TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They highlight one image with a little bubble and mention that it matches another image with the same batch number. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 2,304, image 59 and scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 19. They point out that both batches have the same little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They also mention that there are duplicate ballots in the batch, with one example being scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 92, which matches scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 33. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 59, and scanner 5,162, batch 235, image 19. They point out similarities between the two batches, such as the same little tail on a vote and the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't gone through all of them yet. They don't know the exact numbers of the total batches, but they believe that the duplicates occurred. The speaker concludes that the entire batch of ballots has been scanned multiple times.

The speaker points out duplicate ballots in the video, showing examples where the word "Republican" is written the same way on different ballots. They have a total of 62 images showing similar instances. The batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are provided as well. It is clear that the same batch was scanned multiple times, resulting in duplicate ballots.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers. They mention that the sheets are signed by the person who filled them out, but the information is redacted. They then shift focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are over 4,000 duplicate images. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, which has an error rate of 59.5%. The transcript ends abruptly.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that some sheets show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They mention that the sheets are signed by the auditors, but the person responsible for the fraud remains unknown. The speaker then shifts focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are duplicate markings on different ballots. They mention that over 4,000 duplicate reports were found, with an error rate of 59.7% according to a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They suspect that the people conducting the audit filled out these sheets with incorrect counts. The speaker also mentions that the sheets are signed by unknown individuals, making it difficult to determine who committed the fraud. They then shift focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are over 4,000 duplicate scanned ballots. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items that shows an error rate of 59.5% between the original election and the recount.

There are concerns about duplicate ballots in the audit. The speaker mentions that there should be a lower count due to duplicates, but they are not seeing any reference to duplicates in the forms. Speaker 1 explains that duplicate ballots are created when the original ballot is damaged and cannot be processed. These duplicates should have a matching 6-digit serial number with the original damaged ballot, but they cannot find the matching originals. Speaker 2 confirms this, stating that they are finding duplicate ballots without corresponding serial numbers on the damaged originals. They are struggling to match the duplicated ballots with the missing originals.

There are two batches of votes being examined. The speaker points out that there are identical markings on different ballots, suggesting duplication. They show examples of the same markings and even a dot in the same spot. The speaker mentions having a total of 62 images, but didn't go through all of them. The numbers of the batches are not remembered, but it is clear that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail that appears on both batches, as well as the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. They highlight one specific image with a little bubble and mention the batch numbers that match. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that have been scanned multiple times.

There were odd patterns in the ballots, with repeated anomalies over multiple days. Some ballots had a pattern of 7 for Biden and 1 for Trump, which is statistically unlikely. The patterns were reported, but it's unclear if they were included in the final report. The physical recount aligned with the claimed numbers, but behind the scenes, there were over 17,000 duplicate mail-in ballots. The audit suggests that over 60,000 counted ballots may be illegal, which could significantly impact the election outcome. Voting is considered the most important right in the United States, and having it stolen is devastating.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a tail-like mark on one ballot and explain that it appears on another as well. They also mention the presence of the word "Republican" on both ballots and a dot in the Fannie Willis. The speaker states that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't reviewed all of them yet. They don't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batch numbers and scanner numbers match for some of the duplicate ballots. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are 62 images in total, but they only highlight a few. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They also mention specific image numbers that match in both batches. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots and the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

There is a discussion about 17,852 ballots that lack corresponding ballot images in the second machine count. The speakers acknowledge the significance of this number but express their inability to explain how it occurred. They mention the hope of receiving more information on Tuesday regarding this matter.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They suspect that the people conducting the audit intentionally filled out these sheets with incorrect numbers. The speaker also mentions that the ballot images obtained from Dominion machines show duplicate markings on different ballots, with over 4,000 instances of duplication found so far. They highlight a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, revealing an error rate of 59.5%.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, both from scanner 5162. They point out that there are similarities between the ballots in each batch, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they only highlight a few obvious examples. They also mention that the total numbers of the batches were fairly close. The speaker concludes that these similarities indicate duplicate ballots, suggesting that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers. They reveal that the sheets are signed by unknown individuals, making it difficult to determine who committed the fraud. The speaker then shifts focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out over 4,000 duplicate ballots. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, which shows an error rate of 59.5%. The conversation ends abruptly.

Both ballots show identical markings, including a distinctive tail and the word "Republican." The speaker points out the same dot in each image. They have a total of 62 images showing duplicates, with one example being batch 5162. The speaker highlights specific instances where the same batch was scanned multiple times, revealing duplicate ballots.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out specific similarities, such as a tail and the word "Republican" written on both. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. They highlight the occurrence of duplicate ballots and mention the batch numbers and image numbers that match. The conclusion is that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

In the video, the speaker discusses the issue of 17,852 ballots that lack corresponding ballot images. This is a significant number, and while the speaker can explain the number, they cannot explain how this situation occurred. They mention that they hope to receive more information about it on Tuesday. The ballots were counted in the second machine count, but there is no associated ballot image for each of them.

In the video, the speakers discuss the issue of 17,852 ballots that lack corresponding ballot images. Speaker 0 acknowledges the significance of this number, prompting Speaker 1 to explain it. Speaker 1 clarifies that while they can explain the number, they cannot explain how it occurred. They express hope that more information will be provided on Tuesday regarding this matter.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that they contain fraudulent numbers and are signed by unknown individuals. The speaker then mentions that over 4,000 duplicate ballot images were found, with a spreadsheet showing a 59.5% error rate between the original election and the recount.

There are two different batches of votes being discussed in the video. The speaker points out that there are similarities between the ballots in these batches, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers of the batches, but they mention that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out similarities between the ballots, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They confirm that the batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are 235 and 304, both from scanner 5162. The speaker concludes that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times, indicating a potential issue.