reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Few entrepreneurs have achieved as much as he has, demonstrating remarkable executional excellence akin to Steve Jobs. His ideas about government merit attention, as they are beneficial for everyone. If he claims he can save $2 trillion in spending, I believe him, given the significant waste in federal government spending that we all witness. This is a bipartisan issue; we all recognize the inefficiencies. If we empower him with a mandate, history shows he delivers results. He has consistently accomplished extraordinary things. We should leverage this potential.

- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem. - Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research. - Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs. - Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information. - Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help. - Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions. - They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party. - Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.

Trump is the first president in 40 years to cut waste, fraud, and abuse, which makes Democrats jealous because they ran on the same promises but never delivered. Democrats' "dirty little playbook" involved promising action, never following through, and repeatedly campaigning on the same issues to remain politicians for life and profit from insider trading. Trump is fixing problems and uncovering their fraud, signaling the end of their scheme. Democrats are experiencing a "psychotic break" because their world is ending and they are struggling to accept reality.

The speaker discusses their voting preferences and expresses disappointment in the Obama administration. They also mention the impact of their company, Tesla, and its contribution to manufacturing jobs. The interviewer questions the speaker's support for a candidate who denies climate change, to which the speaker disagrees. They explain their interest in hearing different perspectives and express concerns about government control of information. The speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom of speech and the First Amendment. When asked about voting for Biden, the speaker states they would not vote for him but does not explicitly state support for Trump. They also reject the idea of voting for Nikki Haley due to her stance on social media censorship.

The speaker, a former Democrat who now leans towards the center-right, acknowledges that despite not being a fan of Trump, his administration achieved some significant accomplishments. They highlight the Abraham Accords and the peace agreements between Israel, the GCC, and potentially Saudi Arabia as examples of long-lasting peace efforts. The speaker believes that Trump's achievements are often overshadowed by "Trump derangement syndrome," causing people to overlook the positive work done during his presidency. They mention the success of the border wall, refinancing long-term debt at low rates, and making progress in the Middle East as instances where the message was dismissed due to dislike for the messenger. The speaker urges listeners to look past personal biases and listen to the content of the message.

The speakers disagree on President Trump's competency. One speaker believes it's absurd to question Trump's competency, especially after years of questioning President Biden's mental acuity. The speaker believes words matter and should be used carefully to avoid inflaming the public and to arrive at the truth. The other speaker questions Trump's competency, cognitive abilities, ignorance, and truthfulness, citing examples such as a photoshopped photo, a Supreme Court ruling, Elon Musk holding press conferences in the Oval Office, misunderstanding trade deficits, and a disastrous economy. This speaker believes Trump has driven the country into a disastrous economy, undermined the rule of law and democracy, and cut taxes for the rich. The first speaker disagrees, stating that the first hundred days are exactly what Trump promised and what the American people voted for.

Speaker 1, a Democrat, addresses concerns about receiving support from right-wing figures like Steve Bannon and Donald Trump. He emphasizes his goal of bringing people together and bridging the divide in America. Speaker 1 shares a personal story about his father's train ride, highlighting the diverse support his father received in the past. He acknowledges that he doesn't agree with Trump on most issues but is proud to have support from various groups. Speaker 1 believes in finding common values and focusing on issues that unite people rather than those that divide them. He aims to end polarization by engaging with those who have different opinions.

The speaker has been to Mar-a-Lago a fair amount since the election, spending maybe half their time there or in the surrounding area. They clarify they are not in the room for decision-making but are trying to help in as many ways as possible. The speaker acknowledges that Trump elicits strong feelings in people. They deliberately avoid weighing in on many political topics, such as foreign policy, abortion policy, or guns. Their focus is on tech policy, business, economics, the health of the country, and its success.

Disturbed by elected officials' negative comments towards American citizens, emphasizing the need for change. The Bronx rally showcased unity among diverse groups, with Trump showing care. Criticizing past empty promises, advocating for investments in communities, job opportunities, and education to uplift individuals. Expressing disappointment in the Democratic party's failure to deliver, calling for a shift in priorities. The speaker urges for action to empower and support marginalized communities.

According to Speaker 1, President Trump spent four years planning his return and knew exactly what he wanted to do upon entering office. Trump blew up the establishment, offering Americans hope and a choice beyond the status quo. The speaker claims Trump outmaneuvers the left and is determined to do what's right for the American people. The Democratic party allegedly resorts to lawfare due to an unsellable ideology with unpopular stances on issues like open borders, taxes, and policing. The speaker believes Democrats are doomed if a free and fair society is achieved. The administration is focused on reforming education, fighting crime, and ensuring fair trade. The speaker asserts that Trump built a movement with a generation of leaders to carry on his work. Restoring the republic means prioritizing law-abiding citizens and ensuring the government serves them first.

Yesterday, Randy Fine called me. He berated me for forty two minutes about the Florida governor's race, telling me that if I entered that race, there would be real problems for me in the future, telling me that it wouldn't be nice to Byron Donalds if I ran against him as if we don't have elections in this country. Randy, if Byron is such a good candidate, he'll trounce me. But the truth is Republicans are the ones who got trounced this week. Republicans got trounced because of people like you and Byron Donald's. People like you and Byron Donald's, all you get done is write strongly worded letters, go on CNN and Fox News and whine, and then come back to your districts and act like you got something done for Americans. It's an absolute joke. The only person who's working in Washington DC goes by the name of Donald j Trump. And the do nothing congressional Republicans, many of whom are good people, but the truth of the matter is that if Elon Musk emailed you guys and asked you what you got done this week, you would say absolutely nothing. Because you know what? Going on TV, whining on podcasts, and writing tweets does not count. That does not count as getting something done for hardworking Americans. But you know the beautiful thing about all of this is that you guys endorse each other. You and Byron are thick as thieves, which is quite fitting actually. You guys endorse each other. Byron, you endorsed Randy for his congressional reelection. So Byron, let me ask you. Do you endorse Randy Fine's comment on 07/22/2025 in which in response to children starving in Gaza, Randy said, quote, starve away. This is the problem. This is the problem with you congressional Republicans is you are not focused on delivering for America first. We did not vote for foreign wars. We did not vote for bombing other countries. We did not vote for any of that. We voted for America first, period. End of story. And what you guys have done has been a complete humiliation, a complete rejection of the historic landslide, the mandate that we as voters gave president Trump. Get back to DC, do your jobs, and actually deliver America first.

The speaker admits to initially believing the economy would be tanked by July 4th, a prediction that did not come to pass. While acknowledging economic downturn is still possible, the speaker emphasizes the current reality: the stock market is at record highs, and they don't observe signs of a depression. They expected tariffs to sink the economy, but that hasn't happened. The speaker stresses the importance of dealing with this reality instead of being driven by dislike of Donald Trump, which they believe is unproductive and leads to dishonesty. They admit to not knowing Trump's strategy but acknowledge the current economic indicators.

The speaker criticizes Democrats for not considering the positive aspects of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. They highlight the innovation and growth they witnessed during a bus trip across the country. The speaker believes that when people associate MAGA with voting for Trump, they unfairly scapegoat his supporters. They acknowledge that Trump had some valid points about NATO, immigration, and the economy, but they disagree with his approach. The speaker calls for more respect and understanding towards fellow citizens, urging people to ask why individuals support Trump instead of making it a binary decision. They also criticize the negative rhetoric surrounding MAGA, believing it will have a detrimental effect on the economy.

The speakers disagree on President Trump's competency. One speaker believes it's absurd to question Trump's competency, especially after years of questioning President Biden's mental acuity. They stress the importance of accurate language to avoid inflaming the public and to arrive at the truth. The other speaker questions Trump's competency, cognitive abilities, ignorance, and truthfulness, citing examples such as a photoshopped photo, a Supreme Court ruling, Elon Musk holding press conferences in the Oval Office, and misunderstanding trade deficits. They believe Trump's first hundred days have been disastrous, undermining the rule of law and democracy, and benefiting the rich. The first speaker disagrees, stating that the first hundred days align with Trump's promises and what the American people voted for.

Initially skeptical of Trump, the speaker eventually rated his presidency positively, acknowledging his accomplishments. They praised his avoidance of worsening situations, particularly in wars, which they considered a significant achievement. Another speaker commended Trump's willingness to negotiate and do business, highlighting his meetings with Kim Jong Un, Putin, and Xi Jinping without personal criticism. They attributed this approach to the "art of the deal." The first speaker argued that Trump derangement syndrome prevented people from recognizing the administration's good work and building upon it. They mentioned the success of the border wall, issuing long-term debt at low rates, and a structural piece in the Middle East, criticizing the tendency to dismiss messages based on the messenger. They urged listeners to look past who is speaking and truly listen to the words being said.

The speaker criticizes Ada Hutchinson, the governor of Arkansas, for lacking personality and being a nasty person. They also mention Chris Christie and Liz Cheney, accusing them of having Trump Derangement Syndrome. The speaker claims to have pardoned Scooter Libby, a friend of the Cheney family, while criticizing them for not doing anything for him. They argue that they are not a threat to democracy, but rather Joe Biden is.

Musk is often criticized for his power, but his contributions to technology are significant. AOC drives a Tesla, highlighting Musk's impact. Young innovators are dedicating themselves to serve the public, unlike bureaucrats who may be misusing resources. The Democrats may try to block Trump’s nominees, but he is determined to push through obstacles. Musk's hands-on approach at Tesla, where he lived in the factory to boost production, exemplifies his commitment. Instead of criticism, we should celebrate his efforts to eliminate waste in government. The public's discontent with the Democratic Party's decline in polls reflects this sentiment.

I believe calling out Elon Musk is effective messaging when confronting the transformation of the US government. The American public wants us to bring real weapons to this fight for democracy and the country's future. It's important to push back, especially when someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who often talks about decorum, is being disingenuous. If she's going to make a mockery of hearings, we as Democrats need to match that energy. After those comments, we discussed Elon Musk's actions, like dismantling the Department of Labor, Education, and consumer protection agencies. It's vital to get the public's attention, call Elon Musk out, and show that Marjorie Taylor Greene isn't a serious legislator.

Speaker 0 expresses doubt about Donald Trump's ability to save the country, suggesting that he should focus on himself first. They mention that people don't appreciate the fact that he is aware of what they have been doing. Speaker 0 believes that Trump cares about the city and women in particular. They emphasize that he is not just concerned about his own family but also about everyone else.

The speaker asserts that critics of President Trump's agenda are responsible for COVID lockdowns, open borders, Middle East failures, federal overreach, and the offshoring of essential industries to China. The speaker claims Trump inherited these problems and is actively fixing them. According to the speaker, under Trump, the Southern Border has the lowest number of illegal crossings in US history. The speaker says Trump is protecting American jobs and manufacturing, preventing foreign countries from undermining national defense. The speaker states that manufacturing security is national security, and Trump is confronting the bureaucracy and judiciary that have taken away citizens' rights. The speaker concludes that Trump is restoring national democracy and popular sovereignty, making America free again.

The speaker discusses the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, emphasizing their contributions to saving civilization. Musk is credited with liberating speech through his acquisition of Twitter/X, while Trump is recognized for building an unprecedented political movement. Despite the feud, reconciliation is anticipated due to shared goals. The conflict stems from Trump's stance on a bill focused on no tax on tips, border security, ICE agent growth, energy independence, tax on remittances, asylum claim fees, and financing mass deportations. Although the bill cuts $1.6 trillion, the speaker acknowledges the challenges of a narrow House majority. The speaker dismisses the idea of a new political party proposed by Musk, asserting that unity, not division, is the solution. The focus should be on building a working-class movement and uniting against leftism, socialism, Marxism, and open borders. The speaker hopes Trump disengages from the feud and that Musk will support the existing movement.

The speaker argues that the Trump administration represents the best they’ve seen, and that ten years after the Trump movement and Brexit, their side is in power, with hopes for JD Vance and Marco Rubio to hold leadership for many years. They note that shortly after Trump took office, a drumbeat labeled him as dangerous or controlled, and criticize the tendency to treat those in government as if their duties were the same as those in opposition. They reflect on being Jewish within the nationalist movement, describing it as easy and rewarding for years, especially defending against accusations of anti-Semitism by arguing that critics hadn’t engaged with their speakers or understood the context. That ease has diminished recently, as they observe deeper slander of Jews on the right over the past year and a half. The speaker notes a troubling shift among some right-wing figures who used to advocate for a Jewish-Christian alliance to save America, but now, for reasons they don’t fully understand, advocate praising the Muslim Brotherhood, Islam, and the Quran, while portraying Jews as a major problem. The speaker hopes this will pass and urges a rethink of the relationship between Jews and Christians, asking for mutual honor and discussion rather than hostile accusations, which could include medieval-style accusations against Jews. They reiterate that the coalition was built by Donald Trump and is broad enough to win future elections, but warn that driving coalition members away or dishonoring them risks harming JD Vance’s prospects, Rubio’s prospects, and America’s prospects. Ultimately, the speaker states that there is a choice to be made: if members of the coalition continue to attack and alienate others, they undermine the chances of maintaining the coalition’s gains and electoral success.

The speaker asserts that the Trump administration was “the best administration I’ve ever seen,” noting it’s ten years after the Trump movement and Brexit, and that their side is in power. They express willingness for a long political run, saying they’d be happy if JD Vance could be president for eight years and Marco Rubio for another eight, with continued involvement. They remark that after Trump, the drumbeat of opposition began quickly, accusing him of starting World War III or being controlled, and they stress that those in government have different responsibilities from those in opposition. They ask how JD Vance can win the next election if the group outside has spent four years tearing each other apart. The speaker then addresses being Jewish within the NatCon movement. They state they’ve never done this before and are not particularly comfortable with it. They reflect that it was easy and great to be a leader in the nationalist movement and Jewish until about a year and a half ago, because whenever left-leaning Jews or others accused their speakers of antisemitism, the speaker could defend them, arguing people hadn’t spoken to the person, hadn’t read full statements, and were taking a sentence out of context. They found it fun and rewarding to defend against what they viewed as false, ridiculous antisemitism accusations, and it made them popular. Now, they say, it’s not that easy anymore. They acknowledge that criticism of Israel is fine as a policy discussion, but they’ve been struck by the “depth of the slander of Jews as a people” online over the last year and a half, and say they didn’t expect this on the right. They observe a transition among some on the right—people they once admired and still admire in part—who now believe that praising the Muslim Brotherhood, Islam, and the Quran is appropriate, and that Jews are a big problem. They express hope this will pass and call for reconsidering the relationship between Jews and Christians, proposing a mutual discussion and honor if possible, rather than a vile stream of accusations about Jews’ actions toward Christians in the Middle Ages. Finally, they stress that the coalition was built by Donald Trump and is broad enough to win the next election and future ones. They warn that driving coalition members out, dishonoring them, or keeping them dishonored will lead to loss: it would destroy Vance’s prospects, Rubio’s prospects, and America’s prospects. The speaker presents a choice: preserve the coalition or risk undermining it.

The speaker asserts that the more people see the subject, the more they will like her, citing her effectiveness in the senate, particularly her focus on families and ability to collaborate. The speaker highlights her role in pushing for $35 insulin for senior citizens, with the goal of extending it to everyone. When asked about Trump taking credit for this, the speaker claims Trump takes credit for things he doesn't do and gets blamed for things he does, suggesting he is losing his bearings.