TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They highlight one image with a little bubble and mention that it matches another image with the same batch number. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker discusses the potential illegal votes in the 2020 election. They highlight that there were a staggering 461,349 potential illegal votes. They also compare the number of mail-in ballots in different years, emphasizing that there were 5 to 6 times more mail-in ballots in the 2020 election. However, they point out that only 4,400 out of 1,000,768 mailed-out ballots were rejected, indicating a very low rejection rate of 0.34%. In contrast, in 2018, with fewer ballots, there was a rejection rate of 3.36%. These numbers suggest a significant issue with the checking process for the legitimacy of the ballots.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 2,304, image 59 and scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 19. They point out that both batches have the same little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They also mention that there are duplicate ballots in the batch, with one example being scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 92, which matches scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 33. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 59, and scanner 5,162, batch 235, image 19. They point out similarities between the two batches, such as the same little tail on a vote and the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't gone through all of them yet. They don't know the exact numbers of the total batches, but they believe that the duplicates occurred. The speaker concludes that the entire batch of ballots has been scanned multiple times.

The speaker points out duplicate ballots in the video, showing examples where the word "Republican" is written the same way on different ballots. They have a total of 62 images showing similar instances. The batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are provided as well. It is clear that the same batch was scanned multiple times, resulting in duplicate ballots.

In this video, there is a discussion about the number of votes cast in the election. It is mentioned that 14,150 ballots were cast on November 3rd, with an additional 598 provisional ballots. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between this number and the reported 59,000 people who voted on election day in Fulton County. The speakers question the math and suggest that it doesn't make sense for 45,000 people to have voted in the last two hours.

There are two batches of votes being examined. The speaker points out that there are identical markings on different ballots, suggesting duplication. They show examples of the same markings and even a dot in the same spot. The speaker mentions having a total of 62 images, but didn't go through all of them. The numbers of the batches are not remembered, but it is clear that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail that appears on both batches, as well as the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. They highlight one specific image with a little bubble and mention the batch numbers that match. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that have been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker starts by discussing the title and data for a project. They then mention the trend of clicks over time and adding more context. Next, they talk about the number of "she says" per campaign. Finally, they conclude by referring to the team as a dream team.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a tail-like mark on one ballot and explain that it appears on another as well. They also mention the presence of the word "Republican" on both ballots and a dot in the Fannie Willis. The speaker states that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't reviewed all of them yet. They don't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batch numbers and scanner numbers match for some of the duplicate ballots. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking at a more recent chart to see what has happened. They point out that the current chart is outdated and suggest focusing on more recent data for a clearer picture.

In this video, the speaker shows two batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are 62 images in total, but they only highlight a few. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They also mention specific image numbers that match in both batches. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots and the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker discusses the increase in cancer cases, specifically breast cancer, in younger age groups. They compare the numbers from 2019 to 2023 and highlight a significant spike in cases in 2022 and 2023. The speaker questions what could have caused this sudden increase and expresses frustration over the lack of studies on the potential side effects of certain treatments. They emphasize the need for further investigation into the issue.

The speaker discusses the need for trend analysis of clicks over time and adds context to the video. They also mention the importance of tracking the number of purchases per campaign.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, both from scanner 5162. They point out that there are similarities between the ballots in each batch, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they only highlight a few obvious examples. They also mention that the total numbers of the batches were fairly close. The speaker concludes that these similarities indicate duplicate ballots, suggesting that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker discusses a statistical anomaly in a race where ballots were sorted into groups of 200. Out of 61 groups, 58 favored Biden by 90% or more, while 3 favored Trump by the same margin. This suggests that someone or a group of people may have manipulated the ballots, resulting in a significant imbalance in favor of one candidate over the other in a race that was supposed to be evenly split.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking at a recent chart to see what has happened. They point out that the current chart is outdated and encourage viewers to focus on the most recent data.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out specific similarities, such as a tail and the word "Republican" written on both. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. They highlight the occurrence of duplicate ballots and mention the batch numbers and image numbers that match. The conclusion is that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker discusses the potential illegal votes in the 2020 election. They highlight the significant increase in mail-in ballots compared to previous years. They point out that only a small percentage of these ballots were rejected, suggesting a lack of proper verification. The speaker emphasizes the scale of the issue and expresses concern over the negligence in checking the legitimacy of the ballots.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 59, and scanner 5,162, batch 235, image 19. They point out that both batches have the same little tail, indicating a potential mistake or coincidence. They also highlight another example where the word "Republican" is written the same way on both ballots. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. They conclude that the entire batch seems to have been scanned multiple times.

Further analysis of the duplicates and the EVVs revealed an interesting trend. The graph shows the duplicates in relation to the daily percentage of EVVs. There was a sudden significant increase in the percentage of duplicates on certain days, with 96% of the ballots being duplicates on two of those days. The area under the curve represents around 25-30% of the duplicates, which were received between November 4th and November 9th. This led us to remove the blanks and scribbles from the plot, and the same phenomenon was observed.

In the video, the speaker discusses the issue of 17,852 ballots that lack corresponding ballot images. This is a significant number, and while the speaker can explain the number, they cannot explain how this situation occurred. They mention that they hope to receive more information about it on Tuesday. The ballots were counted in the second machine count, but there is no associated ballot image for each of them.

There are two different batches of votes being discussed in the video. The speaker points out that there are similarities between the ballots in these batches, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers of the batches, but they mention that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out similarities between the ballots, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They confirm that the batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are 235 and 304, both from scanner 5162. The speaker concludes that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times, indicating a potential issue.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.