TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that measles was not deadly in the US after the early 1900s, citing improved nutrition and later, Vitamin A treatment. They believe contracting measles can be beneficial, leading to increased resistance to certain diseases. Regarding an outbreak in Samoa, the speaker alleges that a measles vaccine caused deaths, not measles itself, and that they did not influence policy there. They maintain that vaccines cause autism, referencing a CDC study on the hepatitis B vaccine that showed an elevated risk. They accuse the CDC of fraud, claiming a scientist named Paul Thornson produced a study to create the illusion that vaccines don't cause autism, stole money, and is now a fugitive. The speaker states there are hundreds of studies linking vaccines to autism and neurological injuries. They accuse the CDC of being controlled by the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine adjuvants, particularly aluminum, and their potential link to allergies. They highlight the paradox of using inflammation-inducing substances to make vaccines work in a nonspecific way, especially when inflammation is generally considered harmful. The speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should necessitate specific instructions to minimize the risk of triggering reactions to non-pathogens, potentially leading to lifelong reactivity. They claim to have never heard such instructions being provided.

The speaker believes current vaccines and mRNA-based vaccine designs cannot be safe enough. They compare vaccines to television or social media, stating that the business model and methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Upon learning that vaccines use adjuvants to hyperactivate the immune system, the speaker questioned its safety and connection to allergies. They highlight that vaccines are designed to cause inflammation to work. Using aluminum as an example, the speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should require detailed instructions to minimize the risk of triggering the immune system to react to non-pathogens, which could cause lasting reactivity. They state they have never heard of such instructions.

The speaker discusses peanut butter and genetics of public guidance around it. They claim peanut butter and peanuts are loaded with copper, and that this is why people are told to stay away from them. They also state that peanuts are high in zinc and label peanuts as a complete “superfood.” The speaker asserts that there is a broader narrative about mold and toxicity that leads to avoidance, but argues that whenever something is repeatedly advised to be “stay away,” one should consider using it. Further, the speaker mentions uranium glass and copper cups as items people are told to avoid, suggesting the need to “check it out” and experimentar with them to see how one feels. They advise trying organic peanut butter from Azure and report personally eating about a half a jar per day. The speaker uses this personal consumption as a counterexample to the claim that peanut butter is toxic. They imply there were toxins used to make people allergic to peanuts, though they state this as a part of what “they forgot to say about that whole thing.” The speaker reinforces the idea that peanuts are high in copper and zinc and insists that peanut butter is a “complete superfood.” The closing example stresses that if the alleged toxicity were true, the speaker would have been affected or “gone a long time ago,” given their consumption of organic peanuts. Overall, the speaker presents a contrarian view that peanut butter’s copper and zinc content, along with a supposed history of toxins and allergies, should prompt skepticism toward avoidance messages and encourage personal experimentation with organic peanut products, specifically citing Azure as a brand and advocating substantial daily intake. The argument centers on re-evaluating conventional guidance and endorsing personal dietary experimentation with peanuts and peanut butter.

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. And, you know, there’s two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't.

Speaker 0 claims that pork is avoided so people can be sold Viagra, arguing that the precursors of pork and nitric oxide appear in the pharmaceutical product Viagra; thus, when men have erection problems, pharmaceutical companies can sell them Viagra instead of encouraging them to eat organic pork. They assert a broader pattern: foods are taken away from people, like peanuts, so that TRT can be sold, along with hormones and Viagra, and other products for gut issues supposedly caused by pesticide spraying on crops. They state that probiotics are grown on canola, corn, and soy. The conversation also mentions raw eggs; raw eggs are said to be very beneficial, and the speaker claims to eat two raw eggs every day. The speaker concludes that healing is simple.

Rats can be given food allergies by administering aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a specific protein like peanut or dairy. This induces a permanent allergy to that protein. Vaccines not only contain aluminum adjuvant but also peanut oil excipients, potentially contributing to peanut allergies in a generation. The aluminum adjuvant can also trigger allergies to substances in the environment at the time of vaccination, such as Timothy weed. A study by Mawson indicates that vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. The speaker claims that the prevalence of allergies in children is linked to the aluminum in vaccines.

Mold on raw dairy is actually blue cheese. So people used to eat a lot of blue cheese. But it wasn't until they were injected with penicillin till they stopped eating as much blue cheese as they once did. Because the mold in the blue cheese pulls heavy metals out of their body. There's a great book called the peanut allergy epidemic, which is a deep dive, and you can kind of figure out where the peanut allergy came from, you know, the latex allergy, the shellfish allergy, you know, all these different allergies, they're coming from the injections. And now we have people with tick allergies. Now we have people with meat allergies. Now we have people with egg allergies, dairy allergies. You kinda see what's going on there? And guess who sells the EpiPen? The same people who created those injections that they were putting into the people.

The speaker asserts that the vaccines given this morning in hospitals across America to newborns and others contain a long list of ingredients, including gelatin from boiled pig skin, chicken embryo protein, blood from the hearts of cow fetuses, human fetus DNA, oil extracted from shark liver, proteins from worm ovaries, monkey kidney DNA fragments, and then proceeds to mention the chemical ingredients formaldehyde, polysorbate eighty, potassium chloride, phenyl, borax, aluminum salts, mercury, and Triton X-100 (which is used in spermicides). The speaker emphasizes that potassium chloride is the ingredient used as the third injection when we execute people by lethal injection, noting that it is a smaller dose for infants, and explicitly states that they are not claiming it’s the same dose. The speaker then lists: formaldehyde, polysorbate eighty, and potassium chloride among the chemicals, followed by assertions that this combination includes substances the speaker believes people would not want to inject into their children. The speaker highlights the idea that parents should not inject their babies with something they don’t understand, and asserts that millions of Americans do exactly that every time they go to CVS or Long’s Drugs. The speaker paints a scenario where a 23-year-old assistant pharmacist—described as someone who doesn’t know what he’s mixing and doesn’t know what questions he’s supposed to ask—figures it out and gives your baby an injection, and notes that people go along with it.

The cause of the peanut allergy epidemic is unknown. One hypothesis suggests a correlation between peanut snack consumption and lower allergy rates in Israel, but this doesn't prove causation. There are also virtually no allergies in the Amish community. One speaker's son had severe peanut allergies, leading to the formation of the Food Allergy Initiative, which funded research at Mount Sinai. Scientists there could induce allergies in rats using an aluminum adjuvant and a protein. The speaker claims this adjuvant is also in the hepatitis B vaccine, which sometimes contains peanut oil. A study by Moss and Cowlings allegedly showed that environmental factors at the time of vaccination can also cause allergies. They also found vaccinated children are thirty times more likely to have allergic rhinitis than unvaccinated children. The speaker suggests examining the aluminum in vaccines, as the allergy explosion began in 1989 when the vaccine schedule expanded. Another speaker notes Israel uses the same vaccines. The first speaker counters that Israel doesn't use as many vaccines, nor do they administer the hepatitis B vaccine within the first 24 hours of life, unlike the US.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

- Speaker 0 announces a fact check giveaway for a big bag of pearl and invites viewers to comment “pearl” for a chance to win. - The fact checkers told me that you can't rub off moles and they're not the build up of toxins. - Cheryl says, “I've been using your pearl powder and coconut oil and they are slowly popping off.” - A claim about peanut oil not being in the vaccines is raised, with a prompt: “Do you read that headline from 1964?” - The speaker asks, “Do you know what caused the peanut allergies?” - Two days ago, the speaker received medical misinformation on YouTube about prostate solutions, noting, “Look at how dangerous these solutions are.” - Other items mentioned include apricots, bee pollen, shibbolshot, reishi, and not microwaving your kahonas and keeping your phone out of your pocket. - The speaker references a video about not removing wisdom teeth because they affect your heart, calling it “unsupported information,” then instructs to Google meridian lines for wisdom teeth and to see “Heart.” - They state that viruses are not real: “There are no viruses.” - The statement “What you do to your body determines how you will get ill” is made, followed by the claim that “Those masks and those boosters weren't doing much of anything other than poisoning people,” and, “If it was real, we would be gone a long time ago.” - The message ends with good luck on the fact check giveaway, noting that it “takes a simple Google search to find the truth.” - Books suggested to look into include: The Contagion Myth, The Invisible Rainbow, Can You Catch a Cold? No, you can’t, and Murder by Injection; followed by “Keyword murder, farewell to virology, light as medicine,” and then The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Frazer as another recommended read.

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The speaker asserts that modern vaccines contain a wide range of ingredients sourced from animals, humans, and chemicals, and that these are used in vaccines given this morning in hospitals across America to newborns and other people. He enumerates the ingredients exactly as claimed: “The modern ingredients in your current vaccines. Oh, gelatin from boiled pig skin, just like the old one. Chicken embryo protein. Blood from the hearts of cow fetuses. Human fetus DNA. Oil extracted from shark liver. Proteins from worm ovaries, you don't want to leave that out, monkey kidney DNA fragments.” He adds a set of chemical ingredients: “That stuff I just read is in the vaccines that are given this morning in hospitals all over America to newborns and other people. Now, there's the chemical ingredients. Formaldehyde. Well, who doesn't already know that formaldehyde is not, hey, give me some formaldehyde. Everybody knows that's no good for you. Polysorbate eighty, which causes infertility. And this is my favorite one. Potassium chloride.” He calls potassium chloride his favorite because it “is the ingredient used as the third injection when we execute people by lethal injection. Right? Obviously a smaller dose for infants. I'm not claiming it's the same dose.” He continues listing: “Phenyl, borox, aluminum salts, mercury, Triton X-100, which is used in spermicides.” The speaker argues that injecting such substances into babies is unacceptable, posing a rhetorical question: “You really want to inject my baby with something that's used in spermicides? No parent would let a stranger walk up to their kid and inject them with something they don't understand.” He contends that millions of Americans do this “every time they go to CVS, every time they go to Long's Drugs,” because a 23-year-old assistant pharmacist “doesn't know what he's mixing, doesn't know what questions he's supposed to ask, figures it out, and gives your baby an injection.” He concludes that people go along with it. In addition to the ingredient list, the speaker connects potassium chloride to lethal injections and emphasizes the idea that a common pharmaceutical practice involves injecting substances with controversial associations, as part of a broader critique of vaccine contents and administration.

Speaker 0 expresses a belief that adverse events from regular vaccines occur more frequently than people imagine, including things like allergies. They state that their own allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they feel they will never recover. They also mention that one of their sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to disrupt daily life, while another son has a dairy allergy that the speaker attributes to an allergy to mother's milk, which the speaker says they did not understand at the time but observed as the baby spit up regularly after breastfeeding. The speaker describes this dairy-related issue as a huge waste of a precious resource and questions whether evolution could be blamed for it, noting the expectation that ancestors would be starving and not surrender such nutrients if food were abundant. The speaker elaborates on their current interpretation by suggesting that the dairy allergy in their child was developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. They use this line of reasoning to illustrate a broader point about their view of vaccines and safety testing. The long, winding explanation leads to the central claim: given the education they have received, if they could do everything again, they would choose not to give any vaccines to their newborn children. They make it clear that they are not asserting that it is impossible that some vaccines are more beneficial than harmful, but they state that they now know they cannot trust the safety testing. In the closing, the speaker asserts that even if there were indications that a vaccine might be net beneficial, they would be compelled to wonder what else they do not know. The overall message emphasizes a deep skepticism about safety testing and a belief that current knowledge is insufficient to justify vaccinating newborns, as presented by Speaker 0.

The speaker discusses provocative ideas from the book We Want To Live regarding mold and detoxification. They claim that mold can eat heavy metals, and that moldy substances can play a detoxifying role in the body. The speaker notes that, in younger years, people were injected with penicillin, which allegedly makes you allergic to mold so that you won’t eat mold to detox heavy metals from those injections. They describe this as mind-blowing and reference the book to support the idea that mold can detoxify the body by consuming heavy metals. The speaker cites passages from We Want To Live about people consuming moldy berries to eliminate heavy metals inside the body, suggesting mold eats candida and cleanses metals and related toxins. They argue that moldy fruit such as a moldy strawberry or moldy blueberry, which many would discard, is actually detoxifying and connected to the amoxicillin, penicillin, and other penicillin-like injections used to induce allergies to mold. This, they say, is tied to the broader claim that those injections were used to make people allergic to substances that would otherwise pull metals from the body and thereby heal it. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the emotional reaction to the book, describing it as the kind of read that makes you want to punch somebody in the face. They use the book's ideas to explain why someone might be wondering why they are allergic to something. The narrative suggests a causal chain: injections were administered to people to induce allergies to certain substances, which would otherwise facilitate detoxification by pulling metals out of the body and promoting healing. The speaker asserts that the system injected people with substances to make them allergic to others, implying a deliberate design behind such allergies that impacts detoxification processes. Overall, the speaker presents a controversial and conspiratorial interpretation of how mold, heavy metals, antibiotics, and allergic responses are linked, drawing on We Want To Live as the source for these claims. The central assertions are that mold can detox heavy metals, that moldy foods participate in this detox, and that medical injections (penicillin/amoxicillin) were used to generate mold allergies to prevent detoxification. The discussion centers on the provocative implications of these ideas and the emotional reaction they provoke.

The speaker traces the origins and contents of vaccines from their earliest forms to modern childhood vaccines, presenting a sequence of claimed ingredients and comparisons. - The concept of a vaccine is said to have started from the word cowpox, with the idea that “cow pus” was used. Pus from cows was rubbed into wounds on people, leading to early vaccines. - They claim that practitioners experimented for a long time with various substances, including horse pus and cow pus from an infected horse’s hoof, rubbed into people. - Early vaccines are described as being steeped for years in a mix of ox bile, glycerin, and potato slices, which the speaker notes sounds like a joke but asserts to be true. - The evolution then moves to more modern-but-old-time ingredients, listing dried rabbit spinal cords, duck embryos, chicken blood, human bile (because it shouldn’t be wasted), ground-up rat spleens, and boiled pigskin as examples of earlier vaccine components. Switching to modern day vaccines, the speaker enumerates what is said to be present in today’s childhood vaccines: - Gelatin from boiled pigskin, described as similar to the old ingredient. - Chicken embryo protein. - Blood from the hearts of cow fetuses. - DNA fragments from human fetuses. - Oil extracted from shark livers. - Proteins from worm ovaries. - DNA fragments from monkey kidneys. The speaker then invokes a Shakespearean reference to Macbeth—“eye of Newt, toe of frog, lizard’s leg, tongue of dog”—to emphasize the appearance of a witch’s brew-like mixture in the composition of vaccines, suggesting that Gates, Offit, and Hotez are “sitting around in their witch’s brew putting this stuff together.” Further modern ingredients in childhood vaccines are listed: - Formaldehyde, described as bad. - Polysorbate eighty, claimed to be linked to infertility. - Potassium chloride, called out as the chemical injected as the third injection in lethal injections by executioners, noting that infants receive far less of it than executed individuals. - Sodium borate. - Triton X. - Ethyl mercury, stated as having been used “until very recently.” The speaker concludes with a strong personal stance: “I don’t want mercury injected into my kids. Period.” They recount a memory of a broken light requiring hazmat handling for mercury, contrasting that with the alleged injection of mercury into babies, and labeling the overall situation as crazy.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. They take the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, add a latex molecule, and that rat now has a permanent latex allergy. You add a peanut molecule and it has a permanent peanut allergy.

The speaker discusses mold, heavy metals, and detoxification in a way that connects several claims. Key points include: - A moldy organic beet is referenced as something consumed because mold supposedly makes someone allergic by pulling out heavy metals; the speaker asserts that mold and parasites eat heavy metals, and that once metals are eliminated, the body begins to heal. - The speaker claims that vaccines contain heavy metals and that mold is connected to a spore; they reference the idea that spores heal cancer, citing the Cancer Institute to suggest the information exists there, even if not publicly told. - It is stated that most vaccines also contain yeast, described as a form of mold, which is injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they cannot detox the metals. - There is a claim about citric acid: described as something to avoid, a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum, with heavy metals going into the body. - The speaker questions what to do instead of eating organic moldy berries, then lists additional heavy metal detox methods: dragon's blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. - They mention a regulatory point from 1986: a rule was put in place to protect vaccines, allegedly to prevent lawsuits that could bankrupt the vaccine system when people discover “the truth.” - The closing line is a salutation: “Have a great day.” Note: The content presents a sequence of interconnected claims about mold, heavy metals, vaccines, and detox methods, presenting both the asserted mechanisms (mold and parasites eating metals; vaccines containing heavy metals and yeast to induce allergy) and suggested alternatives (listed detox methods) alongside the implication of a regulatory protection mechanism from 1986.

Speaker 0: You know, if you get into peanut butter, you know the whole thing with peanut butter, they tell you to avoid the peanut butter. Peanut butter is loaded with copper. Peanuts are loaded with copper. That's why they tell people to stay away. Also helps protect you from all these cell phone nonsense that they keep putting up. Peanuts. Now they don't tell you that they were sticking people with toxins which were making them allergic to peanuts. That's the one part they forgot to say about that whole thing. But peanuts are high in copper. They're also high in zinc. They're also a complete superfood. But they'll tell you it's the mold. You gotta stay away. Gotta stay away. Anytime they tell you to stay away from something, you should probably be using it. For example, uranium glass and copper cups Tell you to stay away? Probably should check it out. Probably try it out a little bit. See how you feel with organic peanut butter from Azure. I eat about a half a jar a day. And if that was the case, that it was allegedly as toxic as we were told, I would have been gone a long time ago. Take a perfect example. Get yourself organic peanuts.

The speaker presents a series of claims about mold, heavy metals, and vaccines, framing them as interconnected health dangers and detox strategies. They begin by describing eating a moldy organic beet and claim that mold was used to make someone allergic to it because “the mold pulls out the heavy metals.” They state, “Mold and parasites eat heavy metals,” and claim that “worms growing in your body to eat the metals” and “mold growing in your body to eat the metals” can be found, with healing occurring once heavy metals are eliminated. The speaker asserts that vaccinations contain heavy metals. They then say, “what’s also interesting on the mold situation is it’s connected to a spore,” and claim that “if you go to the Cancer Institute, they talk about how spores heal cancer, but I guess they don’t wanna tell people that.” The discussion deepens with the claim that most vaccines also contain yeast, “a form of mold,” which is being injected into the body to make people allergic to it so they can’t eat it to detox the metals. When addressing cautions about food, someone asks about citric acid, described as “the one to avoid.” The speaker asserts it is “a Monsanto product grown on soy and canola and aluminum,” implying heavy metals enter the body through this product. The speaker then offers detox alternatives for heavy metals, listing: dragon’s blood, organic papaya seeds, fasting, baking soda, borax, spirits of turpentine, cilantro, wormwood, and black walnut. They conclude with a brief historical note: “1986, they put a rule in place to protect the vaccines,” suggesting it was due to lawsuits that could bankrupt vaccine makers, and sign off with “Have a great day.” In summary, the transcript presents a chain of claims that mold and parasites target heavy metals in the body, vaccines contain heavy metals and possibly yeast, spores are linked to healing cancer, citric acid from Monsanto products is a heavy-metal source, and a set of natural and chemical detox methods is proposed. It also asserts a regulatory measure in 1986 intended to shield vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.

The speaker claims there's a simple solution to an unspecified problem: stop vaccinating. They allege that vaccine information sheets are propaganda and that the risk of serious adverse events is about one in twenty, not one in a million. The speaker states that the cause of autism is known, contrary to common belief. They claim there are hundreds of studies showing how toxins can cause autism and that aluminum, in particular, creates massive brain inflammation. The speaker suggests that if people stop vaccinating, eat organic food, and avoid Tylenol, they will be almost guaranteed healthy children.

"My page is now censored like there's less people in here and there's less people seeing my page for talking about eating organic unpasteurized blue cheese." "So people used to eat a lot of blue cheese, but it wasn't until they were injected with penicillin till they stopped eating as much blue cheese as they once did." "And you can kinda figure out where the peanut allergy came from, the latex allergy, the shellfish allergy, all these different allergies, they're coming from the injections." "And guess who sells the EpiPen? The same people who created those injections that they were putting into the people." "You can kinda see what the purpose is of that. of that. You control the people because you inject them when they're young so that they can't eat things or have them go into their body later on in life."