TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A documentary called "Kidnap and Kill, an FBI Terror Plot" examines the case of 13 suspects arrested in the plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, including alleged right-wing militia members. The defense claims the FBI, through undercover agents and informants, masterminded the plot and entrapped the defendants. One person said the FBI created the crime. The film aims to expose what the filmmaker believes is the FBI's dangerous methodology, with one person stating that the FBI is using the same methodology as terrorists. The filmmaker, an independent journalist, has been reporting on the case for four years, conducting over 20 interviews across 8 states. The project is crowd-sourced and needs further funding for editing, production, marketing, and advertising. The filmmaker urges viewers to donate at kandkfilm.com/donate, emphasizing the urgency of releasing the film to expose what they believe the government is doing to American citizens. The filmmaker believes this story is bigger than Michigan and is a warning to all Americans.

Multiple undercover agents and informants have been involved in various incidents throughout history. For example, in Michigan, there were more informants and agents than actual kidnappers in a right-wing militia plot. The FBI has also infiltrated left-wing groups like Occupied Cleveland. On January 6th, a man named Ray Epps, who was seen leading the charge into the Capitol, has raised suspicions of being an informant. Footage shows him pushing a large MAGA sign towards police, while others who touched the sign were arrested and charged. The Gateway Pundit, an online news site, has been investigating these incidents and believes that the government and various agencies were involved in the violence that day.

The FBI's involvement in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case revealed that out of 14 people, 12 were informants. These informants allegedly convinced two individuals to attempt to kidnap the governor, resembling a misguided role-playing game. The situation highlights a saying that suggests the FBI often targets individuals they have a hand in creating.

Recently, some police officers testified about their trauma during the January 6th events. One officer described being outnumbered and attacked while protecting the Capitol. However, it turns out he wasn't in uniform or acting as a Capitol Police officer; he was an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation challenges the narrative surrounding the events, suggesting it was not as strong or truthful as presented. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real story and identify those truly responsible.

A former senior FBI official, Steven D'Antwono, voluntarily testified before the judiciary committee, claiming that the Mar-a-Lago raid was illegitimate. He highlighted several deviations from protocol and accused the FBI of exacerbating political tensions. D'Antwono is known for overseeing the Whitmer kidnapping plot and the January 6th pipe bomb incident. Despite his resignation in disgrace, he felt compelled to expose the FBI's corruption. More revelations are expected from him. These charges emphasize that when the term "national security" is used, it often masks the actions of corrupt individuals in power.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

BuzzFeed has just confirmed that the FBI had a, quote, “hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. In other words, the FBI helped plan it.” An FBI informant organized meetings to kidnap the governor. Another informant, quote, prodded the alleged mastermind of the kidnapping plot to advance his plan. And text from an FBI agent directed an informant to draw people into the conspiracy. In the end, it looks like there were more FBI snitches, informants, people working with the FBI involved in the plot than weren't. It was an FBI plot. So what does this suggest about January 6? We know there were FBI informants in the crowd. We know that for certain. Why can't we know their involvement in January 6 now that we're getting a sense of their involvement in this fake kidnapping plot? Julie Kelly of American Greatness discussed the Lansing April 2020 protest mirroring January 6, with militia groups in military gear, police stood down, firearms, and viral photographs. She cited the plausibility of FBI infiltration before January 6 and Revolver News Darren Beatty's article. The discussion called for leaders to question Christopher Wray.

The FBI is being accused of engineering a terrorism plot in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case. An army veteran named Dan Chappell was approached by the FBI and paid over $60,000 to assemble a group of right-wing extremists. The FBI created a Facebook group called Patriot 3 Percenters and had Chappell attend a protest at the Michigan State Capitol. They then introduced an undercover agent posing as an explosives expert and tried to convince the group to kidnap Whitmer. However, several members of the group refused and expressed their desire to restore the constitutional republic instead. The FBI continued to push the kidnapping plot, even suggesting killing the governor. The details of the case were revealed in court testimony.

The speaker believes Thomas Crooks, like the Gretchen Whitmer case, was set up by the FBI. In the Whitmer case, an undercover FBI employee posed as an explosives expert and showed a video of an SUV being blown up, produced by the FBI. The speaker questions how Crooks, a 20-year-old, acquired the skills to build pipe bombs, suggesting he was likely in communication with an FBI informant, undercover agent, or DHS asset, especially given his training at a rifle range used by government employees. The speaker believes the FBI is creating domestic violent extremists, not targeting or arresting them. She is confident the pipe bombs were planted shortly before being found and that Crooks had a federal handler, fitting the profile of a loner who suddenly becomes an expert in explosives and drones.

Recently, some police officers spoke about their trauma during the January events. One officer described being outnumbered, beaten, and called a traitor. However, it turns out he was not in uniform and was actually an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation undermines the narrative presented, suggesting it was not based on truth. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real culprits behind the events.

The speaker discusses how they can potentially entrap individuals, including pro-lifers, through manipulation and social media tactics. They mention targeting political commentator Alex Jones and causing financial harm to him. Additionally, they reveal that FBI agents were present undercover at the January 6th Capitol riot. The speaker implies that the FBI's involvement in such events is kept secretive.

Multiple federal agents and informants have been involved in undercover operations targeting both right-wing and left-wing groups. In the case of the Michigan militia plot to kidnap the governor, there were more informants and undercover agents than actual kidnappers. Similarly, in the Occupy Cleveland case, anarchists were led by an FBI informant. On January 6th, a man named Ray Epps, who was seen leading the crowd and pushing a large MAGA sign, has not been arrested despite others being charged for similar actions. The Gateway Pundit has been covering these incidents and believes that government agents were involved in instigating the violence. The investigation into the events of January 6th is ongoing.

President tweeted about the need to liberate Michigan. FBI director testified that white right-wing groups pose the greatest threat of domestic terrorism. FBI arrested militiamen planning to kidnap the governor. Attorney General announced charges against 13 members of 2 militia groups. The alleged terror plot was stopped before it could be carried out. The behavior of these individuals is disturbing and reminiscent of ISIS. Failure to condemn them is concerning. FBI and law enforcement are praised for uncovering and stopping these domestic terrorists. Four men accused of plotting to kidnap the governor were not convicted, as FBI informants were involved in planning and encouraging the attack. One informant even suggested similar plans to other groups in different states.

Trust in the government is at an all-time low, particularly regarding institutions like the FBI. The Whitmer Fednapping Hoax and other scandals illustrate a pattern of government involvement and corruption, culminating in the events of January 6th, which I view as a pivotal moment in our history. There is substantial evidence suggesting government entrapment. It's a troubling situation, but with President Trump elected, we have a chance for change. It's crucial to get his cabinet approved, especially Kash Patel, and to pursue restorative justice for those affected by January 6th. I'm eager to discuss this further tonight.

The speaker explains that in the three months since Charlie Kirk’s murder, they have largely refrained from commenting publicly on the investigation. They say this is not due to lack of care or affection for Charlie, whom they knew well since his teenage years, but because they feel they don’t know more than others and want to avoid missteps given their personal connections to those involved. They name Candace Owens, Blake Neff, and Erica Kirk as people they know well and respect, and emphasize a desire to honor Charlie’s memory by seeking justice without criticizing others’ motives when people are sincerely pursuing the truth. They recount a three-hour conversation with Theo Vaughan during which the topic of Charlie Kirk’s case arose. They state they told Vaughan they do not trust the FBI, clarifying that this statement was not an accusation that the FBI is involved in Charlie’s assassination, and they did not intend to imply such. They acknowledge they like Dan Bongino and Cash Patel and do not believe they would intentionally cover up a murder, but they argue that the FBI, being at the top of the organization, is part of a large bureaucracy where some parts act independently from leadership. Therefore, liking individuals within the organization does not equate to trusting the FBI as a whole. The speaker asserts that, as a lesson of the 2024 election, many of the nation’s largest systems and institutions have rot and require reform. They contend that January 6 was a setup and that the FBI was key to that setup, stating it remains unclear whether everyone involved has been fired or punished. They insist that no American is under moral obligation to believe everything the government tells them, especially institutions with a documented history of wrongdoing, such as the FBI’s alleged crimes, manufacturing crimes, and distorting justice. They emphasize that the job of the FBI is to find out what happened, tell the public how they arrived at conclusions, and convince the public of the outcomes, rather than hiding behind national security or confidential sources. The speaker concludes by committing to avoid talking about topics they do not understand, to state things only as they know them, and to remain skeptical. They stress a duty to skepticism and to seek truth and justice without being swayed by tone or certainty from government officials. They reiterate love for Charlie and a wish for justice, while urging others to maintain scrutiny toward the investigation.

The FBI stopped an alleged terror plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Thirteen suspects were arrested, including alleged members of a right-wing militia. The FBI infiltrated and wiretapped the group after a tip that they were plotting against police and planning to attack the state capital to overthrow the government. An informant heard the suspects call Whitmer a tyrant and discuss taking her to a secret location in Wisconsin for a trial ending in execution. In the trial, two defendants were acquitted, and two received mistrials; none were convicted. The defense argued entrapment, claiming paid FBI informants incited the conduct. A senator questioned whether any FBI agents were disciplined after the case. The special agent in charge of the Whitmer case was promoted to the Washington DC office and now leads the January 6 investigation. The lead investigator in the Whitmer case was allegedly fired for beating his wife and making derogatory political posts about President Trump.

I was part of a group arrested for a plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer, but it was a setup by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be about the governor's cottage. I got charged with material support terrorism for taking a video. The government lied about my involvement. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice prevails.

Leading up to the 2020 election, Twitter had regular meetings with various government agencies, including the FBI, DOJ, DHS, and DNI, to engage in unconstitutional censorship. The FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million to censor stories like the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. There was a corrupt relationship between the FBI and Twitter, with former FBI officials joining Twitter and creating their own communication channels. Polls show that if people had known about the Hunter Biden laptop story, 53% would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. This is election meddling and collusion by the FBI, funded by taxpayers. The FBI's politicization extends beyond Twitter, as seen in their targeting of parents at school board meetings, which was prompted by the White House and the secretary of education. This corruption must be addressed to protect the American people from government weaponization.

The federal government claims to have foiled 17 terrorist plots in the past ten years. However, these plots were actually created and controlled by the government itself. Undercover agents targeted vulnerable individuals, often those with Muslim backgrounds, enticing them into participation. While no harm ever came to anyone, these individuals were convicted for crimes based on actions orchestrated by the government. This raises serious questions about the ethics and legality of such entrapment, the misuse of law enforcement resources, and the erosion of freedom when the government punishes thoughts rather than actions. We are left with a false sense of security, paying for a government that creates threats to then claim it is stopping them. This practice, far from keeping us safe, undermines the rule of law and limits our freedoms.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

The FBI stopped an alleged terror plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Thirteen suspects were arrested, including alleged members of a right-wing militia. The FBI infiltrated and wiretapped the group after a tip that they were plotting against police and planning to attack the state capital to overthrow the government. An informant heard the suspects call Whitmer a tyrant and discuss taking her to Wisconsin for a trial ending in execution. In the trial, two defendants were acquitted, and two received mistrials; none were convicted. The defense argued entrapment, claiming FBI informants incited the conduct. A senator questioned whether any FBI agents were disciplined after the case. The special agent in charge of the Whitmer case was promoted to the Washington DC office and now leads the January 6 investigation. The lead investigator in the Whitmer case was allegedly fired for beating his wife and making derogatory political posts about President Trump.

The speaker explains that in the three months since Charlie Kirk was murdered, they have avoided public commentary on the murder investigation out of care for Charlie and respect for the people involved, many of whom they know personally and admire. They emphasize that their goal is truth and justice, and they would not criticize anyone sincerely trying to uncover what happened, recognizing that good motives can lead to wrong conclusions. They recount a three-hour conversation with Theo Vaughan that touched on distrust of the FBI. They clarify this did not mean they accused anyone of involvement in Charlie Kirk’s murder, but it gave them the chance to state that they do not trust the FBI. They distinguish personal trust in individuals (e.g., Dan Bongino, whom they like, and Cash Patel) from trust in the FBI as an institution, noting that parts of the FBI can act independently within a large bureaucracy, separate from leadership. The speaker argues that distrust is not about a general attack on political leadership but about systemic issues. They reference the 2024 election as evidence that major institutions may be corrupt or rot, and they point to January 6 as, in their view, a setup in which the FBI played a key role. They question whether everyone involved in that setup has faced consequences. They insist that no American is morally obligated to believe everything the government says, especially given a history of the FBI's alleged crimes, illicit participation in politics, manufacturing crimes, or distorting justice—claims they assert as part of the FBI’s track record, which, in their view, is counter to its mission to obtain justice through facts and then explain its conclusions. They argue that it is not enough to have government officials declare the truth; the public has the right or obligation to demand proof. A central concern is that the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s murder could be overshadowed by debates about what happened, allowing the FBI to go unchallenged or unaccountable. The speaker asserts that the FBI should tell, show, and convince the public about what happened, rather than hiding behind national security or confidential sources. Ultimately, they commit to avoiding statements they don’t understand, to staying out of the case, but to maintaining love for Charlie and a desire for justice, while urging others to remain skeptical. They conclude that skepticism is a duty and not something to be ashamed of.

Six right-wing militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer will go to trial soon. One member has already pleaded guilty and is expected to testify against the others. The case against these alleged extremists relies heavily on the involvement of government informants and undercover FBI agents, raising questions of entrapment. The FBI was aware of every aspect of the plot and even offered guidance on how to carry out the kidnapping. Despite this, Whitmer has gained sympathy as a victim of former President Donald Trump's rhetoric. However, the FBI agents and Michigan State Police Troopers involved in the operation were thanked by Whitmer herself.

Former FBI special agent Mike Jorman reveals in this documentary that the FBI fabricates cases to maintain fear in the public and gain power and funding. He explains that before 9/11, if he wanted to investigate individuals for terrorism, he would need to provide evidence of their affiliation with terrorist organizations, possession of weapons, and resources to acquire them. However, in recent cases, when he stated that the individuals had no affiliation, weapons, or resources, the FBI would initiate undercover operations, providing them with weapons, money, and the idea of an attack. Jorman believes this is a fabrication of cases to create a sense of seriousness and gain support.

The Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case from fall 2020 revealed troubling details about the FBI's involvement. Initially, Governor Whitmer announced that militia groups were plotting to kidnap her. However, testimony during the trial indicated that the FBI orchestrated much of the plot. An informant, Dan Chappell, was paid over $60,000 to recruit individuals for a fabricated conspiracy. Despite the FBI's efforts, many alleged plotters, including Adam Fox, rejected violent ideas and refused to take money for weapons. The FBI continued to push the narrative, even staging meetings and introducing undercover agents. Ultimately, the case raised serious questions about the FBI's tactics and the legitimacy of the charges against the defendants.