reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm Border Patrol agent Monica Cruz, and I'm blowing the whistle on a flawed system. Juvenile smugglers, or "foot guides," are repeatedly released back to Mexico after apprehension, allowing them to continue smuggling without consequences. One smuggler, "Timmy," has been apprehended and released over 20 times. Cartels recruit children through social media, even video games like Roblox, soliciting them for smuggling. These kids get paid to bring people across, knowing they'll likely be caught and sent back. They even use decoys. The Mexican consulate in Yuma is also involved, providing welfare checks but not assisting in verifying identities for prosecution. These kids idolize the cartel life. They're paid around $800-$1000 per person or $3000-$4000 per group but the cartels make around $10,000 per person smuggled. We need a change in US policy to hold these teenage foot guides accountable.

The speaker expresses frustration, stating they are the only one present who has found dead migrants abandoned by smugglers and witnessed the aftermath of human smuggling operations. They recall finding 19 dead migrants in a trailer, including a child who died in his father's arms, and witnessing the torture of those who couldn't pay smuggling fees. The speaker argues that talk of open borders and abolishing ICE encourages more people to make the dangerous journey, leading to more deaths and violence. They claim that 31% of women are raped during the journey. They believe that failing to close loopholes results in more women being raped and more children dying. The speaker states that people are dying at the hands of those who crossed the border due to open border policies.

A person stated they paid a cartel around $10,000. They believe the American people are right to be concerned about who is entering the country, because there's no guarantee that everyone is "good." They ask what if they are killers or psychopaths. They claim there is no security bill, security check, or background check. They express worry about who is crossing the border, stating that some people do not look normal.

Workers are reportedly striking because they are tired of hearing humans screaming and banging inside shipping containers. According to videos and reports, a major reason for the strike is the sound of children screaming from within these containers. The speaker expresses shock, stating they were unaware that human trafficking, specifically involving shipping containers, was such a significant issue. They emphasize that the workers' complaints involve hearing people being shipped and desperately trying to escape.

I've learned that human trafficking is a sinister issue, especially following natural disasters in third-world countries. Victims are transported in container ships, with only a small percentage of cargo being scanned. These containers can hold dozens of people with life support systems for extended journeys. Port workers are striking because they are frequently hearing the cries of people trapped inside these containers. The workers are not equipped to deal with this. Ports are major hubs vulnerable to criminal infiltration. Checks are difficult and criminals exploit the containers. Smart containers with tracking technology are needed to monitor their status and security, as no single country can combat this problem alone.

I'm 47 years old and have a unique story. I've died four times from smoking fentanyl powder in Seattle, where I was a drug dealer for two cartels during COVID-19. I'm taking the CIA to the Supreme Court for their role in bringing fentanyl across the border. I've witnessed this firsthand as a dealer. Regarding the border crisis, I believe fentanyl doesn't come from individuals crossing the border but rather in railroad cars. Homeland Security officers often overlook these shipments, possibly due to pressure or payments from the CIA. While I can't speculate on their motives, I know the wealthy elite are involved in funding the CIA and influencing their actions.

People who are determined to move to another country will always find a way, regardless of the risks involved. The concern of potential ISIS members infiltrating is valid, but it is unlikely that they would go through the same routes as asylum seekers or highly motivated individuals. Politicians often use immigrants as a scapegoat for the country's problems, blaming them for dissatisfaction, economic decline, high energy costs, and inflation. This tactic is nothing new.

The speaker questions why media outlets like Virgin Media and RTE do not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide. Translation: The speaker questions why the media does not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide.

An individual claims to have made $120,000 last year but suggests Border Patrol agents could passively allow illegal activity to continue for personal benefit. They assert some agents may face financial ruin. The speaker references Lincoln Riley and suggests that signing certain files contributes to "blood on our hands." They imply a moral responsibility for the harm caused to victims of crime. They ask how agents would feel if the victim were their own family member.

The speaker is at a migrant center in San Antonio, Texas, alleging that NGOs are facilitating human smuggling into America. He claims San Antonio police officers are contracted by NGOs to guard the area in their official uniforms and cars. The speaker questions the officers about the alleged conflict of interest and whether they are being paid by NGOs, but they offer "no comment." He accuses the NGOs of lying about paying for migrants' flights and scamming the federal government. He asks why the police are not investigating this and are instead taking money from NGOs. The speaker follows a bus allegedly transporting migrants to the airport and back to the migrant resource center. He questions a woman involved in the pickup about her NGO affiliation. He also questions an airport employee about working a side contract approved by the San Antonio PD.

The speaker reports they have been officially banned from entering the United Kingdom. They state the UK government, under Keirstarmer, deems their presence “not conducive to the public good,” and they express confusion over why being conducive to the public good is a requirement to enter a country. They compare this to thousands of illegal immigrants entering through the Channel daily, noting that “Nobody's asking them to be conducive to the public good,” yet they cannot go to the UK. The speaker mentions they did not apply for an EITA (likely a visa/permit) and had recently returned in September to join the Tommy Robinson rally where they spoke, intending to participate again in May, which now seems impossible. They describe the timing as suspicious, pointing out that three days earlier they posted about Kierst Armour calling out his hypocrisy for wanting to ban X because of women’s safety while allegedly allowing migrant gang rapes to happen. They imply this is connected to the ban as an act to ban free speech. They describe the situation as dystopian and emphasize the severe limitation of their freedom, noting that “as it says in email, I cannot appeal.” They stress they are not convicted of any crime, not under suspicion of any crime, and that the decision was made by Kirstarmer that someone like them is “not welcome in The UK.” The overall claim is that the ban is an abrupt, non-appealable restriction on their entry into the country, framed within accusations of political manipulation and hypocrisy by the UK government and Kier Starmer.

The speaker argues that migration is driven by actions that “destroy the entire regions” where migrants originate, destabilizing those areas so that migrants later arrive and can be used as “cheaper labor.” They claim that British imperialism and other foreign powers preyed on poor regions, leading people in those regions to want to come through Libya and then cross “the channel,” resulting in a “flood.” The speaker cites an “infamous conversation” between Muammar Gaddafi and Tony Blair. The speaker says Gaddafi told Blair that many people from poor regions would like to come through Libya, would come straight across the channel, and flood it. The speaker further claims Gaddafi warned that overthrowing his country would make things worse, and that, despite being warned, “they did it anyway.” The speaker interprets this as implying intent to create a flood of migrants, stating that the actors “knew it would happen, and they did it anyway.” The speaker concludes that people are “taught to be infuriated at the migrants” rather than at “the people who deliberately flooded the place with migrants.”

Speaker 0 identifies as a fellow marine and speaks with urgency about orders he feels compelled to follow. He asserts that people are getting hurt and links this to a broader issue: weapons and military equipment from the United States being sold over the border in Mexico to cartels. He claims he has been able to prove this wrongdoing and says that, as a result, he is supposed to return to the master chief petty officer of the Navy. He describes a specific observation to substantiate the claim: boats that originated from a SEAL boat installation have been seen around the border area. He mentions a location—Industrial Plaza near Food for Less—and states that navy boats, which he attributes to the SEAL boat installation, have been taken apart and transported across the border. He emphasizes that all of this equipment is moving across the border and insists he is not lying. The speaker acknowledges his status as a former marine and expresses concern about the implications of these actions. He conveys a belief that if cartel members obtain and repurpose this equipment, they could use it against the United States, a scenario that would require far more than luck to counter. He reinforces that more substantial measures than luck will be necessary to address the threat he describes. He closes by wishing the listener luck, while reiterating the seriousness of the situation and his need to act on his orders. He signs off with “Thank you so much. Godspeed.”

The speaker discusses a conspiracy involving the US government and NGOs bringing illegal immigrants into the country. A DHS employee reveals how NGOs receive millions of dollars to facilitate this operation. The employee mentions Jewish Family Services receiving $600 million for a few months, with subcontractors requesting more funds. The partnership between NGOs and the government is described as a massive money laundering scheme.

I paid a cartel $10,000 to cross the border. The American people are right, they don't know who's coming in. There's no security or background checks, so there could be killers or psychopaths. It's concerning that abnormal-looking people might be crossing the border.

The speaker discusses the terminology used by the federal government regarding immigrants. They state that the statutory term is not “undying” but “illegal aliens,” and that this is the term used by the government. The speaker suggests that using a different term is an attempt to water down the description of the issue, comparing the shift to a notion of “undocumented” people. To illustrate, the speaker uses an analogy: if someone forgets their wallet and thus does not have their driver’s license, they still have a right to drive, implying that a missing document should not redefine whether someone is entitled to drive. The point being made is that choosing terminology is not simply about a minor omission but about a broader characterization of the status of those who come into the country. The speaker asserts that entering the country “intentionally” and “to come in illegally” is not merely a matter of a missing document. They emphasize that, in their view, this involves a deliberate act of violation of the law. It is described as not just a simple mistake but a purposeful action. The speaker stresses that the act is often done “with the help of the cartels in many cases,” highlighting an element they consider significant in understanding the phenomenon. In summary, the speaker argues that the official language frames immigrants as “illegal aliens” rather than using terms like “undocumented,” contending that the latter would downplay the act of illegal entry. They contend that illegal entry is an intentional breach of the law, not just an incidental lack of paperwork, and that, in many instances, it involves coordination with cartels.

Speaker 0 describes a 'dinghy invasion across the channel' and claims 'we're getting 800 a day' and 'that was a whole batch.' He notes a lorry 'moving the dinghies across the channel from Dover.' The dinghies come into Dover, 'they get loaded onto a truck. They go back to France.' He says he notified GB News in The UK and Nigel Farage that 'he offered them the clip which they didn't come back to him.' The lorry is operated by GXO, 'a company owned by BlackRock, one of the biggest logistics companies in Europe,' and it 'was under contract to the Home Office, the government in The UK at the time.'

The speaker asserts that discussions of child abuse and child trafficking are avoided in the UK Parliament, implying that avoidance signals a problem. They claim there is no separate crime of satanic child abuse in the UK; they say it’s simply child abuse, and suggest that the Netherlands similarly erases the subject. The speaker relates local discoveries in Leicester, described as the nearest city to their area, where they found extensive child abuse linked to both historic and current politicians and to the police. They state they gave evidence against the head of police about “industrial child trafficking.” A central claim is that there is industrial-scale trafficking of children from Ukraine via Moldova to the UK for sexual abuse and organ harvesting. The speaker says this information came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who independently reported the same scheme, without knowing each other. They alleged that Ukrainian secret services collected children during the conflict in the Donbas and handed them over to UK secret services. The two informants reportedly named individuals and were appalled by the task of collecting children for trafficking. The speaker recounts that one whistleblower was killed in a cafe when a bomb was placed under his table, and the second survived a car bombing after being warned by a car park camera clip showing the explosion as he approached his car. They claim the whistleblowers named people very close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his regime, asserting that those individuals purportedly benefit financially from the war by enabling child trafficking. Further claims include that there is more money in child trafficking and sex trafficking than in drugs or weapons because of the trafficked children’s organs. The speaker contends that the trafficking scheme involves selling the children multiple times, and that victims disappear after organs are harvested, which is why victims are not found in the end. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the alleged connection between wartime activity, Ukrainian whistleblowers, assassination attempts, and a broader network that allegedly profits from child trafficking and organ harvesting.

One overlooked aspect of human trafficking is transportation, possibly through container ships. A container ship with 10,000 containers could hide people, as only 5-10% of cargo is scanned. CBP found containers with life support systems for people. This method is a significant problem.

"absolutely convinced that amongst the reasons that people travel through France, which is a safe country, to come to The United Kingdom, amongst the reasons is because it's easier to work in our legal economy than it is in other countries." "Bosses who are prepared to hire people illegally are not asking them for their national insurance card." "You must have ID, mandatory digital ID in order to work because we have to stop illegal working." "It is an automatic collection of the information by the government, so we know exactly who is working in our economy, and it will help us enforce the rules that are there." "I made a pledge that we would do whatever was necessary, pull use whatever tools, were available to deal with illegal migration. I intend to do so."

I recently visited the southern border and spoke with the head of the border guards union. Children are coming over with phone numbers and addresses written on them, but we are not thoroughly checking them. This could be leading them into dangerous situations like prostitution and sweatshops, all funded by American tax dollars.

I paid a cartel around $10,000 to come into this country. The American people are right, they don't know who is crossing the border. There is no security or background check, so there could be killers or psychopaths. People crossing the border may not look normal.

The speaker states they were asked how they could smuggle a terrorist into the United States or return one to the United States. The speaker finds the question preposterous. They claim they don't know how they could smuggle someone into the U.S. and assert they lack the power to return anyone to the United States. The speaker states they are not going to do it.

Speaker 0 says a viral post claimed Jewish NGOs and other international organizations were funding and supporting illegal immigration across the continent. He says this is his third time crossing the Darien Gap, specifically outside the village called Bajo Chiquito, and describes conditions as “one of the most disgusting situations” involving vulnerable people being taken advantage of. He alleges NGOs were making “millions out of this human suffering.” Speaker 0 claims a specific NGO, “highest,” promoted a map showing how to cross the jungle between Colombia and Panama. He says the NGO acknowledged that on the Colombian side, groups controlling trafficking and smuggling through the jungle were the “colombian carter clan del golfo,” and he says thousands died trying to cross the Darien. He lists alleged harms including rape, abuse, drowning, decomposed bodies, and deaths in the jungle, and says he is reacting to evidence about why “Alejandro Mayorkas” “hasn’t been charged” or “arrested” for “crimes against humanity.” Speaker 1 addresses an NGO/international organization, including the United Nations, saying they promoted the route through the Darien where people are suffering and dying, including children and women being raped and abused. He says he has been to Necocli, where he claims the United Nations distributed birth control pills to women and condoms to men. He says that from there, the organization promoted entry to Turbo in Campurganá, and that he entered the jungle through that area. Speaker 1 claims organizations promoted migration through a “map” showing how to enter and exit the Darien, and says people are dying—children drowning and men dying—while women are raped and abused. He says he has been in the Darien where “Centerfront” confronted the cartel of “El Golfo,” eradicated one member group, and arrested two for raping and abusing migrants, and he says organizations still promoted the route. He calls for the United States to “defund” the United Nations and other international organizations that he says promote suffering and migration through the journey. He argues it is not a “route” because he says migrants standing there would say “no” if asked about coming through the Darien route. He says he sees banners and markings, including directions, points, and even details such as weather and distance in water, and he urges people in the United States to “wake up,” claiming these activities make a dollar out of American taxpayer money.

The speaker asserts the primary concern is everyone's welfare and safety, but believes the individuals in question are illegal migrants, not refugees. The speaker claims it's telling that no one specifies what these people are fleeing from, what wars, countries, or persecution they are escaping. Because of this lack of information, the speaker believes they are by definition illegal immigrants and technically criminals. The speaker states they shouldn't be housed in five-star hotels but in cells. The speaker believes they should not be allowed to leave until they pay for their ticket back. The speaker's question is not where they will be moved to in a year, but how they will be removed from the country.