reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

We need to prepare for the upcoming event that will definitely grab people's attention this time.

The United Nations approved a declaration on pandemic prevention. The WHO will vote on international agreements in May 2020. The process is secretive and not widely discussed. The WHO seeks leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

An entity declared it will achieve net zero emissions by 2050, with specific targets for 2025 and 2030 to allow for short-term measurement. Implicitly, the entity anticipates significant financial gains from this transition, believing that being carbon competitive will create value as the world moves in this direction.

Speaker 0 discusses an upcoming March, which they describe as the No Kings March, scheduled for March 28 across the United States. They state that this march will probably be the biggest mass march demonstration in American history and affirm that they will be in attendance along with the We steady state. They also note that they are partners with many organizations that span a wide range of political views and specific positions, emphasizing a broad coalition. The central message conveyed is that it is time to go out into the street and demonstrate the resolve of the American people to stay a democracy. Speaker 0 mentions attending a planning meeting for the No Kings rally on March 28 and adds, “there’s my plug again,” indicating personal involvement and enthusiasm, and notes that they left the planning meeting practically in tears. The speaker emphasizes the scale and significance of the effort by stating that thousands of people are involved in the planning of this event. The transcript ends with an incomplete line: “What’s,” suggesting there is more to the discussion that is not included in the excerpt.

Things have become too polarized, preventing meaningful dialogue between opposing groups. There’s a sense of urgency to take action by 2025; if nothing is done by then, it will be concerning. While risks aren't immediate, time is running short. We need to move beyond the extreme pro-safety and anti-regulatory rhetoric that has dominated discussions, particularly on social media. This ongoing conflict is unproductive and hinders progress.

The speaker states they will achieve net zero by February 1950, with specific, measurable short-term targets set for 2025 and February 1930. They also believe they will profit from this initiative, as the world is moving in this direction. They express confidence that being carbon competitive will create value.

Establishment of the Highlands National Monument is underway. Santino is involved in the process, and there are discussions about filling in necessary dates. The focus is on ensuring everything is completed by the deadline.

Today, we're discussing our concerns. There are many reasons for this, but the main one is important to us.

We are working on a situation today, aiming for the perfect call to action.

The chart referenced is a few months old, and it’s worth examining the recent developments to understand the current situation better.

We need to prepare for the next event, which is likely to attract significant attention.

I've heard that by 2027, there will be significant developments. While I can't disclose specifics, it's clear that the government is aware of an impending situation. There’s a limited timeframe to prepare the public, which is why we're seeing an acceleration in acknowledgment of these issues. Over the past seven decades, there was little recognition, but now we're increasingly addressing it.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention and response. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

Speaker 0 states: "We're gonna manage to net zero by 02/1950. Actually, we're gonna have specific targets by 2025 and 02/1930, so you can measure the short term. And they don't say this quite as loudly, but what they're also saying and thinking, and we're gonna make a lot of money off of this because actually this is the way the world's headed. I mean, I'm sure exactly where we get there, but to be carbon competitive is is gonna be value creating."

A proper digital infrastructure is critical for managing vaccinations, especially with multiple-shot vaccines. It's essential to track who has been vaccinated. This is important not only for healthcare in general, but specifically for managing pandemics and vaccine distribution. However, most countries currently lack this necessary digital infrastructure.

Speaker 0: I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Speaker 1: Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane. Yeah. And so, this is just one aspect of digital currency play. Obviously, there's a lot more than that just going on as well. I would argue that a lot of this push, particularly in The US for dollar stablecoins supposedly being better than a central bank digital currency, also falls into this paradigm we talked about earlier of, you know, moving from the public to the private of the public private partnership because a lot of these stablecoin issuers, you know, if the the big concerns about CBDCs was that they're seasable, they're surveillable and they're programmable, Well, all of those three things also can apply to stablecoins. The only difference is that you would have a private company issue it and control it. But we've seen time and again how a lot of these private entities are willing to do that. When contacted, just look at how Bank of America behaved with January 6, people accused of wrongdoing on that day, for You know, they have no qualms in doing that and engaging in those type of activities. And the biggest dollar stablecoin issuer, Tether, which just hired Bo Hynes from the White House, they have openly said that they are a close partner of the US government for dollar hegemony globally and have uploaded the FBI, the Secret Service and other aspects of the US government onto its platform directly and have seized tethers from people just because government told them to, and this was during the Biden administration. So they obviously are willing to do that under any administration, and it's essentially functioning as a de facto public private partnership, even though we're being told it's a it's much better than a CBDC, but in terms of its impacts on civil liberties, you know, that's not necessarily true. So, again, vigilance is is important here.

Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1 on leadership and promises, noting that public faith is essential to recover in the polls. They reference Speaker 1’s pledge to “smash the gangs” and point out that small boat crossings and the use of asylum hotels have continued to rise, asking if the mission is succeeding and whether the promise to end asylum hotels by the end of the parliament (2029) will be met. Speaker 1 responds that asylum hotels peaked at 400 and are now about 197, with some of that decline occurring before they came to power. The criticization centers on the previous government failing to process asylum claims, which allowed tens of thousands to arrive without determination. This, Speaker 1 argues, created a growing pool needing accommodation, making the hotel system “absurd.” The only long-term solution, he says, is to process those claims and determine who should stay and who should be removed. He claims they have removed 50,000 since taking office—the largest number in the best part of a decade—and reiterates a commitment to ending asylum hotels by the end of this parliament, though he notes it was not a fulfilled part of the manifesto. Speaker 0 presses again, asking for progress and whether the target will be met this year, emphasizing taxpayer frustration due to the last government’s mess and the tens of thousands in limbo awaiting decisions. Speaker 1 clarifies that there is no fixed date yet; he wants the timeline brought forward and accelerated, but he does not want to set a date until the team is confident it can be met. He asserts that the evidence of progress will appear in coming months, and, as they move into 2026, there will be visible steps toward closing the hotels. He stresses that the only lasting reduction in asylum hotels will come from swift processing of claims, ensuring those without a right to be here are removed, and that the pursuit of this objective must be brought forward, not delayed.

The ISO 2022 priority is being given a lot of attention and is considered highly important. The November 2023 deadline seems to be the main focus for everyone.

The United Nations approved a declaration on pandemic prevention. The WHO will vote on international agreements in May 2020. The process is secretive and not widely discussed. The WHO seeks leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

This morning, the United Nations approved a political declaration on pandemic prevention. In May 2024, the WHO will have a final vote on international agreements behind closed doors. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.