reSee.it - Related Video Feed

So many people ask how to get rid of WiFi. Here’s the approach: get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter. Log in to your router by going to the IP on the back of the box with whatever device you have. Find the wireless settings. You have guest WiFi, which you’re going to turn off, and 2.4 and 5 gigahertz bands, which you’re also going to turn off. Make sure all this is turned off. Then take that Ethernet cord and stick it into the back of your router. Next, take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter and plug it into your computer, and wait for it. In about a second, you’ve got the Internet without WiFi. Why would you get rid of WiFi? Because of microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. It doesn’t sound too safe. For reference, my phone’s on airplane mode right now to show everything’s off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. If you’ve got 5G, switch it to 4G or airplane mode. There will always be those who say it’s all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. And here’s what they found: depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. Last but not least, there’s a $13 book that’s 600 pages long on the topic, Things to Look Into.

Speaker 0 argues that LEDs emit radio frequencies that harm people, the same stuff that comes from a cell phone, and that blue light is toxic to our body. They claim a digital light on your face and a street light on your face, and criticize putting LEDs all over faces as silly. If sticking to any type of colored bulb, they say you should use incandescent or halogen or a UV bulb, and “you just go tanning.” They state there’s no need to put LEDs on the face and suggest it should be outlawed because they were never pushed. They claim LEDs are linked to cataracts and mess up health, causing a lot of brain fog, making people unable to focus; in the grocery store, people can’t think because the lights are affecting health. If natural light isn’t available, they recommend getting a candle and placing candles and salt lamps around the house, or, if not, using incandescents or halogens and not bringing LEDs into the house. They further claim that many people with health issues like ringing in the ears are affected by LEDs and Wi-Fi in the home, and that this combination will mess you up.

The speaker asserts that microwave sickness, not pathogens or contaminated water, was the root cause of the pandemic, specifically naming 5G rollout as the culprit. According to the speaker, people received upgrades to their phones and had a cell tower installed in front of their homes, and this, he claims, equated to the pandemic itself. He references “zapping of America” to describe neurological and systemic symptoms associated with microwave exposure, listing heaviness in the head, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, partial memory loss, cardiovascular issues, slow heartbeat, reduced blood pressure, and heart pains. He links these symptoms to microwave sickness and cites that the Soviets observed similar dangers with wireless technology in the 1950s, while American doctors dismissed those concerns, calling them Soviet or not credible. This dismissal, he contends, allowed wireless frequencies to be intensified to extreme levels. The speaker argues that health issues in America have risen because electricity and wireless frequencies are at a “level 10,000,” whereas other countries regulate to a “level five,” implying that higher electromagnetic frequencies lead to illness across populations. He repeats the idea that increasing electromagnetic frequencies on Earth is directly linked to widespread sickness. He also references Laura and makes an analogy to the Spanish flu, specifically the Kansas flu, claiming there was a radio on a Kansas military base that made people sick, using it to support the claim that wireless transmission or exposure contributed to disease. Based on these assertions, the speaker states a personal stance that his house has no wireless technology, implying a preventive or precautionary measure against exposure. Overall, the speaker presents a narrative that attributes the pandemic to the rollout of 5G and associated wireless infrastructure, framing microwave sickness as the real illness experienced by the population, supported by cited historical observations, unnamed references, and a critique of conventional medical and scientific responses. The argument emphasizes a direct causal link between elevated electromagnetic frequencies and widespread health problems, arguing that higher exposure correlates with greater illness and that other nations’ more conservative frequency practices mitigate these issues.

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker demonstrates the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by various devices. They show that when the microwave is off, there is minimal radiation. However, when it is turned on, the levels increase significantly. They compare the radiation levels from using mobile data and Wi-Fi to being close to a microwave oven. The speaker also measures the radiation levels inside a car and finds that it is consistently high. They mention experiencing a headache after a test drive, attributing it to the constant exposure to radiation from mobile phones.

Your laptop likely impacts you more than your diet, a claim that may be unpopular with food experts. Non-native EMF is fundamentally about light, but it's more than just a light issue. It's a combination of light and water that leads to disease.

The speaker discusses various claims about reversing or healing eyesight as people age. They start by noting what Google allegedly says, mentioning surgery, glaucoma, degeneration, eyeballs falling off, and lab-grown eyeballs, but the focus is on natural solutions instead. - A friend reports using pearl powder for the last six months, along with a little castor oil, and shows eye chart changes: before at negative 3.25 and negative 3.5, after at negative 2.75 and negative 2.25. - Another friend says they have been using pearl powder and castor oil. They had worn contacts and glasses since age nine, and their eye prescription at the eye doctor went from plus six to plus four, suggesting reversal of eyesight. - Yet another friend states their daughter has been using pro powder and castor oil, leading to a remarkable reduction in her prescription from negative 5.75 to 4.0. - The speaker notes that eyesight can heal, citing these anecdotal reports. Beyond these claims, the speaker mentions other ways to heal or improve eyesight: - Eyesight exercises and training the eyes, with the assertion that if you don’t train them, they get weak. - Candle gazing or sun gazing as a method. - Pinholes glasses as a possible option. - Removing Wi-Fi, described as cooking the eyes the entire time, and removing LEDs, which are linked to cataracts. - A referenced book: Take Off Your Glasses and See by Jacob Liberman, an eye doctor who talked about how glasses are actually making the eyes weaker over time. The overall message combines anecdotal reports of natural remedies (pearl powder with castor oil) alongside a set of alternative eye-care practices and lifestyle changes, concluding with the claim that glasses may weaken the eyes over time.

Wi-Fi, being so prevalent, might be negatively impacting our health. I believe it degrades mitochondria and compromises the blood-brain barrier. I found an article suggesting radiofrequency radiation affects the blood-brain barrier's permeability and alters microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative diseases. Research indicates this has been expanded on by researchers in China with a published article. They even call it leaky brain. It seems findings in the US were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research. It's the same old story.

Speaker 0 says that at the lows people are buying incandescent bulbs because of a new ban, and it is important to stock up on these bulbs. Incandescent bulbs are described as very natural to our eyes, and it is emphasized that one should put incandescent bulbs into the home and not LEDs. The speaker claims the problem with LED lights is that they burn out the back of the eye, which “causes cataracts,” and that smart bulbs and devices connected to WiFi ping radiation to the skull while plugged in. Therefore, the advice is to avoid anything with LED and anything that's smart—specifically, smart remote, smart sensors, smart plugs, and smart bulbs. The speaker notes that these are all LED lights installed in the hardware store. Additionally, the speaker urges avoiding anything with Bluetooth built in because Bluetooth operates at the same frequency as a microwave. The overall message is that many marketing tactics push the new bulbs, but one should stick to incandescent bulbs.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy theory about powerful individuals wanting to reduce the population by 95%. They claim that a silent war is being waged using invisible radio frequency emissions that people are addicted to. Specifically, they mention that these emissions at 60 gigahertz, which is the absorption spectrum of oxygen molecules, can affect the orbital properties of electrons and the ability of hemoglobin to bind oxygen. The speaker expresses concern about health decisions being made by elected bureaucrats who ignore warnings and trust the wireless industry.

Wi-Fi may be degrading our mitochondria and opening our blood-brain barriers. Radiofrequency radiation exposure has been shown to affect the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and alter microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative disease. One person found an article stating this, but was unsure of its validity. A doctor conducted a study that was expanded upon by researchers in China, resulting in a published article. These findings were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research in the United States. This can cause a "leaky brain."

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

People can create energy weapons using a microwave oven by opening it and pointing it through walls, causing harm to neighbors. Microwaves emit radiation that can make people sick. The speaker warns against using microwaves for cooking due to health risks, citing research on digestive tract cancer. AirPods Pro emit similar levels of radiation as microwaves, posing potential health concerns. The speaker advises against consuming microwaved food and recommends avoiding restaurants that use microwaves for cooking.

Speaker 0: So many people ask how to get rid of Wi Fi. So what you're gonna do, you're gonna get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter like that. Next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna log in to your router. So you're gonna go to the back of the box. You're gonna find an IP on there. You're gonna log in to your router on whatever device you have, and then you're gonna find all these wireless settings. So you have guest WiFi, which you're gonna turn off 2.4, five gigahertz. You're also gonna turn off all your regular wireless. Make sure all this is turned off. Now you're gonna take that Ethernet cord that you bought, and you're gonna stick it into the back of your router. And then next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter, stick it right into your computer, and you're gonna wait for it. And then in about a second, you got the Internet without Wi Fi. Now someone's gonna ask, well, why did you get rid of Wi Fi? Well, microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. Doesn't sound too safe. And just for the record, my phone's on airplane mode right now and see how everything's off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. And if you got five g, turn it to four g or airplane mode. And there'll always be those Muppets who just say it's all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. So it's been known. And here's what they found, depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. And last but not least, here's a $13 book that's 600 pages long on the topic. Things to look into.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss headphones and potential thyroid health concerns. They note they no longer wear Bluetooth and now prefer wired headphones; Speaker 0 says they use wired headphones plugged into the phone, and they are “just Amazon products. Nothing’s fancy, and they work just as well.” Speaker 1 expresses relief that Speaker 0 moved away from wireless, mentioning that they had shared information for years and kept sending content until Speaker 0 switched. Speaker 2 introduces a shift in how people view wireless headphones. They acknowledge that wireless is convenient, but say it’s moving from outside the Overton window toward inside it. They reference a recent analysis (epidemiology) showing a strong or significant association between Bluetooth headphone use (AirPods, Beats, wireless) and an increased incidence of thyroid nodules, noting this applies to both men and women. They describe the thyroid as a master gland and explain that thyroid nodules can be precancerous. They emphasize proximity to a hormonally sensitive gland and RF EMF exposure from a device worn near the neck, asserting they can measure RF with a meter and that earbuds emit RF energy. They compare the RF exposure to that of microwaves, stating the measurement units are microwatts per meter squared and that the RF band of Bluetooth is essentially the same as that of a microwave. They describe the headphones as “a small microwave in your head” for hours a day and note that readings can be obtained by placing the RF meter near a microwave. Speaker 1 agrees with caution, saying they won’t put a cell phone to their ear and questions why anyone would wear earbuds all day, feeling “spidery” about it. Speaker 0 reports returning to wired setups (Apple 1/1Point0) and values conversation without wireless interference, calling it nostalgic and safer long term. Speaker 1 discusses reasons for pushback: tradition, fashion, or fear of changing habits. They mention they once bought olive-colored Apple headphones as a fashion statement and acknowledge that appearance can distract from the health discussion. Speaker 0 clarifies they aren’t “tin hat” about everything but notes that people who sounded alarms often get vindicated later. They prefer alternatives if there’s even a slight chance of risk. Speaker 1 shares a light parenting anecdote: their five-year-old confessed briefly wearing wired headphones for five minutes, illustrating the challenge of managing kids’ exposure. They reflect on broader concerns about kids, screen time, and technology exposure, referencing a recent guest’s emphasis on limiting screen time. Speaker 0 ends with a Casino-like caution: if there’s a better alternative that works as well, why take the chance?

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

Someone asked why I don't use Wi-Fi, which is often seen as convenient and effective. However, studies show that exposure to wireless frequencies can thicken blood and reduce oxygen levels. That's why I prefer a wired connection. I use a simple Ethernet cord connected to an adapter for my phone and computer. I plug the Ethernet into my router, disable Wi-Fi, and operate without it. This way, I avoid the microwave frequencies associated with Wi-Fi, which have been linked to health risks in numerous studies, despite claims of safety.

Speaker 0 describes a distinction between cataracts at the front of the eye and cataracts “in the back of the eye.” They claim that while a cloudy eye is commonly associated with cataracts at the front, radar, microwaves, and wireless technology can cause cataracts behind the eye. They mention pearl powder as something that reverses cataracts and attributes this reversal to dehydration or cooking effects in the eye caused by microwaves, suggesting the pearl powder hydrates the eye and reverses damage. They explain that a microwave heats up your blood and heats up the eye, “cooks the water,” and therefore they advise not using microwaves in the home because there is “no reason” to use them. They state doctors discussed this when radar and microwaves and wireless technologies were being used, claiming these technologies were “cooking” the back of the eye. The speaker asserts that microwaves work by penetrating deep into the body and causing damage that cannot be seen but occurs at the back of the eye. The speaker references a presentation to the US military, noting that many military personnel working on radar developed cataracts behind the eye. They claim there were lawsuits from military members and that the VA and government were trying not to pay out. The overall point made is that eyesight may not improve or may worsen over time due to microwaves or wireless technology, which the speaker links to cataracts behind the eye. They frame these claims as evidence that exposure to microwaves has a connection to back-of-eye cataracts, and they highlight the response of military personnel to this issue, including lawsuits and governmental dispute over compensation.

The speaker asserts several connected claims about mold, indoor air quality, and electromagnetic frequencies. First, they state that mold is present in about 90% of people's homes and commonly found in bathrooms, moist areas, and basements. They emphasize that the growth and toxicity of mold are increased by electromagnetic frequencies such as WiFi. They describe mold, particularly black mold and green mold, as among the most toxic substances people are exposed to inside homes. The speaker argues that indoor air quality can be as much as a thousand times worse than outdoor air quality, even in large cities with many vehicles and other pollutants, and they point to drier vents releasing synthetic fragrances as part of the problem. They describe the combination as a “perfect toxic concoction” because WiFi is said to increase mold growth and can be strengthened by it. Additionally, the speaker provides a quantitative claim about biotoxins: the production of biotoxins in mold culture increased more than 600 times after exposure to ambient electromagnetic frequencies. Throughout, the emphasis is on the interaction between electromagnetic frequencies (like WiFi) and mold, suggesting that exposure to these frequencies both promotes mold growth and amplifies mold toxicity. The statements link ubiquitous indoor mold presence with widespread indoor air quality concerns and claim a significant enhancement of mold-related biotoxins when mold is exposed to ambient EMF frequencies. The overall message centers on the idea that EMF exposure from common wireless sources can exacerbate mold proliferation and toxin production, contributing to indoor air quality problems.

- The speaker discusses a potential connection between electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and diabetes, noting that there has been a slight increase in diabetes rates associated with the rapid expansion of cellular towers, such as after Bill Clinton’s policy changes. - They acknowledge that EMR is not claimed to be the sole cause of diabetes, but suggest that historical data and curves make it tempting to believe EMR could be a significant factor. - The speaker points out that the topic has been present in scientific literature since at least 1931, and asserts that conventional medicine would push back against this viewpoint, with medical education focused on sugar and other factors. - They emphasize that they are not naive and do not claim EMR is the only cause; rather, the implication is that EMR could contribute to diabetes risk. - The argument culminates in a warning: if power systems and telecommunications infrastructure are not designed more carefully, there will be health and national budget costs, implying broader consequences for public health and economic burden.

Lou shows an image of a guy running with ear pods and checking a device like an Apple Watch, asking how much that is doing inside his body and noting many people are likely using them. Speaker 1 says we’ve all been sold sexy products that are fun, but the risks aren’t being shared. They offer a free public education webinar every month, two hours, to walk through the science, and for cliff notes they provide the following immediate observations people may notice: - Headaches - Nosebleeds - Anxiety - Depression - Insomnia They describe this as a neurotoxin that pulsates our biological system many, many times per second, more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field. The brain perceives this invisible light energy as the lights are on, which disrupts the circadian rhythm in the wee hours of darkness. Melatonin suppression is singled out as a major consequence, affecting sleep and the nighttime cell repair and regeneration processes. The blood-brain barrier is a membrane surrounding the brain that helps keep toxins out of sensitive brain areas. The speaker claims that constant pulsing with man-made microwave radiofrequency opens up or permeates the blood-brain barrier, allowing toxins to accompany blood into the brain and contributing to increased neurotoxicity today. The speaker also mentions something called rouleaux formation. When radiating devices like a phone are held, the pinky finger tingles. Citing Dr. Magda Havas and Dr. Rob Brown, they say this exposure leads to rouleaux formation. The speaker explains rouleaux as red blood cells that are normally free-floating and deliver oxygen throughout the body being affected by microwave radiation, causing red blood cells to become magnetized and stick together, forming chains like a stack of coins that cannot efficiently reach tissues and organs to deliver oxygen. Rouleaux formation is described as a very serious concern.

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.