reSee.it - Related Video Feed

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is accused of perjury in relation to the January 6th attack on the Capitol. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oath Keepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn testified that the Oath Keepers did not protect him, contradicting the defense's argument. Evidence shows that Lazarus, who claimed to have witnessed the encounter, was in a different building at the time. Videos were withheld from the defense, raising concerns about the government's handling of the case. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the agent's false testimony. The investigation aims to uncover who orchestrated this false narrative.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is at the center of a controversial story. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oathkeepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Officer Harry Dunn, who was allegedly helped by the Oathkeepers, denied their protection. Lazarus, who testified to witnessing the encounter, was proven to be in a different building at the time. CCTV footage contradicted his claims. The defense argues that the government is withholding evidence and setting up American citizens. Capitol Police leadership expressed concern about the story gaining traction. The investigation aims to uncover who orchestrated this false narrative.

Recently, some police officers testified about their trauma during the January 6th events. One officer described being outnumbered and attacked while protecting the Capitol. However, it turns out he wasn't in uniform or acting as a Capitol Police officer; he was an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation challenges the narrative surrounding the events, suggesting it was not as strong or truthful as presented. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real story and identify those truly responsible.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is at the center of a controversial story. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oathkeepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn testified that the Oathkeepers did not help him during the January 6th attack. However, Lazarus, who was in a different building at the time, claimed to have witnessed the encounter. CCTV footage contradicts Lazarus' account, showing him in a different location. The defense argues that the government is withholding evidence and setting up American citizens. The Capitol Police leadership was reportedly more concerned about the story's traction than the lie told by their special agent. The investigation continues to uncover the truth behind this incident.

Officer Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is under scrutiny for allegedly providing false testimony. His book details his experiences on January 6th, including instances of distress and erratic behavior. There are concerns about the accuracy of his accounts and his actions during the events. The Capitol Police's portrayal of Dunn as a hero is contrasted with criticism of his behavior, raising questions about the narrative surrounding January 6th. Dunn's actions and statements are being closely examined for inconsistencies and potential manipulation of information.

Blaze Media contributor Steve Baker accuses Capitol Police Officer David Lazarus of lying during his testimony in the Oath Keepers trial. Blaze Media obtained closed-circuit surveillance footage that supports the claim. Lazarus, who was assigned to be Speaker Pelosi's security detail, testified about an encounter between Officer Harry Dunn and the Oath Keepers. However, the footage shows that Lazarus could not have witnessed the encounter as he claimed. Ken Harrelson, one of the Oath Keepers, described the events accurately, and other witnesses and video evidence corroborate his account. Despite this evidence, Harrelson and his colleagues remain in prison. The footage will be released once security concerns are addressed.

The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.

Recently, some police officers spoke about their trauma during the January events. One officer described being outnumbered, beaten, and called a traitor. However, it turns out he was not in uniform and was actually an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation undermines the narrative presented, suggesting it was not based on truth. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real culprits behind the events.

The video discusses the case of Ray Epps and his alleged involvement in the events of January 6th. Epps, a former member of the Oath Keepers, was recorded whispering about storming the Capitol the day before the attack. Many have speculated that he may have been a federal informant or undercover agent. However, Epps denies these claims. The video explores Epps' background and his association with the Oath Keepers. It also highlights the reactions of those who knew him and the suspicions surrounding his actions. The video raises questions about Epps' true intentions and the possibility of undercover agents being present during the Capitol attack.

We thank you for your service in protecting our country. However, there are questions about what exactly was being protected. Security footage shows that individuals were allowed to enter without resistance, without weapons, almost like a guided tour. It's important to note that the only casualty was Ashley Babbit, who was shot by Capitol Police. So, it raises the question of what exactly was saved that day. The speaker mentions having written a book before going to break.

The speaker discusses the dishonesty surrounding the death of Brian Sicknick, a police officer. They criticize those who falsely claimed he was murdered by the mob for political gain. The speaker expresses disgust at the exploitation and lies perpetrated by certain individuals and the media. They highlight the press's resistance to releasing information and their commitment to the government's narrative. The speaker also questions the labeling of the Capitol rioters as "armed insurrectionists" when there is no evidence of them using weapons. They conclude by noting the perversion of journalism into a government-supporting entity.

Clay Higgins, a former law enforcement officer and congressman, discusses his concerns about the FBI's involvement in the events of January 6th. He claims that undercover FBI agents and informants were present in the Capitol before the protesters arrived. Higgins also argues that the FBI has been infiltrating and surveilling American citizens who express frustrations with COVID restrictions. He calls for the release of all digital evidence related to January 6th, believing it will reveal the truth about what happened. Higgins expresses his commitment to fighting for the truth and defending individual rights and freedoms.

Private first class Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is described as acting with courage to defend our institutions and our people. Critics say a Capitol Police officer assigned to Pelosi’s detail appears to have given false testimony, with Missus Percher brought in to corroborate another officer’s testimony. It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day. The officer who testified in the Oath Keepers trial was sentenced to eighteen years in prison. Dunn’s book, Standing My Ground, a capital police officer's fight for accountability and good trouble, is described as one of the first accounts from Capitol Police about January 6, and its tour is unique: 'no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories.' Pelosi says, 'And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day,' while others allege a concerted effort to manipulate information.

Jacob Chansley, often depicted as a dangerous conspiracy theorist, was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for his role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The circumstances of his entry into the Capitol remain disputed, but surveillance footage reveals that Capitol Police did not stop him. Instead, they appeared to assist him, guiding him through the building and even attempting to open locked doors. At least nine officers were in close proximity to Chansley, yet none intervened. Chansley seemed to perceive the Capitol Police as allies, as evidenced by a prayer he offered on the Senate floor thanking them. This contrasts sharply with the narrative surrounding his actions during the insurrection.

Clay Higgins, a former law enforcement officer and current congressman, discusses his concerns about the FBI's involvement in the events of January 6th. He claims that undercover FBI agents were present in the Capitol before the protesters entered and that the FBI infiltrated online groups discussing COVID-related frustrations. Higgins calls for the release of all digital evidence related to January 6th and believes it will reveal the corruption within the FBI and DOJ. He also expresses his commitment to fighting for the truth and defending the rights and freedoms of American citizens.

Evidence has emerged exposing orchestrated lies about the events of January 6th. A letter circulated by Capitol press pool and Representative Jamie Raskin's office, which called for an investigation into the events, violated Capitol Police regulations. The letter was allegedly drafted by Capitol police officer Harry Dunn, with assistance from the media and Raskin's office. Dunn had disciplinary action taken against him for this matter, but his involvement was not disclosed during the Oath Keepers trial. Blaze contributor Steve Baker believes the disciplinary report should be made public to reveal the truth. Additionally, an internal Capitol Police email suggests concern about Baker's revelations of alleged lies by another officer, David Lazarus. The corruption within the Capitol Police department needs to be addressed and its leadership replaced.

The transcript argues that the public narrative about January 6 is deceptive and centers on a “composite” story built from two officers, Michael Fanon and BA Miller. It claims that media coverage made a “perfect martyr,” putting one hero figure on every news network and prompting congressional testimony, including claims that he “beat an unconscious unconscious heart attack” and was “tased repeatedly.” It then says the story does not add up because the media “swapped their stories.” The speaker says that in Fanon’s account, he was “dragged into a violent mob,” but when asked for details, it is described as “a blur.” The transcript includes an assertion that Fanon said, “I should have brought my mask,” and then says that “Freeze the frame. Enhance it. Fanon didn’t have a mask.” It contrasts this with officer BA Miller, whom the speaker says did have a gas mask, and frames this as evidence of conflation: “Who are you really watching on the news? Conflate the officers. Sell the narrative.” The transcript also addresses the beating scene by instructing viewers to “Listen to the bloodthirsty mob” and then to “Listen again” to crowd chanting, claiming that the victim is “walking” and “talking.” It says people “helped him back up” and points to Tommy Tatum’s video, which the speaker uses to claim: “Don’t hurt him. They weren’t tearing him apart. They were protecting him.” It then shifts to the immediate aftermath, claiming Fanon is “safe” and being “examined,” and asks listeners to “Listen like a detective.” The speaker asserts that Fanon does not say the word “tased” and does not tell the medic that his heart stopped. Instead, the transcript focuses on the medic’s assessment, quoting the medic’s actions and observations: “No obvious severe injuries,” “Can’t find any fractures,” “Pupils are equal,” and that the person is “dizzy at all?” The medic is said to hear responses indicating he will “rest and enjoy,” that he is “not fighting for his life,” and that he is “laughing.” While the media is said to have claimed Fanon was “fighting for his life,” the transcript claims Fanon and “his buddies” were instead “laughing about hurting protesters.” It adds quoted statements: “we’re sorry,” “for what it’s worth,” “What if we just sit down and stop hitting us?” It further claims jokes about stolen equipment, stating that they “stole my radio,” “stole one of my pistol mags,” and “they stole mine too,” while asserting “Never mentioned a taser to his fellow cops” and that Fanon “claimed he was knocked out for four minutes.” The transcript concludes by repeating claims: the “tape keeps rolling,” the “injuries” “not there,” “the mask, didn’t have one,” and “the deadly mob, they carried him to safety.” It states that the story was assembled by “mix[ing] two cops together,” “ignore[ing] the body cam,” and “hide[ing] the medic footage,” and then labels it “Perjury on display,” calling it “the Fanon Miller deception decoded.”

Jeremy, a special forces member, was providing security at the Capitol. When he was arrested, the same officers who had recruited him were involved. They never asked if the items in question were his. There’s a pattern of hiding information, and judges have allowed this to continue. The situation could lead to indefinite detention. Jeremy expresses his commitment to remain as long as the American people support him. I'm Laura Logan, and this is the rest of the story. Join us.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, claimed to witness an encounter between Officer Dunn and Oath Keepers on January 6th. However, CCTV footage showed Lazarus was in a different building at the time. The defense argued that the government withheld evidence and set up American citizens for long sentences. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the false testimony. The case raises questions about who orchestrated the false narrative presented in court.

Two men approach police officers at the second line. One discusses his recent release from jail and claims the government has misled the public about January 6th. He argues that while many law enforcement officers were injured, the narrative that protesters killed anyone is false; the deceased were all protesters, including Ashley Babbitt, shot by police. He highlights instances of police brutality and the lack of investigations into officers’ actions. He also mentions the presence of undercover agents, particularly Ray Epps, who allegedly incited the crowd. He criticizes the harsh sentences faced by January 6th participants compared to leniency shown to others in similar situations, calling for their pardons. He emphasizes the unfair treatment and suffering endured by those involved, urging for justice and accountability.

On this day, my role was as a capital police officer. I'm Harry Dunn. I swore an oath to protect our constitution, to protect our democracy. It's what allowed me to protect some members Congress who I knew were bigots. I put country above self. The problem is a lot of them didn't. Some who stood behind us when we protected them went back on the floor of congress and stood behind Trump. They voted to acquit him. And worst of all, they denied the violence and trauma that led to the death of some of my fellow officers. I couldn't stand by and watch. I left the force after more than fifteen years of service. So that today, I can announce I'm running for congress. We can't ever let this happen again. We've got a democracy to protect.

Sergeant Aquilino Ganell, a United States Capitol Police officer, recounts his experience during the January 6th insurrection. He describes being called a traitor, which deeply affected him as someone who serves his country. Ganell fought against the rioters, enduring injuries and fearing for his life. He witnessed the brutality inflicted on his fellow officers and was determined to protect the Capitol. The video highlights the emotional toll on Ganell and Officer Byron Evans, who evacuated senators and watched the riot unfold on TV. Despite the trauma, they returned to work shortly after. Ganell expresses his disappointment in the lack of support from the country he loves and sacrificed for.

Specific observations indicate police officers and Capitol Police entered rooms in uniform and emerged as Trump supporters and construction workers. This raises questions about why video evidence hasn't been released. Navigating the Capitol's maze-like layout requires extensive familiarity. Trump supporters leading the way inside the Capitol before doors opened likely coordinated with FBI agents and assets embedded in the crowd, possibly for months. The speaker believes the American people deserve to know this truth.

During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.

US Capitol Police Officer Sergeant Aquilino Ganell is resigning from his position due to the toll the Capitol insurrection has taken on him. In his first TV interview since announcing his resignation, Ganell explains that his injuries and PTSD, along with limitations in his shoulder motion, prevent him from continuing his duties. The final straw was when someone taped a photograph of Donald Trump to his work computer. Ganell holds Trump and his supporters responsible for the riot. He also criticizes Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene for downplaying the riot and making insensitive comments. Ganell is now focusing on healing, writing a book, and considering his next steps.