reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Before entering politics, my net worth was $316,000. Just four years later, it jumped to $46 million. How did this happen? I bought an island vacation home on a whim and now commute via private jet from my island to Washington D.C. It appears some politicians are using insider information for stock trading, and because I'm in politics, I might have access to similar information.

Members of Congress should not trade stock due to the unfair advantage they have with information. Some lawmakers oppose a stock trade ban, but the issue is clear. Congress is seen as a rich man's club, with some members making significant profits from trading. While it's not technically illegal, it's a problem that needs to be addressed. There is a proposed bill to prevent this, but some disagree with the divestiture provision. If amended to allow holding private assets, it may gain more support. Without the amendment, many Republicans may vote against it.

I started a Pelosi stock tracker after seeing politicians' questionable trades during COVID. Richard Burr's insider trading was the last straw. Unusual Whales on X deserves credit for exposing this. I built an app, Autopilot, to let people invest alongside politicians. Pelosi's up 87% since we started tracking her. I'm not political but this corruption needs to stop. Last year, she outperformed hedge funds by 20%. She bought Tesla leaps before Biden's infrastructure bill, then NVIDIA before the CHIPS Act. She made millions. Dan Crenshaw bought Meta then pushed to ban TikTok. They shouldn't be allowed to trade! I want trust back in our institutions.

I can't believe more people aren't talking about this! Since I reported Nancy Pelosi's purchase of Tempest shares on MLK Day, the stock is up 17% in just seventeen days. But it's even crazier because she bought call options, giving her even more leverage. Her initial $75,000 investment is now worth $235,000 – that's a 213% gain since we revealed it a couple weeks ago. Trades like this are why I constantly suggest monitoring what members of Congress are trading via sites like QuiverQuant. Until they outlaw congressional trading, we should all be watching. They have access to non-public information, giving them a massive market advantage. Good luck out there!

I found something fascinating regarding Representative Ilhan Omar's net worth. Her $83 million net worth is striking, considering her annual congressional salary of $175,000. Even saving every penny over eight years would only amount to $1.2 million. I'm curious how such a significant increase in wealth occurred. While I don't know the details of her personal finances, it raises questions that warrant further investigation. It seems worth exploring how a congresswoman accumulates such substantial wealth during her time in office.

Washington DC is seen as a place where anyone can become wealthy, especially if they have the right connections or last name. The Bidens are not the only ones who have profited from their political power. Congresswoman Debbie Dingell defends nepotism, saying that hard work is necessary. However, questions arise about Dingell's knowledge of healthcare stocks. She purchased $50,000 worth of Medtronic stock, and shortly after, the company received FDA approval for a new device, causing the stock to rise. Dingell's committee also granted Medtronic $27 million. It seems like Dingell may have had inside information. Attempts to contact Dingell for clarification have been unsuccessful.

Bill Gates has recently invested $86 million in Ecolab, a major player in water treatment, through his LLC, Cascade Investments, making him one of the largest shareholders. Interestingly, Congressman Alan Lowenthal also began purchasing shares in Ecolab around the same time. Lowenthal is on the committee for infrastructure, water resources, and the environment, aligning with Ecolab's industry focus. Additionally, the EPA has announced new chemical standards for water, which will necessitate significant investments in water treatment facilities. This situation warrants close observation.

Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. This suggests that her primary motivation for being in Congress is financial gain, and she appears to excel at it.

Despite a congressional salary of $174,000, many lawmakers amass significant wealth, often through stock market investments. For instance, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen from Oklahoma saw his net worth nearly quadruple from 2018 to 2022. In January, he purchased shares of Badger Meter, a company that manufactures water meters. Just two weeks later, Tulsa announced a $94 million project to install 145,000 automated water meters, the same product made by Badger Meter. This trend is occurring nationwide due to a federal mandate from the EPA requiring cities to upgrade lead service lines by October 2024. Such situations are common, which is reflected in the impressive performance of lawmakers' trades compared to the S&P 500. For more details, visit cloverquant.com.

I hate drama. I hate influencer drama. I hate Internet drama. I hate the theatrics of it. And so I want to tell you something. The only reason that I'm going up against Crenshaw is I am sick and tired of watching government officials and people in high places try to silence and bully regular American citizens. I'm sick of saying it. Somebody's gotta stand up to this shit. It might as well be me. It might as well be me. On 12/09/2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me. So this all transpired from a conversation that I had with Tulsi Gabbard. And I was concerned... Although I didn't mention his name in the interview... I wanted to know how a newer congressman can afford to hire a mainstream DJ, Steve Aoki, to spin at his fortieth birthday party. I didn't just make this up. Somebody sent me the invitation that he had sent out to everybody for his fortieth birthday. And so that's where I got this from. Anyways, here's the clip with Tulsi. Is there any direct money? I mean, know, you see all these people you see all these people show up in Congress, the Senate, the cabinet, whatever, and, you know, not wealthy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't have firsthand experience in this. I have often questioned the same thing. I know a big factor is the insider trading that goes on in Congress. And again, some people will say, well, like, hey, I didn't know anything about this. I'm just making investments for my family or my wife or my husband is making investments. I don't know anything about what's going on. Maybe they're being honest, maybe they're not. But the reality is you're in a position where you're making decisions, either in committee or on the House floor, that influence our markets, that influence the outcomes of certain industries, either causing some to tank or others to skyrocket. And the mere perception of insider trading shouldn't exist. This is legislation, again, I introduced in Congress years ago. No member of Congress should be allowed to do any trading of any stocks, neither should their spouse, neither should their senior staff. Period. These are the people who have access to proprietary private information that's not open to everybody in the public, or certainly before it becomes public. And the possibility of the abuse of power in trading on that information should not exist. It's interesting because as we're seeing there are some members of Congress who say that share my view on that, but who are continuing to trade stocks themselves. The Senate just passed, I think out of committee, first step legislation that would reflect similar to banning members and their spouses. We'll see where it goes. In the Senate we've heard a lot of talk coming from leaders from both parties, but no action has been taken. That to me is the most obvious way that people are going from being elected and having no money and you make, what, dollars $160 a year or whatever the salary is now to literally becoming multimillionaires. That is the most obvious way. There are kind of stringent requirements of financial reporting that every member has to do certainly at least once a year, more often if you are actively trading in stocks. But it I think it would be a little hard, not impossible, but a little hard if somebody's just coming and bringing you a sack of cash. Speaker 0: So after the conversation with Tulsi, that's when I got the text or the message on Instagram from congressman Crenshaw that I find threatening, telling me he spoke with his boys at six. Here's a screenshot. Hey, Sean. You have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you've got a problem with me or have questions about how I'm getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. Some of my beliefs are based on trendy narratives instead of facts. And just so you know, I mean, Dan does have a history of threatening people. Once again, here is Dan threatening to kill Tucker Carlson. And then, again, he reaffirms that he's not joking. Speaker 2: Have you ever met Tucker? Speaker 0: We've talked a lot. He's the worst person. Okay. So I get the message. I take it is extremely threatening. It is a tier one unit, the best, most effective tier one unit in the world, deadliest unit. But I don't do anything. I move on. And then a little over a year later, I'm interviewing, oh, a member from SEAL Team six. Maybe he's one of Dan's boys at six. So he brought up the fact that he had asked a congressman with an eye patch, didn't wanna mention his name, to help him with his book debacle. He received no aid. I filled in the blank. I said, oh, you must be talking about congressman Crenshaw. Let me share my experience with you, my interactions with congressman Crenshaw. So I shared him. I told him about the Instagram message, and I told him that I found that threatening. And then I asked Matt if he was one of Dan's boys at six, Maybe he was here to come beat me up. Matt assured me he wasn't. Here's the clip. Speaker 2: I'll give you another example. In the height of my my issues, I contacted a former SEAL. I won't name names, but he has an eye patch, And he's a congressman out of a state You Speaker 0: mean Dan Crenshaw? Speaker 2: I'm not naming names. Speaker 0: Another one of my Speaker 2: favorite Sir, here's my situation. You know, Dan? Speaker 0: Dan actually sent me a message. I should fucking read this to you. But, basically, he tells me I brought something up about him, and I never even met I gave him the courtesy of not even mentioning his fucking name. It was about his birthday party where he hired Steve Aoki to to DJ his birthday. I mean, that can't be fucking cheap. Right? Especially on a congressman's salary. And I brought that up. And Dan sends me a message that says his boys over at six are really upset with me that I brought that up, and they're gonna they might come beat me up. Speaker 2: Boys at six. Speaker 0: His boys over at six. Speaker 2: Well, to infer he's got I don't know why congressman would be Speaker 0: threatening me with seal team six, but I'm still fucking waiting. This is actually a couple years This Speaker 2: is threatened quite a Speaker 0: have not had my ass kicked by a couple of guys over at six. But Dan Crunchy he fits with all these fucking people you're talking about. Speaker 2: So I called him. Right? He's a sitting congressman. He's a former officer. And drum roll, please, he was getting ready to release his book. So I call him up. I get a conversation with him. I said, sir, here's my situation. I hired an attorney. The attorney gave me bad advice. Book was published. I've given up attorney client privilege, cooperated everything I can to to fix this. They've still come after me. We can get into all the the other stuff that I'm dealing with. I said, sir, can you help me out with this? He's like, well, you know, I'm I'm about ready to publish my book, and I'm I'm not getting it reviewed. I'm like, well, sir, same same letter of the law that they came after me for failure to seek prepublication review. I didn't get prepublication review because my lawyer told me I didn't have to, and he could do it. Like, in your case, you know you have to get reviewed. I'm here telling you, confirming you have to get reviewed or the government's gonna come after you. He's like, yeah. No. But I'm not gonna write anything classified in my book. I'm like, there's nothing classified in my book. They they said there was. They went through it. They said, nope. There's nothing classified in it. You just failed to seek review. I'm like, so if I only thing I failed to do was seek review, you're willingly going around that obligation, and you don't give a shit. He's like, yeah. But I'm not gonna write about anything classified in my book. That was his answer. Never talked to him again. So he published his book. No review. Nothing's happened. He's kept his money. He's a sitting congressman. I got a payment plan. So so to say I've been alone So Speaker 0: I guess I guess you're not one of Dan's boys over at six. Speaker 2: That's kinda Definitely not Dave Boys at six. That's a pretty ridiculous statement if I've ever heard one.

Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein passed away recently. She owned a $5 million condo in Hawaii and a $55 million private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies with $100 million in government funds. Feinstein served as a congresswoman for 32 years with an annual salary of $174,000. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market, potentially outperforming Barack Obama. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below. Translation: The congresswoman passed away, owning a condo and private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies. She served for 32 years with a modest salary. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below.

Congress is seen as a rich person's club, with members making profitable stock trades. This issue needs fixing as it's a current problem, not just a future concern. Members have access to valuable information before the public, leading to unfair advantages in trading.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

A report reveals that at least 40 members of Congress violated conflict of interest laws in the past year, highlighting a troubling trend where violations outnumber new legislation. Lawmakers prioritize stock trading over legislative duties, with some making significant profits from insider knowledge. For instance, Rick Allen from Georgia reported $8.5 million in stock transactions after 6.5 years, using excuses like clerical errors. Both Democrats and Republicans are implicated, with minimal penalties for violations, often just $200. This systemic issue allows politicians to amass wealth while ordinary citizens would face severe consequences for similar actions. The discussion also touches on campaign contributions from Wall Street, exemplified by Nikki Haley's financial rise linked to corporate relationships. The segment emphasizes the lack of accountability in Congress and the influence of corporate money in politics.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

The issue at hand is the disparity in asset ownership among members of Congress. Many Americans question how certain politicians achieve impressive investment returns, especially those involved in stock trades during the COVID pandemic. This isn't just a perception; it's a real problem. Congress members are trading based on information not available to the public. While insider trading is prohibited, members often receive information that, while not classified as insider information by securities laws, still provides them with a significant advantage. This situation raises concerns about fairness and transparency in financial dealings among lawmakers.

We've been tracking Pelosi's stock trades since May 2021, and she's up 87%, outperforming the S&P 500 by 50%. Our users have invested $300 million following her, collectively profiting $30 million. Pelosi has been questioned about congressional stock trading, defending it as part of a free market. However, her success demonstrates the market isn't free. She benefits from insider information due to her position, which is illegal. In 2024, Pelosi's portfolio grew by 54%, surpassing the market's 27% gain. She outperformed the S&P 500 by 25% and even beat 95% of professional hedge fund managers, according to a Bloomberg report.

TikTokers on the popular social media platform are copying the stock trades of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. They closely watch her financial disclosures for stock tips and use them to inform their own investments. One user even referred to Pelosi as the "queen of investing." Critics argue that Pelosi's annual returns, which have consistently been successful, suggest that she has prior knowledge or involvement in the trades. This raises questions about the Democrats' claims of being for the working class, as data shows that Democrats represent a higher percentage of wealthy taxpayers compared to Republicans. Additionally, the video suggests that the government's money printing and debt ceiling concerns primarily benefit the billionaire class and further inflate the stock market.

I run a Pelosi stock tracker, which started unexpectedly after leaving finance and living in Bali. Seeing politicians, like Richard Burr, trade based on insider information during COVID was outrageous. I'm not particularly political but I saw the opportunity to expose corruption and highlight the hypocrisy of politicians trading stocks by building an app that allows people to invest alongside them. Pelosi's trades, particularly in Tesla and NVIDIA, raised eyebrows, especially with her family's net worth skyrocketing. Dan Crenshaw's also suspect as he voted against banning TikTok while owning stock in Meta. Despite the scrutiny, Pelosi's office hasn't reached out, and people have invested millions alongside her, profiting significantly.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.

Speaker 0: 'So what do we get for a trillion dollars a year to the US military? Do we get anything in return?' Speaker 1: 'We get some enhanced stock portfolios.' 'I haven't voted for a penny for Ukraine, I'm proud of that. It's not my dadgum war.' 'Some of those contractors we described get a multi multi billion with a B dollar, no bid contract.' 'And who do you think has bought stock in that, in that company? Members of Congress, two weeks prior to the president making that official notice.' 'Return on their, 506100% return on their investment.' 'But why is impossible as to ban stock trading for members of Congress? That's a great idea.' 'I have the bill to do it, and that's why we have a bipartisan group, we've got a bill, but it's not going anywhere.' 'Why? Because too many members of Congress, I mean, we were told by leadership that, you know, these guys can't afford to be here.'

It seems odd that many people in the bureaucracy with salaries of a few hundred thousand dollars somehow accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while in their positions. We're curious where this wealth comes from. Maybe they're good at investing, and we should seek their advice. But mysteriously, they get wealthy, and we don't know why. The reality is that they're likely getting wealthy at the taxpayer's expense, and that's the honest truth.