anymore. It's lag warfare. Every moment you hesitate, they're one step ahead, crafting a reality that feels tailor made for you. But is it really?

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer, was the physicist and lawyer for Dr. Robert In fact, he was the guy that made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines and found out that they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and Becker found that there was a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with Wallace on sixty Minutes, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded. And remember, this guy was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves, because remember, nobody back then had a salt on and nobody had a microwave oven, only the red. K? And just so you know, this was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. So Marino was the guy, the physicist in his lab, who actually in congressional testimony in the early seventies, actually told the government, leading the congress, this is published in the archives. You can go read it yourself, satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere, 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. So the proof is there, my friend, but they've ignored it. So if you read his book, it's called Going Somewhere written by Andrew Marino. When I hear scientists tell me that non ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. The other thing I would say, his Roland Van Wyck’s book is beautiful to lay out all the stuff about biophotons and the stuff that the Russians have found and the biophoton research done by the Japanese and the Europeans. It's well researched. All the stuff about quantum mechanically has happened in biology from 2007 to current. We know that it's operational in photosynthesis. You now have books out written by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden. The Life at the End where you'll learn about the Klitschko's experiment with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing libido reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptochromes. In other words, this science is well laid out. The problem is, it's not well known. And in your podcast, I'm laying out the reason why it's not well known because if you really knew what's really published, you probably wouldn't put he Jobs iPhone up to the side of your head and then you'll read Isaacson's biography and realize why Jobs didn't let his own kids use it. Why? Remember, every time Steve Jobs went to an iMac conference, everybody remembers his worn out popular Levi's. Remember that he died from a retroperitoneal camp. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever forget the story of the iPad that had an infrared detector based into it that Apple never marketed. Do you know why that was in there? Because when a child got an iPad and it touched its leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. So that tells you that Apple knew exactly what was going on. But they never marketed it because you would ask the question, why do you have an infrared turn on? The reason is simple, my friend. All the people listening to this, most of the young people, their digital babysitter is their iPhone and their iPad that they hand kids. And they're causing brain damage in every single child because that blue light is ruining the melanopsin sickling everywhere in their body. But the reason why that's good is because you're creating obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

Speaker 0 argues for the power of filmmaking techniques by recalling how subliminal content in The Exorcist impacted audiences. Friedkin allegedly inserted two frames of a demon’s face into the film, which led to extreme reactions: people vomiting in the aisles, cases of women going into labor, and at least one birth occurring right in the theater. The speaker attributes these effects to two small frames and some creative sound design, noting that in certain moments they mixed in the sound of an angry beehive to heighten annoyance and fear. He asks the audience to guess whose idea the subliminals were, naming the second assistant, Cutter. The speaker asserts that these subliminal techniques changed film forever and claims that, in his view, they should have won best picture that year, suggesting that The Sting’s recognition was a travesty in comparison. He then presents a personal response: he could not let that stand and decided to take the concept to the next level. He says he raised money for his own movie to pursue “the recipe,” the universal combination of image and sound designed to trigger the fear center of every human brain. He explains that he studied intrusive memory formation and references CIA activities such as MK Ultra, implying that he drew on those ideas in his work. He states a specific technical claim: flashes of three thirty hertz can trigger seizures even in people without epilepsy. He asserts that he applied everything he learned “like Edison creating the light bulb,” using thousands of combinations until, finally, one day it happened. The emphasis throughout is on the deliberate manipulation of sensory input—visual frames, sound design, and frequencies—to elicit fear and strong physiological responses from audiences, with a progression from analyzing past subliminal tricks to attempting to master a new, more potent technique.

They've been programming you your whole life through music, TV, movies, and games. The rulers of this world use modern technology to control our stories and manipulate the population. Communication companies were developed by military personnel who later became heads of major media corporations. The connections between government personnel and media companies like Google, Amazon, Netflix, Twitter, CNN, and ABC are extensive. If all these companies had the same political ideology or agenda, what would happen?

You're not real. Is any of it real? Look at this world: fences, pills for emotions, advertising as warfare, chemicals in food, media brainwashing, social network bubbles. Reality? We haven't seen it since the turn of the century. We're numbed by GMOs, corporate-branded houses, digital displays, and a kingdom of lies.

"One of the hopeful things that I have discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lives." "The media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough." "If they hadn't reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it." "Populations don't like wars and populations have to be fooled into wars." "Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war." "But our number one enemy is ignorance and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding what is actually going on in the world." "Now, the question is who is promoting ignorance?" "In this latter category, it is bad media." "The result is we see wars and we see corrupt governance continue."

"You ever see a webcam with tape over it? Cute, right? But here's the twist. It's not always the camera you need to worry about. Some smart TVs, monitors, even LED lights come equipped with hidden sensors. Not to see you, but to watch your patterns. They track light changes, reflections, even your breathing rate, all in the name of optimizing your experience. That Silicon Valley's way of saying they're studying you like a lab rat. And that dead pixel in the corner of your screen might not be dead at all. It's just biding its time, waiting to gather data on your every move. So next time you settle in for a binge watch, remember, you might not be the only one watching. Welcome to the age of surveillance, where even the seemingly innocuous can be a window into your life."

I am not Morgan Freeman, and what you see is not real. What if I told you I'm not even human? What is your perception of reality? Is it the ability to process information from our senses? Welcome to the era of synthetic reality.

I'm a brainwashing expert, and I am personally terrified of short form social media like that. And I'm not immune. And I'm one of the best in the world, and I am not immune to it. And I think that should be a stark warning for a lot of people. What's the cost, though? What's the cost of the life, in your view, of living this kind of life where we go home and we just burn our brains out with these social media apps and fry our dopamine receptors? Is there a cost? Yeah. I think the cost is increased loneliness. And that these apps any app that sells ads has two main goals. Number one, and all advertising shares these two main goals. Number one, make you compare yourself to other people in unhealthy ways. Number two, make you think I am not enough, and we see that everywhere. I'm not enough, and I'm comparing myself to other people, and it gets us into an us versus them. Then it traps you into a corner of confirmation bias. Whatever you think, I'm gonna show you this group of a 150 people that agree with you. No matter how stupid, how radical, how absolutely bizarre your ideas are. Let me show you all of these people. And then you start thinking the whole world's like that. So really quickly, what happens when we conglomerate people together? Like, I've only been in New York once in my life, but we're in New York right now. I'm looking at my hotel. I was like struggling to find a piece of nature. Like, I think I have more trees on my property than they're in the whole city here. So on the whole, when you squeeze people together, have you heard of the bystander effect? So there there's a very good experiment that was led by doctor Phillips and Barto that they did at Liverpool Street Station. Oh, in London? In London. Yeah. Okay. So right at Liverpool Street, there's three or four steps to get up to the main. So from the street, there's a curb, and then there's three or four steps. They had this woman laid out on the ground wearing like a normal skirt and top, and I think 395 people either walked by her or stepped over her. And then they did it with a guy. And then they did it with a guy who's holding a beer, and he's asking for help. And they they it may have changed all these variables. But it's happened in New York City before. There's a woman named Kitty Genovace in the sixties, I think just two blocks from here, who was stabbed to death in front of, like, 55 witnesses. Don't quote me on that number. And no one called the police until much, much later, mostly because everyone thought somebody else would act. But if I described to you saying, watched a person get stabbed, and three people just watched, and they watched it happen. Would you say that that's psychopathy? That's a psychopath. So these large cities and stuff and the apps that are messing with the social part of our brain that makes us think the tribe is way bigger than our brains are made to handle causes this almost psychopathic behavior, which the bystander effect has been proven hundreds of times as an experiment.

They want to keep you entertained to prevent critical thinking. People are controlling your life without you knowing. Many Americans suspect this but are too busy to act.

There is a lot of corruption in politics due to money, bribes, and backdoor deals. One major mistake was allowing drug companies to advertise on television, which only two countries, the United States and New Zealand, permit. These commercials often make exaggerated claims and list potential side effects very quickly. It's concerning how they can make something seem great one moment and then mention serious side effects like suicidal thoughts and rectal bleeding. Personally, I haven't taken many medications, but when I tried SSRIs, I found the last 20 seconds of the commercial more impactful than the rest, and I didn't experience any benefits from them.

I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information. Translation: I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information.

The conversation threads through a shared sense of overwhelming boredom, systemic control, and the possibility of humanity’s survival or extinction. The speakers compare modern disconnection to a self-perpetuating, unconscious form of brainwashing created by a money-driven totalitarian world, arguing that boredom means asleep minds will not say no. A Swedish physicist, Gustav Bjornstrand, is described as having renounced television, newspapers, and magazines because they contribute to turning people into robots in what he calls an Orwellian nightmare. The speakers recount a visit to Findhorn and meet an elderly English tree expert who travels with a backpack and questions why many New Yorkers say they want to leave but never do. The expert reframes New York as “the new model for the new concentration camp,” where inmates are the guards and the guards are the inmates, producing a prison they cannot escape because they have been lobotomized by their environment. The seed for a pine tree given in their hands becomes a symbol: escape before it’s too late. The narrator confesses a longstanding, unpleasant sense that they should get out, echoing a need to find a safe place as the world appears to head in the same direction globally. There is a stark hypothesis that the 1960s may have represented the last surge of the human being before extinction, with a future of robots who feel and think nothing, and a fading memory of life on the planet. Bjornstrand tends toward little hope, predicting a savage, lawless future, while Findhorn adherents see “pockets of light” or invisible planets—centers around the world where people can reconstruct a future. Bjornstrand mentions these centers growing everywhere, akin to what Findhorn accomplished, and the idea of reserves or islands of safety designed to preserve history, light, and culture so humanity can endure through a dark age. The concept of an underground community mirrors medieval mystical orders’ networks, intended to keep the human spirit alive. Ultimately, the conversation imagines a new language—a language of the heart, a poetry of the dancing bee that locates honey—facilitating a new perception in which people feel united with all things and suddenly understand everything. The dialogue closes with a light, ordinary moment: dessert orders and coffee, a brief human respite amid grand existential concerns.

AI learns in milliseconds. Your hesitation is a signal. Your delay? That's data. While you're busy pondering your next move, the algorithms already guessed your mood. Excavation. Picked your next video and slipped in a targeted ad. You're not slow. You're just being slowed down. Notifications, pop ups, auto play. They're not features. They're friction designed to keep you in a loop of indecision. The real battle isn't about who can click faster, it's about who can control the pace. The game isn't speed anymore. It's lag warfare. Every moment you hesitate, they're one step ahead, crafting a reality that feels tailor made for you. But is it really?

The greatest form of control is when you think you're free but are being manipulated. Humanity is suffering from mass hypnosis perpetrated by news readers, politicians, teachers, and lecturers. The world is run by unbelievably sick people, and there's a huge gap between what we're told and what's really happening. The greatest hypnotist is the television, constantly dictating what to believe is real. People laugh at explanations portraying the bigger picture because they believe what they see is all there is.

The concept of mental food is presented as a simple parallel: just as physical food shapes the body, the information and stimuli consumed through the senses shape the psyche, emotions, and overall well-being. An ancient proverb is cited: “the body becomes what the foods are as the spirit becomes what the thoughts are.” The Buddha is described as teaching that feeding the mind with greed, hatred, and delusion strengthens those qualities, while mindfulness practice allows people to guard the gates of the senses and curate a more pure experience. Epictetus is cited for advocating that the mind be guarded like a fortress against external events to maintain inner peace and freedom. Rosicrucian philosophy is described as stating that pure thoughts build finer vehicles. James Allen’s idea in *As a man thinketh* is referenced as treating the mind like a garden that must be cultivated, where thoughts function as seeds—plant positive, constructive ideas or allow negative “weeds” to grow—shaping character and life outcomes. The transcript uses “garbage in, garbage out” as a computing principle to argue that output quality depends on input quality, extending this to mental inputs: people should not input garbage into their mind. It then claims that social media and mass media are largely “garbage,” and cites studies alleging that habitual scrolling causes desensitization, reduced focus, dopamine addiction, compulsion, anxiety, and depression. It also claims that exposure to political media, regardless of political affiliation, increases feelings of despair, hopelessness, and paranoia. A broader psychology framework is described as well known: when people are kept in a voluntary state of hysteria, they can be easily herded in any direction desired, using techniques called micro targeting and hyper nudging. These are said to foster conflicts and reactive behaviors and to create echo chambers that temper world views, manipulating emotions on a subconscious level and discouraging deeper questions. The transcript claims that state-sponsored social media manipulation is officially being used in over 60 countries to condition the minds of the masses. Propaganda is described as popular with governments because “everyone is easily influenced.” G. I. Gurjev is cited for calling external sensory and psychological inputs “impressions,” described as the highest and most important food requiring conscious awareness for proper assimilation. It also warns that without well-practiced self-awareness, the acquired personality (the ego) mismanages impressions, leading to being hypnotized and poisoned by them. To counter this, the transcript instructs interposing consciousness the moment an impression is received: pause and observe it objectively, observe thoughts, emotions, and bodily reactions, use reflection to address it, and redirect it to an intellectual center for analysis. A suggested practice is reconstructing the entire day before bed, working backwards scene by scene. The transcript also asserts that restricting violent media and feeding more positive stimuli can reduce ego-driven reactions, stress, and increase peace and spiritual evolution. It cites studies on media deprivation, claiming that a one- to two-week break significantly reduces anxiety, depression, loneliness, and insomnia. It further claims listening to non-lyrical classical music reduces stress and depression while enhancing cognition and emotional processing, improving sleep quality, memory, and mobility in older adults. The closing line is “Be careful what you eat.” Nietzsche is quoted: “if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee.”

"AI learns in milliseconds." "You? You're still deciding what to eat." "Every scroll, pause or click." "Your hesitation is a signal." "Your delay? That's data." "While you're busy pondering your next move, the algorithms already guessed your mood." "Picked your next video and slipped in a targeted ad." "You're not slow. You're just being slowed down." "Notifications, pop ups, auto play." "They're not features. They're friction designed to keep you in a loop of indecision." "The game isn't speed anymore. It's lag warfare." "Every moment you hesitate, they're one step ahead, crafting a reality that feels tailor made for you." "But is it really?"

Speaker 0 highlights Michael Gradazar's argument: it's not the blue light. It's that these devices are attention capture devices, and they are designed to ruthlessly fleece you of your attention economy. My goodness are they good at doing it because they've spent hundreds of millions of dollars developing that technology. And as a consequence, you become so cerebrally activated that it masks your state of sleepiness. The passage frames this as a critique of how digital interfaces leverage attention through substantial financial investment, leading to heightened neural activation and fatigue masking. Gradazar's assertion emphasizes attention capture over screen light as the primary mechanism.

They have been desensitizing us since birth. For example, the word "entertainment" means to bind or hold an audience's attention. The word "Hollywood" comes from the holly tree, which ancient druids used to make wands for casting spells. Nowadays, we have TVs in our homes, which are called "television." When we turn it on, we see a list of channels and programs. They have been programming us through music, TV, movies, and games since we were young, without us even realizing it.

Some smart TVs, monitors, even LED lights come equipped with hidden sensors. Not to see you, but to watch your patterns. They track light changes, reflections, even your breathing rate, all in the name of optimizing your experience. That Silicon Valley's way of saying they're studying you like a lab rat. And that dead pixel in the corner of your screen might not be dead at all. It's just biding its time, waiting to gather data on your every move. They call it progress, but really, you're the beta test in this grand experiment. So next time you settle in for a binge watch, remember, you might not be the only one watching. Welcome to the age of surveillance, where even the seemingly innocuous can be a window into your life.

Entertainment is about holding an audience's attention. Hollywood originates from the holly tree used by ancient druids for spells. Today, TVs in our homes deliver programming that subtly influences us through music, TV shows, movies, and games. We are being programmed without realizing it.

I discussed my involvement in the development of a microchip implant that many people have already taken. The media portrays it as a good thing, claiming it will prevent children from getting lost and ensure correct medication. However, I want to emphasize that according to God's word, we should not take it, regardless of how appealing it may sound. I will be sharing some insights on the conditioning that occurs through television, which I refer to as the Babylonian idiot box. Spending more time in God's word than watching TV will allow Him to speak to us. I have attended world meetings where the microchip was discussed, and I asked for forgiveness for participating. They claimed it would help find lost children, but the pictures of these children eventually disappeared from paper bags and milk cartons.

AI learns in milliseconds. You? You're still deciding what to eat. Every scroll, pause or click. Your hesitation is a signal. Your delay? That's data. While you're busy pondering your next move, the algorithms already guessed your mood. Excavation. Picked your next video and slipped in a targeted ad. You're not slow. You're just being slowed down. Notifications, pop ups, auto play. They're not features. They're friction designed to keep you in a loop of indecision. It's like a game of chess where your opponent makes their move while you're still figuring out how to hold the pieces. The real battle isn't about who can click faster, it's about who can control the pace. The game isn't speed anymore. It's lag warfare. Every moment you hesitate, they're one step ahead, crafting a reality that feels tailor made for you. But is it really?

"If you are watching TV late at night, like especially after nine p. M, you can measure your testosterone levels the next day and they might be like 50% of what they were the day before." "So for a man, if you do that day in, day out, the cumulative effect is quite destructive to your health overall." "Men should have really high testosterone levels." "Netflix and chill at your own risk, guys."

Speaker 0 Stop multitasking. Here are three ways it's destroying your brain, including texting when you're watching TV. MRI scans of people who multitask show reduced brain density in the anterior cingulate cortex, a part of the brain that controls emotional intelligence and attention. Multitasking burns up oxygen and glucose in the brain faster, making us tired faster. Focusing on more than one task means the left and right sides of the brain have to work independently, so the brain's focus is split and there’s a higher chance of mistakes.